David Wilkerson and Billy Graham

Rev. David Wilkerson, Billy Graham and Evangelicalism

Notice this man above and and his hand and compare to the picture above it.

“Billy Graham’s career started in 1950, and he formed a non-profit association in order to give receipts. In the charter papers of that organization, this same thought marked the beginning of his public ministry.

The stated purpose was 

“to spread the gospel by any and

all means.”

From this early date of 1950, Billy Graham began a relationship and friendship with the Catholic Church. Cardinal Richard Cushing wrote a diocesan paper in which he praised Billy Graham. “He and I became wonderful friends.” Graham “made a point of stressing his own ‘tremendous admiration’ for the Cardinal.” 

Officiating at the funeral of President Nixon

 Billy Graham

began his sermon talking about The Great Ching ie  

The Great Qing

Listen to the words of Billy Graham giving a sermon:

“The Great Qing

(and then he stammered and said)

of Ancient Israel, David,

said on the death of Saul

who had been a bitter enemy…….”

Please watch and listen to Billy Graham at the beginning of his sermon:

Richard Nixon Funeral (8): Rev. Billy Graham’s message 1

==============================================

==============================================

This post is about the presence of Billy Graham in disguise as Jack Ready a Secret Service man of the Kennedys. Jackie is handed a puppet at the fenceline and the Jack Ready impersonator gives hand signals as she receives the puppet and I believe because of this clandestine activity less than 1/2 hour before the President is assassinated that the impersonator who I have identified as Billy Graham is involved in the conspiracy to kill JFK. It is quite possible that Rev. Wilkerson was involved. He recently died in a car wreck and I think it is probable that his death may have to do with his link to this day Nov. 22, 1963 and his relationship with Billy Graham and possibly his associates! His last blog post before he died in a car wreck refers to Billy Graham’s stated purpose and I believe purposefully to implicate Billy Graham and the failure of Billy Graham’s way! Both men were at the airport in Dallas with the entourage of reporters and camera men, and the Secret Service around the Kennedy’s 1/2 hour before JFK’s assassination.

Many of the snapshots in this article came from the you tube linked, please watch:

PRESIDENT KENNEDY’S ARRIVAL

AT LOVE FIELD IN DALLAS ON 11/22/63

Crew cut man (BG:L) 

 with Strawberry Blond hair

<======The man on the left is supposed to be Jack Ready Secret Servuce Agent who is in the snapshot to the right……>

(More on him later)

Wish I could place the man on the left…kind of looks like President Bush Sr.’s dad! Throughout the airport film of the arrival of JFK this man seems to be keenly aware of what is occurring as if he knows what is about to occur such as what happens to Secret Service Agent Kellerman at the airport, which I try to illustrate below!!!!!!!

snapshot of buddy of Billy Graham at Wheaton College from photo below

Puppet man

Graham (left) with two friends in front of Williston Hall on Wheaton College campus. Probably the fall of 1940. Photo was donated by Mrs. Jean Flora and was taken by her husband Louis.

Billy Graham Center Archives

 The man handing Mrs. Kennedy the puppet Lambchops is a friend of Billy Graham from his college days at Wheaton College.

Who are these men around and behind Jackie Kennedy as she is being handed a puppet? When watching the videos on you tube it is hard to distinguish because they are “matted in” and running around. It is a fast moving video so I snapped some stills once I realized that Jackie Kennedy did receive the puppet at the airport by the fence line of people. I watched the video over and over again and tried to follow certain people in the you tube at the time of the hand over of the puppet.

These men stood out, I think they are giving her cover.

Notice the man with the crew cut (BG:L) behind Mrs. Kennedy below.

(This is at 7:11/10:59 in you tube at top of page)

After she accepts her puppet Lambchops. the man with the crew cut (BG:L) “matted” behind Mrs. Kennedy

makes a gesture with his hand to his nose in the picture below and then quickly hides behind her.

It seems that the puppet is important enough to send a message to someone by a hand gesture by this man (BG:L).

WHY?

(This is at 7:13/10:59)

crew cut man make’s gesture with hand

(Then he hides his face behind Jackie Kennedy’s head at 7:14/10:59)

Crew cut man’s shoulder behind Jackie, hiding his face momentarily behind her head. He must have seen a camera! After that for a a couple of seconds the crew cut man seems to ‘ freak out’ because he realized he was caught on camera ……..and he was caught on candid camera! Looks like he was cussing about it and gritting his teeth.

ANYWAY HE LOOKS DISTRESSED LIKE HE IS SAYING AN EXPLETIVE AND KICKING HIMSELF BECAUSE IT WAS CAUGHT ON CAMERA AND HE KNEW IT!

What I find to be interesting is that in some news interviews Mrs. Kennedy said she was surprised and thought it was odd to be handed red roses in Dallas (as opposed to yellow roses),

yet doesn’t mention the puppet.

I believe  it is protocol to receive a bouquet of flowers, but highly unusual to receive a puppet,

(because Jackie received red roses on her trip to Greece in the presence of ONASSIS before her trip with her husband JFK to Dallas)

Onassis bowing and kissing Jackie’s hand

but highly unusual to receive a puppet.

Isn’t it odd that she forgot about the puppet,

but keyed in on the roses?

Yet she had just received red roses in Greece.

This is a tactic to give a false lead which seems to be rampant in this event ie DISINFORMATION.

but on the other hand it is information when you compare.

Angle of Deviation

“In optics, the net angular deflection experienced by a Light Ray after one or more refractions or reflections.

The total deviation ε of a light ray can be computed, given the incidence angle α. The same calculation allows for determination of the emergence angle δ. The angle of deviation is the angle between the original incident ray and the emergent ray. Since the larger angle of deviation corresponds to a larger refractive index, violet light would emerge with the largest angle of deviation and red light would emerge with the smallest angle. Hence, the light emerging from the prism would disperse into a spectrum of rainbow colors wherein each color corresponds to a different angle of deviation. The difference between the angles of deviation of any two rays is called the angle of dispersion.”

================================

(Kind of like comparing the Synoptic Gospels to the Gospel of John.)

Please Read:

Folly of the Synoptic Gospels

Another lousy low down deception was to blame Mr. Greer, the driver, for the death of President Kennedy

when she knew better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The innocent people involved were devastated for the rest of their lives trying to figure out if they had done something different would it have made a difference. they were berated umpteen times by various people for their mishandling of the situation, ineptness and then ultimately blamed.

The only thing that would have saved President Kennedy is if they had recognized that the woman was not Jackie Kennedy, and even President Kennedy was fooled.

There are other faces in his entourage and within the pilot crew that are worth careful scrutiny,

because they seem to know what is about to occur and they seem to enjoy watching.

There is definitely more to this than meets the eye!

There is the puppet Lambchops in front of her above the roses and notice the hand between the two women at the fence line.

Notice the man in the brown suit in front of Mrs. Kennedy with the flip in his hair and hand up (check out his face, eyes, hand, etc)

He may well be Glenn Norton/Rev. David Wilkerson and

The crew cut man may well be Glenn A. Bennett/Rev. Billy Graham.

The man in the brown suit that cleaned the limo could be Rev. Wilkerson!

Lambchops closeup

Looks like a sharp stick in between gloved fingers

———————————

What is Jackie Kennedy doing in this picture?

Many of the snapshots in this article came from the you tube linked:

PRESIDENT KENNEDY’S ARRIVAL

AT LOVE FIELD IN DALLAS ON 11/22/63

BEFORE THEY LEAVE THE CROWD TO ENTER THE LIMO ROY KELLERMAN SEEMS TO BE THEIR TARGET. HE IS THE SECRET SERVICE BODY GUARD OF THE PRESIDENT. YOU WILL NOTICE HIM AT ALL TIMES BY THE PRESIDENT AND HE DOES A FINE JOB AND MAYBE THAT IS WHY HE IS A CONCERN FOR THE PERPE=TRAITORS AND WHY THEY DO SOMETHING TO HIM, I BELIEVE , BECAUSE OF WHAT OCCURS NEXT THAT I HAVE TRIED TO ILLUSTRATE !

Roy Kellerman (Kennedy’s bodyguard)

Roy Kellerman smiling at 7:39/10:59

then something weird occurs in the next few seconds

Roy Kellerman winces as if something hurts him at 7:44/10:59

Jackie does something to Roy Kellerman which startles him and he starts to turn his head from the President toward Jackie and looks at what Jackie is holding.

Roy Kellerman is looking down at the roses for a second. I don’t know if he was able to see the other item in her hand, because he has to follow the President a second later, but he does seem to be concerned!!!
These men surrounding are watching Roy Kellerman like they know that he is being affected by something. These men are involved in this dirty business! 7:43/10:59

This occurs at 2:21/4:07 to 2:24/4:07

He sees something and seems to do a double-take glance before heading to limo

Perhaps she stuck him with the stick?

Or injected him with a drug

crew cut man on left and the Kennedys about to enter limo

A few of the men on the right seem to be excited and oblivious to the President,

but attentive to Jackie and the crew cut man. Very odd!

Then to top it off right before Roy Kellerman enters the limousine his face looks very messed up  and disheveled as if his body has been snatched and the men around him seem to be very aware of the alteration and they seem to think it is funny:

Now he looks like a zombie.

Here is a picture of the flowers at the Breakfast in Fort Worth:

In some of the videos of that morning in Fort Worth Jackie looks down at the red flowers with the white ones at the table in a strange way (Symbolically). What are the white flowers? There is a plant called Devil’s Breath (Scopolamine) that grows in Colombia. They are flowers also. Can make people into zombies and can kill.

I wonder if that isn’t what happened to Jackie, JFK, Roy Kellerman, and the rest of the victims in this tragedy. The drug renders people helpless and in a trance so they can be manipulated to do anything and not remember a thing or remember selectively.

Then again it could just be another false lead in the JFK assassination. Here are some more pictures at the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce Breakfast on Nov. 22, 1963. This is from the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. Jackie sits down, then licks as she looks at the flowers.

Kind of odd.

The Last Two Days, November 1963: 21-22

  ===========================================================

Shredded Lambchops puppet in limo after assassination.

WHEN ALL MEANS FAIL

by David Wilkerson | April 27, 2011

“To those going through the valley and shadow of death, hear this word: Weeping will last through some dark, awful nights—and in that darkness you will soon hear the Father whisper, “I am with you. I cannot tell you why right now, but one day it will all make sense. You will see it was all part of my plan. It was no accident. It was no failure on your part. Hold fast. Let me embrace you in your hour of pain.”

(Very Clintonian!)

This is supposedly part of the last blog entry of Mr. Wilkerson before his death.

I think that he has had some general prophetic successes and had some general prophetic failures. Which generally means he senses things, like most people do in the political, economical, physical world in which we live in. Maybe he was a prophet because of some of those success,

but whom did he serve by these prophecies and who gave him these cues?

It certainly helped his ministry!

I read a few posts that he sensed that God told him to make 2000-peanut butter sandwiches, which is ridiculous. Why would God tell him to make a bunch of peanut butter sandwiches, because the Twin Towers in NY were going to be destroyed.

What brand of peanut butter did he buy?  Peter Pan Peanut Butter?

IF that is who God is, then we who believe in God are in big TROUBLE!

What strikes me as odd is what he wrote in his last blog,

“It was no accident” 

and then shortly afterwards

he has an accident

with a truck

and it seems to have been his fault,

at least so far as we know at this time!

It is an unusual last blog, it seems prophetic, as if he knew he was gonna die.  

It is very coincidental

or did someone add that to his post for effect and mystery

to gain attention and support for their ministry?

I wonder who took over his ministry?

A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

Just recently another accomplice was hospitalized:

Evangelist Billy Graham, 92, hospitalized with pneumonia

Billy Graham Hospitalized: Preacher Admitted For Pulmonary Condition (UPDATE)

In the Nation Billy Graham returns home

              

Billy Graham | The devil relies on our disbelief

Found this article: The Awful Truth about Billy Graham

What does he have to do with the assassination of President Kennedy?

This man in the pictures with Mrs. Kennedy

looks like Rev. Billy Graham.

He even has the same hair wave on the top of his head, but looks like he altered his hair for this event by shaving around his ears and above his forehead and more than likely  dyed his hair for this deception.

3 nuclear reactors melted down after quake,

Japan confirms

The other man looks like Rev. David Wilkerson.

What is going on?

Who do they really represent?

Here is what Rev. Billy Graham says about JFK and JFK’s son and his wife Carolyn in 

Just as I am

A Billy Graham memoir

Kind of an odd exerpt. Maybe he was just anticipating his off game?

He tells where he was and who he was with the day Kennedy was assassinated, etc.

PERHAPS Building his alibi!
He wrote about the foreboding he had of the impending assassination of President Kennedy in his book and how he just wasn’t able to get the message through to the President by ANY MEANS because he had a cold and there was a misunderstanding about a golf game. This guy who has built a huge ministry all over the world could not and did not warn the President. I’m pretty positive he knew and did not want to warn the President because he was behind THE MEANS to assassinate President Kennedy.

I’m pretty sure JFK’s son was suspicious of him and he was afraid of John Kennedy Jr.’s  interest in him and JFK’s son, pregnant wife, and sister-in-law were killed in a plane crash. I’m pretty sure their deaths are related to this conspiracy and

to Billy Graham and his ministry!

My interest in Billy Graham began when writing

The Synoptic “Q Source”

I had no idea he was a part of this mess.

You might say I stumbled into this and one thing lead to another.

Please read the post above – it might enlighten you how these cues given to Evangelicals and the like are related to the “Q source” and the spirit which gives them those cues (Q’s)!

This source seems to have helped his sphere of influence with the Presidents that followed, his prophetic utterance that is, and the spirit that he lifts up in place of the true spirit of the Father and who He truly sent. Billy Graham was caught on tape saying what he truly thinks of Jews on the Nixon tapes which, by the way, Jesus of Nazareth was a Jew, wasn’t he? Which then you have to wonder who do these Evangelicals/Charismatics represent? I am quite positive it is a Roman version inspired mostly by the Source of the “Q source” where they get their CUES! We all get cues everyday, and we make decisions sometimes by those cues. Some cues are reasonable and  some are not. I have dreams that I could tell that are very interesting and possibly prophetic, and I may tell a friend or someone close to me, but I don’t publicize them, because I don’t trust dreams! 

Some of us are more sensitive to these cues and we may act upon them sometimes right and sometimes wrong, but to build your reputation and a ministry because of them is scary. There is a picture of President Kennedy adjusting his hair on the back of his head as he turned on to Elm Street before he was assassinated. Was he receiving a ‘Q”? Probably, but it did not help him! Same thing goes with the Q that Rev. Wilkerson may have received according to his last blog before he had his accident. I gather he had a premonition ….not a prophecy!

There is a difference,

 unless it was premeditated,

which is why 

I decided to read a bit about Rev. Wilkerson, since I had cried the other night and felt despair and actually said outloud in prayer about my confusion about what is happening lately in my life and in the world. Anyway, it was coincidental to say the least! Possibly, he might have been feeling like things are winding up and down to some kind of conclusion, biblically speaking, and so may have written those words to encourage his readers, but it did hit home with me, and I became suspicious,

because I am naturally that way…..

THESE DAYS!

I read how his ministry began, because some boys in NY city that were on trial for the murder of a young boy named Michael Farmer. He felt compassion for the boys accused of Michael’s murder and went to NY to get involved with gang youth and that some gang youth recognized him from pictures, somehow or another, I presume the newspaper. But I just have a hard time believing that they recognized Rev. Wilkerson or that gang members for that matter even read the paper. I looked up what I could on line and there is very little written about this event and in very general terms. Basically, all I could find was an article in Life Magazine and Time Magazine which are both affiliated with each other.

David Wilkerson: ‘influential’ Long Before The ‘time 100′ – Usa Today

“The editors of Time write about the “democratization of influence” and the social media rallying calls for revolution in the streets of the Middle East and North Africa.

Says Time:

It’s never been easier to influence or to be influenced.”

But by whom?

In my latest blog article called

JFK and the Secret Service

I think it is apparent that we are being mislead/deceived by TIME/LIFE and the PRESS just in the examples given of the pictures provided by them of certain famous and influential people involved in the JFK assassination. There is a picture from Life of James J. Rowley which is provided by them, but Harry Truman’s library provides another of the same person, and both can’t be right!

I am pretty sure that Billy Graham has great influence in both

the Press and Time/Life!

TO DECEIVE

and to coverup his involvement with

the death of our President and many others!

================================

After having written 

The Covenant with Many

which lead me to write about President Kennedy’s assassination in my post called

Mel Gibson and President Kennedy’s Assassination

and the fact that the film of Zapruder’s was manipulated and altered by                        Life Magazine, I became even more suspicious of the story about the beginnings of Rev. Wilkerson’s ministry.

I tried to look up the two lawyers mentioned by name in Life Magazine and could not find any information on them either, which is odd (except something from DC.)

It is as if his ministry has been built by myth and nurtured by this myth with the help of Life Magazine and Time Magazine.

This picture of Rev. Wilkerson early in his career

(which is hard to believe, since the man in the picture above

seems totally different in his looks)

came from an article I found on the internet linked:

About

Teen Challenge Global History

And what concerns me is that there is a picture of David Wilkerson with a youth  (I presume he is a troubled youth) …..

I would like to know who took the picture?

Did David Wilkerson have a personal photographer following him around to enhance his image and to build his ministry?

Or did this photo just miraculously take a picture of Rev. Wilkerson in action?

Obviously, this is image building! Who built this image?

Life Magazine?

Who is the power behind Life Magazine?

World Challenge, Inc.

“As such, World Challenge serves as a corporate umbrella for Mr. Wilkerson’s crusades, ministers’ conferences, book and tract publishing, film production, training schools, street evangelism, repentance gatherings, literature distribution, feeding programs, church planting efforts and numerous other charitable ministries.”

World Challenge and Duke of Edinburgh

 The Duke of Edinburgh is Prince Philip, husband of Queen Elizabeth who said:

Prince Philip, In His Own Words: We Need To ‘Cull’ The Surplus Population

Just wondering if the

corporate umbrella of Rev. Wilkerson’s many activities, businesses and ministries

 isn’t related to the

HOUSE OF WINDSOR?

By the way, the boy named Michael Farmer that was killed by the gang was Jewish! 

Remember, WWII did cull the population of Jews by 6 million and seemed to be the intent of the Nazi’s and their accomplices to control, punish and kill the Jews and control the world.

Could the Umbrella Corporation of Rev. Wilkerson/World Challenge, Inc and World Challenge/Prince Philip have anything to do with each other

and the umbrella signal at the exact time of the assassination of John F. Kennedy,

and the book that JFK published called

“Why England Slept“

I think it does!

Here is the testimony of the man (Mr. Witt) who held up an umbrella as an afront to

John F. Kennedy

at the exact time he was assassinated?

In the least, it is very coincidental!

I wonder who influenced him ….Q’d him to do this

umbrella stunt/signal

at the exact time of the assassination

and why!

House Select Committee On Assassinations

“Umbrella Man” Testimony

“…..Mr. FAUNTROY. I wonder if you would care to tell us a little more about your understanding of the significance of the umbrella, and why you felt that it would heckle the president to raise the umbrella?

“Mr. WITT. I know the generalities of the thing. It had something to do with the–when the senior Mr. Kennedy was Ambassador or England, and the Prime Minister, some activity they had had in appeasing Hitler. The umbrella that the Prime Minister of England came back with got to be a symbol in some manner with the British people. by association, it got transferred ot the Kennedy family, and, as I understood, it was a sore spot with the Kennedy family, like I said, in coffee break conversations someone had mentioned, I think it is one of the towns in Arizona, it is Tucson or Phoenix, that someone had been out at the airport or some place where some members of the Kennedy family came through and they were rather irritated by the fact that they were brandishing the umbrellas. This is how the idea sort of got stuck in my mind.

Mr. FAUNTROY. Is it true that what you felt was that Mr. Kennedy would be sensitive because of the appeasement image of the umbrella as related to his father?

Mr. WITT. Not the appeasement thing. It was just…..”

And then there is the puppet Lambchop that is overlooked by the Warren Commission.  

Here is an article that has a lot of information and pictures of the reception at the airport and of the limo after the assassination. The last picture is at the top of this page and it looks like lamb chop in the car seat with blood on it. It does not look like flowers, but it does look like some of the material is shredded. ROY KELLERMAN SAID HE HEARD A FLURRY OF SHOTS WITHIN THE LIMO …..MAYBE THE PUPPET HAD SOME DEVICE WITHIN IT TO CREATE THAT EFFECT! 
The article below includes an interview with Jean Hill  for the white puppy that she thought she saw for which she was ridiculed (and she sounds very sane and forthright). 

I have no idea what significance the puppet Lamb Chops has in this incident, except that it is in the pictures and does get shorn in the assassination as you can see in the picture of the limo after the assassination.

JUSTICE FOR KENNEDY

Lamb dishes are very english fare.

There is the picture at the top of this article where Mrs. Kennedy (her impersonator) receives the lamb chop puppet by the fence at the airport in Dallas with a few other men that seem to be there at that same moment in time. One of them signals to someone else immediately afterwards. It is not mentioned by the Warren Commission that I know of, nor is it mentioned by Jackie Kennedy, but then she doesn’t remember being on the back of the limo after the assassination, yet she knows why: to pick up pieces of JFK’s brains. Does that make any sense?

Maybe that “Q source” suggested the reason!

Even though that generation treated women differently, it seems that everyone has shielded her from every possible angle. I’m sure some have because they are her accomplices, but the others because it is hard to believe she would be involved. I am a woman and believe me she is just as capable as the next guy.

The Zapruder film demonstrates that she was an agile and proficient killing machine!

The real Jackie was a beautiful, soft-spoken, gracious and classy lady,

but I believe the assassin is not Jackie, but a double of Jackie.

In my opinion!

 I am a portrait artist and notice features more than the average Joe and I believe these guys are who I have cited, and I believe they are connected!

Jackie-Kennedy Blogspot.com

PRESIDENT KENNEDY’S ARRIVAL AT LOVE FIELD IN DALLAS ON 11/22/63

Obviously, the puppet was important

or why bother passing it to “the assassin”

as the pictures above seem to show?

CIA agents were given press passes by the PRESS

It seems that the CIA and the Press work together here in the US and abroad,

but they don’t want to publicize it because it puts the press in peril……. except that everyone knows their secret that is why the press seem to be targeted by enemies of the state in whatever country they are trying to influence.

 I read an article of some press/photographers that were also theologians working with the press when President Kennedy was assassinated.

So I assume that those theologians could also be CIA agents.

Maybe that is their best secret of all as the pictures above seem to demonstrate.

Why would theologians be involved?

and

Who do they represent?

=====================

Here is an interesting article

by Padresteve’s World…Musings of a Passionate Moderate
The Unexplained and Tragic Death of David Wilkerson

“If this were the only time that he wrote such deep and troubling words and if the circumstances of his death were different I would not have given the article a second thought.  But because of the circumstances I decided to keep reading. I read every blog post dating back to February and the topics of hopelessness, failure and struggle are present in almost every article.”

========================

I think the above pictures and the implication of his presence at that particular time was Rev. Wilkerson’s burden. More than likely he was involved in the death of President Kennedy by association, whether he was involved voluntarily or not, and possibly was rebelling in his death,

or possibly he was murdered for his silence 

or to keep him silent in the above conspiracy.  

I do not think he committed suicide with his wife in the car.

This is either foul play or deception!

========================

IN his book and the movie “The Cross and the Switchblade” the business when talking to some gang youth who wanted to kill him and Wilkerson supposedly says something like ….. you can cut me into (some number of pieces?) and every piece will love you…..

 (Can’t help but think of Daniel 8:25.)

Just thought I would add this because it sounds so hokey- whether or not it was a true incident, or a myth!

I also looked up the name Wilkerson and it seems there

is a very big company called Wilkerson:

Welcome to Wilkerson!

“Wilkerson manufactures and markets a complete line of compressed air treatment components and control products. These include filters, regulators and lubricators, air dryers, separators, drains and other components used in air preparation. Our quality products meet a wide variety of industrial, process, consumer and health care applications.”

There is an Auxiliary Bishop named Wilkerson which I have linked in the title following which is a Roman Catholic Organization called:

The Archdiocese of Los Angeles

 Bishop Gerald Wilkerson

 …  An auxiliary bishop,

in the Roman Catholic Church, is an additional bishop assigned to a diocese because the diocesan bishop is unable to perform his functions, the diocese is so extensive that it requires more than one bishop to administer, or the diocese is attached to a royal or imperial office requiring the diocesan bishop’s protracted presence at court. According to Canon law, no bishop can be ordained without title to a certain and distinct episcopal see which he governs either actually or potentially,

therefore auxiliary bishops are titular bishops

to sees that no longer exist…..

========================================

VERY STRANGE INDEED!

========================================

especially the bit about being titular bishops to

sees

that no longer exist.

Titular means in name only!

Talk about WEIRD!

THE DEAD PERHAPS?

So Gerald Wilkerson is an auxiliary bishop in name only to sees that no longer exist.

What the heck does that mean?

=====================================

I think some of the things that Mr. Wilkerson has accomplished are commendable, such as reaching out to the gang youth in NY. Don’t get me wrong, it is a wonderful thing to do. And he seems to have been a cut above most Evangelicals.

David Wilkerson’s son is named Gary Wilkerson

which is a variable of the name Gerald.

Gerald Wilkerson is the Auxiliary Bishop in name only

to nothing that I mentioned above

and I was wondering if they aren’t related somehow.

Rev. David Wilkerson also has a Publication Business linked below

that sells his books and his son’s books and others:

David Wilkerson Publications

“The following books are a catalog of printed works by Pastor David Wilkerson and other selected authors. Some bring instruction and direction. Others bring hope and encouragement. All bring the word and the life of God our Savior, to build and edify His people and His church. To view more detailed information on each book, please click the “More Info” button below each title.”

Here is snippet of an article which is linked by wikipedia about

Rev. David Wilkerson:

David Wilkerson

“……David Wilkerson (May 19, 1931 – April 27, 2011^[1]) was an American Christian evangelist, best known for his bookThe Cross and the Switchblade. He was also the founder and pastor of Times Square Church in New York, a non-denominational church…..”“…….. Later in 1958, he founded Teen Challenge,^[2] an evangelical Christian addiction recovery program affiliated with theAssemblies of God, with a network of Christian social and evangelizing work centers.^[3]……He founded and became the pastor of Times Square Church,^[1] which opened its doors in October 1987…….”

David Wilkerson has had a very successful career in the religion of Evangelicalism.

I listened to a sermon of his that I have previously heard before and I admit he was an unusually talented preacher! The sermon was called Anguish.

 Very well trained!

But just because someone excels at the art of preaching,

does not mean they are not deceiving!

I looked up Evangelicalism to read their history and supposedly it goes back a few centuries, depending on what article you read, but as far as I can remember,

the first evangelical preacher I remember is

Billy Graham!

I just revised a post on one of my blogs just a couple days ago

about the “Q source” :

The Synoptic “Q Source”

and revised this post to include information about Billy Graham

and his prophetic non-utterance

about the Assassination of President Kennedy

and other telling events with other Presidents of our country.

The dire circumstance we find ourselves in

-in this world-

leads me to believe that the church and the believers are as deceived as the non-believers and I have tried to discern how and why this is the case.

===================

I believe that Evangelicals

is a parody of the phrase

“EVIL ANGELS”

and  is just another branch of Roman Catholicism

with another name like the Jesuits,

and Islam!

(Jesuits also serve as if they are deadmen)

I believe that Barnabas who is mentioned often in the New Testament is a parody of the name:

Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus

who also happens to be NERO!

What I don’t understand is why the so-called

ministers of Christianity

don’t seem to see the deception

contained in their bibles!

Either they are part of the deception and are purposefully deceiving and exploiting us,

or they are blind!

==========================

Did Rev. Wilkerson

decide to be a Martyr or

was his death

an irony of his ministry and his last words?

He said in his last post on his blog

“It was no accident”

and a few days later he dies in an accident?

He also titled his last post:

“WHEN ALL MEANS FAIL”

WHAT I FIND INTERESTING ABOUT THAT TITLE IS WHAT BILLY GRAHAM SAID IN HIS STATED PURPOSE OF HIS ORGANIZATION:

“Billy Graham’s career started in 1950, and he formed a non-profit association in order to give receipts. In the charter papers of that organization, this same thought marked the beginning of his public ministry.

The stated purpose was 

“to spread the gospel by any and

all means.”

WAS REV. DAVID WILKERSON AN EMPLOYEE IN A CLANDESTINE WAY TO BILLY GRAHAM?

BOTH ARE SEEN AT THE AIRPORT VERY CLOSE TOGETHER IN DALLAS AT LOVE FIELD BEHIND MRS. KENNEDY AND SOON THEREAFTER PRESIDENT KENNEDY IS ASSASSINATED. NOT ONLY ARE THEY THERE, BUT SO IS A BUDDY OF BILLY GRAHAM FROM COLLEGE WHO ACTUALLY HANDED THE PUPPET TO MRS. KENNEDY.

THAT IS A BIG COINCIDENCE!

I think Rev. Wilkerson was sending a message by the title of his last post to warn. First of all, he knew that the release of information about the assassination of Kennedy lately and in the future would incriminate him and others and perhaps he was helping in that purpose.

Many of the names of the people involved in this momentous event of the Assassination of JFK mirror ACTS of the bible and in Josephus Flavius’s writings.

The fact is,

if you are serving a false Messiah that is written about

in the Synoptic Gospels

whether or not you have great talent and can prophesy to varying degrees of accuracy,

Is it right and does it affect the outcome?

==============================

No Honor Among Thieves

Martyrdom is very Roman Catholic. They love martyrs. It is their business and they love to make many martyrs even when a person doesn’t want to be a martyr, because they don’t really care about people! If they cared about people they would tell them the truth, but they don’t. It isn’t as if they haven’t had a chance to learn the truth,

they just don’t want to lose their

irony grip,

so instead they murder dissenters and people that might be a hindrance or a problem and possibly Rev. Wilkerson might have been a victim of this power and also President Kennedy, Japanese catholics and many, many more!

============

This February before the earthquake and the tsunami in Japan, the Vatican and the Pope were trying to coerce the Catholic Bishops of Japan into practicing the “new evangelism” called the Neocatechumenal Way and some were resisting and stalling for another 5 years, because of their concern for the

Neocatcumenal Way’s MO and the rising suicide rate in their country

Here is the post:

Japan Quakes after Confirmation of the Neocatechumenal Way

which includes the

false claims by the Pope

about the confirmation by the Lord via ecclesiastical approval and a false claim that the Lord approved of the Neocatechumenal Way through that ecclesiastical vote:

“VATICAN CITY, JAN. 17, 2011 (Zenit.org).-

…..“Benedict XVI says that the Neocatechumenal Way has been confirmed by the Lord through ecclesiastical approval, and entrusted to its members to offer an

“original contribution” 

to the

New Evangelization.”…..

So the word “evangelism” is Roman Catholic!

They keep betraying themselves! Roman Catholicism and their many ‘evangelizations” or “isms” are like when someone tells a lie and they have to tell more lies to cover the first lie and pretty soon they have told so many lies they can’t remember their other lies and it turns into a big mess!

3 nuclear reactors melted down after quake,

Japan confirms

Where did the word evange come from?

Is the word evange a parody of the word avenge?

=========================================

a·venge

tr.v. a·venged, a·veng·ing, a·veng·es

1. To inflict a punishment or penalty in return for; revenge: avenge a murder.

—————————————————————————————————–

I am suspicious of the meaning of Pope Benedict’s XVI suggestion for the offer of an “original contribution” and from other articles I think he means martyrdom in a

“dark sentences”

(see Daniel 8:23 below)

kind-of-way!

“The Church in Japan began in 1549, with the missionary activities of St. Francis Xavier.It is Church built by a multitude of holy and excellent missionaries,

and has become the

Mother of a host of martyrs.”…

That quote is very telling!

Obviously, MARTYRDOM IS TAUGHT AND LAUDED

except of course,

if you are the Pope or the papal officials such as

Secretaries to the popes —-

like George GANSWEIN

and the Vatican and it’s members

because they are Superior!

…….Evangelicals are some of the first sects (daughter) to start the reuniting with Roman Catholicism (mother) to build the World Church System in deference to the earlier protests of many people (Protestants etc) at the cost of their lives in history,

because Evangelicalism is a religious charade created by Roman Catholicim to attract the other break-aways (daughters) to join them and reunite with the

MOTHER HEN ….ROME.

Matthew 23:37  O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together,

even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

The Synoptic gospels ie the “Q source” even betray’s Herself

by HER language to HER deception.

And then to top it off the Synoptic gospels betray themselves again:

Luke 13:32-33

 ³²And he said unto them, Go ye, and tell that fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and I do cures to day and to morrow, and the third day I shall be perfected.

Nevertheless I must walk to day, and to morrow, and the day following: for it cannot be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem.

Compare that verse to Matthew 23:37 above and you should be scratching your head!

Please read:

Abomination of Desolation

Abomination of Desolation Pt 2

The Synoptic gospels forgot to add that the prophets they sent

were false prophets,

(like the Evangelists/tele-evangelists that have been sent in our day and age

to our country and others)

because they spin a web,

but HER desire is “to gather her chickens”.

Think about the top Evangelicals and especially the tele-ones and you have to admit they are a rotten bunch:

Benny Hinn, Robert Tilton, etc who followed in the footsteps of Billy Graham. There are plenty more but I know you know who I mean:) They all lived like kings in their mansions and dance around ranting in tongues making fools of themselves and everyone they attract and you have to wonder what spirit that is that acts like chickens with their heads cut off preaching about nonsense and how to attain wealth like them.

The reason they do that is that spirit is mocking the truth about God

and mocking you.

Evangelicalism also produced their fruit “the Charismatic Movement” and supposedly the Charismatic Movement introduced itself into Roman Catholicism later on, but that is the lie of Roman Catholicism. They produce the fruit and they infiltrated the Protestant Religions giving the credit to the Protestants so as not to discredit themselves and then suck them back to themselves. Same thing happened with the environmental movement and many more. They float it, they back off, they let others do it so that if it fails they won’t take the heat and if it succeeds they claim it.

It is a circus!

Here is something else that I found lately to be utter nonsence and it illustrates the Roman Catholic Church via Pope Benedict XVI lauding the gift of organ donation:

“Pope cannot be organ donor, Vatican official says “……..Pope Benedict has called organ donation a generous “act of love.” In 2008, he told a Vatican conference that “tissue and organ transplants represent a great advance of medical science and are certainly a sign of hope for the many people who suffer from serious and sometimes critical medical conditions…….”

But since he belongs to the church the pope is no longer viable to be an organ donor…..

Do you see the IRONY? 

I wonder why?

The reasons given are idiotic,

Does belonging to the Roman Catholic Church mean you don’t need organs either?

Does it mean that you are dead when you Parish?

I think there is more to this than meets the eye in an

automated kind-of-way!

Seems like we are dealing with non-humans or clones/replicas

or maybe

just

EVIL and AVENGING ANGELS!

=======================

This article obviously demonstrates the predicament humans face in these very deceptive times. I know that what I have posted seems outlandish and unbelievable, but I did not make up these pictures or articles. Until we wake up and take an honest look at ourselves, our preachers, priests, the bible, our government and history, etc.,

we will be destroyed by them.

=============================

Josephus Flavius son of Matthew

and his curious

exhaltation of suicide in the case of the Jews at Yodfat and at Masada. Josephus seemed to enjoy destroying and writing about the various ways people were deceived and destroyed, which makes me think that that is who Daniel is referring to in the verses below. Here are some articles to help you connect the dots of Josephus, Barnabus (Joses), Luke and many others.

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

Josephus and His Footprints

The Dividing of Times – Part One

Pope Benedict XVI and His Power of Suggestion

 Daniel 8:23-25

 ²³And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and , shall stand up.  ²⁴And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power:

and he shall destroy wonderfully,

and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.  ²⁵And through his policy (propaganda) also he shall cause craft to prosper (deception) in his hand (time?); and he shall magnify himself in his heart (think he is God), and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.

Is the person that destroys wonderfully

spoken about in the prophecy of Daniel

the same person that

destroyed Rev. Wilkerson,

to deceive?

Or did he destroy himself in order

to deceive?

Something is not right

(ie perverted)

about the circumstances of his death, his last blog, his ministry, his religion, his legacy, and his image! Here is another view of Rev. Wilkerson typed by Art of New Wineskins who was electrified by the book written by Rev. Wilkerson and coincidentally attended his church in NYC recently:

The Real Deal (UPDATED)

and he seems to know Rev. Wilkerson intimately and parabolically! Always seems to know the an-other side of things! Strange article indeed! Thou dost beepraise too much! ================

The articles linked below demonstrate the Synoptic Failure parabolically speaking that I hope you will take the time to read and ponder!

I think Rev. Wilkerson was mixed up and at the least mixed up with some very bad people!

IF “THEOLOGIANS” KILLED A PRESIDENT

CAN THEY POSSIBLY KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT JESUS?

=========================

John 16:2-3

 ²They shall put you out of the synagogues:

yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.

 ³And these things will they do unto you,

because they have not known the Father,

nor me.

=======================

Please wake up! Billy Graham did say that the Devil counts on your disbelief and maybe he has been used by that Devil or was brain washed. I don’t know, but what I do know is that something is definitely wrong and we do not have time for the government to peter out information about the assassination.

We need information NOW, so that we can move forward, possibly undo the damage done in the past by facing the truth and change the direction and path we are on before it is too late!

Here is another problem I hope you will read:

JFK and the Secret Service

===========================

BILLY GRAHAM MUTATIONS

============================

Just thought I would add this because I have been doing some studies on Billy Grahams appearances and he sure looks like who he is with. It’s like he changes shapes. Especially his nose. When he is with one person he seems to take on their characteristics.

He sees Johnny Cash and there is Billy with this humongous nose. Billy Graham stated his regrets lately of being involved in politics. I would add one of his regrets ought to be physically hanging out with Johnny Cash!

If only I had had a foreboding that he was going to see Johnny Cash,

I would have warned him:

DON’T GO TO SEE JOHNNY CASH!

This is supposed to be David Wilkerson according to TIME LIFE

This is supposed to be Billy Graham according to BGEA

Now he looks like Wilkerson with a skinny nose
Check out the BGEA Photo Gallery links below. That is where these pictures originated.

PHOTO GALLERY

Billy Graham and the Presidents

Billy Graham: A Life in Pictures

Gets with a bunch of old men

Then he is with Arnold Palmer (Now his nose gets smaller)

PHOTO GALLERY

Billy Graham and the Presidents

Billy Graham: A Life in Pictures

It is like he looks at them and starts to be them….weird!

Something tells me he’s a shape shifter of some kind and possibly he is able to overtake people to perform his will.

Now I know why Billy Graham didn’t ever get in an elevator alone with just a woman,

because he was afraid he would turn into one!

John 22:23-25

 ²³Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day,

many believed in his name,

when they saw the miracles which he did.

²⁴But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men,

 ²⁵And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.

I believe that the Gospel of John is the only gospel to tell about this and the only gospel to tell about the raising of Lazarus and many other things. The Gospel of John is the only gospel that tells his name and agrees with the Old Testament.

Something to consider!

==========================================

The Fig Tree – Blessed are the Barren

How is it That Ye Do Not Understand?

Bible Controversies and Solutions

Indulgences and the Parable of Usury

THE PARABLE OF FAITH – PART ONE (4 part series)

Perhaps Rev. Wilkerson’s Title on his last post before he died was referring to:

Parabolic Lie algebra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In algebra, a parabolic Lie algebra  is a subalgebra of a semisimple Lie algebra  satisfying one of the following two conditions:

•  contains a maximal solvable subalgebra (a Borel subalgebra) of ;
• the Killing perp of  in  is the nilradical of .

These conditions are equivalent over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, such as the complex numbers. If the field  is not algebraically closed, then the first condition is replaced by the assumption that

•  contains a Borel subalgebra of 

where  is the algebraic closure of .

par·a·bol·ic

adj.1. Of or similar to a parable.

===============================

Billy Graham, 92, hospitalized with pneumonia

Brave, ie., not

When

All the world’s a stage!

CBS News and JFK (The first few hours)

CBS News and JFK

=========================================

Please read these articles:

The Covenant with Many

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

JFK and the Secret Service

(About the Beast)

====================================

My other blogs:

Merangue’s Blog

Eye of a Needle         The Keep

The DrawbridgeBlue Skies

The Fortress

Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many – Part 3

JFK Blows The Whistle on Secret Societies!

You will miss the point of this post if you neglect Part 1

which is linked in the following title:)

The Covenant with Many

Part 3

Now before the assassination in Dallas

Now her part is on the left and his part is still on the right when facing them!

Both their parts are in the center.

LastMeal

Their parts are opposite each other as they sit next to each other.

Hers on the left and his on the right.

His part is on the right and hers on the left as you face them!

Now their parts are on the inside. Hers on the left and his on the right.

This woman is not Jackie Kennedy!

Not only did her part change ……..but so did her shins. Jackie Kennedy had sort of boney shins and the imposter has thick shins in comparison. Shins don’t change over the years except with extreme weight gain. Eventually, I will update this post with examples. The woman at the funeral of JFK was not the real Jackie Kennedy….unless Jackie replaced her legs with someone else’s legs.

Newly Discovered Footage of JFK’s Final Moments

also shows the parts of both President Kennedy and woman in the car with him

in this you tube linked in purple above!

Here is the Zapruder film for you to see the cold blooded assassination of our President

by what I believe is a double of the first lady.

=================================

Somewhere, somehow, something happened to her

and she was replaced!

Perhaps on her trip to India?

Here is the you tube link in red below to study:

Hi quality footage of JFK Assassination

The Undamaged Zapruder Film

335 of the last sequence of the slow motion concentrated on President Kennedy, Jackie Kennedy has something in her hand behind his back, because it is perpendicular to the horizon. It is either heat and smoke, or has been touched up to hide what she is holding.

The link below (Part One of this trilogy) has a few you tubes of the assassination and one in particular that examines the Secret Service and their innocence  and seems pretty accurate, except for the fact that the woman representing Jacqueline Kennedy does wave in the direction of the Secret Service guard, and he backs off and shrugs 3 times, even though he was supposed to be on the heel of the car protecting the President.

Below this title and link is a snippet of the post!

Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, Joseph Ratzinger

and

The Covenant with Many

“Here is what I see NOW:

She is fiddling with him as he is shot the first time, then Connelly looks back and she looks at Connelly and he is shot, she looks back at her husband and gets closer and under him and he is shot again and the blood spray goes up, then

it looks as if she has something in her right hand after the second shot

(perhaps a silencer and it looks like Captain Hook’s arm without the hook?).

And it seems to be emitting gas straight up! And if I am correct it probably came with her red roses!

Who was the florist?

Supposedly, Jackie thought it was odd that she received red roses in Dallas in one of her infamous interviews spinning the Camelot myth.

Possibly, lost that object when she pushed her husband over and fled to the trunk of the car to get whatever was back there,and it looks like a tube of lipstick because of the way it stays on the trunk of the car. She pursues it on the trunk of the car and gets it and gets back and hunches down with everyone else.

*April 2nd 2011 Just watched this video again a few times and it looks like she is the only one that seems to be busy …..very active….and in control…….everyone else seems to be reacting.

Everyone else seems to be in slow motion and she is in very fast motion.

Whoever her focus is on seems to be before that person is shot! IMO

Which is very disturbing!”

Jackie triggers a killing mechanism?

Basically, what I am trying to say in above snippet of the post is that she is running circles around everyone and most people in a state of shock do not react so quickly unless they are the perpetrator!

===============

Supposedly Jackie would not change her clothes before the swearing in of Lyndon Johnson and said 

“I want them to see what they have done.”

That is called deflecting and pointing the finger elsewhere.

Murderers don’t usually need to be reminded, so who is she speaking of?

And as far as having her husbands brains in her hands, or in her lap …….how could that possibly be true if she was on the trunk of the car picking up things (perhaps caps?)

unless she picked it up his brain parts

after she hunkered down

with the rest of the people that seemed to react normally!

besides the fact that she was not Jackie Kennedy, IMO.

Here is film shot from the opposite direction as the Zapruder film and seems to match exactly, which substantiates the Zapruder films accuracy IMO!

Orville Nix, version 1 (AVI, 3.41 MB)
Orville Nix, version 2 (AVI, 2.25 MB)

=================

April 6th re-vision

Funny thing is that I started to notice a lot of articles creeping into the Internet about Jackie being part Jewish, as if that has anything to do with this at all, and I realized that the propaganda machine was active, very busy to deceive, cover up and deflect.

Case in point:

Another you tube suddenly appeared with News coverage about the Kennedys visit in San Antonio before the assassination. Supposedly this old man had kept a movie of the Kennedy’s for almost 50 years in a drawer ‘all neat and perfect’ in his attic desk and just decided to donate it.

In my opinion, its a fake.

President Kennedy looks like he is out to lunch, as if he is not really there, or in another place. His actions and expressions do NOT fit the scene. And, of course, the man that donated the film mentions that President Kennedy is confused and gives his own excuse for why the President is acting confused!

WHICH IS VERY TELLING …..AS IF HE KNOWS!

Jackie wore her hair parted on the other side that night also. . I think that was the point of this you tube…..covering their tracks….so to speak. If you watch the you tube it looks suspicious and is very confusing, a film full of mayhem that could easily be manipulated and, in fact, if you study the film it has a lot of discrepancies. Why anyone would go to such trouble – all of a sudden – and it magically appearing 50 years later is suspicious in its entirety. President Kennedy looks like he’s drugged. It just does not fit!!! So I am including this you tube in this article.

Jackie is wearing gloves when she enters

and then when she gives her speech she’s not wearing her gloves

which is Very Very out of character for her.

I think someones made a big error in this film.

They forgot the gloves!

That’s what happens when you are in a hurry.

Not only that, but they forgot to invite the Connally’s.

That Day in Dallas/ Nellie Connally

By Robert R. Rees,
CyberProfile Contributing Editor

However, the Connally’s were on every other activity STRANGE and, in fact,

It is VERY VERY FISHY

— the sudden appearance of this film, that is!!!!!

Why would the Connally’s be excluded?

The whole event I have described, the odd behavior of the people involved, the exclusion of the Connally’s, leads me to believe that this was the critical point,

a watershed event

in regards to

the assassination of President Kennedy!

All I can say is, in time, all things will

be revealed and, I hope, whoever is involved

knowingly

in propaganda to deceive 

will change their course and do the right thing while they still have a chance

before it is too late!

Film surfaces of JFK night before assassination

Zoom in and Check out 1:54/4:22 expression of Jackie in this film. Very odd and I would call it demonic, as if she had had a fit,

or a glitch!

DOES THIS LOOK LIKE JACKIE KENNEDY?

Check out the woman near the end of the film who seems to be trying to say something  with her hand at 3:43/4:22. Perhaps she is an unwilling participant in a very ugly scam!

Then from frame 2:07/4:22 Jackie Kennedy looks at least 10/20 years older sitting with her bare hands in her pockets.

This film is full of holes!

Now compare this to the poise of the real Jackie speaking spanish!

Jacqueline Kennedy speaking spanish

and her part matches her husband’s part!

I wonder if the film that suddenly surfaced didn’t steal bits and pieces from this film and many others,

but just made a few errors in the new “timely” film just now donated

because this old man all of sudden decided to part with

his sacred treasure!

There is a big difference between the women in each of these films besides the obvious glitch!

So why would this old man come up with this film 48 or so years later and decide to donate it – at this time – when he had it in his drawer the whole time?

Why would some of the news stations and press combine it with another film and put sound behind it, even though it was a silent film?

Some of the broadcasts that were aired ought to be investigated for fraud.

IT is as if the Press is hiding something that they are complicit in!

Why embellish the film?

Could it be they want you to swallow it,

hook, line and sinker?

They have the tools to deceive and they are deceiving you!

Why?

Life Magazine supposedly had the Zapruder film and parts were destroyed

Why?

Who do they work for?

Who does the man at the Museum of The Texas School Book Depository work for that received this film and helped to affirm it’s worth. Does he have no levels or standards of  integrity for a film to be accepted as historical evidence? I guess anything goes.

Even I could layer a film as bad as that one!

It is sooooo obvious that this film is layered!

Even Diane Sawyer (who acts drunk on herself, IMO) of ABC News aired it and they did their own layering for you to accept it!

If they try to spoon feed us this film and add, of course, the other one of the same night …

does that make it true?

Because their are two films of the same scam

does that make it true?

How about 3 or 4?

Who do they serve?

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

For if they know or have an inkling that they are deceiving,

they should quit,

but they don’t because they have to support their life style!

===============================

Basically, what happened that day:

The power of the Presidency was stolen by the Treasury Department!

The Treasury Department heads the Secret Service

which is supposed to protect the President

and his wife !!!

So we lost a branch of our government that day,

our elected President, and his wife!

That’s why there was cover-up!

==============================

JFK & Marilyn Monroe Photo: ONLY Picture Together Unveiled (VIDEO)

Only Photo of JFK & Marilyn Monroe Together Unveiled, On Sale

Trove of John F. Kennedy photos from White House are sold at auction

IF you look real close this is a picture that has been manipulated also.

I have read so much pure junk and innuendo about JFK and his brother Bobby

and a recent released photo of JFK and Bobby with Marilyn Monroe that

was “saved”

from a dryer

Up for auction, only photo of JFK and Marilyn Monroe

together moments after she sang sultry ‘Happy Birthday’

IT is a strange photo with President Kennedy looking away.

He was embarrassed:

Because it is not him

he was wearing a grecian hair band?

 he could not figure out which side

to part his hair

on that occasion!

It is not even Robert Kennedy or Marilyn Monroe!

Marilyn Monroe had a soft rounder nose and plumper lips and two shoulders

not just one and a half!

Compare her nose to the nose on the woman in the other picture. There is a big difference! IN this picture her nose is not as boney or as long as the one above and her lips are plump comparatively. Even the woman’s body is different. Marilyn Monroe was always clumsily over-weight in a very attractive way and the woman above is slender and even the breasts are different and smaller! 

THIS IS RIDICULOUS….

THE PICTURE OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY, BOBBY KENNEDY AND MARILYN MONROE

ABOVE IS A FAKE

AND LOOKS TO BE A LEFTOVER

FROM MANIPULATING PHOTOS

TO MAKE A GOOD COVERUP

(that is why it was found in a dryer of all places )

AND TARNISH THEIR REPUTATIONS

AND FALSELY PROVE A RELATIONSHIP

WITH MM FOR THAT COVERUP.

I WONDER WHY?

It is called DIS – INFORMATION!

============

Hersh’s Dark Camelot

The three people that these actors above represented were cut down early in life and I think I know why:

To fulfill prophecy in order to deceive!

It has something to do with the head wound prophecy in Revelation: 

Revelation 13:3 

  ³And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death;

and his deadly wound was healed:

and all the world wondered after the beast.

THE PROPHECY WAS ALREADY FULFILLED BY ROME

SO IN ORDER TO DEFLECT THEY HAD TO FULFILL IT IN OUR COUNTRY 

Please read:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

By the way, in his letters when JFK used the code letters

MM

I don’t think it is in reference to Marilyn Monroe,

but rather

Mary Magdalene.

I found a few places that use MM for their identification!

They are MANY!

But for $$$$$$$$ and the public’s consumption they have made a

Mountain out of a Mole!

I found a few places that ALSO use MM for their identification!

Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America (M.M.)

[MM] Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America (Maryknoll Fathers)

M a r y k n o l l    O f f i c e   f o r    G l o b a l    C o n c e r n s

MMi

WORLD MEDICAL MISSION

Agency Mission:

“World Medical Mission is a ministry of Samaritan’s Purse,
an international Christian relief and evangelism organization specializing in meeting the needs of victims of war, poverty, natural disasters and disease”

 Samaritan’s Purse

More like the big fish ate the little fish. Basically, the son of Billy Graham took over a ministry. Whether foul play was involved…who knows.

The founder died from Leukemia soon after the friendship with Franklin Graham!

John 12:6

 ⁶This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.

Letter From Billy Graham to John F. Kennedy

IF this letter was truly written by Billy Graham, which I cannot verify,

it is sickening!

Paragraph two is very telling! He says he took it to two of JFK’s friends but that it did not go past him ……kind of a misnomer. You don’t go to two friends to clarify, if you want to keep a secret. DUH

So what was the intent of the letter?

If you read  between the lines I would call that a veiled threat, otherwise why bring it up. What friends? Was it Mr. Graham’s job to clarify rumors of JFK or was he just alerting the Senator that he had some goods on him? 

KIND OF CAGEY!

Kind of gross!

—————————-

I think President John F. Kennedy, Senator Bobby Kennedy, Marilyn Monroe

and many, many others were unfortunate victims of a

mafia filled church, drunk on power and deception,

that tried to make our country heel!

The mafia is obviously their creation!

They do the dirty work for the church and the church absolves them and themselves. 

THEY INFILTRATE EVERY ALLEY AND DARK CORNER OF EVERY INSTITUTION TO DO THEIR MISSION!

They are the scum of the earth!

========================

Rome’s secret weapon for recatholicising the EU

“This brings us to Benedict and Rome today.  Readers will be well aware of the Vatican’s efforts after World War II to dominate Europe through the Treaty of Rome.  This strategy was spearheaded by the “St Benedict for first European” campaign conceived during World War II.  Pius XII may have been silent about the holocaust but he certainly made waves when one of Benedict’s early monasteries, Monte Cassino, was bombed by the allies.  Churchill, unworried, correctly observed, “the enemy fortifications were hardly separate from the building itself”. But Pius castigated it as an “atrocity bombing”.  He and his two successors, John XXIII and Paul VI, 

all vowed to use Benedict’s European credentials to bring the continent to heel.”

We are the allies that bombed Monte Cassino!

Please read:

 The Synoptic “Q Source”

Special reference to Billy Graham and his part in this affair in the article linked!

John 16:2
They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh,

that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.

JOHN KENNEDY, HIS BROTHER BOBBY AND MARILYN MONROE

WERE MURDERED FOR

MM

===============================

Now, we have lost our government in total to the

World Government headed by Rome!

Obviously, it was the Vatican and the Pope and their legions

and

THEY ARE MANY

who arranged the death of President Kennedy and probably Jacqueline!

But thank goodness it won’t last!

Courtyard of the Gentiles

Revelation 11:1-2

¹And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.

²But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not;

for it is given unto the Gentiles:

and the holy city shall they tread under foot

forty and two months.

That’s about 3 1/2 years we have to put up with this nonsense!

Time is ticking!

They are the legions that want to make you believe them, nothing, or anything and everything,

but the truth!

That is their end/purpose!

=================

Now, we have lost our government in total to the

World Government headed by Rome!

Obviously, it was the Vatican, the Pope, and their legions

who arranged the death of President Kennedy and probably Jacqueline!

Thank goodness it won’t last!

Courtyard of the Gentiles

Revelation 11:1-2 

And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.

²But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not;

for it is given unto the Gentiles:

and the holy city shall they tread under foot

forty and two months.

That’s about 3 1/2 years we have to put up with this nonsense!

Time is ticking!

They are the legions that want to make you believe them, nothing, or anything and everything,

but the truth!

That is their end/purpose!

============================

Jackie’s Personal Sense of Styleby Kathleen Tracy

The President and First Lady after the First Anniversary Inaugural Salute Dinner, 1962

Photo Credit: Cecil Stoughton, White House/John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston

zoom in on the hands, bottom of dress, the man’s face behind Jackie.

I guess the photographer needed to add people and shadows….

to make it look real?

How about that eyebrow and the side burns on the man behind Jackie….

maybe Cal Thomas was attending?

In regards to Cal Thomas, he was just recently accused of Plagiarizing by a ridiculous Texas editor

 (I call it relating)

Columnist Cal Thomas accused of plagiarizing the New York Times …

 Accused Of Plagiarism, Cal Thomas Admits He Should Have Credited …

==========================

 Lyndon Johnson Swearing-in Nov 22, 1963

The Most Revealing Wink
Of The 20th Century

 A WINK FROM THE MAN ON THE LEFT AT JOHNSON!

A SMILE ON JOHNSON’S WIFE!

NOT SURE ABOUT ABOUT THE EXPRESSION ON JACKIE!

THEN GRIEF SEEMED TO OVERCOME THE CROWD IN THE PLANE AS JOHNSON IS SWORN IN AS PRESIDENT!

WHO IS THAT MAN IS WITH THE DARK EYEBROWS

IN THE LEFT CORNER AT THE BOTTOM?

THIS REMINDS ME OF A YOU-TUBE OF PRESIDENT CLINTON AFTER RON BROWN AND MANY OTHERS WERE KILLED IN A PLANE CRASH! ONE MINUTE HE WAS HAPPY AND WHEN HE KNEW THAT THE CAMERA WAS ON HIM HE CRIED!

Bill Clinton fakes crying

==========================

I checked out this you-tube filming from the car behind the limo of President Kennedy and I took some close-up shots of the hands of Jackie’s double, because of Mary Moore’s testimony of seeing a white puppy dog between the President and his wife at the time of the assassination which she was ridiculed for that observation. Since reviewing, I thought it might be possible that she was seeing Jackie Kennedy’s gloved hands as their limo passed by her. So I keyed in on those hands and they seem rather large in comparison to her husband President Kennedy. White gloves can appear larger in video. White always looks larger and affects photography in funny ways, but nevertheless her/his hands seem extremely large especially the one closest to the President.

I am including a comparison of her/his hand waving and the President from this film following:

See the QuickTime Movie taken by Dave Powers

Zoom the view of these pictures to see better!

Her hand is opening and his hand is pointing forward on the right. Compare the relationship to their heads!

Her hand looks really huge like a man but even larger.

Her hand is closed again and it looks like a rose with thorns on the arm. Kind of an odd shape if you zoom in.

(and it looks like a silencer)

Jackie saluting behind and to the right possibly to a Secret Service guard (the one that is supposed to shield the President?)

Her hand size is about the same size as her head..maybe larger!

His hand is a little forward, but seems dramatically smaller in comparison to his head and normal.

Her hand looks abnormally GIGANTiC???

STRANGE!

I can see why Mary Moore thought she saw

a fluffy white puppy between them.

The look of love is in your eyes

THE FACE OF EVIL IN DALLAS 1963

====================================================

Truth may be stranger that fiction

in an automated kind-of-way!

====================================================

Some of these guys supposedly boasted that they got the SOB (JFK) and the little bastard (Bobby Kennedy)!

At Bobby Kennedy’s assassination a woman with a polka dot dress was seen, but disappeared.

Maybe he is that woman!

David Sánchez Morales

“During that operation he acquired a reputation as the CIA’s top assassin in Latin America.”

After the communist revolution of 1959, Cuba restricted religious practice, this led to persecution of many Catholics at universities and jobs………

…..From 1959 to 1961 eighty percent of the professional Catholic priests and Protestant ministers left Cuba for the United States. Relationships between the new government and congregations were tense, the new Cuban government was very limiting and suspicious of church operations, blaming them for collaboration with the CIA during the Bay of Pigs invasion and stockpiling arms provided for a “counter-revolution“.

I believe that Jackie was not really Jackie, but a hit woman – how far fetched could it be that maybe she was a he and a hit man that was very effeminate with very large hands, like in the picture above.

The one hiding his face
that has his arm around his companion on the right!

Jackie arrival at Love Field

Either she is packing a gun in her crotch or she is a HE!

It might be a good idea to have her pink suit examined for

traces of semen!

If she were actually a he it would explain what she did with the wedding ring at the hospital probably because she no longer had her gloves and the ring didn’t fit!

It would also explain the odd phone call from President LBJ to Jackie and would explain her odd replies.

LBJ and Jacqueline Kennedy

Kind of like

George Gänswein and the Pope

In my latest article

Courtyard of the Gentiles

ROMAN CATHOLICISM STINKS! 

Please read the articles below:

 

The Covenant with Many

———————–

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

I Am the True Vine

————–

Rev. Wilkerson, Evangelicalism and the Covenant With Many

JFK and the Secret Service

My blogs:

Merangue’s Blog

Eye of a Needle         The Keep

The Drawbridge Blue Skies

The Fortress

The Kennedys

Television review: ‘The Kennedys’

Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many – Part 2

You will miss the point of this post if you neglect Part 1 which is linked in the following title:)

In part one of this trilogy

The Covenant with Many

I stumbled upon a coincidence of Joseph of Arimathea/Josephus Flavius

marriage to the church

and the marriage of Jackie Kennedy to Aristotle Onassis (the Greek Shipping Tycoon)

and this is how this particular post came about!

President Kennedy Assassination and Mel Gibson

Part two

After my conclusions about the Kennedy assassination I was intrigued and curious why Jackie Kennedy would be so bold as to kill her husband in broad daylight in front of cameras and people etc. I went through quite a few emotions and ideas kept popping in my head about his supposed affairs except vaguely and over time, reading about them with Marilyn Monroe. I always still had a deep respect for our President and his stance publicly for truth and openness and I have always hated that he was assassinated. I also hate the secrecy associated with the findings about the assassination! His private life might not have been perfect, but he seemed like a Perfect President. And probably there is more to the story than what meets the eye!

I always thought highly of Mrs. Kennedy and her kids. After looking at many pictures of her she is even more beautiful than I remember. But compared to the woman on the screen in the Zapruder film I just wasn’t satisfied with my conclusions even though I think that woman did assassinate President Kennedy.

To start, I would like to divulge again that I am a portrait artist and I notice features a little more closely than the average person. So I decided to compare pictures of her to see if possibly, by chance, that the woman in the Zapruder film might be someone else. I found quite a few pictures and compared them to each other to see if and when she might have been replaced with a double. I know that sounds preposterous, but there is no doubt in my mind after seeing the Zapruder film over and over, and studying it closely, that she looks and acted very guilty. Yet Jacky Kennedy doesn’t seem to be the type of woman to be so calculating and cold. The person on the screen in the film acts like a professional hit woman. So after writing the article The Covenant with Many and the deception involved and how the assassination of President Kennedy seems to cor-relate in very strange ways, especially Jackie’s marriage later to Aristotle Onassis, I had to look into it deeper than I ever have.

=========================

I kept running into the dilemma of mirror-image confusion. If you take an object and stick it in your right hand and go to the mirror the object will be in you left hand. In many of the pictures of her she parted her hair on the left and sometimes on the right.

For instance:

(I put the web addresses for you to put in your title bar to go to the picture to see it larger because my blog will not show it large enough to see a clearly)

http://cache2.allpostersimages.com/p/LRG/34/3482/N386F00Z/posters/rickerby-art-first-lady-jackie-kennedy-standing-by-reflecting-pool-in-front-of-taj-mahal-during-visit-to-india.jpg

1962

http://popartmachine.com/item/pop_art/LOC+1138083/%5BJACQUELINE-KENNEDY-IN-FRONT-OF-THE-TAJ-MAHAL%5D-LOT-9700-%5BITEM%5D…

http://www.allposters.com/-sp/First-Lady-Jackie-Kennedy-Standing-by-Reflecting-Pool-in-Front-of-Taj-Mahal-During-Visit-to-India-Posters_i4740851_.htm

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&q=pictures+of+jacquelin+kennedy+in+

Taj+Mahal&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=7222b5efa7d4217b

This is the first lady at Taj Mahal on one of her many trips. In the picture above her purse is on her left arm and the part in her hair is on the left and her leg is poised forward on the left when facing her (or her right) and on the picture above that it is the exact opposite. I spent a long time pondering and studying these pictures because she is wearing the same dress and obviously it is the same day, right?…..it appears that way anyway.

Then I realized the mirror-image dilemma.

DID WE HAVE THAT PROCESS VIA PHOTOSHOP BACK IN THOSE DAYS…..

I HAVE NO IDEA?

But we do now!

Most people rarely change their part from the left to the right, or visa versa. But with mirror-image I could not get past the confusion, until I put her with another person …..her husband.

Men never change their parts, especially back in those days. So I studied a bunch of pictures of them together and in every shot I could find of the two of them together, their parts were always on the same side. His would be on his right when facing him and hers was on the right when facing her when they were side by side. So if you looked at them they were two right parts, like they matched.

Both have their parts on the right above.

Again.

Again, again  and again!

Both have their parts on the right again!

Both have their parts on the same side again like parallel as the other two above!

And again. Hard to see but their parts are on the right.

Again both President Kennedy and Mrs. Kennedy have their parts on the right when you are facing them.

Jackie’s Pink Suit- more examples two Jackies

“It was at President Kennedy’s request that she wear the outfit in Dallas.

He said she looked “ravishing in it.” 

(Susan Mary Alsop, 1963)”

===========================

The Covenant with Many - Part one

============================

Part 3

Now Before the Assassination in Dallas

Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many

PART 1

———————————————————————————————–

JFK and Mel Gibson

The Covenant with Many

————————————————————————————————————–

The Covenant with Many

(revised)

 

February 11, 2010 By Kevin Flower Israeli archaeologists say they’ve found a 1,500-year-old road, 4.5 meters under the current level of streets in Jerusalem’s Old City.

 

The reason I am writing this post is because of the prophecy in Daniel that a lot of people write about on blogs and websites.

I don’t understand why the prophecy teachers and scholars that try to have an understanding of Daniel’s prophecies…get stuck on the same mantra.

I am not trying to be different, but I think there have been some colossal mistakes made by scholars, bible teachers and the whole spectrum of experts of the bible.

I don’t see how you can read the Gospel of John and collapse it into the Synoptic gospels and say they blend at all or compliment each other.

In Reality

The Gospel of John and the Synoptic Gospels

collide !

In the book of Daniel it talks about Messiah the Prince and a prince.

Why does everyone think the covenant with many is for the future.

How does one come to that conclusion from these verses?

Daniel 9:25-27

²⁵Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

It is quite possible that the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince has already occurred,

but has been covered up by the

Chief Priests and the Legion - (please read)

Ancient wall found in Jerusalem Western Wall, Jerusalem The Western Wall was built by King Herod in 20 BC during his expansion of the Temple enclosure, and is part of a retaining wall that enclosed the western part of Temple Mount. According to the Roman-Jewish historian Josephus, construction of the walls took 11 years, during which time it rained in Jerusalem only at night so as not to interfere with the workers’ progress. Ancient road found in Jerusalem’s heart February 11, 2010|By Kevin Flower “Archaeologists working under the direction of the Israeli Antiquities Authority have uncovered a 1500-year-old road running through the center of Jerusalem’s Old City. Excavation director Dr. Ofer Sion said the discovery lends further credence to the accuracy of what is known as the Madaba Map – a Byzantine period mosaic map of the Holy Land that depicts an entrance into Jerusalem that leads to a single central street. Archaeologists working in Jerusalem have made various finds to suggest the Madaba map was geographically correct, but the road depicted in the mosaic had not been found.”

Obviously, there have been two walls from two different temple eras

and a road!

Micah predicted the downfall of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple, which were fulfilled by the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in about 586 BC and again by the Romans in 70 AD. The Temple has not been rebuilt since that destruction. Jerusalem was destroyed a second time by the Romans in about 135 AD.

The only reason I added the above link and the information about the destruction of Jerusalem

and the temple and the destruction again of Jerusalemin in 135 AD

is because it might apply to Daniel’s prophecies.

Perhaps we are wrong about when Jesus really died? Many people seem to think Jesus was 30 or 33 when he started his ministry but in the Gospel of John they refer to him as not yet being 5o years old.

I would say we have a problem within the bible of who and which Jesus is the Messiah!

John 8:56-59

⁵⁶Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.

⁵⁷Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?

⁵⁸Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

⁵⁹Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.

(Interesting that they threw stones at him.)

“Cephus” means stone.

The Synoptic Gospels have built their “image of Jesus” metaphorically by using stones!

By the way, I believe Cephus refers to Josephus Flavius!

Was there ever a decree to build the temple to the Messiah the Prince?

Perchance the destruction of Jerusalem in 135 AD is a clue?

Maybe the decree to build the temple to the Messiah the Prince occurred before 135 AD!

Seems odd that after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD that anyone would need to destroy it again 65 years later.

Building a city takes time, and funds, and manpower,

so why was there a need to destroy it again so soon after it had already been destroyed?

Seems to me that most and maybe all scholars of the bible are making presumptions, because they lump the gospels into one big ball but I think, to be fair,

we should separate the Synoptic Gospels from the Gospel of John

and calculate both sides to see if maybe we can come up with some other answers.

Maybe that is what is meant by the 153 fish which relates to the inferred 153:265 ratio!

Pope Benedict XVI and 153 Great Fish

Pope Benedict XVI is the

265th Pope,

was born Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger

Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, and the Pope

George Gänswein, Pope Benedict XVI, and Mel Gibson

revised

In the two article above that I just recently posted which are very similar I included in both a link to an article I found on the internet about names!

Praising Or Pleading

(POP)

seems to be his (The Pope) MO these days and in this article he pleads for parents to give their children traditional names before baptism so I gather names have meaning to him!

So since they are so important I thought maybe his name might be important also.

The Pope’s Last Name

IN the article

I relate the possibility that the Pope is related to another Pope whose last name was RATTE which would fulfill another prophecy in Revelation 17:11 about him being the eighth and one of the seven:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

But I did not deal with his middle name so:

The Pope’s Middle Name

Aloisius a german name means great warrior but comes from the name

Cleophas meaning and name origin

Cleophas \c-leo-phas\ as a boy’s name is of Greek origin, and the meaning of Cleophas is “visionof glory“.

Biblical name: husband of one of the Marys who stood at the foot of the Cross.

Cleophas has 4 variant forms: Cleo, Cleofas, Cleofaso and Cleophus.

Alphaeus

which is basically the switch from the Synoptic version and Simon from Cyrene who bears the cross and takes over after Jesus is crucified. In essence to REPLACE the true disciples/apostles with his own sons etc because they were the Chief Priests and they wanted to stay that way and replace Jesus with their own perception of Him. It is the great deception! The Synoptic version of the bible (Matthew Mark and Luke) plus many additional books in the bible to form the amalgamation we now call Christianity.

Basically, Rome absconded the truth and twisted it into their baby.

That is why I believe that Mel Gibson has been targeted for his rendition of the Gospels in THE PASSION,

THE BABY or to be more specific THE DEVIL’s BABY

Here are a few posts about that baby!:

Affliction and the Time of Testing

Mel Gibson and the Book of Acts 2

Mel Gibson, Japan Quakes, and the Kamikazes

Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, and the Pope

George Gänswein, Pope Benedict XVI, and Mel Gibson

revised

You might say I went overboard, which is true, but I am trying to learn and to get your attention and the articles are ongoing because of the events which are at present rapidly unfolding.

======================

Back to the Prophecy of Daniel

============================================================

Daniel 9:26

²⁶And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

INTERESTING: NICODEMAS MEANS “THE PEOPLE” AND

IT WAS NICODEMAS AND JOSEPH OF ARIMATHEA

THAT BURIED JESUS.

THE POPE’S FIRST NAME

IT’S A GOOD POSSIBILITY THAT JOSEPH OF ARIMATHEA

IS THE “prince of the people“.

Another interesting coincidence: Demas is a fellowlabourer of Paul:

Philemon 1:24

²⁴Marcus, Aristarchus, Demas, Lucas, my fellowlabourers.

You don’t suppose that Demas is Nicodemas?

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

Daniel 9:27

²⁷And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Sounds to me like in order to cover-up the abomination he had to make it desolate?

Who is “he” in verse 27?

Is “he” the Messiah the Prince?

OR

Is “he” the prince?

It makes a big difference who “he” is in verse 27!

The thing that concerns me is that we have been waiting for some treaty or covenant that will be confirmed and seems to me we ought to know first and foremost:

what is the covenant that is made with the many?

Then try to figure out

who confirms that covenant with the many!

The Covenant with the Many

Many treaties have been made with many people so what kind of treaty will be made with the many and confirmed with the many that this particular prophecy in Daniel is referring to? Certainly it has to do with the prince and the temple and/or worship and/or sin.

Most treaties we read about in the news most people are unaware of so why would Daniel of the bible be speaking of some political treaty that only the few politicians and leaders involved realize. This is a prophecy about the Messiah the Prince and the people of the prince and he (I assume is the prince of the people)

But it isn’t a treaty that Daniel talks about….it’s a covenant!

To be more specific it is the “covenant with many”!

What is the covenant with many?

I looked up “covenant” in the bible search on line and found a lot of covenants.

The covenant that caught my eye is the one that the Synoptic Jesus makes with the Synoptic disciples at the Synoptic Last Supper

and the verses about this covenant uses the word many.

I think that is a BIG CLUE about this covenant!

MATTHEW 26:26-29

²⁶And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body.²⁷And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;²⁸For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.²⁹But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.

MARK 14:22-25

²²And as they did eat, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is my body.²³And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it.²⁴And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.²⁵Verily I say unto you, I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, until that day that I drink it new in the kingdom of God.

LUKE 22:15-20

¹⁵And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer:¹⁶For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God.¹⁷And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves:¹⁸For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come.¹⁹And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.²⁰Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.

 

THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

DOES NOT MENTION THIS

NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant with many!

I THINK THAT IS VERY SIGNIFICANT THAT THE

New Testament/Covenant

IS ABSENT IN

THE GOSPEL OF JOHN!

The three Synoptic gospels don’t mention the washing of the feet,

nor the dialogue that Jesus has with his disciples explaining what is going to happen

and many other things that is worth the time to study.

WHAT IS GOING ON?

Why are the Synoptic Gospels account of the Last Supper so different than the Gospel of John?

Were there two different “LAST SUPPERS”?

For a  break and for fun in an ironic way,

Please watch:

The Last, But One Supper

(It is a Monty Python skit with John Cleese acting like the Pope)

THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW SAYS THAT BLOOD OF THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant WHICH IS SHED FOR THE MANY is

FOR THE “REMISSION OF SINS“.

THE OTHER TWO SYNOPTICS GOSPELS (MARK AND LUKE) EXCLUDE THE “REMISSION OF SINS” TO THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant.

THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW AND THE GOSPEL OF MARK SAY THAT THE BLOOD OF THE NEW TESTAMENT/covenant IS SHED FOR THE MANY.

BUT THE GOSPEL OF LUKE SAYS IT IS FOR YOU. (HE IS TALKING TO HIS DISCIPLES)

EVEN THOUGH THESE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS ARE IN AGREEMENT THAT THERE IS A

NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant.

THEY ARE DISAGREEING AS TO WHO THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant IS FOR…..

THEMSELVES (YOU) OR THE MANY.

(I HATE TO BE A JERK!)

BUT THE ACCOUNTS GIVEN OF THE “LAST SUPPER” BY THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT (NT as opposed to the OT)

DIFFER A GREAT DEAL AS TO THIS “NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant” AND ARE WORLDS APART FROM THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

SINCE this “New Testament”

DOESN’T EVEN OCCUR IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN.

THE PRAYER AND THE DIALOGUE OF JESUS WITH HIS DISCIPLES

HAPPENS ONLY IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN AND THERE IS QUITE A BIT OF INFORMATION GIVEN!

========

Another point by Paul Carlson in his article  below, I get the impression that Paul Carlson thinks that all of the contradictions that are contained in the NT makes everything written about Jesus a lie and that is not my point!

I don’t believe that!

I think Jesus the Messiah did come and so did false messiahs and their many supporters

to quell the truth against Him and His true apostles

for money, power and control.

It’s like saying, for example, that the  September 11th terrorist attack on the Twin Terrors weren’t destroyed because 3 or 4 witnesses/terrorists don’t tell the same story, hence it’s all a lie and the Twin Towers are still there. That is ridiculous! But that is the point in having contradictions so that some people will come to that conclusion! Obviously, the Twin Towers were destroyed and something very big happened, because they are no longer there.

Deception is in the bible purposefully

to deceive

and to reveal!

In other words, it works both ways!

An oxymoron (plural oxymorons or oxymora) (from Greek ὀξύμωρον, “sharp dull”) is a figure of speechthat combines contradictory terms. Oxymorons appear in a variety of contexts, including inadvertent errors such as extremely average and literary oxymorons crafted to reveal a paradox.

Truth is a funny thing, because it is quite possible these contradictions were said

and did actually happen

…..but by who?

Why don’t the experts and scholars of the bible raise the possibility of what seems to be written in black and white in the bible? I get the impression they are hiding from what seems to be obvious …….

but why?

When Jesus came it made such a stir that Jerusalem was destroyed and their temple, Rome was destroyed and Jerusalem was destroyed again 65 years later. Jesus was big news and his coming had major ramifications! And I believe his enemies made sure of the destruction. propaganda and deception to cover up the truth! History was rewritten to hide the truth and many people were slaughtered!

People that lived under the rule of the Romans were slaughtered when they wrote anything that would make the Romans look bad. And I am convinced those times are coming again soon. So when you read Josephus and other writers, keep in mind that they could lose their lives for what they wrote and so maybe there are hidden meanings to their stories. Contradictions may abound in the bible and in the history given by the major history authors (Josephus included, even though his accounts seem to be false IMO) to point us to the truth while avoiding the threat of death for us to be able to discern via archeology and other avenues and the unfolding, at the right time! Possibly the power that caused so much destruction was something other than just the Romans, because they also suffered and suffer now, because they lack the truth and are deceived…..they just don’t realize it!

Daniel 7:25

And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High,

and think to change times and laws:

and they shall be given into his hand

until

a time and times and the dividing of time.

I think that is what is meant by the words “time and times and the dividing of times” is what has been written about that time and the deception about those times.

I think we are in the times prophesied by Daniel and specifically

the “Dividing of time”.

Please read the following fantastic article I found on the internet which is linked next:

The Reliance of Luke-Acts on the Writings of Flavius Josephus

…..”So, Steve Mason, associate Professor of Humanities at York University, Ontario asks:

“If Luke did not know of Josephus’ work, how did this language suggest itself to him?”[5]….

Daniel is talking about he, the prince that was to come,

the prince that Jesus warns us about in the gospel of John.

So when you link to this site below by Paul Carlson and/or read my articles that talk about contradictions in the bible

keep in mind that just because there are contradictions

doesn’t mean it did not occur!

===========

New Testament Contradictions (1995)

Paul Carlson

A. WHEN – BEFORE OR DURING PASSOVER?

“…….In Matthew, Mark and Luke the last supper takes place on the first day of the Passover (Matthew 26:17, Mark 14:12, Luke 22:7).

In John’s gospel it takes place a day earlier and Jesus is crucified on the first day of the Passover (John 19:14).…….”

============

The Blood Covenant at the Last Supper

in the Synoptic Gospels seems to be a bit odd

since Jesus had not died yet!

I know I must seem like I’m just quibbling about small details,

(although they are not small to me)

but

since it is a contract

it seems to me it should be very clear and concise!

All I can tell is that this NEW TESTAMENT/covenant

is for “many”

or for

“you” which was “them” (the disciples sitting at the table).

Why the controversy?

Can’t they even agree on what the “New Testament” /covenant is,

and who it is between,

and what it is for?

The reason this is so IMPORTANT to me is that I have found many problems in the Synoptic Gospels

and have an inclination

to distrust their word of the Word.

New Testament

the collection of the books of the Bible that were produced by the early Christian church, comprising the Gospels, Acts of the Apostles, the Epistles, and the Revelation of St. John the Divine.

the covenant between god and humans in which the dispensation of grace is revealed through Jesus Christ

==============================================

Could the

“Covenant with many”

spoken about by Daniel be the

“Covenant with many”

made at the Last Supper

in the Synoptic Gospels?

Makes sense to me!

If so, then who confirms this covenant?

======================================

Whoever confirms this covenant could be the “he” in verse Daniel 9:27

In my last article on another blog, I wrote called Abomination of Desolation: Part one

(which is also linked here and at the bottom of this post)

the Synoptic Jesus in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke

talks about desolation:

Matthew 23:38

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

Luke 13:35

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate:

and verily I say unto you,

Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say,

Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

=============================

They themselves

(The Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke)

testify to the

“Desolation” and a “Covenant with Many”

===========================

Remember:

the Covenant is not in tbe Gospel of John

nor is desolation mentioned.

========================

Daniel 9:26

²⁶And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

—————–

Daniel 9:27

²⁷And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

————-

Whoever that prince is that “he” is referring to is the one that causes the sacrifice and the oblation to cease., etc

after the Messiah is cut off.

I believe it is the the same prince that Jesus of the Gospel of John warns us about:

John 12:31

Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.

—————-

John 14:30

Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh,

and hath nothing in me.

——————

From the sounds of His warnings the prince of this world would be coming very soon,

not waiting 2000 years later!

I assume that is why Jesus says NOW twice.

“Now” could have a double meaning?

*********

The first time you hear about the prince of this world (in the Gospel of John)

is at the Jewish Feast in Jerusalem

after Jesus had raised Lazarus from the dead in Bethany when the Greeks arrive to that Jewish Feast to see Jesus.

I think that was a sign about this prince of this world.

===============================

I believe that the Covenant at the Last Supper was made with the prince of this world,

and he broke the covenant and desolation occurred.

I DO NOT BELIEVE GOD THE FATHER OR HIS TRUE SON ARE LIARS!

I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT JESUS OF NAZARETH WRITTEN ABOUT IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

WOULD MAKE A COVENANT AND THEN BREAK IT

AND THEN CAUSE DESOLATION

SO THEREFORE WHOEVER DOES THIS IS THE LIAR

AND IS NOT THE TRUE MESSIAH!!!!!

The reason I believe this is because this Covenant at the Last Supper

is not in the Gospel of John

and John does not mention it later in his gospel.

The only gospels to mention desolation are two of the Synoptic Gospels

in the past tense:

Matthew 23:38

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

—————–

Luke 13:35

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate:

and verily I say unto you,

Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say,Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

———————————

Here are some interesting comparisons of Paul and Josephus.

PLEASE READ:

Flavious Josephus And the Apostle Paul Were the Same Person?, page 1

and there are many more examples which I have included in other articles about

Josephus Flavius and Joseph of Arimathea.

PLEASE READ:

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

The Synoptic “Q Source”

Josephus and His Footprints

The Dividing of Times – Part One

Maybe if we looked at things a bit differently, events like Masada and Yodfat and the discrepancies of the archeological evidence vs. Josephus Flavius’s historical account

might make more sense…….

Perhaps since no evidence of Jewish bones have been found at the site of Masada

could there have been a resurrection of the living?

I don’t know of course, but it is worth considering!

Josephus Flavius’s historical account and the archeological evidence do NOT match,

so I wonder what really did happen at Masada and Yodfat

and why would Josephus make up stories of mass suicide of JEWS!

that seems to have not happened at all?

If a mass suicide did not occur, why would Josephus lie about it???

Is he trying to promote suicide as a heroic sacrificial act for Jews or is he trying to infer their inferiority?

What would be the point?

He did seem to turn on his own country and people from what I have read about him and by him,

if, in fact, he was Jewish?

But then wasn’t HITLER Jewish? And we do not want to forget that lesson!

Or was he leaving us clues???

Why would he lie about it?

If there had been a victory by the Romans

why not write about it?

From his writings. he seemed to be kind of sick in the head or had some kind of deep insanity. His accounts of what happened show lots of inside information, even what people were actually thinking

and he seemed to be in charge !!!

His paranoia may be a result of knowing the thoughts of the people and their plots against him.

If you read his works they are quite descriptive of maniacal sadistic manipulative type behavior

and he seemed to enjoy the destruction and the deceptions of the people!

It must be that he is trying to hide who he is!

WHY?

Could Josephus Flavius be the “prince” ?

Could he have rewritten history and written the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke)

to cover up the truth

about Jesus of Nazareth

and replace himself

as the Messiah?

IE

THE DEVIL

Could he have taken the records in the Temple in Jerusalem as he says he did,

rewritten parts of the OT to bolster his Synoptic Gospels,

composed other books from The Book of ACTS and the rest?

Could he have changed the Genealogy records or destroyed them as others say they no longer exist to cover up

WHO HE REALLY IS?

Could he have been the one to make a covenant with many?

Could Josephus be Cephus?

Makes sense to me!

THE STONE

????????????????????????????????

Could Josephus Flavius Son of Matthew be Joseph of ARIMathea

(ARI means lion. and eagle)

Ari is also a very GREEK name.

ARISTOTLE

Jacqueline Kennedy married Aristotle Onassis which in itself seems very odd when you think about it!

Especially since recently ART of New Wineskins with *his propaganda site* IMO

implied that the head wound of the beast spoken about in Revelation

was President Kennedy’s assassination and that President Barrack Obama’s head vein?/scar? had something to do with this prophecy!

The Devil and his legions are in a hurry for lots and lots of reasons!

Since finishing this post today,

I have watched some you-tubes of the moments of President Kennedy’s assassination, because of what I have been learning and writing and it looks pretty scary. I have seen them a hundred times before and always gave Jacky the benefit of doubt because she is a female, very pretty, soft spoken and his wife,

but Jacqueline’s behavior before and after, are disconcerting to say the least!

Here is what I see NOW:

She is fiddling with him as he is shot the first time, then Connelly looks back and she looks at Connelly and he is shot, she looks back at her husband and gets closer and under him and he is shot again and the blood spray goes up, then

it looks as if she has something in her right hand after the second shot.

Possibly, lost that object when she pushed her husband over and fled to the trunk of the car to get whatever was back there,and it looks like a tube of lipstick because of the way it stays on the trunk of the car. She pursues it on the trunk of the car and gets it and gets back and hunches down with everyone else.

*April 2nd 2011 Just watched this video again a few times and it looks like she is the only one that seems to be busy …..very active….and in control…….everyone else seems to be reacting.

Everyone else seems to be in slow motion and she is in very fast motion.

Whoever her focus is on seems to be before that person is shot! IMO

Which is very disturbing!

Here is the video:

Hi quality footage of JFK Assassination

And the Secret Service act peculiar in the front seat, the driver and the passenger and the guy that left his post at the back corner  by President Kennedy.

See the driver? Yup, that’s right… NO GUN! *

But WHO knows with digital mastering and all of the coverups!

The same applies to Mel Gibson and the tapes of his rantings. My husband is a sound engineer and voices can also be spliced and diced and altered …….digitally mastered. It isn’t as if he doesn’t have plenty of emotional voice samples in all of the movies he has been involved with.

WHO knows!

I just would not place much faith in visual or sound technology.

I hope it isn’t a technique or practice employed to defame, destroy and rob individuals who have money, influence or sway,

but aren’t in alignment with the

One World Government, One World Religion, and One World Finance

fostered by Pope Benedict XVI and his legions.

THAT WOULD BE A NIGHTMARE

but maybe it is a warning and a sign of things to come!

Another time and on another post I watched a you-tube which also showed

peculiar behavior of the Secret Service

and that was behind Donald Rumsfeld when he misspoke

about the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

This is the post:

The Bohemian Grove, the Vatican and the NWO-Revised

“A very interesting you -tube I watched recently of Donald Rumsfeld slip of the tongue, and I have linked it. Pay close attention to what he says about the the shooting down of the plane and the Pentagon and the reaction of the people in the background. Makes me think the Secret Service are a bit more powerful than I ever imagined. The Treasury Department runs the Secret Service. That is interesting since we are in debt up to our EARS. President Bush SR used to head the CIA. Hmmmmmmmmm. I wonder if Rumsfeld didn’t do that on purpose for our benefit? You never know! I hope so.”

The article below shows the relationship of banking

with the Synoptic Gospels, Paul, Josephus and BAAL!

1 Timothy 6:10
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

Please Read:

The Synoptic “Q Source”

*************************

What we do know is that

President John Kennedy

was killed because of his posture and his actions

exposing

SECRET SOCIETIES.

Time is our ally.

Please read about the head wound below:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

Many people keep looking for a place called Arimathea, and so far there is none.

Could Josephus Flavius/Joseph of ARI-Mathea have been the Fear of the Jews?

Could Saul/Paul be Josephus Flavius?

1 Corinthians 3:22

²²Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas,

or the world,

or life, or death,

or things present, or things to come;

all are your’s;

=====================

John 14:30

Hereafter I will not talk much with you:

for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

[and compare to what Paul says]

1 Corinthians 16:24
My love be with you all in Christ Jesus. Amen.

=============

Below Saul/Paul contradicts himself:

and then following Paul tricks people:

2 Corinthians 11:31
The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is blessed for evermore, knoweth that I lie not.

2 Corinthians 12:16
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty,

I caught you

with guile.

Guile

Definition: Craft; deceitful cunning; artifice; duplicity; wile; deceit; treachery.

=====================[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[=================

If you read his history of the Jews and Josephus’s biography it’s almost like he is writing about the underworld,

or the world of the dead.

The spiritual world.

======================

A lot of the names and events seem to parallel Acts and I don’t think it’s accidental!

He seems to relish the people being deceived!

THE DEVIL ENJOYS DECEPTION!

Could Josephus Flavius have been as a

Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde

with

MANY OTHER NAMES

I don’t think we should ignore his writings, but rather compare his style and details to the events in the bible!

================================

Other sites of interest in regard to old and recent covenants:

===============================

Covenants of Israel

Thinking Anglicans

Covenant

Vatican and Arab League sign agreement

Here is a recent Covenant with Many that might be of interest:

Magen David Adom Covenant

- The value of saving lives as seen by the three religions,

will be presented to the Pope

Salute No Man

=================================

Masada

Solved mystery of Masada remains

The Works of Flavius Josephus

Flavius Josephus

Luke and Josephus (2000)

The shipwrecks of Josephus and Paul (Part 3)

Josephus and the New Testament

————————————————–

My last *four posts that I believe relate to the subject of the covenant follow:

*Abomination of Desolation: Part one

*The Abomination of Desolation Part 2

*In The Garden of Gethsemane

*Sour Wine

Josephus and His Footprints

CONFIRMATION OF THE COVENANT

The Fruits of the Vatican

———–=======================———–

Here is a recent Covenant with Many that might be of interest:

Magen David Adom Covenant

- The value of saving lives as seen by the three religions, will be presented to the Pope

=======================================

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

I Am the True Vine

If you have read any of my articles I have a basic theme throughout most of my posts on my blogs and it is that the Synoptic (Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke), Acts and many other epistles are false! I believe they represent a false Messiah and a False Prophet! I believe I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt quite often that they contradict each other and are antithetical to the gospel of John. They promote a political agenda to control the people and quell the truth about Jesus and his message.I think the synoptic gospels were written by thieves of the true Word of God and his true apostles.

I believe these guys killed the true apostles, stole what they could from them, altered their messages, rewrote history to cover up their crime, in collusion with the the powers that be at the time to create their own version of Jesus and God.

The contradictions are pretty apparent if you compare the gospels to each other and read the bible critically. For many years, I didn’t study, but just read what other people thought and still kept running into a cement wall. I don’t think I have all the answers, yet nor do I think I will attain that ever in my lifetime. I write in my blogs as I am learning and hope it will help others that have also questioned the same things I question that is written about God and Jesus.

I don’t think it is healthy to accept what we have been fed for years as “the truth” I think it is healthier to question, study and discuss. I don’t think the ecclesiastic entity appreciates our freedom to question it’s authority on their interpretation of what is written in the bible but who said they have the right to quell our search for the truth? To them it is Apostacy,,,the falling away…. I say it is Apostacy from them, and falling away from them. They think they have the answers…..

I dont think they have the answers, so thats why I write my blogs. Enuf said on that!

 

153 Hail Mary’s and 153 Hilda

John 21

¹After these things Jesus shewed [proved] himself again to the disciples at the sea of Tiberias;

and on this wise [in this way] shewed [proved] he himself.

===============

Odd that this is said twice within the same sentence

which makes me think it is a warning and at the very least a

Double Entendre

“A double entendre (French pronunciation: [dublɑ̃tɑ̃dʁə]) or adianoeta^[1] is a figure of speech in which a spoken phrase is devised to be understood in either of two ways. Often the first (more obvious) meaning is straightforward, while the second meaning is less so: often risqué, inappropriate, or ironic.

The Oxford English Dictionary defines a double entendre as especially being used to “convey an indelicate meaning”. It is often used to express potentially offensive opinions without the risks of explicitly doing so.”

or maybe a Riddle

I am he

vs

another…..in this way?

Please read the articles about the Neocatechumenal way

of Roman Catholicism

in Israel and in Japan:

Cardinal O’Malley : Neocatechumenal Way’s Domus Galilaeae Center in Israel

Japan Quakes after Confirmation of the Neocatechumenal Way

If you read the article it shows that the Pope was wrong or misstepped

and made a big huge error in his power that backfired which proved he is wrong!

Either which way he was wrong, which is ironic!

Will he try again on the Sea of Galilee….we shall see, but I would hope he has learned his limitations!

²There were together Simon Peter, and Thomas called Didymus, and Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, and the sons of Zebedee, and two other of his disciples.

³Simon Peter saith unto them, I go a [alpha.aleph.truth] fishing. They say unto him, We also go with thee. [They follow Peter] They went forth, and entered into a ship immediately; and that night they caught nothing.

⁴But when the morning was now come, Jesus stood on the shore:

but the disciples knew not that it was Jesus.

⁵Then Jesus saith unto them, Children, have ye any meat [belief?our meat is to believe] [His meat is to do the will of God]?

They answered him, No.

⁶And he said unto them, Cast the net on the right side of the ship [starboard side], and ye shall find. They cast therefore, and now they were not able to draw it for the multitude of fishes.

Here is a link with the whole article about ship terminology:

Know Your Ship Terminology

…..”The port side is the left side of the ship, when you are facing forward

(i.e., toward the pointy front end of the ship).

Here’s a simple rule for remembering this: Left has four letters, and port has four letters.

The right side of the ship is the starboard side”……

…….”The pointy end of the ship I discussed earlier is in fact called the bow, and the back end of the ship is called the stern”……..

……If you want to reach the bow, you head in a forward direction. But if you want to reach the stern you don’t head backwards; you head aft. Why? Just to confuse us, of course……..

————

⁷Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter,

It is the Lord.

Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt

[In architecture or structural engineering, a girt is a horizontal structural member in a framed wall. Girts provide lateral support to the wall panel.]

his fisher’s coat unto him, (for he was naked,

[did not believe in Jesus of the Gospel of John and was in sin])

and did cast [sow] himself into the sea.

Sowing of himself as the Lord ie the Pope and the Synoptic Jesus

(into the See)?

[I think this is a reference to the Book of Acts about and Paul's ship wreck when he cast the wheat into the sea and that it was not about Jesus, but Peter himself. Not to mention He did not yet believe in Jesus, ie naked. Everything about Peter and Paul in the Book of Acts is weird.

⁸And the other disciples came in a little ship; (for they were not far from land, but as it were two hundred cubits,) dragging

1. Pull (someone or something) along forcefully, roughly, or with difficulty.

2. Take (someone) to or from a place or event, despite their reluctance:

the net [fish net/the internet] with fishes.

⁹As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.

¹⁰Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish [meat /believe/ truth]which ye have now caught.

Caught in the act? caught, trapped, lured, entrapped?

Believers?

¹¹Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great fishes, an hundred and fifty and three:

and for all there were so many, yet was not the net broken.

153:265

Split the two sentences with a Period instead of a colon and you get Another meaning.

¹²Jesus saith unto them, Come and dine. And none of the disciples durst [dared] ask him,

Who art thou?

knowing that it was the Lord.

¹³Jesus then cometh,

In my opinion, Jesus does not come till we know

the which

Jesus he is.

The Synoptic Jesus of the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke

and inspired by the “Q” source

or

Jesus of Nazareth

written about in the Gospel of John.

and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish likewise.

¹⁴This is now the third time that Jesus shewed [proved] himself to his disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.

¹⁵So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these?

The fish? Tall tales?Hail Mary’s of the beaded prayers? Lucky passes? The other disciples?Women?

He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee.

He saith unto him,

Feed my lambs.

Does he mean with food or with the truth ie His bread, or both!

¹⁶He saith to him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee.

He saith unto him,

Feed my sheep.

¹⁷He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee.

Jesus saith unto him,

Feed my sheep.

Peter was grieved because he had denied Jesus three times which could mean in reference to

times, time and a half a time

and not feeding his lambs and sheep possibly for

times. time of the above measurement of time

¹⁸Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdest thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not.

Please read::

The Image of the Beast

========

Jesus of the Gospel of John says :

John 5:42-44

⁴²But I know you, that ye have not the love of God in you.⁴³I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.⁴⁴How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only?

I wrote about Ye

in

Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised

John 14:30
Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

==============

¹⁹This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him,

Follow me.

²⁰Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee?

²¹Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this man do?

²²Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee?

follow thou me.

²³Then went this saying abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should not die: yet Jesus said not unto him, He shall not die; but, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee?

²⁴This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his testimony is true.

²⁵And there are also many other things which Jesus did,

the which ,

if they should be written every one,

I suppose that even the world itself could not contain

the books that should be written. Amen.

====================

153 Fish and 153 HAIL MARY’s

Did Jesus ask Peter if he loved 153 fish more than Him?

Makes sense since Peters co-fishers, some of the disciples hauled them in.

Or was Jesus referring to the 153 Hail Mary’s of the rosary?

How about lucky passes called Hail Mary’s in football?

Here is a song by Oksana :

Oksana – ,,Say My Name”

There is an asteroid named 153Hilda.

153 Hilda

Observations

Hilda was observed to occult a star on December 31, 2002, from Japan. It has a very low-amplitude light curve indicating a spherical body or a non-varying albedo.^{[citation needed]}

Apparition

…..”In astronomical parlance, apparition is the term that refers to the appearance of periodic comets. Periodic comets are classified as those comets whose orbital period does not reach 200 years, or those who have been seen in more than one perihelion passage. They are also called short-period comets. The term periodic comet is also used to mean any comet that is marked by a periodic orbit, regardless of it being greater or less than two centuries.”….

…..”Popular comets in human history are often signalled by apparitions, and are often named after the persons who were lucky enough to have seen them. Halley’s Comet, Finlay’s Comet, and Neujmin Comet are just some of the examples. However, there are also periodic comets whose name is from the person who actually calculated their orbit, and examples are 2P/Encke and 27P/Crommelin.”…..

…..”It is not always easy to tell the next apparition of a periodic comet, and this is because the orbit of such comets is also not easy to measure exactly. Possible space perturbations coming from various planets might mess up the celestial path. Few comets were actually lost because of their orbits getting affected by non-gravitational factors such as gas release and some other materials that form and define

the coma and tail of a comet.”…..

Medjugorje Annual Apparitions: 1992 – Medjugorje Messages

Apparitions at Fatima (1992)

……”Praised by Pope John Paul II and Sr. Lucía herself — both of whom appear in postscript footage from a premiere of the film greeting the three young actors who play the visionaries in the film — Apparitions at Fatima is free of the sentiment and stereotyping of the Hollywood version (which Sr. Lucía reportedly disliked) — not to mention the softening and homogenization of the story’s spirituality for mainstream audiences.”……

…..”Apparitions at Fatima deals with the more challenging aspects of the Fatima story, including the vision of hell that so terrified little Jacinta (Cécile Maupeu), and the harsh penances the children took on themselves in reparation of the sins of the world, including refraining from drinking water on hot days and wearing ropes around their waists tied so tightly that Mary herself had to tell the children that, while God was pleased with their willingness to suffer, they should not wear the ropes to bed.”…..

How Insane!

Most of these “Mary visits” are rushing the apparition believers to say the rosary and pray, pray, pray for whatever it is she warns them of, as if she knows what is ahead. Perhaps she does know. Perhaps she knows because it is the plan of the Roman Catholic Entity to which she belongs to accomplish. Long term type plans. Then use Propaganda Scare Tactics on children…………….no less.

The innocent.

Here is a post by Ultraguy on his site linked:

New Wineskins

Eternal Perspective

Posted by: ultraguy | March 8, 2011

“In his latest post, Andrew Strom has put succinctly what I’ve thought for a long time:

God looks at things from an “eternal” point of view. To Him the greatest disaster is for man to die in an unsaved state – totally unprepared for Judgment and eternity. God is even willing for there to be great shaking and turmoil in the earth, if it causes men to seek Him and find eternal salvation. There is none of this in “man’s” media. It is just a total “human” tragedy and they have no interest in eternity at all.

One could just as well speak of “great shaking and turmoil” in peoples’ individual lives, whatever form that may take, and however it may come about, e.g., illness, job loss, death of a loved one, etc.

“On the other hand, if this physical life and its various shakings and turmoils are all that the great cosmic ‘game’ of life is about, then ours is a sorry lot indeed.  Satan would like to convince you that the physical is paramount. God’s ‘game’ is different. The things of this earth — our earthly treasure and interactions ‘down here’ are all intended, in one fashion or another, as a way to ‘get’ (save) peoples eternal selves from something much worse.”

Eternal perspective and eternal salvation. Buy now while it’s still on sale (free).”

………………….end of his post=======================end of his post………………….

============================

Some of his article may be true but IMO

this part is a con job:

“Buy now while it’s still on sale (free).”

Why, is it gonna cost me later on? Does the price go up after this moment or that?  Because there are calamities in the world…….to become a believer (if one is not one) they have to do it NOW or it will be more expensive later.

Calamities are a fact of living life on earth!

Sounds like a one day sale at Nordstroms!

Armageddon Entrepreneurs: Who’s Profiting From Fear?

Pope Benedict XVI and His Power of Suggestion

It does seem like there is a game going on, but I don’t think it is a good game.

Moor like hunting a horse while holding it’s rein.

*

The fact is

God is not in a hurry,

but the Devil is in a hurry!

*****

But, Mousie, thou art no thy lane [you aren't alone]
In proving foresight may be vain:
The best laid schemes o’ mice an’ men
Gang aft a-gley, [often go awry]
An’ lea’e us nought but grief an’ pain,
For promised joy.

John Steinbeck’s 1937 novel - Of Mice and Men.
…

“Chodesh Tammuz,” The Month of Tammuz

***

To be honest I have no idea if the above and what is following applies but with everything going on in the world today I thought I should add it to this post!

Isaiah 66:16-18

¹⁶For by fire and by his sword will the LORD plead with all flesh:

and the slain of the LORD shall be many.

¹⁷They that sanctify themselves,

==========================

sanc·ti·fy

1. Set apart as or declare holy; consecrate.

2. Make legitimate or binding by religious sanction

*****

==========================

and purify themselves in the gardens behind one tree in the midst,

eating swine’s flesh,

and the abomination, and the mouse,

shall be consumed together, saith the LORD.

¹⁸For I know their works and their thoughts:

it shall come,

that I will gather all nations and tongues;

and they shall come, and see my glory.

[It does seem coincidental!]

By the way, I don’t think the “abomination” is our President or the US since this verse is speaking to the world!

I think it is the Vatican, the Pope, Roman Catholicism, the Universal Religion, and the NeoCatechumenal Way!

They were just “sanctioned” by the Vatican and the Pope before the earthquake and the tsunami in Japan.

IN fact the Pope said that the Lord sanctioned their new religion by an ecclesiastical vote.

I think Isaiah 66:16-18 is referring to both!

To Mimic Asteroid Collisions, Scientists Smash Boulders Together

Courtyard of the Gentiles

At the airport in Dallas 1/2 hour before his assassination both Jackie and John Kennedy greet an old woman in a wheel chair and the press mentions how this woman waited for 69 years to meet a President. As if she wanted this experience as a baby etc. It was a ridiculous remark. But I think it is in reference to a woman who waited in the temple for so many years to meet Jesus as a baby in the bible.

Then the other picture is a ship with the opposite numbers of 153. Both taken on their cruise at Hyannisport.  A bit weird.

Those pictures were snapped from a French synopsis of Jackie Kennedy on following you tubes:

What Jackie knew – Part 1

What Jackie knew – Part 2

 What Jackie knew – Part 3

What Jackie knew – Part 4

What Jackie knew – Part 5

What Jackie knew – Part 6

Please read about the Neocatechumenal way of Roman Catholicism:

Japan Quakes after Confirmation of the Neocatechumenal Way

Pope Prays

Affliction and the Time of Testing

Mel Gibson and the Book of Acts 2

The Grace of Anathema Maranatha

more articles at: Merangue’s Blog

Lust for Power-Part two

James 2:14-26

¹⁴What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?¹⁵If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food,¹⁶And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?¹⁷Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.¹⁸Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.¹⁹Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.²⁰But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?²¹Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?²²Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?²³And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.²⁴Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.²⁵Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way?²⁶For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.

John 6:28-29

²⁸Then said they unto him,

What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?

²⁹Jesus answered and said unto them,

This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

Here we have a major contention

between Jesus written about in the Gospel of John

and the book of James!

James boastingly says says you have to prove your faith by your works!

Jesus (in the Gospel of John) says believing is the work and does not add that faith is made perfect by works because obviously faith is the work!

———————-

By the way, how does James know what the devils believe? Or for that matter who the devils believe? Is James an expert on devil knowledge?

Who wrote the book of James?

Was it a disciple?

It was written by James, the half-brother of Jesus (according to the earliest sources). James was martyred in 62 AD.

Galatians 1:19 & 2:9

BTW: There were two disciples named “James”:

1) James (the son of Zebedee) and brother of the disciple John.
&
1) James (the son of Alphaeus) who was the brother of Matthew (who was also known as Levi).

Galatians 1:19

¹⁹But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord’s brother.

Galatians 2:9

⁹And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.

John 19:30
When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.

James 1:15
Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.

I wonder why James…….the supposed “brother of Jesus or disciple of Jesus” would use the phrase

It is finished

when speaking of lust…..sin…….bringing forth death. The same phrase that the Gospel of John says that were the last words Jesus said when he was crucified.

IT is as if James is saying that lust……sin…….

brought forth the death of Jesus

by his own character!!!

Interesting!

BTW I did a check on the phrase“It is finished” in the online bible (KJV) and it is

ONLY USED ON TWO OCCASIONS! That is pretty coincidental and very rare that this exact phrase is used only two times in the bible!

Please follow the link: IT IS FINISHED

Also, you should note that the above article says that James was martyred in the year of 62 and yet he conveniently refers to the phrase “It is finished” in opposition to the teaching of Jesus in the Gospel of John.

Matthew 13:55
Is not this the carpenter’s son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?

Acts 4:36
And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus,

NERO

Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (15 December AD 37 – 9 June AD 68),

^[1] born Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus

Whose apostles surnamed Joses to Barnabus? Which Jesus?

Luke wrote Acts and the gospel of Luke, but just about everything in the gospel of Luke is antithetical to the gospel of John. Why?

Yet in the book of Zechariah it is the four Carpenter’s who scatter the sheep so that no man did lift up his head.

I am assuming Zechariah means THE ROMAN IRON GRIP on mankind!

Zechariah 1:18-21

¹⁸Then lifted I up mine eyes, and saw, and behold four horns.

¹⁹And I said unto the angel that talked with me, What be these? And he answered me, These are the horns which have scattered Judah, Israel, and Jerusalem.

²⁰And the LORD shewed me four carpenters.

²¹Then said I, What come these to do? And he spake, saying, These are the horns which have scattered Judah, so that no man did lift up his head:

The Brethren of Jesus did not believe in Him as stated in the gospel of John.

James did not believe in Him!

James is one of the 4 carpenters i,e. one of the horns spoken of in the book of Zechariah!

James is the brother of Barnabus (Joses)!

Both articles below and the links included within the articles include information about Nero/Barnabus/Luke and Paul/Saul!

Lust For Power

The Gospel of Luke – A Parody

The Synoptic “Q Source”

There is a world of difference between

the SYNoptic Jesus

and Jesus in the gospel of John!

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

Josephus and His Footprints

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

The Covenant with Many

Abomination of Desolation

many more posts …..

Merangue’s Blog

The Abomination of Desolation Part 2

The Christological Symbol (Brazen Serpent Sculpture), created by Italian artist, Giovanni Fantoni, stands atop Mount Nebo. It is symbolic of the bronze serpent created by Moses in the wilderness (Numbers 21:4-9) and the cross upon which Jesus was crucified (John 3:14).

Mount Nebo

According to the 2 Maccabees 2:4-7, the Prophet Jeremiah hid the tabernacle and the Ark of the Covenant here.

Recent history

Pope Benedict XVI visited the site on May 9, 2009, gave a speech, and looked out from the top of the mountain in the direction of Jerusalem.

ISRAEL: The pope’s gifts–taking stock

Significance to Christianity

“As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life“.^[11]

Hezekiah destroyed the brazen serpent, calling it Nehushtan, or “a lump of brass.” From this it was argued by some that rulers in Church and State have authority to prohibit, in the public worship of God, the use of things that have been abused to Idolatry. [1] But this likely falls short of the true significance of Hezekiah’s actions - the condemnation of idol worship that has replaced true worship. Conservative scholars note a similar episode in the life of Gideon ^[12] as a theological parallel. [2][3] The Apostle Paul condemns this principle of replacement in Romans 1.22-23, 25.

Nehushtan

The creation of a bronze snake (the Nehustan) is attributed to Moses in the Book of Numbers (Numbers 21:6).

The Talmud, Rosh Hashanah 29a, asserts that it was not the copper serpent that healed the Israelites, but it was their looking up and submitting themselves to God.

——————————————————-

Numbers 21:5-9

⁵And the people spake against God, and against Moses, Wherefore have ye brought us up out of Egypt to die in the wilderness? for there is no bread, neither is there any water; and our soul loatheth this light bread.

⁶And the LORD sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people; and much people of Israel died.

⁷Therefore the people came to Moses, and said, We have sinned, for we have spoken against the LORD, and against thee; pray unto the LORD, that he take away the serpents from us. And Moses prayed for the people.

⁸And the LORD said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a pole: and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall live.

⁹And Moses made a serpent of brass, and put it upon a pole, and it came to pass, that if a serpent had bitten any man, when he beheld the serpent of brass, he lived.

———————————————————————————–

2 Kings 18:4

⁴He removed the high places, and brake the images, and cut down the groves, and brake in pieces the brasen serpent that Moses had made: for unto those days the children of Israel did burn incense to it: and he called it Nehushtan.

————————————————————————————

Book of Zephaniah

Some scholars believe that much of the material does not date from the days of King Josiah (ca. 640-609 BC), but is actually post-monarchic. Three general possibilities are that a person, possibly named Zephaniah, prophesied the words of the book of Zephaniah; the general message of a Josianic prophet is conveyed through the book of Zephaniah; or the name could have been employed, either during the monarchic or post-monarchic period, as a ‘speaking voice’, possibly for rhetorical purposes. Although it is possible that a post-monarchic author assumed the persona of a monarchic prophet to add credibility to his message, there is no evidence to support such a claim.

Zephaniah

THE LINK PRECEDING states that Zephaniah the prophet of the Book of Zephaniah is the only prophet of the prophets in the OT that gives a partial genealogy of himself.

I wonder why Zephaniah would give his partial genealogy and what difference does it make? Why bother?

I looked up the gospel of Matthew to see if Hezekiah was part of the genealogy of Jesus that Matthew proposes in his gospel and it does include Hezekiah in the NIV and Ezekias in the KJV:

Matthew 1:9 NIV

⁹Uzziah the father of Jotham, Jotham the father of Ahaz, Ahaz the father of Hezekiah,

Matthew 1:9 KJV

⁹And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias;

I am assuming that Hezekiah and Ezekias are one and the same person, but I don’t know!

I believe that Zephaniah supports the Gospel of Matthew’s genealogy up to Hezekiah/Ezekias to support himself as a true prophet and the Gospel of Matthew is using the prophets book of Zephaniah (his genealogy) to support his claim to being the Messiah with the other two synoptic renditions of Jesus (Gospels of Mark and Luke) in collusion with the Q source, Paul, his family, followers and cohorts and Josephus Flavius son of Matthew (historian) and his account of history

to quell the truth about Jesus written about in the Gospel of John.

and I believe it is not by accident, but purposeful with the intent to deceive and promote a false Jesus. If you read my posts you will see lots and lots of examples to support my belief.

There is a world of difference between the Gospel of John and the other gospels and they should be examined carefully!

Daniel 7:25
And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.

I think history has been multiplied and divided to hide the prophetic events people are expecting to come that have already occurred and to confuse the masses about who Jesus was, when he came, and why he came. It is not a mistake or just differing viewpoints of that time that can explain the differences between the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John!

Josephus and the holy books of Jerusalem

Below is an article presented by ChristianAnswers with a listing of many prophecies about the identification of Jesus:

Messianic Prophecies

“More specificially, he would be of the house of David (2 Samuel 7:12-16; Jeremiah 23:5; Psalm 89:3-4). Fulfilled: See Christ’s genealogy in Matthew 1; Luke 1:27, 32, 69. Note: Since the the Jewish genealogical records were destroyed in 70 A.D., along with the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple, it would not be possible for a Messiah imposter who was born later to prove his lineage back to David and thus fulfill this prophecy.”

Do you think this may mean that there might actually have been a false Messiah that wants to replace the true Messiah back in those days?

It is no accident that the records were destroyed!

SO anyone that comes saying he is the Messiah in this present age OR IN THE PAST cannot possibly prove his IDENTIFICATION BY HIS GENEALOGY!

The messiah is supposed to come from the line of David, but if you recall one of David’s sons called Soloman had hundreds of wives!

I believe the Abomination of Desolation occurred then, but often times prophecies have a dual fulfillment and meaning so it could be possible that it will happen again. Also SOME FULFILLMENTs OF PROPHECIES ARE FALSE FULFILLMENTS CREATED AND IMPLEMENTED BY A FALSE PROPHET AND A FALSE MESSIAH TO PROVE THEIR FALSE ID-ENTITY AND FALSE PROPHECIES!

The gospels of Matthew and Luke WROTE that there was Desolation:

Matthew 23:38

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

Luke 13:35

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate: and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

DON’T YOU FIND THAT THESE STATEMENTS PROVE THAT AN ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION HAS ALREADY OCCURRED desolation for sure. AND BOTH THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW AND THE GOSPEL OF LUKE SEEM TO REFLECT THIS IN THESE STATEMENTS (ATTRIBUTED TO JESUS) ABOVE AND ALSO SEEM TO BE RELISHING IT!

THEY ARE TRYING TO SAY THAT THE MESSIAH HIMSELF SAYS THESE WORDS PROPHETICALLY IN THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW

YET, IF IT ALREADY HAPPENED

HOW IS THAT PROPHETIC?

IF A PROPHECY IS WRITTEN ABOUT THE PAST

SHOULDN’T IT BE CONSIDERED HISTORY

AND A FALSE PROPHECY!

If the Gospel of Matthew is looking back in history to make prophetic statements about things of the past (implying the desolation of Jerusalem and the Temple) obviously the genealogical records were  destroyed by the time the gospel of Matthew was completed then why bother adding genealogy of Jesus to his text? There is no way to prove or disprove his genealogy and the gospel writer of Matthew must realize this Catch-22.

It seems to me that the statements about

‘beholding their desolation’ etc.,

written by the false prophets and false shepherds/wolves

who wrote the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke

are the poison

that Jesus warns his disciples

about at the last supper

in the Gospel of John!

I believe that the story in Numbers 21:4-9 is a prophetic picture pointing us to what is written in the Gospel of John because Jesus knew what would be written about him in the other gospels. When a person discovers the lies in the Synoptic Gospels or discovers the contradictions in the bible. it can be disconcerting and take a person’s faith down a notch or two and for some can even make them lose faith totally in what is written. I have come often to different levels of despair about the contradictions because of what is written in the gospels, the OT,  and in the history information afforded us, but when I read the gospel of John and read about Jesus in most parts, it helps me to believe when I am at my lowest.

I honestly think the devil is in the details of the gospels! I think we have been robbed of so much by the powers in the church that supposedly protected the gospels. Nevertheless there are morsels left in the gospels to hold us over.

I have a hard time with people that say not to believe because there are contradictions. It is like saying there was never a temple because now there is a mosque sitting in the same spot. That’s ridiculous. Or when someone says that the holocaust did not occur. We luckily have photos to show the evidence of the holocaust which we did not have in the biblical days. The only way to keep the truth in the gospels was to allow the lies, otherwise all would have been lost. So when you find a contradiction in the bible and there are many, many of them, it is a good idea to do research in other books, gospels, anywhere that you can find information (and also pray) and eventually the truth will shine through the lies that have been sown purposefully to trip you up and wear you down.

They are the stones!

That’s why I believe that what happened to the Hebrews in Numbers was for this generation also to look past the lies and see!

Read the Gospel of John and learn it well and it will help to see more clearly.

As far as the Synoptic Gospels there are some outstanding parts that very well could be true, but mixed in are some parts that just do not measure up to the standards of reliability.

In many ways life itself is a contradiction. We are living in times that are very similar to the confusion that engulfed those days in Israel but we now have access to more information than ever before and we should take advantage of what we have been given to sort it out, so to speak.

There is no comparison to any other than who, what and why Jesus came!

Even if you have to read between the lines He is a miracle!

Abomination of Desolation: Part one

In The Garden of Gethsemane

The Covenant with Many

CONFIRMATION OF THE COVENANT

Salute No Man

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

==========================================