The Drawbridge

BIblical Controversies and Discord

Simon, Simon – Who is Simon’s Son? Part Two


John 19:25

Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother‘s sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene.

I cannot imagine that the mother of Jesus would be called the same name as her sister.

  Maybe that is why the punctuation mark (comma) was added later to clarify that Mary wife of Cleophas

was not the sister of Mary in the verse John 19:26 above.

But is that true?

Please read the post called:

The Mother of Jesus Christ: SHALOM!

=======================================

CLEOPHAS

======================================

Cleophas was one the two men walking on the road to Emmaus that said he saw Jesus Christ after He was risen as they walked 7 and a half miles from Emmaus, then ate with Jesus Christ then walked again 7 and a half miles in the same hour from Emmaus back to Jerusalem! CLEOPHAS and the other man met with the disciples behind closed doors and said they knew of them in breaking bread.

They must have been wearing Nike running shoes to be able to walk 7 and 1/2 miles one way chit chat and then eat and again walk 7 and 1/2 miles back in one hour!

Most people have a hard time jogging a 10 minute mile and that is on paved jogging tracks! Lets say they jogged a 10 minute mile that would make it 70 minutes one way and 70 minutes back again with a meal in between which adds up to over 140 minutes at the least which is 2 hours and 20 minutes at the least

and that is jogging in sandals?

Even then if this is an exaggeration of time why rush to get back to Jerusalem when they just got to Emmaus. The apostles were clustered behind closed doors for fear of the Jews, but these two men are trolluping between two cities fearlessly and able to find the house that these other chosen apostles are hiding in,

even though they did not know them, but knew of them in breaking bread!

Luke 24:33-35

33 And they rose up the same hour, and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven gathered together, and them that were with them, 34 Saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon. 35 And they told what things were done in the way, and how he was known of them in breaking of bread.

So Jesus appears to Simon before he appears to his chosen apostles because Luke says so,

even though he personally was not there!

Jesus waits for a person named Simon and a person named Cleophas

to show up again where the others (HIS CHOSEN APOSTLES) are gathered behind closed doors!

John does not mention that Cleophas and/or Simon came

or said that they had indeed “seen Jesus Christ risen”

…..and John was there!

Who is lying?

IF they did not know them before and had only heard of them “in breaking bread”,

how did they know where they were gathered behind closed doors?

I think Luke and his pals felt excluded and made up a story.

There is no substance to their story except to be included and be placed ahead of the apostles.

“Have ye any meat?” Just does not sound like Jesus of the gospel of John whatsoever. I don’t think they liked Jesus and I think they are mocking because what was written in the Gospel of John with Jesus and the woman at the well when he said

“my meat is to do the will of him who sent me.”

And since Luke and his pals disdain women I think they are mocking.

===================

John does mention the name Cleophas except once when he says that Cleophas’s wife Mary stood by the cross.

(which could have been added into scripture later…who knows?)

And then, Jesus asks for food again, even though he had already eaten that same hour with Cleophas and his friend!

Luke 24:41-43

41And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat?

42And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb.43And he took it, and did eat before them.

I guess Cleophas and his friend did not give Jesus big enough portions of food

because according to Luke, who was a follower and defender of Saul/ Paul

and who did not know Jesus Christ says that Jesus Christ asked for more food!

So they feed him again.

 

I guess Jesus Christ was house-hopping for meat?

But the gospel of John doesn’t say that Jesus asked for food!

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

What in the world does Luke mean by:

“And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered”

Luke has a way with words very similar to Saul/Paul when he explains the meaning of Amen

and when he is Cursing Anathema Maranatha!

Anyway that statement is perverted, inane and mocking.

Here is another way of putting it: 

And whileth ey yet believe d not forj oy, and won dered

 It makes about as much sense as the above version.

Please Read:

The Grace of Anathema Maranatha

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

It is established by Luke that either Cleophas is called SIMON

or the man that walked with him to Emmaus is called Simon!

Luke 24:34

34Saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon.

Cleophas (klē`ōfəs),

in the New Testament, husband of one of the Marys who stood at the foot of the Cross. This is apparently Mary the mother of St. James the Less, but the father of James the Less is Alphaeus. An explanation is that Cleophas is the Aramaic form and Alphaeus the Greek form of the same nameSome identify Cleopas with Cleophas.

========================================

Part 3

========================================

It is Simon’s son that is the betrayer!

In New Exhibit, Running Shoes Are Potent Symbol Of Boston Bombing

 

The Son of Simon Part Three (in revision)

————————————————————————–

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)


Other Blogs of Mine:

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon


Advertisements

June 25, 2010 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , | Leave a comment

How is it That Ye Do Not Understand?


MARK 8:13-21

13And he left them, and entering into the ship again departed to the other side.14Now the disciples had forgotten to take bread, neither had they in the ship with them more than one loaf.

15And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod.16And they reasoned among themselves, saying,

It is because we have no bread.

17And when Jesus knew it, he saith unto them, Why reason ye, because ye have no bread? perceive ye not yet, neither understand? have ye your heart yet hardened?18Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not?

and do ye not remember?19When I brake the five loaves among five thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up? They say unto him, Twelve.

20And when the seven among four thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up? And they said, Seven.

21And he said unto them,
How is it that ye do not understand?

======================

  E   I  E  I  O

======================

Someone please tell me what this means!

Is this a trick question?

I hate to sound mean but I think this rendition of Jesus sounds maniacal!

I’ll tell you the truth, I don’t and never have understood what the above means!

I have never perceived, understood, nor seen, neither remembered anyone that does get what the above means!

I don’t think it means anything!  Do you?

(For the longest time I thought this was a mathematical poser.)

The point is he doesn’t want you to understand. It is a mock of Jesus, his disciples, the miracle of feeding of the 5000 etc and

mocking the gospel of John!

————————————-

Lets take these verses a few at a time and figure out what the Synoptic Jesus is trying to swerve:

1)Did they have bread or not?
Obviously, they did have bread because verse 14 states that they had a loaf of bread! So someone is contradicting himself  just in the above verses! They must not have realized that they had bread, because they ask within themselves is it because we have no bread, when they had a loaf of bread.

2) Does the Synoptic Jesus know that they had a loaf of bread?

 Either the Synoptic Jesus doesn’t know that they had a loaf of bread, or he is lying and using his power of suggestion to make them think that they don’t have bread when in actuality they had a loaf of bread as verse 14 states. (If they had a loaf of bread on the ship….why didn’t the Synoptic Jesus know it? If the Synoptic Jesus knew that there was a loaf of bread on the ship why didn’t he just tell them that they had a loaf of bread on the ship?)

3) Is the Synoptic Jesus berating the disciples?

Definitely! The Synoptic Jesus is very good at creating chaos and confusion. He loves to make them look stupid and make himself look oh so smart when in reality he is crazy, but he is so crazy he doesn’t know that he is crazy. (Reminds me of OBAMA.) 

For if he were in his right mind he would say.

Hey guys, there is a loaf of bread on the ship as verse 14 states.

4)What does the leaven of the Pharisees and the leaven of Herod have to do with whether or not they had taken bread?

Nothing.  Just propaganda, I’m sure!  In these verses Jesus is saying to beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Herod and they say, Is it because we have no bread? when they did have bread.

It makes no sense! It is inane.

=============================================

The feeding of the four thousand is not in the gospel of John

and it is not in the Gospel of Luke.

—————————–

Diminishing Jesus written about in the Gospel of John

—————————–

John 6:51
I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

He is the bread that came down from Heaven. So either the Synoptic disciples did not believe that he was the living bread and did not believe the Gospel of John or the Synoptic Jesus forgot to tell them that he was the living bread or he did not know himself that he was the living bread,

or the Synoptic Gospels  are full of HOT AIR

otherwise they would make sense!

This is proof that the Synoptic Jesus is trying to confuse!

Since Jesus is the bread of life and he taught his disciples this concept

in the Gospel of John

why wouldn’t Jesus in the Gospel of Mark just remind them?

Because Jesus of the Gospel of Mark is not the same person

as Jesus of the Gospel of John.

============

Paul wrote 1Corinthians or so the scholars say:

1 Corinthians 2:9

But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.

Isaiah 64:4
For since the beginning of the world men have not heard, nor perceived by the ear, neither hath the eye seen, O God, beside thee, what he hath prepared for him that waiteth for him.

Compare to the verses in the Gospel of Mark:

17And when Jesus knew it, he saith unto them, Why reason ye, because ye have no bread? perceive ye not yet, neither understandhave ye your heart yet hardened?18Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not?

and do ye not remember?19When I brake the five loaves among five thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up? They say unto him, Twelve.

Did Paul write the Gospel of Mark and Isaiah or did he just add to them?

Maybe. Certainly “his own hand” is in them or someone at the very least that is imitating him.

Josephus Flavius admitted to stealing the Holy Books from the Temple

and took them to Rome of all places

maybe he did it.

==================================

How is it that ye do not understand?

The point is he doesn’t want them to understand!

But as usual he betrays himself: 

Paul was identified with being the Greek-speaking Egyptian that led 4000 murderers in the wilderness in the book of Acts.

Acts 21:38

Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar,

and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?

The point I’m making is that

 Paul is the Synoptic Jesus!

This is proof that the Synoptic Jesus is trying to confuse!

============================================

Megan Kelly of Fox News just said that two Senators now believe that the Sequester is responsible for the bomb blast at the Boston Marathon in Massachusetts which is absolutely ridiculous as is this post demonstrates.

Same kind of ridiculous and insane delusion.

It is not a coincidence that the Newtowners were at this event near where the explosions occurred. I would look into why they were put there and by whom, etc. There were bomb sniffing dogs around and they did not smell the bombs at the beginning of the race  in those areas so that ought to be a big clue.

I’m suspicious of drone usage and involvement.

If you watch drone attacks on line it could easily be altered to mimic a rough bomb

and it makes sense that it is.

Why?

Because the Obama administration said they would not use drone attacks on Americans on American soil.

This is more deadly distraction for Obama and his legion which is his M.O.

Now they have their sites on a bag in front of the fence line at the Marathon yet very few people were affected on that side of the fence line ie the runners. Obviously it was not that bag. On Sean Hannity of Fox News I watched some films as closely as I could (they are pretty quick films) and there was a hole made by something in the middle of the spectators area that was affected which is consistent with a drone strike but people overseas don’t lose their limbs when a drone strikes them, right? If it was in the trash can that was on the outside of the fence line it also would have affected the runners……doesn’t add up

and as far as Napolitan’s suggestion that there is no broader plot

….can you believe anything she says?

Isn’t she the lady lying about ammunition.

DHS excuses for buying so much ammo don’t add up

J. D. Heyes
Natural News

March 27, 2013

Just move along, folks. There’s nothing to see here.

That’s the attitude of the Department of Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano when it comes to scrutiny of her agency’s massive purchase requests for billions – that’s right, billions – of rounds of ammunition, along with 7,000 “personal defense weapons” (they would be called assault weapons if owned by private citizens), and 2,700 mine-resistant, ambush-protected (MRAP) armored vehicles of the type used to protect troops in Iraq and Afghanistan from improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

Which is what this explosive at the Marathon is being described as

is an IED.

Possibly this is about the Sequester in a perverted kind of way!’

Course the press won’t even question anyone about the difference of the appearance of the two men at Benghazi the one that they claim is Ambassador Chris Stevens and is not.

So I guess they would believe that a bag in front of the fence line that affected the people behind the fence line and not the ones in front of the fence line would be the incendiary bomb, because they have their thinking caps on.

Also a friend just mentioned to me that in the comparisons of the pictures of the bag in front of the fence line before and after the explosion one picture has a man hole cover and the other picture does not yet they are supposed to be of the same scene.

So to put it another way

they are lying.

SO if anyone ridicules the public for suspicion of conspiracy they are liars because obviously conspiracies have been occurring for a long time. Why in the world did the clergy not inform us of these contradictions in the bible? Why do they say that the gospels harmonize?

You can learn quite a bit from Walter Veith if interested in learning about the deception most of the world is mired in. I found his you tubes to be of great value and I hope if you want to start getting a real grasp of knowledge you might start there. There are many other sites with his works besides the following but this set of you tubes ought to help quite a bit.

He is prolific, entertaining, honest, and interesting:

Walter Veith: Total Onslaught Series

He is a former Catholic, a scientist, and a teacher:

Who is Walter Veith?

============================

Tell No Man

Salute No Man

Why Callest Thou Me Good?

 The Fig Tree – Blessed are the Barren

Folly of the Synoptic Gospels

America Land of the Nuns and Dishtowels

Other Blogs of Mine:

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon

June 19, 2010 Posted by | bible, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversies, BIBLE PROPHECY, Bread of Life, Consecration of the Bread, Feeding of the 4000, Feeding of the 5000, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Parables, Synoptic Gospels, The Antichrist, The Eucharist, The Gospels, The Monstrace, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Seven Mountains of Revelation


Revelation 17:9

9And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.

=====================

Here is another riddle in Revelation and I want to attempt to solve this problemo.

First of all, a woman is a church.

OBVIOUSLY, Rev. 17 is describing a false church.

The verse also says that the heads are seven mountains:

It is obvious—> the hills of Rome.

Seven hills of Rome

List of cities claimed to be built on seven hills

Thats a lot of cities!

To take this a step further

I think it is what this church stands upon spiritually

that are the seven mountains!


Seven Sacraments of the Roman Catholic  Church

Seven Deadly Sins which the above sacraments help to alleviate.

Sounds like the RCC ITself!

It’s a business, you see!

Talk about HYPOCRISY!

I’m sure I will be very unpopular for what is the obvious meaning of the above verse, but that’s life! I love the catholic friends I have known in my life, and always will, but it is what it is. and it is not my fault. What else could the above verse mean? The history of that church system proves itself. What else do you need?

Roman Catholicism is slavery!


They give a false remedy to sin

and lie to it’s own people

and they profit from it.


That is EVIL!

Indulgences, Tourism to every shrine made for every false sighting or revelation from Mary, Icons, Relics, Idols, books, and EUCHARIST WAFERS, and last, but not least,

the The Shroud of Turin!

More than likely involved in illegal banking practices! The Press! UNIONS! Education! Government!

(A self -fulfilling blob)

I think that is why it is referred to as THE BEAST!

The Mysterious Death of Pope John Paul I [A Treatise]

Isn’t that why one Pope got bumped off? He had the audacity to want to clean up the Vatican’s banking problems. He was known as the smiling Pope! He lasted a whole 30 days! He is the 5th Pope (#263) since the signing of the The Lateran Concordant!

Please read:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

The post linked above is about the prophecy in Revelation:

Revelation 17:11

And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

=====================================

Revelation 18:4
Then I heard another voice from heaven say: “Come out of her, my people, so that you will not share in her sins, so that you will not receive any of her plagues;

——————————————————

Other Blogs of Mine:

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon


June 19, 2010 Posted by | bible, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversies, BIBLE PROPHECY, Indulgences, POPE BENEDICT XVI, Roman Catholicism, The Antichrist, The Eucharist, The Monstrace, The Shroud of Turin, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Mount of the Congregation


Luke 22:28

Ye are they which have continued with me in my temptations.

Luke was the only gospel writer to include this statement

as being said by Jesus Christ at the Last Supper.

Luke was not at the Last Supper!

Where in the world did he get this from?

And who was doing the tempting?

Seems to me only the tempter and the accuser would know!

Luke 22:31

And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat:

This particular verse (or statement or anything resembling it)

is not in the Gospel of John, neither the Gospel of Mark, nor the Gospel of Matthew.

I ask again….where did it come from?

How would Luke know what Satan desires, unless he is Satan?

REMEMBER

LUKE WAS NOT AN APOSTLE!

HE WAS NOT AT THE LAST SUPPER!

HE DID NOT EVEN KNOW JESUS CHRIST!

Luke 22:32

But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.

The same thing goes for this particular verse.

THE BRETHREN ARE PAUL AND LUKE!

I believe that Luke is making this up for the benefit of Paul and himself.

Isaiah 14:12-13

How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!13For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God:

I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

NEOCATECHUMENAL WAY OPENS A CHAPEL ON THE MOUNT

 

—————————————————–

Other Blogs of Mine:

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon

June 19, 2010 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

In The Garden of Gethsemane


Part one: The Prayers in the Garden

Matthew 26:36-46

36Then cometh Jesus with them unto a place called Gethsemane, and saith unto the disciples, Sit ye here, while I go and pray yonder.37And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy.38Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me.

Mark 14:32-34

32And they came to a place which was named Gethsemane: and he saith to his disciples, Sit ye here, while I shall pray.33And he taketh with him Peter and James and John, and began to be sore amazed, and to be very heavy;34And saith unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful unto death: tarry ye here, and watch.

Both Matthew and Mark say essentially the same thing!

Luke 22:35-40

35And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing? And they said, Nothing.36Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

The reason for the contradiction is he has to lay the guilt of the arrest of Jesus Christ on Jesus Christ himself : for sedition

Jesus Christ did not tell his disciples to buy a sword!

And Luke was not a disciple of Jesus Christ and was not present in the garden to know what Jesus said and has come up with this story out of thin air!

37For I say unto you, that this that is written must yet be accomplished in me, And he was reckoned (weighed) among the transgressors:

for the things concerning me have an end.

38And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords.

And he said unto them,

It is enough.

This is a parady of the last words Jesus said before he died when He said:

It is finished.

By the way, the things concerning Jesus of Nazareth do not have an end!

It is only wishful thinking outloud from Luke the follower of Saul/Paul and their “way”  which looks more and more like they are against the truth and they are the ones that weigh us.

The apostles of the false Christ from the Land of Synopsia

use their swords to slice and dice men, 

Jesus of Nazareth and his chosen apostles!

They are antithetical in their three gospels

and other books in the New Testament about

Jesus Christ in the gospel of John!

39And he came out, and went, as he was wont, to the mount of Olives; and his disciples also followed him.40And when he was at the place, he said unto them,

Pray that ye enter not into temptation.

Just out of nowhere Jesus says: Pray that ye enter not into temptation.

Again, making Jesus sound really weird!

================

Prayer Number One

================

Matthew 26:39-41

39And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt.40And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them asleep, and saith unto Peter, What, could ye not watch with me one hour?41Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.

Mark 14:35-38

35And he went forward a little, and fell on the ground, and prayed that, if it were possible, the hour might pass from him.36And he said, Abba, Father, all things are possible unto thee; take away this cup from me: nevertheless not what I will, but what thou wilt.37And he cometh, and findeth them sleeping, and saith unto Peter, Simon, sleepest thou? couldest not thou watch one hour?38Watch ye and pray, lest ye enter into temptation. The spirit truly is ready, but the flesh is weak.

Luke 22:41-46

41And he was withdrawn from them about a stone’s cast, and kneeled down, and prayed,42Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done.43And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, strengthening him.44And being in an agony he prayed more earnestly: and his sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground.45And when he rose up from prayer, and was come to his disciples, he found them sleeping for sorrow,46And said unto them, Why sleep ye? rise and pray, lest ye enter into temptation.

It is hard to enter into temptation when asleep and besides they were not asleep as the gospel of John tells.

Why in the world would they be sleeping in a garden in Gethsamane with their two swords that they armed themselves with before entering the garden anyway

(as Luke says earlier).

This is so ridiculous and fakey!

Luke says an angel appeared unto him from heaven to strengthen Jesus, but the other two synoptic gospels (Matthew and Mark) do NOT mention an angel. 

As I said a while ago, Luke was not there, so the angel comes from his own imagination!

==================

Prayer Number Two

==================

Matthew 26:42-43

42He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done.43And he came and found them asleep again: for their eyes were heavy.

Mark 14:39-40

39And again he went away, and prayed, and spake the same words.40And when he returned, he found them asleep again, (for their eyes were heavy,) neither wist they what to answer him.

Both Matthew and Mark say that Jesus went back a second time to pray for the cup to pass away from him! But in the gospel of John when Jesus was in Jerusalem for the Jewish Feast and he says:

John 12:27

27Now is my soul troubled; and what shall I say? Father, save me from this hour: but for this cause came I unto this hour.

Jesus was not trying to escape the reason he came!

He is telling us in John 12:27 that others will say that he asks to be saved from this hour are not witnesses! All three synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) are agreed in this representation and have obviously misplaced this quote to another event and placed it in the garden and it has something to do with the Covenant with Many made in their rendition of the “Last Supper.” John does not include the Covenant with Many made in the Last Supper about drinking the fruit of the vine until the Kingdom of God has come.

Must be that the mysterious “Q” source told them to say it.

The Synoptic “Q Source”

I don’t believe the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) of what happened in the garden, because Jesus said that was why he came to this hour was to glorify the name of God. Which he did at the feast in Jerusalem:

John 12:28

28Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again.

==================

Prayer Number Three

==================

Matthew 26:44-46

44And he left them, and went away again, and prayed the third time, saying the same words 45Then cometh he to his disciples, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest: behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners. 46Rise, let us be going: behold, he is at hand that doth betray me.

Mark 14:41-42

41And he cometh the third time, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest: it is enough, the hour is come; behold, the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners.42Rise up, let us go; lo, he that betrayeth me is at hand.

Both Matthew and Mark say that Jesus tells his disciples to sleep on and then tells them to rise.  They should have asked him “what do you want us to do? Sleep or rise?”

They make Jesus sound skitszoid!

Luke has no more to say about when Jesus prayed in the garden. Matthew says Jesus prayed a second time and a third time for the cup to pass from him. Mark only says he prayed a second time and a third time all the while the disciples were asleep. Does that include Mark? If he was asleep, how would he know? Luke doesn’t mention a second and a third prayer time. And to top it off……they were not there!

All verses are pretty similar but in Matthew Jesus fell on his face, and in Mark Jesus fell on the ground and in Luke Jesus kneels down to pray. Luke, who adds an angel, agony, and great drops of  sweat. Of course, they are all asleep so how would he know of the angel and drops of blood-like sweat and the agony. If Jesus was doing this would not that wake up the disciples, but they were asleep. I imagine if there were an angel visibly there they would be wide awake, but they were asleep.

Does not make sense! 

All three of the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke say that Jesus is praying for the cup to be taken from him, but in the gospel of John this does not happen at all, in fact, Jesus had already prayed (chapter 17 Gospel of John) at the site of the Last Supper. We know Luke was not there, Mark was not there, and Matthew was not there since they missed out on the dialogue at the Last Supper and the prayer.

Jesus was not asking for the cup to be taken from him in the prayer at the Last Supper. John mentions no prayer at the garden but, of course, John and Peter and whoever was in the garden were supposed to be sleeping. Jesus knew what was going to happen. He is the spirit of prophecy as he says in Revelation.

Why do these other three gospels add this blarney when they were not there at the garden or the supper?

I like Shakespeare, but this is ridiculous.

================================

Part Two: The Kiss and the Arrest

=============================

Matthew 26:47-48

47And while he yet spake, lo, Judas, one of the twelve, came,

and with him a great multitude with swords and staves,

from the chief priests and elders of the people

.48Now he that betrayed him gave them a sign, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he: hold him fast.49And forthwith he came to Jesus, and said, Hail, master; and kissed him.

Sounds like Judas was Roman!

Mark 14:43-44

43And immediately, while he yet spake, cometh Judas, one of the twelve, and with him a great multitude with swords and staves, from the chief priests and the scribes and the elders.44And he that betrayed him had given them a token, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he; take him, and lead him away safely.45And as soon as he was come, he goeth straightway to him, and saith, Master, master; and kissed him.

How would Mark know what Judas said? Mark says that Judas says to lead him away safely and Matthew says: hold him fast after Judas kisses Jesus!

Matthew says Judas says Hail Master and Mark says Judas says Master, master.

Luke 22:47-48

47And while he yet spake, behold a multitude, and he that was called Judas, one of the twelve, went before them, and drew near unto Jesus to kiss him.48But Jesus said unto him, Judas, betrayest thou the Son of man with a kiss?

That is what Matthew, Mark and Luke seem to be saying is that Judas betrays Jesus with a kiss! Jesus already knew Judas was going to betray him. He said it a bunch at dinner and in the gospel of Matthew 3 times before that. It wasn’t as if Jesus did not know that Judas was going to betray him! This kiss business is so contrived! Jesus knew who would betray him way before the betrayer knew. He also knew if he would kiss him or not and Jesus never prophecies a kiss from the betrayer.  HMMMMMM!

Why not?

I guess the authors of Matthew, Mark and Luke forgot to do that!

THE “Q” SOURCE FORGOT TO TELL MATTHEW, MARK AND LUKE.

Please read my post that I have linked:

An Holy Kiss

They betray themselves with their sign: an holy kiss!

Wasn’t it the Synoptic gospels

that said no sign would be given?

Well let’s check:

Matthew 16:3
And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowering. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?

Matthew 16:4
A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.

Mark 8:12
And he sighed deeply in his spirit, and saith, Why doth this generation seek after a sign? verily I say unto you, There shall no sign be given unto this generation.

Luke 2:12
And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger.

Luke 2:34
And Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against;

Luke 11:29
And when the people were gathered thick together, he began to say, This is an evil generation: they seek a sign; and there shall no sign be given it, but the sign of Jonas the prophet.

Luke 11:30
For as Jonas was a sign unto the Ninevites, so shall also the Son of man be to this generation.

So was the sign of the kiss from Judas in the Garden

the same sign as the sign of the prophet Jonas?

Was the sign of the prophet Jonas the sign of

the baby Jesus in swaddling clothes in a manger?

The Synoptic Gospels are a mess!

=========================

Part Three:  One of Them That Smote the Ear

=======================

Matthew 26:50-51

50And Jesus said unto him, Friend, wherefore art thou come? Then came they, and laid hands on Jesus and took him.51And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest’s, and smote off his ear.

Mark 14:46-47

46And they laid their hands on him, and took him.47And one of them that stood by drew a sword, and smote a servant of the high priest, and cut off his ear.

Luke 22:49-51

49When they which were about him saw what would follow, they said unto him, Lord, shall we smite with the sword?50And one of them smote the servant of the high priest, and cut off his right ear.51And Jesus answered and said, Suffer ye thus far. And he touched his ear, and healed him.

Luke set this up earlier in his gospel when he said that Jesus told his disciples to buy a sword, so I’m surprised he doesn’t say who it is that smote the ear! But he does say that they asked whether they shall smite with the sword.

This is so unreal!

All three synoptic gospels say it was one of them that smote the ear, so I guess they don’t know which one of them it is!

Doesn’t sound like they are in the know!

Only the gospel of Luke says that Jesus healed the ear.

Luke wasn’t there!

He doesn’t know who smote the ear, but he knows Jesus healed the ear yet no one else notices Jesus healing the ear.

Perhaps Luke or Paul is Malchus?

In depictions of Paul there is always one ear missing or a covering of one ear. ( At least that is what I have noticed IN MY STUDIES AND EXPLORATION.)

Sounds an awful lot like Jackie Kennedy’s amnesia of leaping to the trunk of the car, but knowing why she did. To get brain parts when in actuality it looks an awful lot like a hard tube rolling, Maybe caps from a weapon? Not to mention failing to tell about the puppet she received over the fence line at the airport 1/2 hour before the assassination of JFK, but musing as to why someone would give her red roses as she arrived in Dallas. What is so odd about receiving red roses? Jackie Kennedy had lots of selective memories!   Back to the Gospel of Matthew:

Matthew 26:52-54

52Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.53Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?54But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be?

Legion is a roman military term!

Only the three synoptic gospels speak about legion and legions, but mostly in reference to demons! Here is a post about Legions and demons:

Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised

Part Four:  Disciples Forsook Him


Matthew 26:55-56

55In that same hour said Jesus to the multitudes, Are ye come out as against a thief with swords and staves for to take me? I sat daily with you teaching in the temple, and ye laid no hold on me.56But all this was done, that the scriptures of the prophets might be fulfilled.Then all the disciples forsook him, and fled.

Of course thats what they were doing, and Jesus knew it! Why did Jesus ask when he already knew that they came out as against a thief with swords and staves to take him?

Again, the synoptic gospels have made nonsense of the truth and betray themselves!

Mark 14:48-52

48And Jesus answered and said unto them, Are ye come out, as against a thief, with swords and with staves to take me?49I was daily with you in the temple teaching, and ye took me not: but the scriptures must be fulfilled.50And they all forsook him, and fled.

51And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:52And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.

This is a very strange addition to the story! I really don’t understand the meaning of it,

but I am sure the intent to deceive is written all over it!

Kind of makes me think of the Shroud of Turin!

Luke 22:52-53

52Then Jesus said unto the chief priests, and captains of the temple, and the elders, which were come to him, Be ye come out, as against a thief, with swords and staves?53When I was daily with you in the temple, ye stretched forth no hands against me: but this is your hour, and the power of darkness.

Part Five:  Peter Follows

Matthew 26:57-58

57And they that had laid hold on Jesus led him away to Caiaphas the high priest, where the scribes and the elders were assembled.58But Peter followed him afar off unto the high priest’s palace, and went in, and sat with the servants, to see the end.

Mark 14:53-54

53And they led Jesus away to the high priest: and with him were assembled all the chief priests and the elders and the scribes.54And Peter followed him afar off, even into the palace of the high priest: and he sat with the servants, and warmed himself at the fire.

Luke 22:54

54Then took they him, and led him, and brought him into the high priest’s house. And Peter followed afar off.

Looks like not all of the disciples fled or forsook Jesus as Matthew and Mark suggest in the section above! Matthew says Peter followed to see the end which is kind of suggesting that Peter was looking forward to this end. Luke seems to suggest that because of the “buying a sword tale” that the true Jesus Christ was the wolf that scatters the sheep only to cover up who the real wolf is!

This post tells who are the wolves in sheep’s clothing:

Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised

==============================


Part Six:  According to the Gospel of John


John 18:1-12

1When Jesus had spoken these words, he went forth with his disciples over the brook Cedron, where was a garden, into the which he entered, and his disciples.2And Judas also, which betrayed him, knew the place: for Jesus ofttimes resorted thither with his disciples.3Judas then, having received a band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons.4Jesus therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye?5They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them.6As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground.7Then asked he them again, Whom seek ye? And they said, Jesus of Nazareth.8Jesus answered, I have told you that I am he: if therefore ye seek me, let these go their way:9That the saying might be fulfilled, which he spake, Of them which thou gavest me have I lost none.10Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest’s servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant’s name was Malchus.11Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath:

the cup

which my Father hath given me,

shall I not drink it?

12Then the band and the captain and officers of the Jews took Jesus, and bound him,

Peter was the ONE OF THEM that smote the ear!

The man that had his ear whacked was Malchus!

images

NSA collecting phone records of millions of Verizon customers daily

Jesus went forth to the garden to meet the band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, and also Judas.

He did not try to escape! He deliberately met the multitude!

He asked that his disciples be allowed to go their way!

They did not forsake him!

He did what He had purposed to do!

The Crucifixion

John 19:29-30

29Now there was set a vessel full of vinegar:

and they filled a spunge with vinegar, and put it upon hyssop, and put it to his mouth.

30When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished:

and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.

———————————————————-

The Covenant in Blood

I wonder why the three Synoptic Gospel have a a covenant for the many at the Last Supper,

but not in the Gospel of John.

Seems to me that the Gospel of John would include this covenant made with the many?

Matthew 26:26-28

26And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body.27And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;28For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

Mark 14:22-25

22And as they did eat, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is my body.23And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it.24And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.25Verily I say unto you, I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, until that day that I drink it new in the kingdom of God.

Luke 22:20

20Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.

It is written as “covenant” instead of “testament” in the NIV and many other versions of the bible.

Definition of TESTAMENT

1
a archaic : a covenant between God and the human raceb capitalized : either of two main divisions of the Bible
2
a : a tangible proof or tributeb : an expression of conviction : creed
3
a : an act by which a person determines the disposition of his or her property after deathb : will
— tes·ta·men·ta·ry adjective
=========================================================

Daniel 9:27
And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

So what is Paul saying below?

I have a hard time with Paul and understanding where he is coming from because he seems most of the time to digress/swerve often!

Galatians 3:15-17
15Brethren, I speak after the manner of men;

Though it be but a man’s covenant,

yet if it be confirmed,

no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.

16Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.

17

And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

Daniel 9:27 (New International Version)

27 He will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven.’ [a] In the middle of the ‘seven’ [b] he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on a wing of the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him.

Confirmation of the Covenant: Who is “He”?

Sour Wine

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon


June 18, 2010 Posted by | bible, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversies, BIBLE PROPHECY, Bread of Life, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, In The Garden of Gethsemane, Parables, Synoptic Gospels, The Antichrist, The Gospels, The Shroud of Turin | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

ABOMINATION THAT MAKETH DESOLATE


Today I read an article:

What Is the “Abomination of Desolation”?

The article submitted by The Restored Church of God (RCG Organization) above did not surprise me because I have heard the same description about the abomination of desolation for many years in hundreds (if not thousands) of articles on the internet and all of them seem to be basically alike.

What gets me is why did not the rendition of Jesus in the

Gospel of Matthew get more specific about the future: like saying that people will be flying in airplanes and driving cars? Wouldn’t Jesus have thought that would help us to know that these are the end times? Wouldn’t he want us to know this? How about space travel? And internet communication? What about Haarp and weather manipulation? Mind control?  WWI and WWII where millions of people are slaughtered in ovens and gas chambers? How about the unknown continent of America?

IT is as if he does not know! Just gives vague prophecies of little value!

How convenient!

Matthew 24:41

41Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

He talks about two women grinding at the mill, granted women still do that in places like Africa. Seems odd he would leave out so much detail and is so vague about the signs except for the signs that happened in the tumultuous years of the destruction of Jerusalem and Rome. IN fact he says:

Matthew 24:19

19And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!

Well, just so happens Josephus mentions in his writings about some of the same things written about in the Gospel of Matthew.

….

It seems as if the vision of Matthew is a bit short sighted!

As if he could only see what was to be in the future by looking back!

The Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke and Acts and many of the other epistles all seem to weave a nice basket that Josephus backs with his prophecies that as far as I can tell he saw in the future behind him as well!

SEQUENCE OF EVENTS IS IMPORTANT IN SORTING OUT THE TRUTH!

PLEASE READ:

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

The Gospel of Matthew rendition of Jesus appears to be a false prophet he warned of when he said:

Matthew 24:3

3And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?

Matthew 24:4

4And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you

nomen

noun \ˈnō-mən\plural no·mi·na

: the second of the three usual names of an ancient Roman male — compare cognomenpraenomen

Kind of a play on words!

Interesting site: Nomen

Matthew 24:35

35Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.

Seems to me many of his words did pass away by his nomen!

Matthew 24:22

22And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened.

Who is Matthew’s Jesus speaking about when he says the elect?

And the flesh is the word and very little of it survived!

Matthew 23:26-39

36Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.

Yea because it had already happened by the time Matthew (author of Matthew) wrote this particular verse!

37O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

With a little help from their friends!

38Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

How thoughtful and kind. This person acting in the name of Jesus is pretending he cares as he is rubbing their nose in the dirt.

39For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

This person is not the Son of God that is in the Gospel of John!

Because in the Gospel of John they greet Jesus with those same words after he had raised Lazerus from the dead in Bethany as he entered Jerusalem on the colt of an ass for the Jewish feast when the Chief Priests freaked out about how the people were following him and preceeded to entrap the real Jesus. (The one that came to glorify the name of His Father and not just himself!!!! ) The Messiah did not come to crucify Israel either. Pope Benedict was welcomed by those same words by Perez in Israel at the airport when he visited and also toured the Dome of the Rock. (although the film was edited and over-dubbed since then. I heard it and that is what alarmed me. Why was it altered if it wasn’t indicative of deception.)

John 12:12-13 King James Version

12On the next day much people that were come to the feast, when they heard that Jesus was coming to Jerusalem,

13Took branches of palm trees, and went forth to meet him, and cried, Hosanna: Blessed is the King of Israel that cometh in the name of the Lord.

John 12:12-13 New International Version

12The next day the great crowd that had come for the Feast heard that Jesus was on his way to Jerusalem. 13They took palm branches and went out to meet him, shouting,
“Hosanna![c]
“Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!”[d] 
“Blessed is the King of Israel!” 14Jesus found a young donkey and sat upon it, as it is written,

Funny, I recall that what is written in the NIV is what was said in KJV, but isn’t.


38Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

Sounds like he relishes this desolation and I don’t buy that the Messiah would say that!

Important to observe that Jerusalem was not desolate at that time….

not yet.

Odd discrepancy if you ask me!

I guess the author of the gospel of Matthew had NOT counted on the the survival of the written account given about the true Son of God in the Gospel of John!

Timing is very important!

When Pope Benedict went to Jerusalem in May of 2008 He was greeted by Shimon Perez at the airport and I saw the video clip where Shimon Perez said “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.”

Obama: Only Thing Keeping GOP Together Is Its Love Of Helping Rich People

Obama: Only Thing Keeping GOP Together Is Its Love Of Helping Rich People
 Look Who’s Coming For Dinner in Israel
You don’t have to allow him in! He certainly won’t be serving. He is relishing his job.
———————————————————

IT disappeared quickly!!!!

I think that Pope Benedict is the Synoptic version of Jesus in the bible ie a false ‘made up’ rendition of Jesus…..more like Josephus Flavius!

The problem with everyone trying to decipher the meaning of what is written about Jesus is that there is a difference between the Son of Man and the Son of God. One of them has a kingdom now on earth and then the true Son of God’s kingdom is not of this world and He is the true Messiah!

A lot of people were named Jesus back in those days.

A lot of people were named Simon

and Joseph and Matthew, etc.

A lot of people called all kinds of things God!

The Gospel of John and the Synoptic Gospels are talking about two different people.

The Gospel of John seems to be an eyewitness account from the inside. The Synoptic Gospels seem to be a distant, fragmented, corrupted, confused account and very antithetical to the Gospel of John (I believe on purpose) to deceive the readers about who is the true Messiah. There is a huge difference in the personality, character and message portrayed of the Messiah in the Gospel of John and the Synoptic Gospels and they cannot be the same person. Jesus seems to be apolitical in the gospel of John and very political in the synoptic renditions.

The false synoptic versions of the account of the Son of God is the Great Deception!

You cannot combine the Gospel of John with the Synoptic Gospels and say they match, because they don’t.

They are so opposite and they collide!

Everyone needs to remember that there was a war in Heaven and a third of the angels fell! They want to deceive men about God and His Son!

Why? Because they hate God and His Son and they hate all men and women!

Not just the Jews, not just the Christians, and not just Arabs, etc!

Matthew 10:22
And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved.

Mark 13:13
And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake: but he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.

Luke 21:17
And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake.

I put in the search on the online bible “hated of all men”and the Synoptic Gospels are the only ones that have this same saying. (Matthew 10:22Mark 13:13Luke 21:17)

I suspect that the Synoptic Jesus was hoping that this would be true and more than likely wants to pick and choose his favorites to endure while turning each faction he invented against each other to confuse us so that we don’t know who the real enemy is. It is a trick of the devil.

I don’t consider these duplicate verses very much of a prophecy

(Mark 13:13 Matthew 10:22).

Whoever survives will survive. I guess he needed to point out the obvious! Maybe because the Synoptic Jesus needs and loves martyrs! Notice that there aren’t very many martyrs in the Vatican. Those are the guys that get to endure for the Synoptic Messiah.

Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised

The Synoptic Jesus is a very mixed up Messiah!

Maybe “all men” has another meaning!

WHEN ALL MEANS FAIL by Rev. David Wilkerson

Please read the following article which I believe exposes the enemy:

Rev. Wilkerson, Evangelicalism and the Covenant With Many

Aulus

Could this rendition of Jesus be the Abomination of Desolation. He sure seems to gloat about their demise!


Daniel 11:45 (King James Version)

45And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him.

Love how words that never pass away seem to be doing just that.  Compare the same verse in New International Version:

Daniel 11:45 (New International Version)

45 He will pitch his royal tents between the seas at [a] the beautiful holy mountain. Yet he will come to his end, and no one will help him.

Pope Benedict delivered a tabernacle:

Pope Benedict XVI Blesses Magdala Center Cornerstone

“Duc in altum – Put out into the deep”

Im no prophet, but sure seems coincidental ….

Yet it very well could mean absolutely nothing!

I think the Abomination of Desolation happened already

and we are still enduring it!

Matthew 24

After reading Matthew 24

I get the feeling

MATTHEW got up on the wrong side of the bed.

Bed bugs: stronger, tougher, and harder to kill than ever

Joint Statement on Bed Bug Control in the United States from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

===========

Abomination of Desolation Pt 2

Here is an article somewhat related by Sola Dei Gloria with different conclusions: Flavius Josephus and the Apocalypse of John

Blogs about Flavius Josephus

in other words

the False Messiah:

Josephus and His Footprints

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

The Covenant with Many

The Synoptic “Q Source”

Pope Benedict XVI and His Power of Suggestion (aka Joseph Ratzinger)


June 15, 2010 Posted by | bible, Bible Controversies, BIBLE PROPHECY, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Indulgences, POPE BENEDICT XVI, Synoptic Gospels, THE ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION, The Antichrist, The Eucharist, The Gospels, The Monstrace, The Shroud of Turin, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pope Delivers Tabernacles- Daniel 11:45


COULD THESE BE THE TABERNACLES SPOKEN OF IN THE BOOK OF DANIEL?

Daniel 11:45

And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him.

In May of 2009, Pope Benedict delivered a tabernacle to Notre Dame in Jerusalem. Please watch that link!  Quite interesting!!!!!!  The tabernacle he delivered was a little box? The Pope also blessed the cornerstone of the Magdala Center. Could that be considered a tabernacle, along with Notre Dame, and the little box (shrine, I guess) that he delivered to the Center of Notre Dame?

The verse in Daniel doesn’t mention just one tabernacle, but tabernacles…..plural!

ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc

Definition of Tabernacle

1. often Tabernacle The portable sanctuary in which the Jews carried the Ark of the Covenant through the desert.

2. often Tabernacle A case or box on a church altar containing the consecrated host and wine of the Eucharist.

3. A place of worship.

4. A niche for a statue or relic.

5. Nautical A boxlike support in which the heel of a mast is stepped.

June 15, 2010 Posted by | Bible Controversies, BIBLE PROPHECY, Book of Daniel, POPE BENEDICT XVI, Synoptic Gospels, The Antichrist, The Eucharist, The Gospels, The Monstrace, Uncategorized | , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Temptation of Jesus Christ – revised


Right after Jesus is baptized by John the Baptist, the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke tell the story of Jesus being led into the wilderness for 40 days fasting and being tempted by Satan,

yet the gospel of John says nothing about 40 days ritual in the wilderness hanging out with the devil!

Lets compare the gospels that do include this story

Matthew 4:1-2

1Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil.2And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he was afterward an hungred.

Mark1:12

12And immediately the spirit driveth him into the wilderness.13And he was there in the wilderness forty days, tempted of Satan; and was with the wild beasts; and the angels ministered unto him.

Luke 4:1

1And Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness,2Being forty days tempted of the devil. And in those days he did eat nothing: and when they were ended, he afterward hungered.

——————————————————-

Why would the Spirit drive Jesus Christ into the wilderness to be tempted for 40 days?

What Spirit are we talking about?

Is fasting and temptation by the devil for 40 days a prerequisite for proof that Jesus Christ is righteous enough to be the Son of God?

I don’t believe this is true.

I think this fast and the temptations was included in the Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke to deceive!

Luke DOES NOT include that the angels ministered unto him! Why not?

Wasn’t it written (in the gospel of Matthew and Mark)?

Did he not hear, nor see, and neither perceive what was written in the gospel of Matthew and Mark?

Mark does not include the three temptations that are in the gospels of Matthew and Luke!

——————————————————–

Matthew 4:3

3And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread.4But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.

Luke says this stone, Matthew says these stones!

Luke 4:3-4

3And the devil said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, command this stone that it be made bread.4And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God

Where in the bible is:

“IT is Written” that man shall not live by bread alone but in the gospel of Matthew for Luke and in the gospel of Luke for Matthew!

They only support each other……wow thats really mysterious

———————————————–

Matthew 4:5-7

5Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple,6And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.7Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God

This is referring to Psalm 91 but taken totally out of context and to whom it was written about!

Either Matthew is mixed up, or Luke is mixed up as to the order of temptations!

Were they there in the wilderness with Jesus Christ in his temptations?

No!

How would they know whether Jesus was tempted by the devil?

They didn’t even know Jesus Christ!

Luke 4:5-8

5And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.6And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.7If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.8And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.

Obviously, Luke is referring to what the gospel of Matthew and the gospel of Mark say that Jesus Christ said to Peter, but this is not in the gospel of John!

Matthew 16:23
But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

Mark 8:33
But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.

Sounds like Obama’s leadership.

Leading from behind.

—————————————————–

Matthew 4:8-10

8Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;9And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.10Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.

Either Matthew is mixed up, or Luke is mixed up as to the order of temptations!

Who is telling the truth? Matthew or Luke?

Were they in the wilderness with Jesus Christ?

We know that Luke did not know Jesus Christ but was a companion to Saul/Paul of Tarsus!

Was Matthew with Jesus Christ in the wilderness to know what the devil tempted, and in what order?

Luke 4:9-12

9And he brought him to Jerusalem, and set him on a pinnacle of the temple, and said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down from hence:10For it is written, He shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee:11And in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.12And Jesus answering said unto him, It is said, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.

Were they there in the wilderness with Jesus Christ?

Did Luke know Jesus Christ? Obviously not. He never met him!

————————————————

Matthew 4:11

11Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him.

Luke 4:13

13And when the devil had ended all the temptation, he departed from him for a season.

————————————————

At the Same Time that Jesus Christ

(in the gospels Matthew, Mark and Luke)

is in the wilderness being tempted by the devil

Jesus Christ

(in the gospel of John)

attends a wedding in Cana

with his disciples and his mother.

As all of my articles have said: Matthew, Mark and Luke were not of the chosen apostles and were not witnesses and were not there.

Luke 22:28-29

28Ye are they which have continued with me in my temptations.29And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me;

I think Luke is talking about the kingdom of this world and a false Jesus Christ!

And to add insult to injury talking to Paul:

Acts 21:38
Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?

———————————————————-

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *


Other Blogs of Mine:

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon

June 15, 2010 Posted by | bible, Bible Controversies, Bread of Life, Consecration of the Bread, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Synoptic Gospels, The Eucharist, The Gospels, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

JAMES AND JOHN ZEBEDEE


Boanerges (sons of thunder). A name given to James and John, the sons of Zebedee, because they wanted to call down “fire from heaven” to consume the Samaritans for not “receiving” the Lord Jesus.

The Gospel of John does not say that James and John were given the name Boanerges!

Why? I think they were named Boanerges by the deceiver/deceivers that wrote the Synoptic Gospels (the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke)!

Please read the link below:

The Grace of Anathema Maranatha

IN the book of Acts, Saul and Barnabus are on a “ministry” that coincides with the death of James, the imprisonment of Peter when Peter goes to another place, the death of Herod when he is eaten by worms and they take John surnamed Mark with them after their “ministry” is completed. What in the world was their “ministry”?

Then Saul metamorphosizes into Paul!

This post is about the tearing down of the character of James and John Zebedee. There was a reason for the synoptic gospels to include these personal attacks on these two brothers. I believe the reason for the attacks on John and James is because the Gospel of John tells about the true Jesus Christ and the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) are trying to deceive us and sell us a false rendition of Jesus Christ and his disciples!

In the gospel of Mark, Jesus is explaining to his disciples what was to befall Him very shortly and James and John come to him:

Mark 10:33-34

33Saying, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be delivered unto the chief priests, and unto the scribes; and they shall condemn him to death, and shall deliver him to the Gentiles:34And they shall mock him, and shall scourge him, and shall spit upon him, and shall kill him: and the third day he shall rise again.

Mark 10:35

35And James and John, the sons of Zebedee, come unto him, saying, Master, we would that thou shouldest do for us whatsoever we shall desire.

Let’s get real! Does this sound normal?

This is absurd that James and John would respond this way to what Jesus was telling them at that time, according to the gospel of Mark.

Isn’t it odd that Matthew’s gospel doesn’t mention that James and John say: Master we would that thou shouldest do for us whatsoever we shall desire?

But maybe even to the writer of the gospel of Matthew realized how fakey this sounds!

————————————————-

Matthew 20:20-21

20Then came to him the mother of Zebedees children with her sons, worshipping him, and desiring a certain thing of him.21And he said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that these my two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on the left, in thy kingdom.

And another anomaly is that in the gospel of Matthew it is the mother of James and John that requests that her two sons sit at the right and left, yet in the gospel of Mark it is  James and John that ask to sit on his left and right!

Mark 10:36-39

36And he said unto them, What would ye that I should do for you?37They said unto him, Grant unto us that we may sit, one on thy right hand, and the other on thy left hand, in thy glory.38But Jesus said unto them, Ye know not what ye ask: can ye drink of the cup that I drink of? and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?39And they said unto him, We can. And Jesus said unto them, Ye shall indeed drink of the cup that I drink of; and with the baptism that I am baptized withal shall ye be baptized:

Why did Jesus ask them if they could drink of the cup that he drinks

and why did Jesus ask if they can be baptized with the baptism

that he was baptized with

if indeed they would be?

Does that make sense?

This is redundant!

Remember : Jesus Christ was baptized by John the Baptist!

Never did anyone see Jesus Christ baptized with FIRE!

——————————————

Mark 10:40-41

40But to sit on my right hand and on my left hand is not mine to give; but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared.41And when the ten heard it, they began to be much displeased with James and John.

Do you really think James and John Zebedee would ask to sit on the right or left side?

And would any sane person ask such a thing to the Messiah?

How did the other ten disciples hear of it? Weren’t the ten disciples also there listening to Jesus at the time?

These were real people and real people don’t act this way in real life!

Not that we don’t think stupid things sometimes, but to say what they said publicly?

I don’t believe that James and John said this to Jesus Christ and in front of the other disciples.

It sounds like a weekly soap opera theme and I think that is what the synoptic gospels want you to think, especially about James and John Zebedee! Why? Because they were the true apostles of Jesus Christ!

It is another way to discredit the truth in the gospel of John that they could not find and destroy!

=================================================

Luke 9:49-50

49And John answered and said, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name; and we forbad him, because he followeth not with us.50And Jesus said unto him, Forbid him not: for he that is not against us is for us.

Does this sound normal?

What does that mean he that is not against us is for us?

Jesus was not running for a popularity contest, nor for political office.

Just because someone isn’t against you does not mean they are for you!

Just because someone isn’t for you does not mean they are against you!

This is stupidity!

============================================

Luke 9:52-53

52And sent messengers before his face: and they went, and entered into a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him.53And they did not receive him, because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem.

Jesus sent messengers before his face….

……his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem

neither of the above make any sense!

IF Jesus sent messengers before him, how would the Samaritans know that his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem?

If Jesus’s face was as though he would go to Jerusalem, why would it matter if they did not receive him in Samaria?

This is NONSENSE!

=============================================

Luke 9:54-56

54And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did?55But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.56For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them. And they went to another village.

Please Read Woman at the Well!

It is about Jesus going to Samaria and it is written in the gospel of JOHN!

All three synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) do not include this encounter with the woman at the well in Samaria!

WHY?

Something eerie about the absence of this in the other three gospels, because it has to do with the 6th hour which is the same hour that Jesus Christ dies!

THE SAME JESUS CHRIST THAT DIED AT THE 6TH HOUR ON THE CROSS IS THE SAME JESUS CHRIST THAT WENT TO SAMARIA AND MET THE WOMAN AT THE WELL!

For some reason

THE THREE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS EXCLUDE THIS EVENT!

Didn’t they know that Jesus Christ went to Samaria?

Why didn’t they know that?

They PROVE that they DID NOT KNOW HIM by their lack of knowledge that Jesus did go to Samaria and this is what he said to the woman at the well about the 6th hour:

John 5:24-25

24Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
25Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live.

===============================================


Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did? Jesus says :Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of, and then Jesus says :For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them.

IN the book of Acts fire comes down from heaven in the form of cloven tongues.

Revelation also speaks of  fire coming down from heaven in the sight of men and is speaking about the false prophet and the antichrist!

INTERESTING!

——————————-

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *


Other Blogs of Mine:

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon

June 14, 2010 Posted by | bible, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversies, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Synoptic Gospels, The Antichrist, The Gospels, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Prophecy of Esaias


Revising at this time:

Parables, Isaiah, and Ashes

Matthew 13:10-17

10And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?11He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.

Then why bother talking to them in parables!

Does that make any sense? Why gather people about you and talk so they don’t understand?

Isn’t that what speaking in tongues is for?

12For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.13Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.

14And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias,

which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand;

and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:

Well, that is the important thing ….to fulfill prophecy at every cost!

Even at the expense of truth!

Why would Jesus waste His time teaching people He did not want to learn from His teaching. I just can’t imagine the Son of God wasting His time in such a fashion.

Didn’t He have better things to do than that?

15For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

So the Synoptic Jesus of the Gospel of Matthew came to gather crowds about him, because he did not want to heal the people.

Synoptic Ignorance ….yea, that will keep them busy and under his spell.

He came so they would not see with their eyes?

He came so that they would not hear with their ears?

He came so that they should not understand with their heart?

He came so that they should not be converted?

He came so that He should not heal them?

Somehow, that just doesn’t seem even logical,

much less sane.

I really don’t think Jesus Christ came to trick people,

yet Matthew’s rendition of Jesus

admits to tricking the people.

Isn’t that deception!

Obviously, this was not the Messiah!

===================

16But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

17For verily I say unto you,

That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see,

and have not seen them;

and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.

(now he his pandering)

Then the Synoptic Jesus of the Gospel of Matthew

tells the the parables of the

Sower and the Seed

and the

Wheat and the Tares:

Matthew 13:34-36

36Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house:

and his disciples came unto him, saying,

Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field.

Then the Synoptic Jesus explains the parable of the Wheat and the Tares to the disciples

because they did not seem to be blessed?

I thought they (the disciples) were blessed, because their eyes saw and their ears heard, but apparently they needed help to see and to hear, so they came to Jesus in private,

and then he explains the parable of the Wheat and Tares to them.

So was this Jesus pandering to his disciples even though their ears didn’t really hear, and their eyes didn’t really see, and their hearts didn’t really understand?

I thought he said:

16But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

Was Matthew’s Jesus lying to his disciples?

Was the Synoptic Jesus using reverse psychology to get his disciples to admit to not understanding him and come to ask him what the parables meant?

Something is not right here!

This Synoptic Jesus contradicts himself by saying that

they had eyes to see and ears to hear unlike everyone else,

because obviously they didn’t!

Wouldn’t the real Jesus know whether they understood what he was saying

so that he would not contradict himself,

or was this Synoptic Jesus being sarcastic about his disciple’s blessedness

ie. presumed knowledge?

Somebody is trying to make Jesus look sinister

and/or his disciples look dumb.

Either way it’s a very odd!

All I can surmise from this is it doesn’t sound like Jesus Christ the Son of God…the one that gave his life for his friends. I am not saying he did not share wisdom, but why did he pretend that they knew the meaning when he knew they did not know the meaning? Why did he teach people so that they would not understand,

so he wouldn’t have to heal them? 

Isn’t that insane? Isn’t that deceitful? Isn’t that evil?

I don’t think the true Jesus Christ was deceitful.

Isaiah 53:9
And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death;

because he had done no violence,

neither was any deceit in his mouth.

Deceit is deception!

OR is Isaiah insane along with Matthew

who supposedly wrote the Synoptic Gospel of Matthew, OR is it possible that someone added to the book of Isaiah?

(In any case the fact that his disciples had to get help to understand his parables when he said that they understood because they were blessed at the very least was sarcasm. Jesus in the Gospel of John was not sarcastic. I have noticed that many people have resorted to sarcasm in the years of the Obama administration even those that seemed to be on his side referring to him in terms of the Messiah by the press, Time Magazine, and even a few comedians. So far it seems that everything Obama says people have to weigh because it seems nothing he says is true. Of course usually we find out later in time because most of what he says are promises he doesn’t intend to keep, etc. It seems that Jesus of the Gospel of Matthew also had that same personality trait. Maybe the Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew was a sneaky politician. There are many examples if you read my posts that are on the subject of the gospels and especially the ones that compare the gospels.)

The Gospel of Matthew basically is saying that Jesus was deceiving and yet Isaiah says there was no deceit in his mouth.

SO which is it?

Do you believe the Gospel of Matthew on this point about Jesus,

or do you believe Isaiah?

Then whose mouth was deceiving in the Gospel of Matthew?

The DECEIVER

Please read:

Salute No Man

In my opinion, this rendition of Jesus Christ in the gospel of Matthew seems like a pompous show-off and a deceiver.  I really truly believe that Jesus Christ was not a show-off.  I believe Jesus Christ was sincere to the utmost and kind, and the gospel writer Matthew either misunderstood Jesus to the nth degree, or made this one up! The Synoptic version of Jesus is pretty mixed up

and I think it was done purposefully to mix us up! 

I don’t believe for a minute that Jesus Christ came to ridicule men,

even the ones that did not see, and did not hear,

or have hearts to understand! 

If I did believe that Jesus came so I and others would not understand or perceive, and if I believed that He came so he would not heal me and you,

then why bother learning about Him!

I wouldn’t waste my time on a false Messiah!

These Synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke)

are uncannily similar in places and seems that their goal was to diminish and overpower the gospel of John. Its apparent to me that Luke wrote his gospel after seeing John’s gospel, because Luke’s gospel is eerily antithetical to the gospel of John in many, many places, and the same goes for the gospels of Matthew and Mark!

Is it possible that there are some parts of the Synoptic Gospels that are true?

There is definitely big disagreement as to His character

His purpose,

if and when you compare it to the Gospel of John,

Which you ought to do,

because it is very telling and has been a blessing to me!

There are so many problems when you compare the Synoptic Gospels with the Gospel of John. It is also possible that Luke, by being so antithetical with the Gospel of John,

is actuality highlighting the deception in the gospels of Matthew and Mark?

Could be that the writer of the gospel of Luke was trying to point to the deception without being obvious. Then again the writer of the gospel of Luke may be so depraved that he/she relished the insertion of aberrant remarks against Jesus Christ.

One thing to keep in mind is that the people that hated Jesus were in power and people were killed for telling and writing the truth about Jesus. It is possible that the writers of the gospels had to write in ways so that we might have to search for the truth in the gospels! We are very lucky in these times to be able to write what we want to write and read what we want to read without the threat of death, but under Roman rule people were slaughtered for no reason and sometimes simply for entertainment.

Which could be why Jesus Christ says:

John 13:18

I speak not of you all: I know whom I have chosen: but that the scripture may be fulfilled, He that eateth bread with me hath lifted up

his heel against me.

Jesus was also cryptic in his words! He could have just said who it was that had lifted his heel against him, but instead he left clues in his words for us. Obviously, there were reasons for this because he knew the words would be destroyed!

If you read some of my earlier posts you will see the lack of harmony between the Synoptic gospels and the Gospel of John and I think the dissimilarities are so striking that they ought to be heavily scrutinized!

Two of the gospels writers of Mark (John Mark) and Luke were not apostles! They were followers/cohorts of Paul/Saul of Tarsus. I don’t think Matthew was an apostle either because he missed some really important events that John writes about in his gospel or he purposefully omitted them to satisfy someone else’s objectives.

I am very suspicious that Paul wrote the gospel of Matthew!

Now wouldn’t that be a coup to have Paul (and his partners) authoring 3 out of 4 of the gospels, Acts and Romans etc, etc, etc?

I am very suspicious that Saul/Paul of Tarsus is either Simon of Cyrene or one of Simon’s Sons.

Tarsus (skeleton)

 the bones of the ankle and heel, collectively  

Gee, that’s a big clue!

Luke in his gospel added this quote from Jesus Christ at the Last Supper event :

Luke 22:31

And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat:

As I said in another post, how does he know?

Luke wasn’t at the Last Supper and the above statement is not in any of the other gospels!

—————–

Isaiah 44:13-20

13The carpenter stretcheth out his rule; he marketh it out with a line; he fitteth it with planes, and he marketh it out with the compass, and maketh it after the figure of a man, according to the beauty of a man;

that it may remain in the house.

What house?

The house spoken of in the Book of Acts?

14He heweth him down cedars, and taketh the cypress and the oak, which he strengtheneth for himself among the trees of the forest: he planteth an ash, and the rain doth nourish it.15Then shall it be for a man to burn: for he will take thereof, and warm himself;yea, he kindleth it, and baketh bread; yea, he maketh a god, and worshippeth it; he maketh it a graven image, and falleth down thereto.16He burneth part thereof in the fire; with part thereof he eateth flesh; he roasteth roast, and is satisfied: yea, he warmeth himself, and saith, Aha, I am warm, I have seen the fire:17And the residue thereof he maketh a god, even his graven image: he falleth down unto it, and worshippeth it, and prayeth unto it, and saith, Deliver me; for thou art my god.

18They have not known nor understood:

for he hath shut their eyes, that they cannot see;

and their hearts, that they cannot understand.

 

WHO

HAS SHUT THEIR EYES

THAT THEY CANNOT SEE;

AND THEIR HEARTS, THAT THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND?

Paul of Tarsus?

Tarsus is part of Turkey.

What is the religion of Turkey?…..98 % Islam.

The Synoptic Gospels are the origin of ISLAM!

19And none considereth in his heart, neither is there knowledge nor understanding to say, I have burned part of it in the fire; yea, also I have baked bread upon the coals thereof;

I have roasted flesh,

and eaten it:

and shall I make the residue thereof an abomination?

shall I fall down to the stock of a tree?20He feedeth on ashes: a deceived heart hath turned him aside, that he cannot deliver his soul, nor say, Is there not a lie in my right hand?

Is this talking about the DECEIVER?

I believe that the

“Q Source”

that is credited to a great degree to be the inspiration of the Synoptic Gospels is the Deceiver!

I think that “The brethren of Jesus” are the

four carpenters James, Joses, Simon and Judas written about in Zechariah:

The Carpenters of Zechariah-The Four Horns

18Then lifted I up mine eyes, and saw, and behold four horns.19And I said unto the angel that talked with me, What be these? And he answered me, These are the horns which have scattered Judah, Israel, and Jerusalem.20And the LORD shewed me four carpenters.21Then said I, What come these to do? And he spake, saying, These are the horns which have scattered Judah, so that no man did lift up his head: but these are come to fray them, to cast out the horns of the Gentiles,

which lifted up their horn over the land of Judah to scatter it.

Who is no man?

 

Please read these two comparisons of the gospels:

Salute No Man

Tell No Man

Matthew 13:55
Is not this the carpenter‘s son? is not his mother called Mary?

and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?

Mark 6:3
Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.

IN the Gospel of John

Jesus never calls his mother by the name of Mary!

He calls her Woman!

WHY?

John 19:25-26

25Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother’s sister,

Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene.

26When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son!

Mary was the sister of the mother of Jesus!

=============================

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *


June 11, 2010 Posted by | bible, Bible Controversies, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Parables, Synoptic Gospels, The Eucharist, The Gospels, The Monstrace, The Truth, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment