The Drawbridge

BIblical Controversies and Discord

How is it That Ye Do Not Understand?


MARK 8:13-21

13And he left them, and entering into the ship again departed to the other side.14Now the disciples had forgotten to take bread, neither had they in the ship with them more than one loaf.

15And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod.16And they reasoned among themselves, saying,

It is because we have no bread.

17And when Jesus knew it, he saith unto them, Why reason ye, because ye have no bread? perceive ye not yet, neither understand? have ye your heart yet hardened?18Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not?

and do ye not remember?19When I brake the five loaves among five thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up? They say unto him, Twelve.

20And when the seven among four thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up? And they said, Seven.

21And he said unto them,
How is it that ye do not understand?

======================

  E   I  E  I  O

======================

Someone please tell me what this means!

Is this a trick question?

I hate to sound mean but I think this rendition of Jesus sounds maniacal!

I’ll tell you the truth, I don’t and never have understood what the above means!

I have never perceived, understood, nor seen, neither remembered anyone that does get what the above means!

I don’t think it means anything!  Do you?

(For the longest time I thought this was a mathematical poser.)

The point is he doesn’t want you to understand. It is a mock of Jesus, his disciples, the miracle of feeding of the 5000 etc and

mocking the gospel of John!

————————————-

Lets take these verses a few at a time and figure out what the Synoptic Jesus is trying to swerve:

1)Did they have bread or not?
Obviously, they did have bread because verse 14 states that they had a loaf of bread! So someone is contradicting himself  just in the above verses! They must not have realized that they had bread, because they ask within themselves is it because we have no bread, when they had a loaf of bread.

2) Does the Synoptic Jesus know that they had a loaf of bread?

 Either the Synoptic Jesus doesn’t know that they had a loaf of bread, or he is lying and using his power of suggestion to make them think that they don’t have bread when in actuality they had a loaf of bread as verse 14 states. (If they had a loaf of bread on the ship….why didn’t the Synoptic Jesus know it? If the Synoptic Jesus knew that there was a loaf of bread on the ship why didn’t he just tell them that they had a loaf of bread on the ship?)

3) Is the Synoptic Jesus berating the disciples?

Definitely! The Synoptic Jesus is very good at creating chaos and confusion. He loves to make them look stupid and make himself look oh so smart when in reality he is crazy, but he is so crazy he doesn’t know that he is crazy. (Reminds me of OBAMA.) 

For if he were in his right mind he would say.

Hey guys, there is a loaf of bread on the ship as verse 14 states.

4)What does the leaven of the Pharisees and the leaven of Herod have to do with whether or not they had taken bread?

Nothing.  Just propaganda, I’m sure!  In these verses Jesus is saying to beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Herod and they say, Is it because we have no bread? when they did have bread.

It makes no sense! It is inane.

=============================================

The feeding of the four thousand is not in the gospel of John

and it is not in the Gospel of Luke.

—————————–

Diminishing Jesus written about in the Gospel of John

—————————–

John 6:51
I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

He is the bread that came down from Heaven. So either the Synoptic disciples did not believe that he was the living bread and did not believe the Gospel of John or the Synoptic Jesus forgot to tell them that he was the living bread or he did not know himself that he was the living bread,

or the Synoptic Gospels  are full of HOT AIR

otherwise they would make sense!

This is proof that the Synoptic Jesus is trying to confuse!

Since Jesus is the bread of life and he taught his disciples this concept

in the Gospel of John

why wouldn’t Jesus in the Gospel of Mark just remind them?

Because Jesus of the Gospel of Mark is not the same person

as Jesus of the Gospel of John.

============

Paul wrote 1Corinthians or so the scholars say:

1 Corinthians 2:9

But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.

Isaiah 64:4
For since the beginning of the world men have not heard, nor perceived by the ear, neither hath the eye seen, O God, beside thee, what he hath prepared for him that waiteth for him.

Compare to the verses in the Gospel of Mark:

17And when Jesus knew it, he saith unto them, Why reason ye, because ye have no bread? perceive ye not yet, neither understandhave ye your heart yet hardened?18Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not?

and do ye not remember?19When I brake the five loaves among five thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up? They say unto him, Twelve.

Did Paul write the Gospel of Mark and Isaiah or did he just add to them?

Maybe. Certainly “his own hand” is in them or someone at the very least that is imitating him.

Josephus Flavius admitted to stealing the Holy Books from the Temple

and took them to Rome of all places

maybe he did it.

==================================

How is it that ye do not understand?

The point is he doesn’t want them to understand!

But as usual he betrays himself: 

Paul was identified with being the Greek-speaking Egyptian that led 4000 murderers in the wilderness in the book of Acts.

Acts 21:38

Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar,

and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?

The point I’m making is that

 Paul is the Synoptic Jesus!

This is proof that the Synoptic Jesus is trying to confuse!

============================================

Megan Kelly of Fox News just said that two Senators now believe that the Sequester is responsible for the bomb blast at the Boston Marathon in Massachusetts which is absolutely ridiculous as is this post demonstrates.

Same kind of ridiculous and insane delusion.

It is not a coincidence that the Newtowners were at this event near where the explosions occurred. I would look into why they were put there and by whom, etc. There were bomb sniffing dogs around and they did not smell the bombs at the beginning of the race  in those areas so that ought to be a big clue.

I’m suspicious of drone usage and involvement.

If you watch drone attacks on line it could easily be altered to mimic a rough bomb

and it makes sense that it is.

Why?

Because the Obama administration said they would not use drone attacks on Americans on American soil.

This is more deadly distraction for Obama and his legion which is his M.O.

Now they have their sites on a bag in front of the fence line at the Marathon yet very few people were affected on that side of the fence line ie the runners. Obviously it was not that bag. On Sean Hannity of Fox News I watched some films as closely as I could (they are pretty quick films) and there was a hole made by something in the middle of the spectators area that was affected which is consistent with a drone strike but people overseas don’t lose their limbs when a drone strikes them, right? If it was in the trash can that was on the outside of the fence line it also would have affected the runners……doesn’t add up

and as far as Napolitan’s suggestion that there is no broader plot

….can you believe anything she says?

Isn’t she the lady lying about ammunition.

DHS excuses for buying so much ammo don’t add up

J. D. Heyes
Natural News

March 27, 2013

Just move along, folks. There’s nothing to see here.

That’s the attitude of the Department of Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano when it comes to scrutiny of her agency’s massive purchase requests for billions – that’s right, billions – of rounds of ammunition, along with 7,000 “personal defense weapons” (they would be called assault weapons if owned by private citizens), and 2,700 mine-resistant, ambush-protected (MRAP) armored vehicles of the type used to protect troops in Iraq and Afghanistan from improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

Which is what this explosive at the Marathon is being described as

is an IED.

Possibly this is about the Sequester in a perverted kind of way!’

Course the press won’t even question anyone about the difference of the appearance of the two men at Benghazi the one that they claim is Ambassador Chris Stevens and is not.

So I guess they would believe that a bag in front of the fence line that affected the people behind the fence line and not the ones in front of the fence line would be the incendiary bomb, because they have their thinking caps on.

Also a friend just mentioned to me that in the comparisons of the pictures of the bag in front of the fence line before and after the explosion one picture has a man hole cover and the other picture does not yet they are supposed to be of the same scene.

So to put it another way

they are lying.

SO if anyone ridicules the public for suspicion of conspiracy they are liars because obviously conspiracies have been occurring for a long time. Why in the world did the clergy not inform us of these contradictions in the bible? Why do they say that the gospels harmonize?

You can learn quite a bit from Walter Veith if interested in learning about the deception most of the world is mired in. I found his you tubes to be of great value and I hope if you want to start getting a real grasp of knowledge you might start there. There are many other sites with his works besides the following but this set of you tubes ought to help quite a bit.

He is prolific, entertaining, honest, and interesting:

Walter Veith: Total Onslaught Series

He is a former Catholic, a scientist, and a teacher:

Who is Walter Veith?

============================

Tell No Man

Salute No Man

Why Callest Thou Me Good?

 The Fig Tree – Blessed are the Barren

Folly of the Synoptic Gospels

America Land of the Nuns and Dishtowels

Other Blogs of Mine:

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon

June 19, 2010 Posted by | bible, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversies, BIBLE PROPHECY, Bread of Life, Consecration of the Bread, Feeding of the 4000, Feeding of the 5000, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Parables, Synoptic Gospels, The Antichrist, The Eucharist, The Gospels, The Monstrace, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Seven Mountains of Revelation


Revelation 17:9

9And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.

=====================

Here is another riddle in Revelation and I want to attempt to solve this problemo.

First of all, a woman is a church.

OBVIOUSLY, Rev. 17 is describing a false church.

The verse also says that the heads are seven mountains:

It is obvious—> the hills of Rome.

Seven hills of Rome

List of cities claimed to be built on seven hills

Thats a lot of cities!

To take this a step further

I think it is what this church stands upon spiritually

that are the seven mountains!


Seven Sacraments of the Roman Catholic  Church

Seven Deadly Sins which the above sacraments help to alleviate.

Sounds like the RCC ITself!

It’s a business, you see!

Talk about HYPOCRISY!

I’m sure I will be very unpopular for what is the obvious meaning of the above verse, but that’s life! I love the catholic friends I have known in my life, and always will, but it is what it is. and it is not my fault. What else could the above verse mean? The history of that church system proves itself. What else do you need?

Roman Catholicism is slavery!


They give a false remedy to sin

and lie to it’s own people

and they profit from it.


That is EVIL!

Indulgences, Tourism to every shrine made for every false sighting or revelation from Mary, Icons, Relics, Idols, books, and EUCHARIST WAFERS, and last, but not least,

the The Shroud of Turin!

More than likely involved in illegal banking practices! The Press! UNIONS! Education! Government!

(A self -fulfilling blob)

I think that is why it is referred to as THE BEAST!

The Mysterious Death of Pope John Paul I [A Treatise]

Isn’t that why one Pope got bumped off? He had the audacity to want to clean up the Vatican’s banking problems. He was known as the smiling Pope! He lasted a whole 30 days! He is the 5th Pope (#263) since the signing of the The Lateran Concordant!

Please read:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

The post linked above is about the prophecy in Revelation:

Revelation 17:11

And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

=====================================

Revelation 18:4
Then I heard another voice from heaven say: “Come out of her, my people, so that you will not share in her sins, so that you will not receive any of her plagues;

——————————————————

Other Blogs of Mine:

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon


June 19, 2010 Posted by | bible, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversies, BIBLE PROPHECY, Indulgences, POPE BENEDICT XVI, Roman Catholicism, The Antichrist, The Eucharist, The Monstrace, The Shroud of Turin, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Mount of the Congregation


Luke 22:28

Ye are they which have continued with me in my temptations.

Luke was the only gospel writer to include this statement

as being said by Jesus Christ at the Last Supper.

Luke was not at the Last Supper!

Where in the world did he get this from?

And who was doing the tempting?

Seems to me only the tempter and the accuser would know!

Luke 22:31

And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat:

This particular verse (or statement or anything resembling it)

is not in the Gospel of John, neither the Gospel of Mark, nor the Gospel of Matthew.

I ask again….where did it come from?

How would Luke know what Satan desires, unless he is Satan?

REMEMBER

LUKE WAS NOT AN APOSTLE!

HE WAS NOT AT THE LAST SUPPER!

HE DID NOT EVEN KNOW JESUS CHRIST!

Luke 22:32

But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.

The same thing goes for this particular verse.

THE BRETHREN ARE PAUL AND LUKE!

I believe that Luke is making this up for the benefit of Paul and himself.

Isaiah 14:12-13

How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!13For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God:

I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

NEOCATECHUMENAL WAY OPENS A CHAPEL ON THE MOUNT

 

—————————————————–

Other Blogs of Mine:

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon

June 19, 2010 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment