The Drawbridge

BIblical Controversies and Discord

Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many – Part 3


JFK Blows The Whistle on Secret Societies!

You will miss the point of this post if you neglect Part 1

which is linked in the following title:)

The Covenant with Many


Part 3

Now before the assassination in Dallas

Now her part is on the left and his part is still on the right when facing them!

Both their parts are in the center.

LastMeal

Their parts are opposite each other as they sit next to each other.

Hers on the left and his on the right.

His part is on the right and hers on the left as you face them!

Now their parts are on the inside. Hers on the left and his on the right.

This woman is not Jackie Kennedy!

Not only did her part change ……..but so did her shins. Jackie Kennedy had sort of boney shins and the imposter has thick shins in comparison. Shins don’t change over the years except with extreme weight gain. Eventually, I will update this post with examples. The woman at the funeral of JFK was not the real Jackie Kennedy….unless Jackie replaced her legs with someone else’s legs.

Newly Discovered Footage of JFK’s Final Moments

also shows the parts of both President Kennedy and woman in the car with him

in this you tube linked in purple above!

Here is the Zapruder film for you to see the cold blooded assassination of our President

by what I believe is a double of the first lady.

=================================

Somewhere, somehow, something happened to her

and she was replaced!

Perhaps on her trip to India?

Here is the you tube link in red below to study:

Hi quality footage of JFK Assassination

The Undamaged Zapruder Film

335 of the last sequence of the slow motion concentrated on President Kennedy, Jackie Kennedy has something in her hand behind his back, because it is perpendicular to the horizon. It is either heat and smoke, or has been touched up to hide what she is holding.

The link below (Part One of this trilogy) has a few you tubes of the assassination and one in particular that examines the Secret Service and their innocence  and seems pretty accurate, except for the fact that the woman representing Jacqueline Kennedy does wave in the direction of the Secret Service guard, and he backs off and shrugs 3 times, even though he was supposed to be on the heel of the car protecting the President.

Below this title and link is a snippet of the post!

Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, Joseph Ratzinger

and

The Covenant with Many

“Here is what I see NOW:

She is fiddling with him as he is shot the first time, then Connelly looks back and she looks at Connelly and he is shot, she looks back at her husband and gets closer and under him and he is shot again and the blood spray goes up, then

it looks as if she has something in her right hand after the second shot

(perhaps a silencer and it looks like Captain Hook’s arm without the hook?).

And it seems to be emitting gas straight up! And if I am correct it probably came with her red roses!

Who was the florist?

Supposedly, Jackie thought it was odd that she received red roses in Dallas in one of her infamous interviews spinning the Camelot myth.

Possibly, lost that object when she pushed her husband over and fled to the trunk of the car to get whatever was back there,and it looks like a tube of lipstick because of the way it stays on the trunk of the car. She pursues it on the trunk of the car and gets it and gets back and hunches down with everyone else.

*April 2nd 2011 Just watched this video again a few times and it looks like she is the only one that seems to be busy …..very active….and in control…….everyone else seems to be reacting.

Everyone else seems to be in slow motion and she is in very fast motion.

Whoever her focus is on seems to be before that person is shot! IMO

Which is very disturbing!”

Jackie triggers a killing mechanism?

Basically, what I am trying to say in above snippet of the post is that she is running circles around everyone and most people in a state of shock do not react so quickly unless they are the perpetrator!

===============
Supposedly Jackie would not change her clothes before the swearing in of Lyndon Johnson and said 

“I want them to see what they have done.”

That is called deflecting and pointing the finger elsewhere.

Murderers don’t usually need to be reminded, so who is she speaking of?

And as far as having her husbands brains in her hands, or in her lap …….how could that possibly be true if she was on the trunk of the car picking up things (perhaps caps?)

unless she picked it up his brain parts

after she hunkered down

with the rest of the people that seemed to react normally!

besides the fact that she was not Jackie Kennedy, IMO.

Here is film shot from the opposite direction as the Zapruder film and seems to match exactly, which substantiates the Zapruder films accuracy IMO!

Orville Nix, version 1 (AVI, 3.41 MB)
Orville Nix, version 2 (AVI, 2.25 MB)

=================

April 6th re-vision

Funny thing is that I started to notice a lot of articles creeping into the Internet about Jackie being part Jewish, as if that has anything to do with this at all, and I realized that the propaganda machine was active, very busy to deceive, cover up and deflect.

Case in point:


Another you tube suddenly appeared with News coverage about the Kennedys visit in San Antonio before the assassination. Supposedly this old man had kept a movie of the Kennedy’s for almost 50 years in a drawer ‘all neat and perfect’ in his attic desk and just decided to donate it.

In my opinion, its a fake.

President Kennedy looks like he is out to lunch, as if he is not really there, or in another place. His actions and expressions do NOT fit the scene. And, of course, the man that donated the film mentions that President Kennedy is confused and gives his own excuse for why the President is acting confused!

WHICH IS VERY TELLING …..AS IF HE KNOWS!

Jackie wore her hair parted on the other side that night also. I think that was the point of this you tube…..covering their tracks….so to speak. If you watch the you tube it looks suspicious and is very confusing, a film full of mayhem that could easily be manipulated and, in fact, if you study the film it has a lot of discrepancies. Why anyone would go to such trouble – all of a sudden – and it magically appearing 50 years later is suspicious in its entirety. President Kennedy looks like he’s drugged. It just does not fit!!! So I am including this you tube in this article.

Jackie is wearing gloves when she enters

and then when she gives her speech she’s not wearing her gloves

which is Very Very out of character for her.

I think someones made a big error in this film.

They forgot the gloves!

That’s what happens when you are in a hurry.

Not only that, but they forgot to invite the Connally’s.

That Day in Dallas/ Nellie Connally

By Robert R. Rees,
CyberProfile Contributing Editor

However, the Connally’s were on every other activity STRANGE and, in fact,

It is VERY VERY FISHY

— the sudden appearance of this film, that is!!!!!

Why would the Connally’s be excluded?

The whole event I have described, the odd behavior of the people involved, the exclusion of the Connally’s, leads me to believe that this was the critical point,

a watershed event

in regards to

the assassination of President Kennedy!

All I can say is, in time, all things will

be revealed and, I hope, whoever is involved

knowingly

in propaganda to deceive 

will change their course and do the right thing while they still have a chance

before it is too late!

Film surfaces of JFK night before assassination

Zoom in and Check out 1:54/4:22 expression of Jackie in this film. Very odd and I would call it demonic, as if she had had a fit,

or a glitch!

DOES THIS LOOK LIKE JACKIE KENNEDY?

Check out the woman near the end of the film who seems to be trying to say something  with her hand at 3:43/4:22. Perhaps she is an unwilling participant in a very ugly scam!

Then from frame 2:07/4:22 Jackie Kennedy looks at least 10/20 years older sitting with her bare hands in her pockets.

This film is full of holes!

Now compare this to the poise of the real Jackie speaking spanish!

Jacqueline Kennedy speaking spanish

and her part matches her husband’s part!

I wonder if the film that suddenly surfaced didn’t steal bits and pieces from this film and many others,

but just made a few errors in the new “timely” film just now donated

because this old man all of sudden decided to part with

his sacred treasure!

There is a big difference between the women in each of these films besides the obvious glitch!

So why would this old man come up with this film 48 or so years later and decide to donate it – at this time – when he had it in his drawer the whole time?

Why would some of the news stations and press combine it with another film and put sound behind it, even though it was a silent film?

Some of the broadcasts that were aired ought to be investigated for fraud.

IT is as if the Press is hiding something that they are complicit in!

Why embellish the film?

Could it be they want you to swallow it,

hook, line and sinker?

They have the tools to deceive and they are deceiving you!

Why?

Life Magazine supposedly had the Zapruder film and parts were destroyed

Why?

Who do they work for?

Who does the man at the Museum of The Texas School Book Depository work for that received this film and helped to affirm it’s worth. Does he have no levels or standards of  integrity for a film to be accepted as historical evidence? I guess anything goes.

Even I could layer a film as bad as that one!

It is sooooo obvious that this film is layered!

Even Diane Sawyer (who acts drunk on herself, IMO) of ABC News aired it and they did their own layering for you to accept it!

If they try to spoon feed us this film and add, of course, the other one of the same night …

does that make it true?

Because their are two films of the same scam

does that make it true?

How about 3 or 4?

Who do they serve?

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

For if they know or have an inkling that they are deceiving,

they should quit,

but they don’t because they have to support their life style!

===============================

Basically, what happened that day:

The power of the Presidency was stolen by the Treasury Department!

The Treasury Department heads the Secret Service

which is supposed to protect the President

and his wife !!!

So we lost a branch of our government that day,

our elected President, and his wife!

That’s why there was cover-up!

==============================

JFK & Marilyn Monroe Photo: ONLY Picture Together Unveiled (VIDEO)

Only Photo of JFK & Marilyn Monroe Together Unveiled, On Sale

Trove of John F. Kennedy photos from White House are sold at auction

IF you look real close this is a picture that has been manipulated also.

I have read so much pure junk and innuendo about JFK and his brother Bobby

and a recent released photo of JFK and Bobby with Marilyn Monroe that

was “saved”

from a dryer

Up for auction, only photo of JFK and Marilyn Monroe

together moments after she sang sultry ‘Happy Birthday’


IT is a strange photo with President Kennedy looking away.

He was embarrassed:

Because it is not him

he was wearing a grecian hair band?

 he could not figure out which side

to part his hair

on that occasion!

It is not even Robert Kennedy or Marilyn Monroe!

Marilyn Monroe had a soft rounder nose and plumper lips and two shoulders

not just one and a half!

Compare her nose to the nose on the woman in the other picture. There is a big difference! IN this picture her nose is not as boney or as long as the one above and her lips are plump comparatively. Even the woman’s body is different. Marilyn Monroe was always clumsily over-weight in a very attractive way and the woman above is slender and even the breasts are different and smaller! 

THIS IS RIDICULOUS….

THE PICTURE OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY, BOBBY KENNEDY AND MARILYN MONROE

ABOVE IS A FAKE

AND LOOKS TO BE A LEFTOVER

FROM MANIPULATING PHOTOS

TO MAKE A GOOD COVERUP

(that is why it was found in a dryer of all places )

AND TARNISH THEIR REPUTATIONS

AND FALSELY PROVE A RELATIONSHIP

WITH MM FOR THAT COVERUP.

I WONDER WHY?

It is called DIS – INFORMATION!

============

Hersh’s Dark Camelot

The three people that these actors above represented were cut down early in life and I think I know why:

To fulfill prophecy in order to deceive!

It has something to do with the head wound prophecy in Revelation: 

Revelation 13:3 

  3And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death;

and his deadly wound was healed:

and all the world wondered after the beast.

THE PROPHECY WAS ALREADY FULFILLED BY ROME

SO IN ORDER TO DEFLECT THEY HAD TO FULFILL IT IN OUR COUNTRY 

Please read:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

By the way, in his letters when JFK used the code letters

MM

I don’t think it is in reference to Marilyn Monroe,

but rather

Mary Magdalene.

I found a few places that use MM for their identification!

They are MANY!

But for $$$$$$$$ and the public’s consumption they have made a

Mountain out of a Mole!


I found a few places that ALSO use MM for their identification!


Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America (M.M.)

[MM] Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America (Maryknoll Fathers)

M a r y k n o l l    O f f i c e   f o r    G l o b a l    C o n c e r n s

MMi

WORLD MEDICAL MISSION

Agency Mission:

“World Medical Mission is a ministry of Samaritan’s Purse,
an international Christian relief and evangelism organization specializing in meeting the needs of victims of war, poverty, natural disasters and disease”

 Samaritan’s Purse

More like the big fish ate the little fish. Basically, the son of Billy Graham took over a ministry. Whether foul play was involved…who knows.

The founder died from Leukemia soon after the friendship with Franklin Graham!

John 12:6

 6This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.

Letter From Billy Graham to John F. Kennedy

Billy Graham, August 10, 1960.  The Honorable Jack Kennedy, The United States Senate, Capital Building, Washington, DC.  Dear Senator:  I trust that you will treat this letter in the strictest confidence.  There is a rumor in the Democratic Party that I intend to raise the religious issue publicly during the presidential campaign.  This is not true.  In fact, I would like to commend you for facing it squarely and courageously.  There was another matter concerning malicious gossip that I had overheard about you.  I took it immediately to two of your closest friends and they clarified it.  I promis you it has not gone beyond me.  It is most unfortunate that political leaders are subject to these types of ugly rumors and gossip.  I shall probably vote for Vice President Nixon for several reasons, including a long-standing personal friendship.  I am sure you can understand my position.  However, if you should be elected President, I will do all in my power to help unify the American people behind you.  In the event of your election you will have my wholehearted loyalty and support.  With every good wish, I am cordially yours.

IF this letter was truly written by Billy Graham, which I cannot verify,

it is sickening!

Paragraph two is very telling! He says he took it to two of JFK’s friends but that it did not go past him ……kind of a misnomer. You don’t go to two friends to clarify, if you want to keep a secret. DUH

So what was the intent of the letter?

If you read  between the lines I would call that a veiled threat, otherwise why bring it up. What friends? Was it Mr. Graham’s job to clarify rumors of JFK or was he just alerting the Senator that he had some goods on him? 

KIND OF CAGEY!

Kind of gross!

—————————-

I think President John F. Kennedy, Senator Bobby Kennedy, Marilyn Monroe

and many, many others were unfortunate victims of a

mafia filled church, drunk on power and deception,

that tried to make our country heel!

The mafia is obviously their creation!

They do the dirty work for the church and the church absolves them and themselves. 

THEY INFILTRATE EVERY ALLEY AND DARK CORNER OF EVERY INSTITUTION TO DO THEIR MISSION!

They are the scum of the earth!

========================

Rome’s secret weapon for recatholicising the EU

“This brings us to Benedict and Rome today.  Readers will be well aware of the Vatican’s efforts after World War II to dominate Europe through the Treaty of Rome.  This strategy was spearheaded by the “St Benedict for first European” campaign conceived during World War II.  Pius XII may have been silent about the holocaust but he certainly made waves when one of Benedict’s early monasteries, Monte Cassino, was bombed by the allies.  Churchill, unworried, correctly observed, “the enemy fortifications were hardly separate from the building itself”. But Pius castigated it as an “atrocity bombing”.  He and his two successors, John XXIII and Paul VI, 

all vowed to use Benedict’s European credentials to bring the continent to heel.”

We are the allies that bombed Monte Cassino!

Please read:

 The Synoptic “Q Source”

Special reference to Billy Graham and his part in this affair in the article linked!

John 16:2
They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh,

that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.

JOHN KENNEDY, HIS BROTHER BOBBY AND MARILYN MONROE

WERE MURDERED FOR

MM

===============================

Now, we have lost our government in total to the

World Government headed by Rome!

Obviously, it was the Vatican and the Pope and their legions

and

THEY ARE MANY

who arranged the death of President Kennedy and probably Jacqueline!

But thank goodness it won’t last!

Courtyard of the Gentiles

Revelation 11:1-2

1And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.

2But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not;

for it is given unto the Gentiles:

and the holy city shall they tread under foot

forty and two months.

That’s about 3 1/2 years we have to put up with this nonsense!

Time is ticking!

They are the legions that want to make you believe them, nothing, or anything and everything,

but the truth!

That is their end/purpose!

=================

Now, we have lost our government in total to the

World Government headed by Rome!

Obviously, it was the Vatican, the Pope, and their legions

who arranged the death of President Kennedy and probably Jacqueline!

Thank goodness it won’t last!

Courtyard of the Gentiles

Revelation 11:1-2 

And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.

2But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not;

for it is given unto the Gentiles:

and the holy city shall they tread under foot

forty and two months.

That’s about 3 1/2 years we have to put up with this nonsense!

Time is ticking!

They are the legions that want to make you believe them, nothing, or anything and everything,

but the truth!

That is their end/purpose!

============================

The President and First Lady after the First Anniversary Inaugural Salute Dinner, 1962

Photo Credit: Cecil Stoughton, White House/John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston

zoom in on the hands, bottom of dress, the man’s face behind Jackie.

I guess the photographer needed to add people and shadows….

to make it look real?


How about that eyebrow and the side burns on the man behind Jackie….

maybe Cal Thomas was attending?


In regards to Cal Thomas, he was just recently accused of Plagiarizing by a ridiculous Texas editor

 (I call it relating)

Columnist Cal Thomas accused of plagiarizing the New York Times 

 Accused Of PlagiarismCal Thomas Admits He Should Have Credited 

==========================

 Lyndon Johnson Swearing-in Nov 22, 1963

The Most Revealing Wink
Of The 20th Centur
y

 A WINK FROM THE MAN ON THE LEFT AT JOHNSON!

A SMILE ON JOHNSON’S WIFE!

NOT SURE ABOUT ABOUT THE EXPRESSION ON JACKIE!

THEN GRIEF SEEMED TO OVERCOME THE CROWD IN THE PLANE AS JOHNSON IS SWORN IN AS PRESIDENT!

WHO IS THAT MAN IS WITH THE DARK EYEBROWS

IN THE LEFT CORNER AT THE BOTTOM?

THIS REMINDS ME OF A YOU-TUBE OF PRESIDENT CLINTON AFTER RON BROWN AND MANY OTHERS WERE KILLED IN A PLANE CRASH! ONE MINUTE HE WAS HAPPY AND WHEN HE KNEW THAT THE CAMERA WAS ON HIM HE CRIED!

Bill Clinton fakes crying

==========================

I checked out this you-tube filming from the car behind the limo of President Kennedy and I took some close-up shots of the hands of Jackie’s double, because of Mary Moore’s testimony of seeing a white puppy dog between the President and his wife at the time of the assassination which she was ridiculed for that observation. Since reviewing, I thought it might be possible that she was seeing Jackie Kennedy’s gloved hands as their limo passed by her. So I keyed in on those hands and they seem rather large in comparison to her husband President Kennedy. White gloves can appear larger in video. White always looks larger and affects photography in funny ways, but nevertheless her/his hands seem extremely large especially the one closest to the President.

I am including a comparison of her/his hand waving and the President from this film following:

See the QuickTime Movie taken by Dave Powers

Zoom the view of these pictures to see better!

Her hand is opening and his hand is pointing forward on the right. Compare the relationship to their heads!

Her hand looks really huge like a man but even larger.

Her hand is closed again and it looks like a rose with thorns on the arm. Kind of an odd shape if you zoom in.

(and it looks like a silencer)

Jackie saluting behind and to the right possibly to a Secret Service guard (the one that is supposed to shield the President?)

Her hand size is about the same size as her head..maybe larger!

His hand is a little forward, but seems dramatically smaller in comparison to his head and normal.

Her hand looks abnormally GIGANTiC???

STRANGE!

I can see why Mary Moore thought she saw

fluffy white puppy between them.

The look of love is in your eyes

THE FACE OF EVIL IN DALLAS 1963


====================================================

Truth may be stranger that fiction

in an automated kind-of-way!

====================================================

Some of these guys supposedly boasted that they got the SOB (JFK) and the little bastard (Bobby Kennedy)!

At Bobby Kennedy’s assassination a woman with a polka dot dress was seen, but disappeared.

Maybe he is that woman!

David Sánchez Morales

“During that operation he acquired a reputation as the CIA’s top assassin in Latin America.”

After the communist revolution of 1959, Cuba restricted religious practice, this led to persecution of many Catholics at universities and jobs………
…..From 1959 to 1961 eighty percent of the professional Catholic priests and Protestant ministers left Cuba for the United States. Relationships between the new government and congregations were tense, the new Cuban government was very limiting and suspicious of church operations, blaming them for collaboration with the CIA during the Bay of Pigs invasion and stockpiling arms provided for a “counter-revolution“.

I believe that Jackie was not really Jackie, but a hit woman – how far fetched could it be that maybe she was a he and a hit man that was very effeminate with very large hands, like in the picture above.

The one hiding his face
that has his arm around his companion on the right!

Jackie arrival at Love Field

Either she is packing a gun in her crotch or she is a HE!

It might be a good idea to have her pink suit examined for

traces of semen!

If she were actually a he it would explain what she did with the wedding ring at the hospital probably because she no longer had her gloves and the ring didn’t fit!

It would also explain the odd phone call from President LBJ to Jackie and would explain her odd replies.

LBJ and Jacqueline Kennedy

Kind of like

George Gänswein and the Pope

In my latest article

Courtyard of the Gentiles

ROMAN CATHOLICISM STINKS! 

Please read the articles below:
 

The Covenant with Many

———————–

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

I Am the True Vine

The Fortress

The Kennedys

Television review: ‘The Kennedys’



Advertisements

April 7, 2011 Posted by | BILLY GRAHAM, Deception, Endtime Deception, Jackie Kennedy, Jackie Onassis, JFK, John Kennedy, JOSEPHUS, Josephus Flavius, Mel Gibson, POPE BENEDICT XVI, President Kennedy, Samaritan's Purse, The 34th President, The 44th President, The False Church, The Kennedy's, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many – Part 2


You will miss the point of this post if you neglect Part 1 which is linked in the following title:)

In part one of this trilogy

The Covenant with Many

I stumbled upon a coincidence of Joseph of Arimathea/Josephus Flavius

marriage to the church

and the marriage of Jackie Kennedy to Aristotle Onassis (the Greek Shipping Tycoon)

and this is how this particular post came about!


President Kennedy Assassination and Mel Gibson

Part two

After my conclusions about the Kennedy assassination I was intrigued and curious why Jackie Kennedy would be so bold as to kill her husband in broad daylight in front of cameras and people etc. I went through quite a few emotions and ideas kept popping in my head about his supposed affairs except vaguely and over time, reading about them with Marilyn Monroe. I always still had a deep respect for our President and his stance publicly for truth and openness and I have always hated that he was assassinated. I also hate the secrecy associated with the findings about the assassination! His private life might not have been perfect, but he seemed like a Perfect President. And probably there is more to the story than what meets the eye!

I always thought highly of Mrs. Kennedy and her kids. After looking at many pictures of her she is even more beautiful than I remember. But compared to the woman on the screen in the Zapruder film I just wasn’t satisfied with my conclusions even though I think that woman did assassinate President Kennedy.

To start, I would like to divulge again that I am a portrait artist and I notice features a little more closely than the average person. So I decided to compare pictures of her to see if possibly, by chance, that the woman in the Zapruder film might be someone else. I found quite a few pictures and compared them to each other to see if and when she might have been replaced with a double. I know that sounds preposterous, but there is no doubt in my mind after seeing the Zapruder film over and over, and studying it closely, that she looks and acted very guilty. Yet Jacky Kennedy doesn’t seem to be the type of woman to be so calculating and cold. The person on the screen in the film acts like a professional hit woman. So after writing the article The Covenant with Many and the deception involved and how the assassination of President Kennedy seems to cor-relate in very strange ways, especially Jackie’s marriage later to Aristotle Onassis, I had to look into it deeper than I ever have.

=========================

I kept running into the dilemma of mirror-image confusion. If you take an object and stick it in your right hand and go to the mirror the object will be in you left hand. In many of the pictures of her she parted her hair on the left and sometimes on the right.

For instance:

(I put the web addresses for you to put in your title bar to go to the picture to see it larger because my blog will not show it large enough to see a clearly)

http://cache2.allpostersimages.com/p/LRG/34/3482/N386F00Z/posters/rickerby-art-first-lady-jackie-kennedy-standing-by-reflecting-pool-in-front-of-taj-mahal-during-visit-to-india.jpg

1962

http://popartmachine.com/item/pop_art/LOC+1138083/%5BJACQUELINE-KENNEDY-IN-FRONT-OF-THE-TAJ-MAHAL%5D-LOT-9700-%5BITEM%5D…

http://www.allposters.com/-sp/First-Lady-Jackie-Kennedy-Standing-by-Reflecting-Pool-in-Front-of-Taj-Mahal-During-Visit-to-India-Posters_i4740851_.htm

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&q=pictures+of+jacquelin+kennedy+in+
Taj+Mahal&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=7222b5efa7d4217b

This is the first lady at Taj Mahal on one of her many trips. In the picture above her purse is on her left arm and the part in her hair is on the left and her leg is poised forward on the left when facing her (or her right) and on the picture above that it is the exact opposite. I spent a long time pondering and studying these pictures because she is wearing the same dress and obviously it is the same day, right?…..it appears that way anyway.

Then I realized the mirror-image dilemma.

DID WE HAVE THAT PROCESS VIA PHOTOSHOP BACK IN THOSE DAYS…..

I HAVE NO IDEA?

But we do now!

Most people rarely change their part from the left to the right, or visa versa. But with mirror-image I could not get past the confusion, until I put her with another person …..her husband.

Men never change their parts, especially back in those days. So I studied a bunch of pictures of them together and in every shot I could find of the two of them together, their parts were always on the same side. His would be on his right when facing him and hers was on the right when facing her when they were side by side. So if you looked at them they were two right parts, like they matched.

Both have their parts on the right above.

Again.

Again, again  and again!

Both have their parts on the right again!

Both have their parts on the same side again like parallel as the other two above!

And again. Hard to see but their parts are on the right.

Again both President Kennedy and Mrs. Kennedy have their parts on the right when you are facing them.

Jackie’s Pink Suit– more examples two Jackies

“It was at President Kennedy’s request that she wear the outfit in Dallas.

He said she looked “ravishing in it.” 

(Susan Mary Alsop, 1963)”

===========================

The Covenant with Many – Part one

============================

Part 3

Now Before the Assassination in Dallas

April 7, 2011 Posted by | BIBLE PROPHECY, Deception, Jackie Kennedy, Jackie Onassis, JFK, John Kennedy, JOSEPHUS, Josephus Flavius, Mel Gibson, POPE BENEDICT XVI, President Kennedy, The 34th President, The 44th President, The Kennedy's | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many



PART 1

———————————————————————————————–

JFK and Mel Gibson

The Covenant with Many

————————————————————————————————————–

The Covenant with Many

(revised)

 

February 11, 2010 By Kevin Flower Israeli archaeologists say they’ve found a 1,500-year-old road, 4.5 meters under the current level of streets in Jerusalem’s Old City.

 

The reason I am writing this post is because of the prophecy in Daniel that a lot of people write about on blogs and websites.

I don’t understand why the prophecy teachers and scholars that try to have an understanding of Daniel’s prophecies…get stuck on the same mantra.

I am not trying to be different, but I think there have been some colossal mistakes made by scholars, bible teachers and the whole spectrum of experts of the bible.

I don’t see how you can read the Gospel of John and collapse it into the Synoptic gospels and say they blend at all or compliment each other.


In Reality

The Gospel of John and the Synoptic Gospels

collide !

In the book of Daniel it talks about Messiah the Prince and a prince.

Why does everyone think the covenant with many is for the future.

How does one come to that conclusion from these verses?

Daniel 9:25-27

25Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

It is quite possible that the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince has already occurred,

but has been covered up by the

Chief Priests and the Legion – (please read)

Ancient wall found in Jerusalem

Western Wall, Jerusalem

The Western Wall was built by King Herod in 20 BC during his expansion of the Temple enclosure, and is part of a retaining wall that enclosed the western part of Temple Mount. According to the Roman-Jewish historian Josephus, construction of the walls took 11 years, during which time it rained in Jerusalem only at night so as not to interfere with the workers’ progress.

Ancient road found in Jerusalem’s heart

February 11, 2010|By Kevin Flower

“Archaeologists working under the direction of the Israeli Antiquities Authority have uncovered a 1500-year-old road running through the center of Jerusalem’s Old City.

Excavation director Dr. Ofer Sion said the discovery lends further credence to the accuracy of what is known as the Madaba Map – a Byzantine period mosaic map of the Holy Land that depicts an entrance into Jerusalem that leads to a single central street.

Archaeologists working in Jerusalem have made various finds to suggest the Madaba map was geographically correct, but the road depicted in the mosaic had not been found.”

Obviously, there have been two walls from two different temple eras

and a road!


Micah predicted the downfall of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple, which were fulfilled by the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in about 586 BC and again by the Romans in 70 AD. The Temple has not been rebuilt since that destruction. Jerusalem was destroyed a second time by the Romans in about 135 AD.

The only reason I added the above link and the information about the destruction of Jerusalem

and the temple and the destruction again of Jerusalemin in 135 AD

is because it might apply to Daniel’s prophecies.


Perhaps we are wrong about when Jesus really died? Many people seem to think Jesus was 30 or 33 when he started his ministry but in the Gospel of John they refer to him as not yet being 5o years old.

I would say we have a problem within the bible of who and which Jesus is the Messiah!

John 8:56-59

56Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.

57Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?

58Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

59Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.

(Interesting that they threw stones at him.)

Cephus” means stone.

The Synoptic Gospels have built their “image of Jesus” metaphorically by using stones!

By the way, I believe Cephus refers to Josephus Flavius!

Was there ever a decree to build the temple to the Messiah the Prince?

Perchance the destruction of Jerusalem in 135 AD is a clue?

Maybe the decree to build the temple to the Messiah the Prince occurred before 135 AD!

Seems odd that after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD that anyone would need to destroy it again 65 years later.

Building a city takes time, and funds, and manpower,

so why was there a need to destroy it again so soon after it had already been destroyed?


Seems to me that most and maybe all scholars of the bible are making presumptions, because they lump the gospels into one big ball but I think, to be fair,

we should separate the Synoptic Gospels from the Gospel of John

and calculate both sides to see if maybe we can come up with some other answers.

Maybe that is what is meant by the 153 fish which relates to the inferred 153:265 ratio!

Pope Benedict XVI and 153 Great Fish

Pope Benedict XVI is the

265th Pope,

was born Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger


Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, and the Pope

George Gänswein, Pope Benedict XVI, and Mel Gibson

revised

In the two article above that I just recently posted which are very similar I included in both a link to an article I found on the internet about names!

Praising Or Pleading

(POP)

seems to be his (The Pope) MO these days and in this article he pleads for parents to give their children traditional names before baptism so I gather names have meaning to him!

So since they are so important I thought maybe his name might be important also.

The Pope’s Last Name

IN the article

I relate the possibility that the Pope is related to another Pope whose last name was RATTE which would fulfill another prophecy in Revelation 17:11 about him being the eighth and one of the seven:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

But I did not deal with his middle name so:

The Pope’s Middle Name

Aloisius a german name means great warrior but comes from the name

Cleophas meaning and name origin

Cleophas \c-leo-phas\ as a boy’s name is of Greek origin, and the meaning of Cleophas is “visionof glory“.

Biblical name: husband of one of the Marys who stood at the foot of the Cross.

Cleophas has 4 variant forms: CleoCleofasCleofaso and Cleophus.


Alphaeus

which is basically the switch from the Synoptic version and Simon from Cyrene who bears the cross and takes over after Jesus is crucified. In essence to REPLACE the true disciples/apostles with his own sons etc because they were the Chief Priests and they wanted to stay that way and replace Jesus with their own perception of Him. It is the great deception! The Synoptic version of the bible (Matthew Mark and Luke) plus many additional books in the bible to form the amalgamation we now call Christianity.

Basically, Rome absconded the truth and twisted it into their baby.

That is why I believe that Mel Gibson has been targeted for his rendition of the Gospels in THE PASSION,

THE BABY or to be more specific THE DEVIL’s BABY

Here are a few posts about that baby!:

Affliction and the Time of Testing

Mel Gibson and the Book of Acts 2

Mel Gibson, Japan Quakes, and the Kamikazes

Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, and the Pope

George Gänswein, Pope Benedict XVI, and Mel Gibson

revised

You might say I went overboard, which is true, but I am trying to learn and to get your attention and the articles are ongoing because of the events which are at present rapidly unfolding.

======================

Back to the Prophecy of Daniel

============================================================

Daniel 9:26

26And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

INTERESTING: NICODEMAS MEANS “THE PEOPLE” AND

IT WAS NICODEMAS AND JOSEPH OF ARIMATHEA

THAT BURIED JESUS.


THE POPE’S FIRST NAME


IT’S A GOOD POSSIBILITY THAT JOSEPH OF ARIMATHEA

IS THE “prince of the people“.

Another interesting coincidence: Demas is a fellowlabourer of Paul:

Philemon 1:24

24Marcus, Aristarchus, Demas, Lucas, my fellowlabourers.

You don’t suppose that Demas is Nicodemas?

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

Daniel 9:27

27And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Sounds to me like in order to cover-up the abomination he had to make it desolate?

Who is “he” in verse 27?

Is “he” the Messiah the Prince?

OR

Is “he” the prince?


It makes a big difference who “he” is in verse 27!

The thing that concerns me is that we have been waiting for some treaty or covenant that will be confirmed and seems to me we ought to know first and foremost:

what is the covenant that is made with the many?

Then try to figure out

who confirms that covenant with the many!


The Covenant with the Many


Many treaties have been made with many people so what kind of treaty will be made with the many and confirmed with the many that this particular prophecy in Daniel is referring to? Certainly it has to do with the prince and the temple and/or worship and/or sin.

Most treaties we read about in the news most people are unaware of so why would Daniel of the bible be speaking of some political treaty that only the few politicians and leaders involved realize. This is a prophecy about the Messiah the Prince and the people of the prince and he (I assume is the prince of the people)

But it isn’t a treaty that Daniel talks about….it’s a covenant!

To be more specific it is the “covenant with many”!


What is the covenant with many?

I looked up “covenant” in the bible search on line and found a lot of covenants.

The covenant that caught my eye is the one that the Synoptic Jesus makes with the Synoptic disciples at the Synoptic Last Supper

and the verses about this covenant uses the word many.

I think that is a BIG CLUE about this covenant!


MATTHEW 26:26-29

26And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body.27And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;28For this is my blood of the new testamentwhich is shed for many for the remission of sins.29But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.

MARK 14:22-25

22And as they did eat, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is my body.23And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it.24And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testamentwhich is shed for many.25Verily I say unto you, I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, until that day that I drink it new in the kingdom of God.

LUKE 22:15-20

15And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer:16For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God.17And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves:18For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come.19And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.20Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.

 

THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

DOES NOT MENTION THIS

NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant with many!


I THINK THAT IS VERY SIGNIFICANT THAT THE

New Testament/Covenant

IS ABSENT IN

THE GOSPEL OF JOHN!


The three Synoptic gospels don’t mention the washing of the feet,

nor the dialogue that Jesus has with his disciples explaining what is going to happen

and many other things that is worth the time to study.


WHAT IS GOING ON?

Why are the Synoptic Gospels account of the Last Supper so different than the Gospel of John?


Were there two different “LAST SUPPERS”?


For a  break and for fun in an ironic way,

Please watch:

The Last, But One Supper

(It is a Monty Python skit with John Cleese acting like the Pope)


THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW SAYS THAT BLOOD OF THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant WHICH IS SHED FOR THE MANY is

FOR THE “REMISSION OF SINS“.

THE OTHER TWO SYNOPTICS GOSPELS (MARK AND LUKE) EXCLUDE THE “REMISSION OF SINS” TO THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant.

THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW AND THE GOSPEL OF MARK SAY THAT THE BLOOD OF THE NEW TESTAMENT/covenant IS SHED FOR THE MANY.

BUT THE GOSPEL OF LUKE SAYS IT IS FOR YOU. (HE IS TALKING TO HIS DISCIPLES)

EVEN THOUGH THESE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS ARE IN AGREEMENT THAT THERE IS A

NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant.

THEY ARE DISAGREEING AS TO WHO THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant IS FOR…..

THEMSELVES (YOU) OR THE MANY.

(I HATE TO BE A JERK!)

BUT THE ACCOUNTS GIVEN OF THE “LAST SUPPER” BY THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT (NT as opposed to the OT)

DIFFER A GREAT DEAL AS TO THIS “NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant” AND ARE WORLDS APART FROM THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

SINCE this “New Testament”

DOESN’T EVEN OCCUR IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN.

THE PRAYER AND THE DIALOGUE OF JESUS WITH HIS DISCIPLES

HAPPENS ONLY IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN AND THERE IS QUITE A BIT OF INFORMATION GIVEN!

========

Another point by Paul Carlson in his article  below, I get the impression that Paul Carlson thinks that all of the contradictions that are contained in the NT makes everything written about Jesus a lie and that is not my point!

I don’t believe that!

I think Jesus the Messiah did come and so did false messiahs and their many supporters

to quell the truth against Him and His true apostles

for money, power and control.

It’s like saying, for example, that the  September 11th terrorist attack on the Twin Terrors weren’t destroyed because 3 or 4 witnesses/terrorists don’t tell the same story, hence it’s all a lie and the Twin Towers are still there. That is ridiculous! But that is the point in having contradictions so that some people will come to that conclusion! Obviously, the Twin Towers were destroyed and something very big happened, because they are no longer there.

Deception is in the bible purposefully

to deceive

and to reveal!

In other words, it works both ways!

An oxymoron (plural oxymorons or oxymora) (from Greek ὀξύμωρον, “sharp dull”) is a figure of speechthat combines contradictory terms. Oxymorons appear in a variety of contexts, including inadvertent errors such as extremely average and literary oxymorons crafted to reveal a paradox.

Truth is a funny thing, because it is quite possible these contradictions were said

and did actually happen

…..but by who?

Why don’t the experts and scholars of the bible raise the possibility of what seems to be written in black and white in the bible? I get the impression they are hiding from what seems to be obvious …….

but why?

When Jesus came it made such a stir that Jerusalem was destroyed and their temple, Rome was destroyed and Jerusalem was destroyed again 65 years later. Jesus was big news and his coming had major ramifications! And I believe his enemies made sure of the destruction. propaganda and deception to cover up the truth! History was rewritten to hide the truth and many people were slaughtered!

People that lived under the rule of the Romans were slaughtered when they wrote anything that would make the Romans look bad. And I am convinced those times are coming again soon. So when you read Josephus and other writers, keep in mind that they could lose their lives for what they wrote and so maybe there are hidden meanings to their stories. Contradictions may abound in the bible and in the history given by the major history authors (Josephus included, even though his accounts seem to be false IMO) to point us to the truth while avoiding the threat of death for us to be able to discern via archeology and other avenues and the unfolding, at the right time! Possibly the power that caused so much destruction was something other than just the Romans, because they also suffered and suffer now, because they lack the truth and are deceived…..they just don’t realize it!

Daniel 7:25

And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High,

and think to change times and laws:

and they shall be given into his hand

until

time and times and the dividing of time.

I think that is what is meant by the words “time and times and the dividing of times” is what has been written about that time and the deception about those times.


I think we are in the times prophesied by Daniel and specifically

the “Dividing of time”.


Please read the following fantastic article I found on the internet which is linked next:

The Reliance of Luke-Acts on the Writings of Flavius Josephus

…..”So, Steve Mason, associate Professor of Humanities at York University, Ontario asks:

“If Luke did not know of Josephus’ work, how did this language suggest itself to him?”[5]….


Daniel is talking about he, the prince that was to come,

the prince that Jesus warns us about in the gospel of John.

So when you link to this site below by Paul Carlson and/or read my articles that talk about contradictions in the bible

keep in mind that just because there are contradictions

doesn’t mean it did not occur!

===========

New Testament Contradictions (1995)

Paul Carlson

A. WHEN – BEFORE OR DURING PASSOVER?

“…….In Matthew, Mark and Luke the last supper takes place on the first day of the Passover (Matthew 26:17, Mark 14:12, Luke 22:7).

In John’s gospel it takes place a day earlier and Jesus is crucified on the first day of the Passover (John 19:14).…….”

============


The Blood Covenant at the Last Supper

in the Synoptic Gospels seems to be a bit odd

since Jesus had not died yet!


I know I must seem like I’m just quibbling about small details,

(although they are not small to me)

but

since it is a contract

it seems to me it should be very clear and concise!


All I can tell is that this NEW TESTAMENT/covenant

is for “many”

or for


“you” which was “them” (the disciples sitting at the table).


Why the controversy?

Can’t they even agree on what the “New Testament” /covenant is,

and who it is between,

and what it is for?


The reason this is so IMPORTANT to me is that I have found many problems in the Synoptic Gospels

and have an inclination

to distrust their word of the Word.

New Testament

the collection of the books of the Bible that were produced by the early Christian church, comprising the Gospels, Acts of the Apostles, the Epistles, and the Revelation of St. John the Divine.
the covenant between god and humans in which the dispensation of grace is revealed through Jesus Christ
==============================================

Could the

“Covenant with many”

spoken about by Daniel be the

“Covenant with many”

made at the Last Supper

in the Synoptic Gospels?


Makes sense to me!


If so, then who confirms this covenant?


======================================

Whoever confirms this covenant could be the “he” in verse Daniel 9:27

In my last article on another blog, I wrote called Abomination of Desolation: Part one

(which is also linked here and at the bottom of this post)

the Synoptic Jesus in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke

talks about desolation:

Matthew 23:38

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

Luke 13:35

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate:

and verily I say unto you,

Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say,

Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.


=============================

They themselves

(The Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke)

testify to the

“Desolation” and a “Covenant with Many”

===========================

Remember:

the Covenant is not in tbe Gospel of John

nor is desolation mentioned.


========================
Daniel 9:26
26And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
—————–
Daniel 9:27
27And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
————-
Whoever that prince is that “he” is referring to is the one that causes the sacrifice and the oblation to cease., etc
after the Messiah is cut off.

I believe it is the the same prince that Jesus of the Gospel of John warns us about:
Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.
—————-
Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh,

and hath nothing in me.

——————

From the sounds of His warnings the prince of this world would be coming very soon,
not waiting 2000 years later!
I assume that is why Jesus says NOW twice.
“Now” could have a double meaning?
*********
The first time you hear about the prince of this world (in the Gospel of John)
is at the Jewish Feast in Jerusalem
after Jesus had raised Lazarus from the dead in Bethany when the Greeks arrive to that Jewish Feast to see Jesus.
I think that was a sign about this prince of this world.


===============================
I believe that the Covenant at the Last Supper was made with the prince of this world,
and he broke the covenant and desolation occurred.

I DO NOT BELIEVE GOD THE FATHER OR HIS TRUE SON ARE LIARS!
I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT JESUS OF NAZARETH WRITTEN ABOUT IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN
WOULD MAKE A COVENANT AND THEN BREAK IT
AND THEN CAUSE DESOLATION
SO THEREFORE WHOEVER DOES THIS IS THE LIAR
AND IS NOT THE TRUE MESSIAH!!!!!

The reason I believe this is because this Covenant at the Last Supper
is not in the Gospel of John
and John does not mention it later in his gospel.

The only gospels to mention desolation are two of the Synoptic Gospels

in the past tense:


Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
—————–

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate:
and verily I say unto you,
Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say,Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.
———————————

Here are some interesting comparisons of Paul and Josephus.
PLEASE READ:

Flavious Josephus And the Apostle Paul Were the Same Person?, page 1

and there are many more examples which I have included in other articles about
Josephus Flavius and Joseph of Arimathea.
PLEASE READ:
Maybe if we looked at things a bit differently, events like Masada and Yodfat and the discrepancies of the archeological evidence vs. Josephus Flavius’s historical account
might make more sense…….
Perhaps since no evidence of Jewish bones have been found at the site of Masada
could there have been a resurrection of the living?
I don’t know of course, but it is worth considering!

Josephus Flavius’s historical account and the archeological evidence do NOT match,
so I wonder what really did happen at Masada and Yodfat
and why would Josephus make up stories of mass suicide of JEWS!
that seems to have not happened at all?
If a mass suicide did not occur, why would Josephus lie about it???
Is he trying to promote suicide as a heroic sacrificial act for Jews or is he trying to infer their inferiority?
What would be the point?
He did seem to turn on his own country and people from what I have read about him and by him,
if, in fact, he was Jewish?
But then wasn’t HITLER Jewish? And we do not want to forget that lesson!
Or was he leaving us clues???
Why would he lie about it?
If there had been a victory by the Romans
why not write about it?

From his writings. he seemed to be kind of sick in the head or had some kind of deep insanity. His accounts of what happened show lots of inside information, even what people were actually thinking
and he seemed to be in charge !!!
His paranoia may be a result of knowing the thoughts of the people and their plots against him.
If you read his works they are quite descriptive of maniacal sadistic manipulative type behavior
and he seemed to enjoy the destruction and the deceptions of the people!


It must be that he is trying to hide who he is!


WHY?


Could Josephus Flavius be the “prince” ?


Could he have rewritten history and written the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke)
to cover up the truth
about Jesus of Nazareth
and replace himself
as the Messiah?
IE
THE DEVIL
Could he have taken the records in the Temple in Jerusalem as he says he did,
rewritten parts of the OT to bolster his Synoptic Gospels,
composed other books from The Book of ACTS and the rest?
Could he have changed the Genealogy records or destroyed them as others say they no longer exist to cover up
WHO HE REALLY IS?


Could he have been the one to make a covenant with many?


Could Josephus be Cephus?


Makes sense to me!

THE STONE

????????????????????????????????

Could Josephus Flavius Son of Matthew be Joseph of ARIMathea

(ARI means lion. and eagle)

Ari is also a very GREEK name.
ARISTOTLE

Jacqueline Kennedy married Aristotle Onassis which in itself seems very odd when you think about it!
Especially since recently ART of New Wineskins with *his propaganda site* IMO
implied that the head wound of the beast spoken about in Revelation
was President Kennedy’s assassination and that President Barrack Obama’s head vein?/scar? had something to do with this prophecy!
The Devil and his legions are in a hurry for lots and lots of reasons!

Since finishing this post today,
I have watched some you-tubes of the moments of President Kennedy’s assassination, because of what I have been learning and writing and it looks pretty scary. I have seen them a hundred times before and always gave Jacky the benefit of doubt because she is a female, very pretty, soft spoken and his wife,
but Jacqueline’s behavior before and after, are disconcerting to say the least!

Here is what I see NOW:
She is fiddling with him as he is shot the first time, then Connelly looks back and she looks at Connelly and he is shot, she looks back at her husband and gets closer and under him and he is shot again and the blood spray goes up, then
it looks as if she has something in her right hand after the second shot.
Possibly, lost that object when she pushed her husband over and fled to the trunk of the car to get whatever was back there,and it looks like a tube of lipstick because of the way it stays on the trunk of the car. She pursues it on the trunk of the car and gets it and gets back and hunches down with everyone else.
*April 2nd 2011 Just watched this video again a few times and it looks like she is the only one that seems to be busy …..very active….and in control…….everyone else seems to be reacting.
Everyone else seems to be in slow motion and she is in very fast motion.
Whoever her focus is on seems to be before that person is shot! IMO
Which is very disturbing!


Here is the video:

And the Secret Service act peculiar in the front seat, the driver and the passenger and the guy that left his post at the back corner  by President Kennedy.

But WHO knows with digital mastering and all of the coverups!

The same applies to Mel Gibson and the tapes of his rantings. My husband is a sound engineer and voices can also be spliced and diced and altered …….digitally mastered. It isn’t as if he doesn’t have plenty of emotional voice samples in all of the movies he has been involved with.
WHO knows!
I just would not place much faith in visual or sound technology.
I hope it isn’t a technique or practice employed to defame, destroy and rob individuals who have money, influence or sway,
but aren’t in alignment with the
One World Government, One World Religion, and One World Finance
fostered by Pope Benedict XVI and his legions.


THAT WOULD BE A NIGHTMARE
but maybe it is a warning and a sign of things to come!

Another time and on another post I watched a you-tube which also showed

peculiar behavior of the Secret Service


and that was behind Donald Rumsfeld when he misspoke

about the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

This is the post:

“A very interesting you -tube I watched recently of Donald Rumsfeld slip of the tongue, and I have linked it. Pay close attention to what he says about the the shooting down of the plane and the Pentagon and the reaction of the people in the background. Makes me think the Secret Service are a bit more powerful than I ever imagined. The Treasury Department runs the Secret Service. That is interesting since we are in debt up to our EARS. President Bush SR used to head the CIA. Hmmmmmmmmm. I wonder if Rumsfeld didn’t do that on purpose for our benefit? You never know! I hope so.”

The article below shows the relationship of banking

with the Synoptic Gospels, Paul, Josephus and BAAL!

1 Timothy 6:10
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

Please Read:

The Synoptic “Q Source”

*************************


What we do know is that

President John Kennedy

was killed because of his posture and his actions

exposing

SECRET SOCIETIES.


Time is our ally.


Please read about the head wound below:

Many people keep looking for a place called Arimathea, and so far there is none.

Could Josephus Flavius/Joseph of ARI-Mathea have been the Fear of the Jews?

Could Saul/Paul be Josephus Flavius?

1 Corinthians 3:22

22Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas,

or the world,

or life, or death,

or things present, or things to come;

all are your’s;

=====================

John 14:30

Hereafter I will not talk much with you:

for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

[and compare to what Paul says]

1 Corinthians 16:24
My love be with you all in Christ Jesus. Amen.

=============

Below Saul/Paul contradicts himself:
and then following Paul tricks people:

2 Corinthians 11:31
The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is blessed for evermore, knoweth that I lie not.
2 Corinthians 12:16
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty,

I caught you

with guile.

Guile

=====================[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[=================
If you read his history of the Jews and Josephus’s biography it’s almost like he is writing about the underworld,
or the world of the dead.
The spiritual world.
======================

A lot of the names and events seem to parallel Acts and I don’t think it’s accidental!
He seems to relish the people being deceived!
THE DEVIL ENJOYS DECEPTION!
Could Josephus Flavius have been as a
Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde
with

MANY OTHER NAMES

I don’t think we should ignore his writings, but rather compare his style and details to the events in the bible!

================================
Other sites of interest in regard to old and recent covenants:
===============================


=================================

My last *four posts that I believe relate to the subject of the covenant follow:

*Abomination of Desolation: Part one

*The Abomination of Desolation Part 2

*In The Garden of Gethsemane

*Sour Wine

Josephus and His Footprints

CONFIRMATION OF THE COVENANT

The Fruits of the Vatican

———–=======================———–

Here is a recent Covenant with Many that might be of interest:

Magen David Adom Covenant

– The value of saving lives as seen by the three religions, will be presented to the Pope

=======================================

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)


I Am the True Vine


If you have read any of my articles I have a basic theme throughout most of my posts on my blogs and it is that the Synoptic (Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke), Acts and many other epistles are false! I believe they represent a false Messiah and a False Prophet! I believe I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt quite often that they contradict each other and are antithetical to the gospel of John. They promote a political agenda to control the people and quell the truth about Jesus and his message.I think the synoptic gospels were written by thieves of the true Word of God and his true apostles.

I believe these guys killed the true apostles, stole what they could from them, altered their messages, rewrote history to cover up their crime, in collusion with the the powers that be at the time to create their own version of Jesus and God.

The contradictions are pretty apparent if you compare the gospels to each other and read the bible critically. For many years, I didn’t study, but just read what other people thought and still kept running into a cement wall. I don’t think I have all the answers, yet nor do I think I will attain that ever in my lifetime. I write in my blogs as I am learning and hope it will help others that have also questioned the same things I question that is written about God and Jesus.

I don’t think it is healthy to accept what we have been fed for years as “the truth” I think it is healthier to question, study and discuss. I don’t think the ecclesiastic entity appreciates our freedom to question it’s authority on their interpretation of what is written in the bible but who said they have the right to quell our search for the truth? To them it is Apostacy,,,the falling away…. I say it is Apostacy from them, and falling away from them. They think they have the answers…..

I dont think they have the answers, so thats why I write my blogs. Enuf said on that!


 

April 5, 2011 Posted by | bible, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversies, BIBLE PROPHECY, Book of Daniel, Bread of Life, Daniel, Deception, Endtime Deception, JOSEPHUS, POPE BENEDICT XVI, prophecy of Daniel, Roman Catholicism, Synoptic Gospels, THE ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION, The Antichrist, The False Church, THE FALSE MESSIAH, The Gospels | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Abomination of Desolation Part 2


The Brazen Serpent

The Christological Symbol (Brazen Serpent Sculpture), created by Italian artist, Giovanni Fantoni, stands atop Mount Nebo. It is symbolic of the bronze serpent created by Moses in the wilderness (Numbers 21:4-9) and the cross upon which Jesus was crucified (John 3:14).

Mount Nebo

According to the 2 Maccabees 2:4-7, the Prophet Jeremiah hid the tabernacle and the Ark of the Covenant here.

Recent history

Pope Benedict XVI visited the site on May 9, 2009, gave a speech, and looked out from the top of the mountain in the direction of Jerusalem.

ISRAEL: The pope’s gifts–taking stock

Significance to Christianity

“As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life“.[11]

Hezekiah destroyed the brazen serpent, calling it Nehushtan, or “a lump of brass.” From this it was argued by some that rulers in Church and State have authority to prohibit, in the public worship of God, the use of things that have been abused to Idolatry. [1] But this likely falls short of the true significance of Hezekiah’s actions – the condemnation of idol worship that has replaced true worship. Conservative scholars note a similar episode in the life of Gideon [12] as a theological parallel. [2][3] The Apostle Paul condemns this principle of replacement in Romans 1.22-23, 25.

Nehushtan

The creation of a bronze snake (the Nehustan) is attributed to Moses in the Book of Numbers (Numbers 21:6).

The Talmud, Rosh Hashanah 29a, asserts that it was not the copper serpent that healed the Israelites, but it was their looking up and submitting themselves to God.

——————————————————-

Numbers 21:5-9

5And the people spake against God, and against Moses, Wherefore have ye brought us up out of Egypt to die in the wilderness? for there is no bread, neither is there any water; and our soul loatheth this light bread.

6And the LORD sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people; and much people of Israel died.

7Therefore the people came to Moses, and said, We have sinned, for we have spoken against the LORD, and against thee; pray unto the LORD, that he take away the serpents from us. And Moses prayed for the people.

8And the LORD said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a pole: and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall live.

9And Moses made a serpent of brass, and put it upon a pole, and it came to pass, that if a serpent had bitten any man, when he beheld the serpent of brass, he lived.

———————————————————————————–

2 Kings 18:4

4He removed the high places, and brake the images, and cut down the groves, and brake in pieces the brasen serpent that Moses had made: for unto those days the children of Israel did burn incense to it: and he called it Nehushtan.

————————————————————————————

Book of Zephaniah

Some scholars believe that much of the material does not date from the days of King Josiah (ca. 640-609 BC), but is actually post-monarchic. Three general possibilities are that a person, possibly named Zephaniah, prophesied the words of the book of Zephaniah; the general message of a Josianic prophet is conveyed through the book of Zephaniah; or the name could have been employed, either during the monarchic or post-monarchic period, as a ‘speaking voice’, possibly for rhetorical purposes. Although it is possible that a post-monarchic author assumed the persona of a monarchic prophet to add credibility to his message, there is no evidence to support such a claim.

Zephaniah

THE LINK PRECEDING states that Zephaniah the prophet of the Book of Zephaniah is the only prophet of the prophets in the OT that gives a partial genealogy of himself.

I wonder why Zephaniah would give his partial genealogy and what difference does it make? Why bother?

I looked up the gospel of Matthew to see if Hezekiah was part of the genealogy of Jesus that Matthew proposes in his gospel and it does include Hezekiah in the NIV and Ezekias in the KJV:

Matthew 1:9 NIV

9Uzziah the father of Jotham, Jotham the father of Ahaz, Ahaz the father of Hezekiah,

Matthew 1:9 KJV

9And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias;

I am assuming that Hezekiah and Ezekias are one and the same person, but I don’t know!

I believe that Zephaniah supports the Gospel of Matthew’s genealogy up to Hezekiah/Ezekias to support himself as a true prophet and the Gospel of Matthew is using the prophets book of Zephaniah (his genealogy) to support his claim to being the Messiah with the other two synoptic renditions of Jesus (Gospels of Mark and Luke) in collusion with the Q source, Paul, his family, followers and cohorts and Josephus Flavius son of Matthew (historian) and his account of history

to quell the truth about Jesus written about in the Gospel of John.

and I believe it is not by accident, but purposeful with the intent to deceive and promote a false Jesus. If you read my posts you will see lots and lots of examples to support my belief.

There is a world of difference between the Gospel of John and the other gospels and they should be examined carefully!

Daniel 7:25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.

I think history has been multiplied and divided to hide the prophetic events people are expecting to come that have already occurred and to confuse the masses about who Jesus was, when he came, and why he came. It is not a mistake or just differing viewpoints of that time that can explain the differences between the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John!

Josephus and the holy books of Jerusalem

Below is an article presented by ChristianAnswers with a listing of many prophecies about the identification of Jesus:

Messianic Prophecies

“More specificially, he would be of the house of David (2 Samuel 7:12-16Jeremiah 23:5Psalm 89:3-4). Fulfilled: See Christ’s genealogy in Matthew 1Luke 1:273269. Note: Since the the Jewish genealogical records were destroyed in 70 A.D., along with the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple, it would not be possible for a Messiah imposter who was born later to prove his lineage back to David and thus fulfill this prophecy.”

Do you think this may mean that there might actually have been a false Messiah that wants to replace the true Messiah back in those days?

It is no accident that the records were destroyed!

SO anyone that comes saying he is the Messiah in this present age OR IN THE PAST cannot possibly prove his IDENTIFICATION BY HIS GENEALOGY!

The messiah is supposed to come from the line of David, but if you recall one of David’s sons called Soloman had hundreds of wives!

I believe the Abomination of Desolation occurred then, but often times prophecies have a dual fulfillment and meaning so it could be possible that it will happen again. Also SOME FULFILLMENTs OF PROPHECIES ARE FALSE FULFILLMENTS CREATED AND IMPLEMENTED BY A FALSE PROPHET AND A FALSE MESSIAH TO PROVE THEIR FALSE ID-ENTITY AND FALSE PROPHECIES!

The gospels of Matthew and Luke WROTE that there was Desolation:

Matthew 23:38

Beholdyour house is left unto you desolate.

Luke 13:35

Beholdyour house is left unto you desolate: and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

DON’T YOU FIND THAT THESE STATEMENTS PROVE THAT AN ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION HAS ALREADY OCCURRED desolation for sure. AND BOTH THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW AND THE GOSPEL OF LUKE SEEM TO REFLECT THIS IN THESE STATEMENTS (ATTRIBUTED TO JESUS) ABOVE AND ALSO SEEM TO BE RELISHING IT!

THEY ARE TRYING TO SAY THAT THE MESSIAH HIMSELF SAYS THESE WORDS PROPHETICALLY IN THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW

YET, IF IT ALREADY HAPPENED

HOW IS THAT PROPHETIC?

IF A PROPHECY IS WRITTEN ABOUT THE PAST

SHOULDN’T IT BE CONSIDERED HISTORY

AND A FALSE PROPHECY!

If the Gospel of Matthew is looking back in history to make prophetic statements about things of the past (implying the desolation of Jerusalem and the Temple) obviously the genealogical records were  destroyed by the time the gospel of Matthew was completed then why bother adding genealogy of Jesus to his text? There is no way to prove or disprove his genealogy and the gospel writer of Matthew must realize this Catch-22.

It seems to me that the statements about

‘beholding their desolation’ etc.,

written by the false prophets and false shepherds/wolves

who wrote the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke

are the poison

that Jesus warns his disciples

about at the last supper

in the Gospel of John!

I believe that the story in Numbers 21:4-9 is a prophetic picture pointing us to what is written in the Gospel of John because Jesus knew what would be written about him in the other gospels. When a person discovers the lies in the Synoptic Gospels or discovers the contradictions in the bible. it can be disconcerting and take a person’s faith down a notch or two and for some can even make them lose faith totally in what is written. I have come often to different levels of despair about the contradictions because of what is written in the gospels, the OT,  and in the history information afforded us, but when I read the gospel of John and read about Jesus in most parts, it helps me to believe when I am at my lowest.

I honestly think the devil is in the details of the gospels! I think we have been robbed of so much by the powers in the church that supposedly protected the gospels. Nevertheless there are morsels left in the gospels to hold us over.

I have a hard time with people that say not to believe because there are contradictions. It is like saying there was never a temple because now there is a mosque sitting in the same spot. That’s ridiculous. Or when someone says that the holocaust did not occur. We luckily have photos to show the evidence of the holocaust which we did not have in the biblical days. The only way to keep the truth in the gospels was to allow the lies, otherwise all would have been lost. So when you find a contradiction in the bible and there are many, many of them, it is a good idea to do research in other books, gospels, anywhere that you can find information (and also pray) and eventually the truth will shine through the lies that have been sown purposefully to trip you up and wear you down.

They are the stones!

That’s why I believe that what happened to the Hebrews in Numbers was for this generation also to look past the lies and see!

Read the Gospel of John and learn it well and it will help to see more clearly.

As far as the Synoptic Gospels there are some outstanding parts that very well could be true, but mixed in are some parts that just do not measure up to the standards of reliability.

In many ways life itself is a contradiction. We are living in times that are very similar to the confusion that engulfed those days in Israel but we now have access to more information than ever before and we should take advantage of what we have been given to sort it out, so to speak.

There is no comparison to any other than who, what and why Jesus came!

Even if you have to read between the lines He is a miracle!

 Life is a miracle but full of a lot of diversions, slippery slopes, pit falls, and lessons, etc. which makes life hard to live sometimes.

Abomination of Desolation: Part one

In The Garden of Gethsemane

The Covenant with Many

CONFIRMATION OF THE COVENANT

Salute No Man

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

==========================================

November 1, 2010 Posted by | Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversies, BIBLE PROPHECY, Book of Daniel, Gospel of Matthew, JOSEPHUS, POPE BENEDICT XVI, Synoptic Gospels, THE ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Josephus and His Footprints


Wiki: Josephus problem

The problem is named after Flavius Josephus, a Jewish historian living in the 1st century. According to Josephus’ account of the siege of Yodfat, he and his 40 comrade soldiers were trapped in a cave, the exit of which is blocked by Romans. They chose suicide over capture and decided that they would form a circle and start killing themselves using a step of three. Josephus states that by luck or maybe by the hand of God (modern scholars point out that Josephus was a well educated scholar and predicted the outcome), he and another man remained the last and gave up to the Romans.

Using a step of three?  What does this mean?

Alter steps?

OR DOES JOSEPHUS MEAN THE ROMAN CATHOLIC STEPS OF SAINTHOOD?

Steps to Sainthood: the third being a martyr?

Third Step: To be beatified and recognized as a “Blessed,” one miracle acquired through the candidate’s intercession is required in addition to recognition of heroic virtue (or martyrdom in the case of a martyr).

Wiki: Siege of Yodfat

The Siege of Yodfat (Hebrew: יוֹדְפַת‎, also Jotapata, Iotapata, Yodefat) was a 47 day siege by Roman forces of the Jewish town of Yodfat which took place in 67 CE, during theGreat Revolt. Led by Roman General Vespasian and his son Titus, both future emperors, the siege ended with the sacking of the town, the deaths of most of its inhabitants and the enslavement of the rest. It was the second bloodiest battle of the revolt, surpassed only by the sacking of Jerusalem, and the longest bar Jerusalem and Masada. The siege was chronicled by Josephus, who had personally commanded the Jewish forces at Yodfat and was subsequently captured by the Romans. [2]

I have a big problems with the story

told by Flavius Josephus!

1) My first concern is why does Josephus not tell how the people committed suicide or killed each other EXCEPT that they cut each others neck.

2) Who decided that it would be every third person?

3) Who decided where each person would stand?

4) and who decided where to start the circle!

It sounds to me like a cruel joke!

If I were there I would be switching places a bunch.  It makes no sense! I cannot imagine that all 41 of those soldiers (“forty persons of eminency that had concealed themselves”) would all be desiring the same fate of death! What kind of military people were they, or were they a different kind of army? Was this cave actually a choking point?

IF they were going to kill each other so that they would not commit suicide, why not fight the enemy to the death?

This story is full of holes!

I thought Flavius Josephus was a general, but as he says he was assisted by

a certain supernatural providence!

Interesting choice of words!

The next link is a simulation game of the Josephus dilemma!

Please click on the title below:

Josephus Flavius game

Josephus Flavius was a famous Jewish historian of the first century at the time of the Second Temple destruction. During the Jewish-Roman war he got trapped in a cave with a group of 40 soldiers surrounded by romans. The legend has it that preferring suicide to capture, the Jews decided to form a circle and, proceeding around it, to kill every third remaining person until no one was left. Josephus, not keen to die, quickly found the safe spot in the circle and thus stayed alive.

If Josephus was trapped in a cave with 40 other soldiers or eminent persons, then there were a total of 41 people in the cave, including himself. He says that two people survived this suicide pact, Josephus and some other person.

Why doesn’t he include the name of the other person that survived with him?

And as he was very desirous neither to be condemned by the lot, nor, if he had been left to the last, to imbrue his right hand in the blood of his countrymen, he persuaded him to trust his fidelity to him, and to live as well as himself.

Basically, Josephus bribed the other guy (obviously in a private way) so that the others would not hear and which must have been in his concscience,

which means that Josephus acted as a Devil!

How did Josephus persuade this other man to go along to get along? The other men were there…did they not notice Josephus offering “his fidelity” and “the good life” to this other fellow?


Sounds like a bribe to me!

IN the simulation game in the link above Josephus would have been the 16th person or the 31st person in the circle to survive!

What a difference it makes where he stood in that circle!

Did he arrange the soldiers (eminent persons)? Wasn’t he in charge?

Josephus says that they drew lots!

How do you draw lots to kill every third person ?

Here is what Josephus says happened, but it still does not make any sense since his 40 fellow cavemen were EXTREMELY desirous that he die with them, so he says!

Why in the world would they (his fellow cavemen) wait for him to be second to the last, or the last?

Please read what Josephus said happened below:

7. However, in this extreme distress, he was not destitute of his usual sagacity; but trusting himself to the providence of God, he put his life into hazard [in the manner following]: “And now,” said he, “since it is resolved among you that you will die, come on, let us commit our mutual deaths to determination by lot. He whom the lot falls to first, let him be killed by him that hath the second lot, and thus fortune shall make its progress through us all; nor shall any of us perish by his own right hand, for it would be unfair if, when the rest are gone, somebody should repent and save himself.” This proposal appeared to them to be very just; and when he had prevailed with them to determine this matter by lots, he drew one of the lots for himself also. He who had the first lot laid his neck bare to him that had the next, as supposing that the general would die among them immediately; for they thought death, if Josephus might but die with them, was sweeter than life; yet was he with another left to the last, whether we must say it happened so by chance, or whether by the providence of God. And as he was very desirous neither to be condemned by the lot, nor, if he had been left to the last, to imbrue his right hand in the blood of his countrymen, he persuaded him to trust his fidelity to him, and to live as well as himself.

There is nothing about the third step in this account!

Josephus lied and connived for his cavemen to kill each other instead of suicide or fighting the Romans, if you believe Josephus!

“let us commit our mutual deaths to determination by lot

It was Josephus that made up this brilliant plan to draw lots!

These guys must have been out of their minds, definitely deceived,  perhaps from fasting, exhaustion, or something else.

I don’t believe it!

I think he murdered them, probably with poison!

Remember Mithradatism?

The mustard seed was used for anecdotes for many things including scorpian bites and poison in Egypt!

Botanical: Thlaspi arvense

—Synonym—Pennycress.
—Part Used—Seeds.

Mithridate Mustard, Thlaspi arvense, grows higher than Treacle Mustard; the leaves are small and narrower, smooth, toothed, arrow-shaped at the base. The flowers are small and white, growing on long branches, the seed-vessels form a round pouch, flat, with very broad wings, earning for the plant its other name of Pennycress.

Recall Cephas in the BIBLE?  Josephus is Cephas.

JOSEPHUS is the STONE!

Remember that Paulus said:

1 Corinthians 3:22

22Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come; all are your’s;

Another bribe!

Whereupon Vespasian sent immediately and zealously two tribunes, Paulinus and Gallicanus, and ordered them to give Josephus their right hands as a security for his life, and to exhort him to come up.

Galatians 2:9
And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision

================================

I have never heard of a general in any military who would get his men to commit suicide or murder their fellow soldier beside them, but instead would hold off the enemy as long as possible, or fight the enemy to the death, or surrender! But it depends on what kind of army we are speaking of. I have a feeling these men were priests!

Wasn’t murdering each other a sin, to the Jews?

This does not make sense!

Josephus Problem

He did try to abandon them early on in “his own account”, because he was the false shepherd, the false christ (of the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke), the instigator, and the destroyer!

Josephus seems to know everything and even what people thought

miles and miles away.

He “set up” the Jews for destruction.

I think he is the devil!

The EYE of Horus!

The Prince of this world that Jesus spoke about that was coming! (In the Gospel of John)

“Thou, O Vespasian, thinkest no more than that thou hast taken Josephus himself captive; but I come to thee as a messenger of greater tidings; for had not I been sent by God to thee, I knew what was the law of the Jews in this case?

Now Josephus is bribing Vespasian!

(He sounds like the fallen angel Lucifer!)

IN fact, he sounds like the Gospel of Luke’s angel that visited Mary!

Even Paul’s angel in the book of Acts!

And then Josephus continues his bribe to Vespasian:

….and how it becomes generals to die. Dost thou send me to Nero? For why? Are Nero’s successors till they come to thee still alive? Thou, O Vespasian, art Caesar and emperor, thou, and this thy son. Bind me now still faster, and keep me for thyself, for thou, O Caesar, are not only lord over me, but over the land and the sea, and all mankind; and certainly I deserve to be kept in closer custody than I now am in, in order to be punished, if I rashly affirm any thing of God.”

YUCK!

Sounds very slithery!

Siege of Yodfat

Yosef Ben-Matityahu had hidden in one of the caves that litter the site, along with 40 other prominent citizens of Yodfat. Although Ben-Matityahu was in favour of surrendering to the Romans, the majority of his comrades opted to kill themselves rather than fall into Roman hands. [4] As suicide is considered sinful, they decided to draw lots to kill each other. Ben-Matityahu and another man, however, were the last to survive, and both resolved to give themselves up. [18] Taken to see the Roman general, Ben-Matityahu prophesied that Vespasian would one day become emperor. Vespasian subsequently spared the rebel leader, who began collaborating with the Romans. At first a slave, he would later be freed and be granted Roman citizenship as Flavius Josephus. [4][19]

 

I looked up what happened in history in 1631 to see if anything pertaining to that number of the Josephus JOTAPATA survivors which were # 16 and  # 31 of the infamous circle suicide had occurred (just for the heck of it) and I found a few interesting facts WHICH I believe ARE related …..

The ERUPTION OF VESUVIUS in 1631

AND MORE STRANGER THAN THAT

King James Bible, 1631 edition –
One Word Makes a World of Difference
In the 1631 edition printing of the King James Bible, in Exodus 20:14, a very small word was forgotten by the printers. The word “not”. This changed the 7th commandment to say Thou shalt commit adultery!

Botched 1631 King James Bible

==========================================

Archaeology of Yodfat

One find of particular interest is an 8 by 11 cm stone slab, found in the residential area on the eastern slope of Yodfat, [9] covered on both sides with scratched drawings made by a pointed tool. One side depicts a building with a triangular roof upon a podium, a small tree and a harp, and is thought to portray a Nefesh (a traditional Judean mausoleum). The other side of the stone features a crab, the astrological symbol of the Hebrew month of Tammuz, on the first day of which Yodfat fell. The stone is believed to have been the work of a besieged Jew anticipating his own impending doom, [7] [22] and its likeness has been etched on a modern memorial to the defenders of Yodfat placed at the foot of the Roman siege ramp.

made by a pointed tool

Perhaps an aul?

I mean, an awl!

Capstone

“One side depicts a building with a triangular roof upon a podium”

Psalm 118:22
The stone the builders rejected has become the
capstone;

Zechariah 4:7

“What are you, O mighty mountain? Before Zerubbabel you will become level ground. Then he will bring out the capstone to shouts of ‘God bless it! God bless it!’ “

Matthew 21:42
Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures: ” ‘The stone the builders rejected has become the
capstone ; the Lord has done this, and it is marvelous in our eyes’ ?

Mark 12:10
Haven’t you read this scripture: ” ‘The stone the builders rejected has become the
capstone ;

Luke 20:17
Jesus looked directly at them and asked, “Then what is the meaning of that which is written: ” ‘The stone the builders rejected has become the
capstone

Acts 4:11
He is ” ‘the stone you builders rejected, which has become the
capstone.

1 Peter 2:7
Now to you who believe, this stone is precious. But to those who do not believe, “The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone, “

Funny, the Gospel of John says nothing about a capstone!

But the Gospel of Luke says:

Luke 20:18
Whosoever shall fall upon that stone shall be broken; but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.

a small tree

Probably the mustard tree which is small and is told about via parables in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke,

but not in the gospel of John!

and a harp

More than likely referring to Nero or

maybe a fallen angel!

The ANGEL OF DEATH!

Maybe HAARP is the meaning to this sign?

a Nefesh

and is thought to portray a Nefesh (a traditional Judean mausoleum)

A Crab

a crab, the astrological symbol of the Hebrew month of Tammuz, on the first day of which Yodfat fell

It looks more like an eye to me!

EYE OF HORUS

Then there looks to be a picture of a scarab which does not seem to be mentioned?

It is voice from the past which could have been a warning, a message,

or could be a footprint,

IE

A signatureA possible premonition?

Yodfat

In June, we found the water cisterns completely full of water

but Josephus said in chapter 7 of Book 3:

12. Now the besieged had plenty of corn within the city, and indeed of all necessaries, but they wanted water, because there was no fountain in the city, the people being there usually satisfied with rain water; yet is it a rare thing in that country to have rain in summer, and at this season, during the siege, they were in great distress for some contrivance to satisfy their thirst;

============================

Book 3 of

The Wars Of The Jews

Or

The History Of The Destruction Of Jerusalem

Interesting !!

In Number 3 of Chapter 2 of Book 3 Josephus talks about Niger which I have linked.

Remember Niger of the Bible?

Acts 13:1
Now there were in the church that was at Antioch certain prophets and teachers; as Barnabas, and Simeon that was called
Niger, and Lucius of Cyrene, and Manaen, which had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Saul.

But their former ill fortune followed them, as the consequence of their unskilfulness, and other deficiencies in war; for Antonius laid ambushes for them in the passages they were to go through, where they fell into snares unexpectedly, and where they were encompassed about with horsemen, before they could form themselves into a regular body for fighting, and were above eight thousand of them slain; so all the rest of them ran away, and with them Niger, who still did a great many bold exploits in his flight. However, they were driven along together by the enemy, who pressed hard upon them, into a certain strong tower belonging to a village called Bezedeh However, Antonius and his party, that they might neither spend any considerable time about this tower, which was hard to be taken, nor suffer their commander, and the most courageous man of them all, to escape from them, they set the wall on fire; and as the tower was burning, the Romans went away rejoicing, as taking it for granted that Niger was destroyed; but he leaped out of the tower into a subterraneous cave, in the innermost part of it, and was preserved; and on the third day afterward he spake out of the ground to those that with great lamentation were searching for him, in order to give him a decent funeral; and when he was come out, he filled all the Jews with an unexpected joy, as though he were preserved by God’s providence to be their commander for the time to come.

4. And now Vespasian took along with him his army from Antioch, (which is the metropolis of Syria,

How does Josephus know these particulars?

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

Salute No Man


=======================================

THE PARABLE OF FAITH -PART ONE

IF YOU ENJOYED THIS POST PLEASE COME VISIT AGAIN AND TRY OUT THESE OTHER INTERESTING SITES BELOW:)

Merangue’s Blog

Blue Skies

Eye of a Needle

The Keep

The Drawbridge

 

September 1, 2010 Posted by | bible, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversies, BIBLE PROPHECY, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, JOSEPHUS, Mustard Seeds, Parables, Synoptic Gospels, THE ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION, The Antichrist, THE FALSE MESSIAH, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment