Nellie Connally: Did Nellie Shoot John Connally?

Nov. 10, 1997 c-span

“Former Congressman Jake Pickle introduces this one hour discussion from the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library, Austin Texas”

snapshot from c-span video

“Well, welcome to the um Nellie Connally homecoming.

This is her home town and uh thank goodness she has bloomed where she was pottied and we’re proud of it.

Now, I’m always a bit nervous when I introduce my dear UT classmate, Nellie Connally, because she’s got the last word, but whose friendship I have enjoyed for over 60 years.

Nellie Brill Connally of Austin has great charm and personality. We elected her our UT Sweetheart and, of course, elected Big John as President of the student body at the same time. That was when we were young and twenty and campus elections were bi-partison, honest, and very important.

Intermingled with her charm and happy laughter is a streak of impishness and even devil(?), if you misbehaved. She does not take herself too seriously and thinks you shouldn’t either, therefore we have all learned to be on our guard. Maybe that’s why Nellie and I have gotten along so well. We understand and we’re sort of kindred spirits in that regard.

Now, I’ve always been proud to have been John’s Law Fraternity Brother, his business partner at KVET and his best man at their wedding. I’ve always told Big John that I’m still the best man, but he didn’t always agree with me on that. (laughter)

During the early years of World War 2, Nellie sold radio spots for station KTVC

(The radio station that was bought/managed by Lady Bird Johnson in 1943)

in the brown building. She knew many of the bidness stores on Congress Avenue and she knew all the merchants on E 6th Street. She would go into the stores unbelievably ?great?, shuck the owners under the chin, give him a little hug, and leave the the business with a contract for spots for 6 months. She was so good she could sell Saul Ginsberg a ticket to the PLO (?Bank?/?Bake?) and she, and she can sell Texas (?Pryor?) haircut.

Well, what a lifetime of great achievement and honor John and Nellie have enjoyed. John was founder of Radio Station KVET, administrative assistant and personal advisor to the …?…Center to Lyndon Johnson, Secretary to the US Navy, Governor of Texas, Secretary of the US Treasury, and served on the board of dozens of corporations.

Now, some say that Nellie lived in the shadow of Big John. Well, there’s nothin wrong with that Nellie, we all have lived under the shadow of Big John. And to be very blunt about it, when we say we’ve all lived under the shadow, that includes LBJ, ?biz? Barnes, Larry Temple, George Christian, Price Daniels, Joe Kilgore, Mac Myers, Julian Reed, Howard Rhodes, John Mobley, and me, especially.

Of those of us whose know this couple best think that John lived in the shadow of Nellie’s charm.

Nellie has always been

our First Lader

[Oppressor-Lucifer snake that befuddles, baffles, confuses, etc]

and leader to all

of these glory years.

Nellie also knows what it is to have position, power and resources

and lose the resources,

but she and John took it on the chin with class, and dignity, and poise and we all love you for that Nellie and we have been proud to see you come back and go forward in

[?haver?]  (babble/nonsense?) time 

and we’re proud of you.

(applause)

Nellie is the unstoppable Grand Dame of Texas public life. She still carries on. Listen, she was a driving force and inspiration that recently created The Nellie Connally Breast Cancer Center at MD Anderson in Houston where millions of dollars have been raised to fight and help eradicate cancer. She has been given the Woman of Distinction Award for the Conis Colitis Foundation in Houston, as well as, the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation Award.

(albeit with OPM for her name and namesakes)

Tonight, she may

(Or she might not….lawyer jargon)

relive with us that heart-breaking day in Dallas, November 22nd, 63 which changed the course of world history and Nellie was there at the very center of that gut-wrenching tragedy. However, to many of her old friends here tonight, she’s is still Nellie Brill Connally of Austin,

our First Lader

[Oppressor-Lucifer snake that befuddles, baffles, confuses, etc],

the mother of John the third, Sharon, our great sculpturer, and Mark, our financier and banker, but she is still our UT Sweetheart who hadn’t changed a bit in 60 years.”

(Then Nellie Connally takes the podium)

Nellie Connally!

 “I don’t know whether to thank Jake or not.

Pretty neat fella!”

“….Today, I’m gonna to read to you some notes I wrote some 30 some odd years ago. Just after we brought John home from Parkland Hospital in Dallas.

I wrote them for my children and my grand children, and others to come, in case they wanted to know how I felt during that day. They lay dormant for 30 years, I forgot all about them. I put them in a file drawer, closed the drawer, and for 30 years never thought of them. One day, I was going through the files, opened the files and I saw these papers. Strange looking papers. I pulled them out and they were these notes. If I had not known that I had written them, I would have said, “I didn’t.” If someone had asked me, “could you write?” I would have said, “No.”….”

Strange to say the least!

In another interview

 when questioned she says the following:

Former Texas First Lady Nellie Connally 

by Texas Monthly Talks

Q:  The time passes and you discover these notes again. What made you think…you said 33 years afterward….

Nellie: Can you believe?

Q:  What made you think at that time I ought to haul these out and I ought to begin to tell the story

Nellie:  Well, I just wanted to read them, so I took them out to read

 and I thought they were pretty accurate pretty good. You know many more things could be added but uh it would destroy the historic notes so I have because I’ve learned a lot of things the different things that uh I could would like to put in there maybe but I’m not ever gonna change em..”

—————————————————————————————–

Well, the truth probably is that those “historians” she talks about a few minutes, seconds…. later (lader?) told her they were important, so she looked for them in those files

one day

so why in the world did she go through this ridiculous explanation about accidentally finding them in her files?

If she had not known she had written them ….yet she didn’t

OR DID SHE?

she didn’t even remember them….yet she found them when she needed them for those historians that told her they were important

and she doesn’t even know if she could write…..yet she did

OR COULD SHE?

Does that make any sense?

Neither does what she says about

how she accidentally found those

strange looking papers.

She probably wanted to see what it is she wrote

(if she wrote them),

because people were curious about her role in the assassination…..

(now that the evidence is slowly being manipulated and trickled out to the public) and she knows her part in the assassination and wanted to manipulate the public.

She says she didn’t write it for the world,

but just for her kids and their kids her grandchildren etc

then why write a book?

Why get on TV and do interviews?

Those historians……IM CURIOUS

What are their names?

Are these the same guys who have hidden history from us for 40 years

 that now want us to know history 

or do they just want to

manipulate history and us?

“Subsequent to Governor Connally’s administration, she served as a member of the

Texas Historical Commission.”

aka 

THC

sounds like a drug

So I guess she is one of those “historians”?

I call that sneaky!

In another interview she said:

“I cannot believe that the notes that I wrote have suddenly become so important.”

“I sat there and wrote what happened in that car. Not for you, not for the world,

 not for history,

not because I thought I was a writer.”

=================

Here are books on internet that Nellie

authored or co-authored:

books by Nellie Connally

Then in that same interview she was asked :

Q: When people read the book now what do you want them to take a way from it?

and she answered;

A: Well I want them to take a way this little bit of history,

which is not happy history, but it is history and I did have my notes checked by the history department at the U. of Texas to see if it really history and they told me if I would change nothing add nothing subtract nothing, not worry about sentence structure, commas, spelling that it was  history. IF I started adding, taking out or doing any of that then it was just a story so  they are exactly as I wrote them that day at the Mansion for my babies.”

(not for history’s sake but for her children and their children etc would know how she felt about being in that car)

In an obituary for Nellie Connally linked below it lists what she did to sell the book:

Nellie Connally, former Texas First lady ( 1919-2006)

“ She conducted a national tour to publicize her book that featured parties in Texas, New York and Washington, along with a host of media appearances, including The TODAY Show, Larry King Live, CBS Evening News and NBC Evening News.“

My dad wrote about his life for his kids and he did not publish a book, tour the countryside appearing on talk shows and television news programs. 

He typed it and gave it to his kids!

WHAT A STRANGE LOOKING PICTURE

of the “sad pink suit” and Nellie

40 or more years after the assassination!

The woman sitting behind that sad suit looks mighty proud!

WHO TOOK THIS PICTURE?

Just for her kids and their kids, huh?

===================================

Did Nellie write those notes?

===============================================

They seem scripted to me!

Later, in her story of the aftermath of the assassination of President Kennedy her son came to her little cell and insisted that she write a note to Jackie Kennedy for him to deliver in Washington DC. 

Could someone have needed a sample of her handwriting to write those notes for her that she says she didn’t write,

for instance

Jackie Kennedy?

Here is a video of Nellie whose voice sounds like Jean Hill that I found recently!

In the recording, she pronounces the word “Telegram” in a funny way for a Southern Woman. Jean Hill was from Oklahoma and I believe that Nellie Connally is Texan. but the lady on the video recording talks with an English Accent especially when she says telegram. It is hard to distinguish her facial anatomy because the video is so light and faded, but I can hear the difference. It is obvious that the person acting as Nellie on the you tube is an actress

(not a very good one)

and she is mocking us. 

Here is the you tube of Jean Hill to compare to the you tube of Nellie!

What they saw Jean Hill

_______

NELLIE CONNALLY’S STATEMENT TO THE PRESS ON NOVEMBER 24, 1963

(2:48-2:50/5:02 is where she says “telegram’)

As I recall,

Billy Graham also

says the word “Telegram”

like the English!

 In 1959, he led his first crusade, which was in London.

Please watch this video of Billy Graham and his english accent:

Billy Graham on the Beatles (1964)

especially the end of the recording

Revelation 13:2
And the beast which I saw was like unto aleopard (camouflaged/hiding/sneaky), and his feet were as the feet of a bear (heavy footprint/mauls), and his mouth as the mouth of a lion (teeth): and the dragon gave him his power (“Q”ing), and his seat, and great authority. (Author of destruction)

===========

I think the beast is

the Synoptic Jesus authored by Q !!!

books by Nellie Connally

Here is another voice sample of Nellie in 1963 to compare:

LBJ and Mrs. Nellie Connally

She sounds different then the Press Statement on November 24th!

IN CONTROL,

CALM, COOL, COLLECTED, NOT WORRIED

AND THAT WAS JUST A FEW HOURS

 FROM THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY

AND THE NEAR DEATH OF HER HUSBAND!

Do you suppose they got the sample of her handwriting

wrote her memories for her

and then replaced her with an actress

or brainwashed her,

or is this some form of DEMON POSSESSION?

Yes, I know it sounds odd, but so is every aspect of this time in history, the investigation, the players involved and their behavior, the witnesses, the coverup, the trickling of information and the flood of disinformation, the power shift, the results evidenced in the world today

AND AS JAKE PICKLE SAID 

“because she’s got the last word!”

CAN YOU BELIEVE?

In essence,

Nellie Connally was and is the epitome of those

Secret Societies that President Kennedy tried to warn us about,

and she was his enemy all along!

Please don’t be fooled by the accolades she receives and received in her public appearances and interviews

and don’t be fooled by her charm!

Her words are chicanery!

840	Small lead particles found on rug underneath left jump seat of Presidential limousine.

SCIENCE IN CRIME DETECTION-2

WHO HANDLED THE GUN

The question I feel obligated to ask:

Did Nellie Connally shoot John Connally?

The Last Two Days, November 1963: 21-22

================

Please Read:

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

Then Please Read:

The Covenant with Many

JFK Assassination, CBS News and the Second Vatican Council

CBS News and JFK (The first few hours)

CBS News and JFK

CBS News and JFK Part 2

CBS News and JFK Part 3

CBS News and JFK Part 4

CBS News and JFK Part 5

Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many

PART 1

———————————————————————————————–

JFK and Mel Gibson

The Covenant with Many

————————————————————————————————————–

The Covenant with Many

(revised)

 

February 11, 2010 By Kevin Flower Israeli archaeologists say they’ve found a 1,500-year-old road, 4.5 meters under the current level of streets in Jerusalem’s Old City.

 

The reason I am writing this post is because of the prophecy in Daniel that a lot of people write about on blogs and websites.

I don’t understand why the prophecy teachers and scholars that try to have an understanding of Daniel’s prophecies…get stuck on the same mantra.

I am not trying to be different, but I think there have been some colossal mistakes made by scholars, bible teachers and the whole spectrum of experts of the bible.

I don’t see how you can read the Gospel of John and collapse it into the Synoptic gospels and say they blend at all or compliment each other.

In Reality

The Gospel of John and the Synoptic Gospels

collide !

In the book of Daniel it talks about Messiah the Prince and a prince.

Why does everyone think the covenant with many is for the future.

How does one come to that conclusion from these verses?

Daniel 9:25-27

²⁵Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

It is quite possible that the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince has already occurred,

but has been covered up by the

Chief Priests and the Legion – (please read)

Ancient wall found in Jerusalem Western Wall, Jerusalem The Western Wall was built by King Herod in 20 BC during his expansion of the Temple enclosure, and is part of a retaining wall that enclosed the western part of Temple Mount. According to the Roman-Jewish historian Josephus, construction of the walls took 11 years, during which time it rained in Jerusalem only at night so as not to interfere with the workers’ progress. Ancient road found in Jerusalem’s heart February 11, 2010|By Kevin Flower “Archaeologists working under the direction of the Israeli Antiquities Authority have uncovered a 1500-year-old road running through the center of Jerusalem’s Old City. Excavation director Dr. Ofer Sion said the discovery lends further credence to the accuracy of what is known as the Madaba Map – a Byzantine period mosaic map of the Holy Land that depicts an entrance into Jerusalem that leads to a single central street. Archaeologists working in Jerusalem have made various finds to suggest the Madaba map was geographically correct, but the road depicted in the mosaic had not been found.”

Obviously, there have been two walls from two different temple eras

and a road!

Micah predicted the downfall of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple, which were fulfilled by the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in about 586 BC and again by the Romans in 70 AD. The Temple has not been rebuilt since that destruction. Jerusalem was destroyed a second time by the Romans in about 135 AD.

The only reason I added the above link and the information about the destruction of Jerusalem

and the temple and the destruction again of Jerusalemin in 135 AD

is because it might apply to Daniel’s prophecies.

Perhaps we are wrong about when Jesus really died? Many people seem to think Jesus was 30 or 33 when he started his ministry but in the Gospel of John they refer to him as not yet being 5o years old.

I would say we have a problem within the bible of who and which Jesus is the Messiah!

John 8:56-59

⁵⁶Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.

⁵⁷Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?

⁵⁸Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

⁵⁹Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.

(Interesting that they threw stones at him.)

“Cephus” means stone.

The Synoptic Gospels have built their “image of Jesus” metaphorically by using stones!

By the way, I believe Cephus refers to Josephus Flavius!

Was there ever a decree to build the temple to the Messiah the Prince?

Perchance the destruction of Jerusalem in 135 AD is a clue?

Maybe the decree to build the temple to the Messiah the Prince occurred before 135 AD!

Seems odd that after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD that anyone would need to destroy it again 65 years later.

Building a city takes time, and funds, and manpower,

so why was there a need to destroy it again so soon after it had already been destroyed?

Seems to me that most and maybe all scholars of the bible are making presumptions, because they lump the gospels into one big ball but I think, to be fair,

we should separate the Synoptic Gospels from the Gospel of John

and calculate both sides to see if maybe we can come up with some other answers.

Maybe that is what is meant by the 153 fish which relates to the inferred 153:265 ratio!

Pope Benedict XVI and 153 Great Fish

Pope Benedict XVI is the

265th Pope,

was born Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger

Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, and the Pope

George Gänswein, Pope Benedict XVI, and Mel Gibson

revised

In the two article above that I just recently posted which are very similar I included in both a link to an article I found on the internet about names!

Praising Or Pleading

(POP)

seems to be his (The Pope) MO these days and in this article he pleads for parents to give their children traditional names before baptism so I gather names have meaning to him!

So since they are so important I thought maybe his name might be important also.

The Pope’s Last Name

IN the article

I relate the possibility that the Pope is related to another Pope whose last name was RATTE which would fulfill another prophecy in Revelation 17:11 about him being the eighth and one of the seven:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

But I did not deal with his middle name so:

The Pope’s Middle Name

Aloisius a german name means great warrior but comes from the name

Cleophas meaning and name origin

Cleophas \c-leo-phas\ as a boy’s name is of Greek origin, and the meaning of Cleophas is “visionof glory“.

Biblical name: husband of one of the Marys who stood at the foot of the Cross.

Cleophas has 4 variant forms: Cleo, Cleofas, Cleofaso and Cleophus.

Alphaeus

which is basically the switch from the Synoptic version and Simon from Cyrene who bears the cross and takes over after Jesus is crucified. In essence to REPLACE the true disciples/apostles with his own sons etc because they were the Chief Priests and they wanted to stay that way and replace Jesus with their own perception of Him. It is the great deception! The Synoptic version of the bible (Matthew Mark and Luke) plus many additional books in the bible to form the amalgamation we now call Christianity.

Basically, Rome absconded the truth and twisted it into their baby.

That is why I believe that Mel Gibson has been targeted for his rendition of the Gospels in THE PASSION,

THE BABY or to be more specific THE DEVIL’s BABY

Here are a few posts about that baby!:

Affliction and the Time of Testing

Mel Gibson and the Book of Acts 2

Mel Gibson, Japan Quakes, and the Kamikazes

Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, and the Pope

George Gänswein, Pope Benedict XVI, and Mel Gibson

revised

You might say I went overboard, which is true, but I am trying to learn and to get your attention and the articles are ongoing because of the events which are at present rapidly unfolding.

======================

Back to the Prophecy of Daniel

============================================================

Daniel 9:26

²⁶And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

INTERESTING: NICODEMAS MEANS “THE PEOPLE” AND

IT WAS NICODEMAS AND JOSEPH OF ARIMATHEA

THAT BURIED JESUS.

THE POPE’S FIRST NAME

IT’S A GOOD POSSIBILITY THAT JOSEPH OF ARIMATHEA

IS THE “prince of the people“.

Another interesting coincidence: Demas is a fellowlabourer of Paul:

Philemon 1:24

²⁴Marcus, Aristarchus, Demas, Lucas, my fellowlabourers.

You don’t suppose that Demas is Nicodemas?

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

Daniel 9:27

²⁷And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Sounds to me like in order to cover-up the abomination he had to make it desolate?

Who is “he” in verse 27?

Is “he” the Messiah the Prince?

OR

Is “he” the prince?

It makes a big difference who “he” is in verse 27!

The thing that concerns me is that we have been waiting for some treaty or covenant that will be confirmed and seems to me we ought to know first and foremost:

what is the covenant that is made with the many?

Then try to figure out

who confirms that covenant with the many!

The Covenant with the Many

Many treaties have been made with many people so what kind of treaty will be made with the many and confirmed with the many that this particular prophecy in Daniel is referring to? Certainly it has to do with the prince and the temple and/or worship and/or sin.

Most treaties we read about in the news most people are unaware of so why would Daniel of the bible be speaking of some political treaty that only the few politicians and leaders involved realize. This is a prophecy about the Messiah the Prince and the people of the prince and he (I assume is the prince of the people)

But it isn’t a treaty that Daniel talks about….it’s a covenant!

To be more specific it is the “covenant with many”!

What is the covenant with many?

I looked up “covenant” in the bible search on line and found a lot of covenants.

The covenant that caught my eye is the one that the Synoptic Jesus makes with the Synoptic disciples at the Synoptic Last Supper

and the verses about this covenant uses the word many.

I think that is a BIG CLUE about this covenant!

MATTHEW 26:26-29

²⁶And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body.²⁷And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;²⁸For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.²⁹But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.

MARK 14:22-25

²²And as they did eat, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is my body.²³And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it.²⁴And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.²⁵Verily I say unto you, I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, until that day that I drink it new in the kingdom of God.

LUKE 22:15-20

¹⁵And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer:¹⁶For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God.¹⁷And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves:¹⁸For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come.¹⁹And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.²⁰Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.

 

THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

DOES NOT MENTION THIS

NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant with many!

I THINK THAT IS VERY SIGNIFICANT THAT THE

New Testament/Covenant

IS ABSENT IN

THE GOSPEL OF JOHN!

The three Synoptic gospels don’t mention the washing of the feet,

nor the dialogue that Jesus has with his disciples explaining what is going to happen

and many other things that is worth the time to study.

WHAT IS GOING ON?

Why are the Synoptic Gospels account of the Last Supper so different than the Gospel of John?

Were there two different “LAST SUPPERS”?

For a  break and for fun in an ironic way,

Please watch:

The Last, But One Supper

(It is a Monty Python skit with John Cleese acting like the Pope)

THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW SAYS THAT BLOOD OF THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant WHICH IS SHED FOR THE MANY is

FOR THE “REMISSION OF SINS“.

THE OTHER TWO SYNOPTICS GOSPELS (MARK AND LUKE) EXCLUDE THE “REMISSION OF SINS” TO THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant.

THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW AND THE GOSPEL OF MARK SAY THAT THE BLOOD OF THE NEW TESTAMENT/covenant IS SHED FOR THE MANY.

BUT THE GOSPEL OF LUKE SAYS IT IS FOR YOU. (HE IS TALKING TO HIS DISCIPLES)

EVEN THOUGH THESE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS ARE IN AGREEMENT THAT THERE IS A

NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant.

THEY ARE DISAGREEING AS TO WHO THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant IS FOR…..

THEMSELVES (YOU) OR THE MANY.

(I HATE TO BE A JERK!)

BUT THE ACCOUNTS GIVEN OF THE “LAST SUPPER” BY THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT (NT as opposed to the OT)

DIFFER A GREAT DEAL AS TO THIS “NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant” AND ARE WORLDS APART FROM THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

SINCE this “New Testament”

DOESN’T EVEN OCCUR IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN.

THE PRAYER AND THE DIALOGUE OF JESUS WITH HIS DISCIPLES

HAPPENS ONLY IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN AND THERE IS QUITE A BIT OF INFORMATION GIVEN!

========

Another point by Paul Carlson in his article  below, I get the impression that Paul Carlson thinks that all of the contradictions that are contained in the NT makes everything written about Jesus a lie and that is not my point!

I don’t believe that!

I think Jesus the Messiah did come and so did false messiahs and their many supporters

to quell the truth against Him and His true apostles

for money, power and control.

It’s like saying, for example, that the  September 11th terrorist attack on the Twin Terrors weren’t destroyed because 3 or 4 witnesses/terrorists don’t tell the same story, hence it’s all a lie and the Twin Towers are still there. That is ridiculous! But that is the point in having contradictions so that some people will come to that conclusion! Obviously, the Twin Towers were destroyed and something very big happened, because they are no longer there.

Deception is in the bible purposefully

to deceive

and to reveal!

In other words, it works both ways!

An oxymoron (plural oxymorons or oxymora) (from Greek ὀξύμωρον, “sharp dull”) is a figure of speechthat combines contradictory terms. Oxymorons appear in a variety of contexts, including inadvertent errors such as extremely average and literary oxymorons crafted to reveal a paradox.

Truth is a funny thing, because it is quite possible these contradictions were said

and did actually happen

…..but by who?

Why don’t the experts and scholars of the bible raise the possibility of what seems to be written in black and white in the bible? I get the impression they are hiding from what seems to be obvious …….

but why?

When Jesus came it made such a stir that Jerusalem was destroyed and their temple, Rome was destroyed and Jerusalem was destroyed again 65 years later. Jesus was big news and his coming had major ramifications! And I believe his enemies made sure of the destruction. propaganda and deception to cover up the truth! History was rewritten to hide the truth and many people were slaughtered!

People that lived under the rule of the Romans were slaughtered when they wrote anything that would make the Romans look bad. And I am convinced those times are coming again soon. So when you read Josephus and other writers, keep in mind that they could lose their lives for what they wrote and so maybe there are hidden meanings to their stories. Contradictions may abound in the bible and in the history given by the major history authors (Josephus included, even though his accounts seem to be false IMO) to point us to the truth while avoiding the threat of death for us to be able to discern via archeology and other avenues and the unfolding, at the right time! Possibly the power that caused so much destruction was something other than just the Romans, because they also suffered and suffer now, because they lack the truth and are deceived…..they just don’t realize it!

Daniel 7:25

And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High,

and think to change times and laws:

and they shall be given into his hand

until

a time and times and the dividing of time.

I think that is what is meant by the words “time and times and the dividing of times” is what has been written about that time and the deception about those times.

I think we are in the times prophesied by Daniel and specifically

the “Dividing of time”.

Please read the following fantastic article I found on the internet which is linked next:

The Reliance of Luke-Acts on the Writings of Flavius Josephus

…..”So, Steve Mason, associate Professor of Humanities at York University, Ontario asks:

“If Luke did not know of Josephus’ work, how did this language suggest itself to him?”[5]….

Daniel is talking about he, the prince that was to come,

the prince that Jesus warns us about in the gospel of John.

So when you link to this site below by Paul Carlson and/or read my articles that talk about contradictions in the bible

keep in mind that just because there are contradictions

doesn’t mean it did not occur!

===========

New Testament Contradictions (1995)

Paul Carlson

A. WHEN – BEFORE OR DURING PASSOVER?

“…….In Matthew, Mark and Luke the last supper takes place on the first day of the Passover (Matthew 26:17, Mark 14:12, Luke 22:7).

In John’s gospel it takes place a day earlier and Jesus is crucified on the first day of the Passover (John 19:14).…….”

============

The Blood Covenant at the Last Supper

in the Synoptic Gospels seems to be a bit odd

since Jesus had not died yet!

I know I must seem like I’m just quibbling about small details,

(although they are not small to me)

but

since it is a contract

it seems to me it should be very clear and concise!

All I can tell is that this NEW TESTAMENT/covenant

is for “many”

or for

“you” which was “them” (the disciples sitting at the table).

Why the controversy?

Can’t they even agree on what the “New Testament” /covenant is,

and who it is between,

and what it is for?

The reason this is so IMPORTANT to me is that I have found many problems in the Synoptic Gospels

and have an inclination

to distrust their word of the Word.

New Testament

the collection of the books of the Bible that were produced by the early Christian church, comprising the Gospels, Acts of the Apostles, the Epistles, and the Revelation of St. John the Divine.

the covenant between god and humans in which the dispensation of grace is revealed through Jesus Christ

==============================================

Could the

“Covenant with many”

spoken about by Daniel be the

“Covenant with many”

made at the Last Supper

in the Synoptic Gospels?

Makes sense to me!

If so, then who confirms this covenant?

======================================

Whoever confirms this covenant could be the “he” in verse Daniel 9:27

In my last article on another blog, I wrote called Abomination of Desolation: Part one

(which is also linked here and at the bottom of this post)

the Synoptic Jesus in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke

talks about desolation:

Matthew 23:38

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

Luke 13:35

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate:

and verily I say unto you,

Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say,

Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

=============================

They themselves

(The Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke)

testify to the

“Desolation” and a “Covenant with Many”

===========================

Remember:

the Covenant is not in tbe Gospel of John

nor is desolation mentioned.

========================

Daniel 9:26

²⁶And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

—————–

Daniel 9:27

²⁷And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

————-

Whoever that prince is that “he” is referring to is the one that causes the sacrifice and the oblation to cease., etc

after the Messiah is cut off.

I believe it is the the same prince that Jesus of the Gospel of John warns us about:

John 12:31

Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.

—————-

John 14:30

Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh,

and hath nothing in me.

——————

From the sounds of His warnings the prince of this world would be coming very soon,

not waiting 2000 years later!

I assume that is why Jesus says NOW twice.

“Now” could have a double meaning?

*********

The first time you hear about the prince of this world (in the Gospel of John)

is at the Jewish Feast in Jerusalem

after Jesus had raised Lazarus from the dead in Bethany when the Greeks arrive to that Jewish Feast to see Jesus.

I think that was a sign about this prince of this world.

===============================

I believe that the Covenant at the Last Supper was made with the prince of this world,

and he broke the covenant and desolation occurred.

I DO NOT BELIEVE GOD THE FATHER OR HIS TRUE SON ARE LIARS!

I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT JESUS OF NAZARETH WRITTEN ABOUT IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

WOULD MAKE A COVENANT AND THEN BREAK IT

AND THEN CAUSE DESOLATION

SO THEREFORE WHOEVER DOES THIS IS THE LIAR

AND IS NOT THE TRUE MESSIAH!!!!!

The reason I believe this is because this Covenant at the Last Supper

is not in the Gospel of John

and John does not mention it later in his gospel.

The only gospels to mention desolation are two of the Synoptic Gospels

in the past tense:

Matthew 23:38

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

—————–

Luke 13:35

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate:

and verily I say unto you,

Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say,Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

———————————

Here are some interesting comparisons of Paul and Josephus.

PLEASE READ:

Flavious Josephus And the Apostle Paul Were the Same Person?, page 1

and there are many more examples which I have included in other articles about

Josephus Flavius and Joseph of Arimathea.

PLEASE READ:

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

The Synoptic “Q Source”

Josephus and His Footprints

The Dividing of Times – Part One

Maybe if we looked at things a bit differently, events like Masada and Yodfat and the discrepancies of the archeological evidence vs. Josephus Flavius’s historical account

might make more sense…….

Perhaps since no evidence of Jewish bones have been found at the site of Masada

could there have been a resurrection of the living?

I don’t know of course, but it is worth considering!

Josephus Flavius’s historical account and the archeological evidence do NOT match,

so I wonder what really did happen at Masada and Yodfat

and why would Josephus make up stories of mass suicide of JEWS!

that seems to have not happened at all?

If a mass suicide did not occur, why would Josephus lie about it???

Is he trying to promote suicide as a heroic sacrificial act for Jews or is he trying to infer their inferiority?

What would be the point?

He did seem to turn on his own country and people from what I have read about him and by him,

if, in fact, he was Jewish?

But then wasn’t HITLER Jewish? And we do not want to forget that lesson!

Or was he leaving us clues???

Why would he lie about it?

If there had been a victory by the Romans

why not write about it?

From his writings. he seemed to be kind of sick in the head or had some kind of deep insanity. His accounts of what happened show lots of inside information, even what people were actually thinking

and he seemed to be in charge !!!

His paranoia may be a result of knowing the thoughts of the people and their plots against him.

If you read his works they are quite descriptive of maniacal sadistic manipulative type behavior

and he seemed to enjoy the destruction and the deceptions of the people!

It must be that he is trying to hide who he is!

WHY?

Could Josephus Flavius be the “prince” ?

Could he have rewritten history and written the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke)

to cover up the truth

about Jesus of Nazareth

and replace himself

as the Messiah?

IE

THE DEVIL

Could he have taken the records in the Temple in Jerusalem as he says he did,

rewritten parts of the OT to bolster his Synoptic Gospels,

composed other books from The Book of ACTS and the rest?

Could he have changed the Genealogy records or destroyed them as others say they no longer exist to cover up

WHO HE REALLY IS?

Could he have been the one to make a covenant with many?

Could Josephus be Cephus?

Makes sense to me!

THE STONE

????????????????????????????????

Could Josephus Flavius Son of Matthew be Joseph of ARIMathea

(ARI means lion. and eagle)

Ari is also a very GREEK name.

ARISTOTLE

Jacqueline Kennedy married Aristotle Onassis which in itself seems very odd when you think about it!

Especially since recently ART of New Wineskins with *his propaganda site* IMO

implied that the head wound of the beast spoken about in Revelation

was President Kennedy’s assassination and that President Barrack Obama’s head vein?/scar? had something to do with this prophecy!

The Devil and his legions are in a hurry for lots and lots of reasons!

Since finishing this post today,

I have watched some you-tubes of the moments of President Kennedy’s assassination, because of what I have been learning and writing and it looks pretty scary. I have seen them a hundred times before and always gave Jacky the benefit of doubt because she is a female, very pretty, soft spoken and his wife,

but Jacqueline’s behavior before and after, are disconcerting to say the least!

Here is what I see NOW:

She is fiddling with him as he is shot the first time, then Connelly looks back and she looks at Connelly and he is shot, she looks back at her husband and gets closer and under him and he is shot again and the blood spray goes up, then

it looks as if she has something in her right hand after the second shot.

Possibly, lost that object when she pushed her husband over and fled to the trunk of the car to get whatever was back there,and it looks like a tube of lipstick because of the way it stays on the trunk of the car. She pursues it on the trunk of the car and gets it and gets back and hunches down with everyone else.

*April 2nd 2011 Just watched this video again a few times and it looks like she is the only one that seems to be busy …..very active….and in control…….everyone else seems to be reacting.

Everyone else seems to be in slow motion and she is in very fast motion.

Whoever her focus is on seems to be before that person is shot! IMO

Which is very disturbing!

Here is the video:

Hi quality footage of JFK Assassination

And the Secret Service act peculiar in the front seat, the driver and the passenger and the guy that left his post at the back corner  by President Kennedy.

See the driver? Yup, that’s right… NO GUN! *

But WHO knows with digital mastering and all of the coverups!

The same applies to Mel Gibson and the tapes of his rantings. My husband is a sound engineer and voices can also be spliced and diced and altered …….digitally mastered. It isn’t as if he doesn’t have plenty of emotional voice samples in all of the movies he has been involved with.

WHO knows!

I just would not place much faith in visual or sound technology.

I hope it isn’t a technique or practice employed to defame, destroy and rob individuals who have money, influence or sway,

but aren’t in alignment with the

One World Government, One World Religion, and One World Finance

fostered by Pope Benedict XVI and his legions.

THAT WOULD BE A NIGHTMARE

but maybe it is a warning and a sign of things to come!

Another time and on another post I watched a you-tube which also showed

peculiar behavior of the Secret Service

and that was behind Donald Rumsfeld when he misspoke

about the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

This is the post:

The Bohemian Grove, the Vatican and the NWO-Revised

“A very interesting you -tube I watched recently of Donald Rumsfeld slip of the tongue, and I have linked it. Pay close attention to what he says about the the shooting down of the plane and the Pentagon and the reaction of the people in the background. Makes me think the Secret Service are a bit more powerful than I ever imagined. The Treasury Department runs the Secret Service. That is interesting since we are in debt up to our EARS. President Bush SR used to head the CIA. Hmmmmmmmmm. I wonder if Rumsfeld didn’t do that on purpose for our benefit? You never know! I hope so.”

The article below shows the relationship of banking

with the Synoptic Gospels, Paul, Josephus and BAAL!

1 Timothy 6:10
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

Please Read:

The Synoptic “Q Source”

*************************

What we do know is that

President John Kennedy

was killed because of his posture and his actions

exposing

SECRET SOCIETIES.

Time is our ally.

Please read about the head wound below:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

Many people keep looking for a place called Arimathea, and so far there is none.

Could Josephus Flavius/Joseph of ARI-Mathea have been the Fear of the Jews?

Could Saul/Paul be Josephus Flavius?

1 Corinthians 3:22

²²Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas,

or the world,

or life, or death,

or things present, or things to come;

all are your’s;

=====================

John 14:30

Hereafter I will not talk much with you:

for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

[and compare to what Paul says]

1 Corinthians 16:24
My love be with you all in Christ Jesus. Amen.

=============

Below Saul/Paul contradicts himself:

and then following Paul tricks people:

2 Corinthians 11:31
The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is blessed for evermore, knoweth that I lie not.

2 Corinthians 12:16
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty,

I caught you

with guile.

Guile

Definition: Craft; deceitful cunning; artifice; duplicity; wile; deceit; treachery.

=====================[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[=================

If you read his history of the Jews and Josephus’s biography it’s almost like he is writing about the underworld,

or the world of the dead.

The spiritual world.

======================

A lot of the names and events seem to parallel Acts and I don’t think it’s accidental!

He seems to relish the people being deceived!

THE DEVIL ENJOYS DECEPTION!

Could Josephus Flavius have been as a

Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde

with

MANY OTHER NAMES

I don’t think we should ignore his writings, but rather compare his style and details to the events in the bible!

================================

Other sites of interest in regard to old and recent covenants:

===============================

Covenants of Israel

Thinking Anglicans

Covenant

Vatican and Arab League sign agreement

Here is a recent Covenant with Many that might be of interest:

Magen David Adom Covenant

– The value of saving lives as seen by the three religions,

will be presented to the Pope

Salute No Man

=================================

Masada

Solved mystery of Masada remains

The Works of Flavius Josephus

Flavius Josephus

Luke and Josephus (2000)

The shipwrecks of Josephus and Paul (Part 3)

Josephus and the New Testament

————————————————–

My last *four posts that I believe relate to the subject of the covenant follow:

*Abomination of Desolation: Part one

*The Abomination of Desolation Part 2

*In The Garden of Gethsemane

*Sour Wine

Josephus and His Footprints

CONFIRMATION OF THE COVENANT

The Fruits of the Vatican

———–=======================———–

Here is a recent Covenant with Many that might be of interest:

Magen David Adom Covenant

– The value of saving lives as seen by the three religions, will be presented to the Pope

=======================================

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

I Am the True Vine

If you have read any of my articles I have a basic theme throughout most of my posts on my blogs and it is that the Synoptic (Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke), Acts and many other epistles are false! I believe they represent a false Messiah and a False Prophet! I believe I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt quite often that they contradict each other and are antithetical to the gospel of John. They promote a political agenda to control the people and quell the truth about Jesus and his message.I think the synoptic gospels were written by thieves of the true Word of God and his true apostles.

I believe these guys killed the true apostles, stole what they could from them, altered their messages, rewrote history to cover up their crime, in collusion with the the powers that be at the time to create their own version of Jesus and God.

The contradictions are pretty apparent if you compare the gospels to each other and read the bible critically. For many years, I didn’t study, but just read what other people thought and still kept running into a cement wall. I don’t think I have all the answers, yet nor do I think I will attain that ever in my lifetime. I write in my blogs as I am learning and hope it will help others that have also questioned the same things I question that is written about God and Jesus.

I don’t think it is healthy to accept what we have been fed for years as “the truth” I think it is healthier to question, study and discuss. I don’t think the ecclesiastic entity appreciates our freedom to question it’s authority on their interpretation of what is written in the bible but who said they have the right to quell our search for the truth? To them it is Apostacy,,,the falling away…. I say it is Apostacy from them, and falling away from them. They think they have the answers…..

I dont think they have the answers, so thats why I write my blogs. Enuf said on that!

 

Josephus and His Footprints

Wiki: Josephus problem

The problem is named after Flavius Josephus, a Jewish historian living in the 1st century. According to Josephus’ account of the siege of Yodfat, he and his 40 comrade soldiers were trapped in a cave, the exit of which is blocked by Romans. They chose suicide over capture and decided that they would form a circle and start killing themselves using a step of three. Josephus states that by luck or maybe by the hand of God (modern scholars point out that Josephus was a well educated scholar and predicted the outcome), he and another man remained the last and gave up to the Romans.

Using a step of three?  What does this mean?

Alter steps?

OR DOES JOSEPHUS MEAN THE ROMAN CATHOLIC STEPS OF SAINTHOOD?

Steps to Sainthood: the third being a martyr?

Third Step: To be beatified and recognized as a “Blessed,” one miracle acquired through the candidate’s intercession is required in addition to recognition of heroic virtue (or martyrdom in the case of a martyr).

Wiki: Siege of Yodfat

The Siege of Yodfat (Hebrew: יוֹדְפַת‎, also Jotapata, Iotapata, Yodefat) was a 47 day siege by Roman forces of the Jewish town of Yodfat which took place in 67 CE, during theGreat Revolt. Led by Roman General Vespasian and his son Titus, both future emperors, the siege ended with the sacking of the town, the deaths of most of its inhabitants and the enslavement of the rest. It was the second bloodiest battle of the revolt, surpassed only by the sacking of Jerusalem, and the longest bar Jerusalem and Masada. The siege was chronicled by Josephus, who had personally commanded the Jewish forces at Yodfat and was subsequently captured by the Romans. ^[2]

I have a big problems with the story

told by Flavius Josephus!

1) My first concern is why does Josephus not tell how the people committed suicide or killed each other EXCEPT that they cut each others neck.

2) Who decided that it would be every third person?

3) Who decided where each person would stand?

4) and who decided where to start the circle!

It sounds to me like a cruel joke!

If I were there I would be switching places a bunch.  It makes no sense! I cannot imagine that all 41 of those soldiers (“forty persons of eminency that had concealed themselves”) would all be desiring the same fate of death! What kind of military people were they, or were they a different kind of army? Was this cave actually a choking point?

IF they were going to kill each other so that they would not commit suicide, why not fight the enemy to the death?

This story is full of holes!

I thought Flavius Josephus was a general, but as he says he was assisted by

a certain supernatural providence!

Interesting choice of words!

The next link is a simulation game of the Josephus dilemma!

Please click on the title below:

Josephus Flavius game

Josephus Flavius was a famous Jewish historian of the first century at the time of the Second Temple destruction. During the Jewish-Roman war he got trapped in a cave with a group of 40 soldiers surrounded by romans. The legend has it that preferring suicide to capture, the Jews decided to form a circle and, proceeding around it, to kill every third remaining person until no one was left. Josephus, not keen to die, quickly found the safe spot in the circle and thus stayed alive.

If Josephus was trapped in a cave with 40 other soldiers or eminent persons, then there were a total of 41 people in the cave, including himself. He says that two people survived this suicide pact, Josephus and some other person.

Why doesn’t he include the name of the other person that survived with him?

And as he was very desirous neither to be condemned by the lot, nor, if he had been left to the last, to imbrue his right hand in the blood of his countrymen, he persuaded him to trust his fidelity to him, and to live as well as himself.

Basically, Josephus bribed the other guy (obviously in a private way) so that the others would not hear and which must have been in his concscience,

which means that Josephus acted as a Devil!

How did Josephus persuade this other man to go along to get along? The other men were there…did they not notice Josephus offering “his fidelity” and “the good life” to this other fellow?

Sounds like a bribe to me!

IN the simulation game in the link above Josephus would have been the 16th person or the 31st person in the circle to survive!

What a difference it makes where he stood in that circle!

Did he arrange the soldiers (eminent persons)? Wasn’t he in charge?

Josephus says that they drew lots!

How do you draw lots to kill every third person ?

Here is what Josephus says happened, but it still does not make any sense since his 40 fellow cavemen were EXTREMELY desirous that he die with them, so he says!

Why in the world would they (his fellow cavemen) wait for him to be second to the last, or the last?

Please read what Josephus said happened below:

7. However, in this extreme distress, he was not destitute of his usual sagacity; but trusting himself to the providence of God, he put his life into hazard [in the manner following]: “And now,” said he, “since it is resolved among you that you will die, come on, let us commit our mutual deaths to determination by lot. He whom the lot falls to first, let him be killed by him that hath the second lot, and thus fortune shall make its progress through us all; nor shall any of us perish by his own right hand, for it would be unfair if, when the rest are gone, somebody should repent and save himself.” This proposal appeared to them to be very just; and when he had prevailed with them to determine this matter by lots, he drew one of the lots for himself also. He who had the first lot laid his neck bare to him that had the next, as supposing that the general would die among them immediately; for they thought death, if Josephus might but die with them, was sweeter than life; yet was he with another left to the last, whether we must say it happened so by chance, or whether by the providence of God. And as he was very desirous neither to be condemned by the lot, nor, if he had been left to the last, to imbrue his right hand in the blood of his countrymen, he persuaded him to trust his fidelity to him, and to live as well as himself.

There is nothing about the third step in this account!

Josephus lied and connived for his cavemen to kill each other instead of suicide or fighting the Romans, if you believe Josephus!

“let us commit our mutual deaths to determination by lot“

It was Josephus that made up this brilliant plan to draw lots!

These guys must have been out of their minds, definitely deceived,  perhaps from fasting, exhaustion, or something else.

I don’t believe it!

I think he murdered them, probably with poison!

Remember Mithradatism?

The mustard seed was used for anecdotes for many things including scorpian bites and poison in Egypt!

Botanical: Thlaspi arvense —Synonym—Pennycress. —Part Used—Seeds. Mithridate Mustard, Thlaspi arvense, grows higher than Treacle Mustard; the leaves are small and narrower, smooth, toothed, arrow-shaped at the base. The flowers are small and white, growing on long branches, the seed-vessels form a round pouch, flat, with very broad wings, earning for the plant its other name of Pennycress.

Recall Cephas in the BIBLE?  Josephus is Cephas.

JOSEPHUS is the STONE!

Remember that Paulus said:

1 Corinthians 3:22

²²Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come; all are your’s;

Another bribe!

Whereupon Vespasian sent immediately and zealously two tribunes, Paulinus and Gallicanus, and ordered them to give Josephus their right hands as a security for his life, and to exhort him to come up.

Galatians 2:9
And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision

================================

I have never heard of a general in any military who would get his men to commit suicide or murder their fellow soldier beside them, but instead would hold off the enemy as long as possible, or fight the enemy to the death, or surrender! But it depends on what kind of army we are speaking of. I have a feeling these men were priests!

Wasn’t murdering each other a sin, to the Jews?

This does not make sense!

Josephus Problem

He did try to abandon them early on in “his own account”, because he was the false shepherd, the false christ (of the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke), the instigator, and the destroyer!

Josephus seems to know everything and even what people thought

miles and miles away.

He “set up” the Jews for destruction.

I think he is the devil!

The EYE of Horus!

The Prince of this world that Jesus spoke about that was coming! (In the Gospel of John)

“Thou, O Vespasian, thinkest no more than that thou hast taken Josephus himself captive; but I come to thee as a messenger of greater tidings; for had not I been sent by God to thee, I knew what was the law of the Jews in this case?

Now Josephus is bribing Vespasian!

(He sounds like the fallen angel Lucifer!)

IN fact, he sounds like the Gospel of Luke’s angel that visited Mary!

Even Paul’s angel in the book of Acts!

And then Josephus continues his bribe to Vespasian:

….and how it becomes generals to die. Dost thou send me to Nero? For why? Are Nero’s successors till they come to thee still alive? Thou, O Vespasian, art Caesar and emperor, thou, and this thy son. Bind me now still faster, and keep me for thyself, for thou, O Caesar, are not only lord over me, but over the land and the sea, and all mankind; and certainly I deserve to be kept in closer custody than I now am in, in order to be punished, if I rashly affirm any thing of God.”

YUCK!

Sounds very slithery!

Siege of Yodfat

Yosef Ben-Matityahu had hidden in one of the caves that litter the site, along with 40 other prominent citizens of Yodfat. Although Ben-Matityahu was in favour of surrendering to the Romans, the majority of his comrades opted to kill themselves rather than fall into Roman hands. ^[4] As suicide is considered sinful, they decided to draw lots to kill each other. Ben-Matityahu and another man, however, were the last to survive, and both resolved to give themselves up. ^[18] Taken to see the Roman general, Ben-Matityahu prophesied that Vespasian would one day become emperor. Vespasian subsequently spared the rebel leader, who began collaborating with the Romans. At first a slave, he would later be freed and be granted Roman citizenship as Flavius Josephus. ^[4][19]

 

I looked up what happened in history in 1631 to see if anything pertaining to that number of the Josephus JOTAPATA survivors which were # 16 and  # 31 of the infamous circle suicide had occurred (just for the heck of it) and I found a few interesting facts WHICH I believe ARE related …..

The ERUPTION OF VESUVIUS in 1631

AND MORE STRANGER THAN THAT

King James Bible, 1631 edition –

One Word Makes a World of Difference

In the 1631 edition printing of the King James Bible, in Exodus 20:14, a very small word was forgotten by the printers. The word “not”. This changed the 7th commandment to say Thou shalt commit adultery!

Botched 1631 King James Bible

==========================================

Archaeology of Yodfat

One find of particular interest is an 8 by 11 cm stone slab, found in the residential area on the eastern slope of Yodfat, ^[9] covered on both sides with scratched drawings made by a pointed tool. One side depicts a building with a triangular roof upon a podium, a small tree and a harp, and is thought to portray a Nefesh (a traditional Judean mausoleum). The other side of the stone features a crab, the astrological symbol of the Hebrew month of Tammuz, on the first day of which Yodfat fell. The stone is believed to have been the work of a besieged Jew anticipating his own impending doom, ^{[7] [22]} and its likeness has been etched on a modern memorial to the defenders of Yodfat placed at the foot of the Roman siege ramp.

made by a pointed tool

Perhaps an aul?

I mean, an awl!

Capstone

“One side depicts a building with a triangular roof upon a podium”

Psalm 118:22
The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone;

Zechariah 4:7

“What are you, O mighty mountain? Before Zerubbabel you will become level ground. Then he will bring out the capstone to shouts of ‘God bless it! God bless it!’ “

Matthew 21:42
Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures: ” ‘The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone ; the Lord has done this, and it is marvelous in our eyes’ ?

Mark 12:10
Haven’t you read this scripture: ” ‘The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone ;

Luke 20:17
Jesus looked directly at them and asked, “Then what is the meaning of that which is written: ” ‘The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone

Acts 4:11
He is ” ‘the stone you builders rejected, which has become the capstone.

1 Peter 2:7
Now to you who believe, this stone is precious. But to those who do not believe, “The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone, “

Funny, the Gospel of John says nothing about a capstone!

But the Gospel of Luke says:

Luke 20:18
Whosoever shall fall upon that stone shall be broken; but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.

a small tree

Probably the mustard tree which is small and is told about via parables in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke,

but not in the gospel of John!

and a harp

More than likely referring to Nero or

maybe a fallen angel!

The ANGEL OF DEATH!

Maybe HAARP is the meaning to this sign?

a Nefesh

and is thought to portray a Nefesh (a traditional Judean mausoleum)

A Crab

a crab, the astrological symbol of the Hebrew month of Tammuz, on the first day of which Yodfat fell

It looks more like an eye to me!

EYE OF HORUS

Then there looks to be a picture of a scarab which does not seem to be mentioned?

It is voice from the past which could have been a warning, a message,

or could be a footprint,

IE

A signature! A possible premonition?

Yodfat

In June, we found the water cisterns completely full of water

but Josephus said in chapter 7 of Book 3:

12. Now the besieged had plenty of corn within the city, and indeed of all necessaries, but they wanted water, because there was no fountain in the city, the people being there usually satisfied with rain water; yet is it a rare thing in that country to have rain in summer, and at this season, during the siege, they were in great distress for some contrivance to satisfy their thirst;

============================

Book 3 of

The Wars Of The Jews

Or

The History Of The Destruction Of Jerusalem

Interesting !!

In Number 3 of Chapter 2 of Book 3 Josephus talks about Niger which I have linked.

Remember Niger of the Bible?

Acts 13:1
Now there were in the church that was at Antioch certain prophets and teachers; as Barnabas, and Simeon that was called Niger, and Lucius of Cyrene, and Manaen, which had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Saul.

But their former ill fortune followed them, as the consequence of their unskilfulness, and other deficiencies in war; for Antonius laid ambushes for them in the passages they were to go through, where they fell into snares unexpectedly, and where they were encompassed about with horsemen, before they could form themselves into a regular body for fighting, and were above eight thousand of them slain; so all the rest of them ran away, and with them Niger, who still did a great many bold exploits in his flight. However, they were driven along together by the enemy, who pressed hard upon them, into a certain strong tower belonging to a village called Bezedeh However, Antonius and his party, that they might neither spend any considerable time about this tower, which was hard to be taken, nor suffer their commander, and the most courageous man of them all, to escape from them, they set the wall on fire; and as the tower was burning, the Romans went away rejoicing, as taking it for granted that Niger was destroyed; but he leaped out of the tower into a subterraneous cave, in the innermost part of it, and was preserved; and on the third day afterward he spake out of the ground to those that with great lamentation were searching for him, in order to give him a decent funeral; and when he was come out, he filled all the Jews with an unexpected joy, as though he were preserved by God’s providence to be their commander for the time to come.

4. And now Vespasian took along with him his army from Antioch, (which is the metropolis of Syria,

How does Josephus know these particulars?

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

Salute No Man

=======================================

THE PARABLE OF FAITH -PART ONE

IF YOU ENJOYED THIS POST PLEASE COME VISIT AGAIN AND TRY OUT THESE OTHER INTERESTING SITES BELOW:)

Merangue’s Blog

Blue Skies

Eye of a Needle

The Keep

The Drawbridge

 

THE PARABLE OF FAITH – PART ONE

PART ONE

The other night I was watching Face Off with my daughter who loves the artistry of makeup. The show is very creative and a lot of fun to watch. The theme of the show that night was about Fears: The contestants had to create a monster from a particular fear or phobia. While inspecting the monsters that were created Tom Sevini, an American actor, stuntman, director, award-winning special effects and makeup artist and one of the judges on the shoe that night mentioned a person he knew from a famous horror movie who had scars on his neck for many years that were the result of mustard gas. He said the wounds had never healed, but remained open sores.

 I challenge whoever reads this series about the mustard seed parable

to truthfully consider the possibility that this parable

is fraudulent, deceptive, and misleading!

===================

FAITH AS A GRAIN OF MUSTARD SEED

Matthew 13:31-32

³¹Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field:

³²Which indeed is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof.

Matthew 17:14-21

¹⁴And when they were come to the multitude, there came to him a certain man, kneeling down to him, and saying,¹⁵Lord, have mercy on my son: for he is lunatick, and sore vexed: for ofttimes he falleth into the fire, and oft into the water.¹⁶And I brought him to thy disciples, and they could not cure him.¹⁷Then Jesus answered and said, O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you? how long shall I suffer you? bring him hither to me.¹⁸And Jesus rebuked the devil; and he departed out of him: and the child was cured from that very hour.¹⁹Then came the disciples to Jesus apart, and said, Why could not we cast him out?²⁰And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.

²¹Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.

The disciples did not have the faith as a grain of mustard seed

to help banish the devil from the child,

yet it is only faith of a grain of mustard seed that can move mountains!

Jesus in the gospel of Matthew says that the kind of devil the disciples were attempting to banish from the child would not depart without prayer and fasting.

So their faith was not enough,

EVEN if they had faith as a grain of mustard seed!

HUGE CONTRADICTION!

The gospel of John does not include the parable of the Mustard Seed!

Why?

Because the parable is a lie!

I wonder why Jesus (in the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke) did not demonstrate this faith by MOVING/REMOVING a real mountain?

I MAINTAIN THAT THE JESUS SPEAKING IN THE GOSPELS OF MATTHEW, MARK, AND LUKE COULD NOT MOVE/REMOVE A MOUNTAIN!

What kind of mountain are they referring to?

Could this parable be referring to

Isaiah 14:12-14

¹²How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

¹³For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God:

I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

¹⁴I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.

It is a great possibility that this is the mountain that the synoptic gospels are referring to in the Parable of the Mustard Seed!

Mark 4:30-32

³⁰And he said, Whereunto shall we liken the kingdom of God? or with what comparison shall we compare it?³¹It is like a grain of mustard seed, which, when it is sown in the earth, is less than all the seeds that be in the earth:³²But when it is sown, it groweth up, and becometh greater than all herbs, and shooteth out great branches; so that the fowls of the air may lodge under the shadow of it.

Here is an article/blog that discusses the truth about the mustard seed!

PLEASE READ!

In the Bible versus the Quran: the Mustard seed is the smallest of all the seeds on earth

The mustard seed is NOT the smallest seed on earth!

That is an out and out lie!

The World’s Smallest & Largest Seed

The authors of the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke

were either ignorant of the truth about the smallest of seeds on earth,

or they lied!

If they lied about this FACT,

what else have they lied about??????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IN answer to the man’s question as to whether the Quran is an offshoot of the bible, I would respond with a definite YES, at least THE QURAN is an offshoot of the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke!

The Jesus in the three synoptic gospels is not the true Son of God

as I have written about numerous times in most of my articles on my blogs!

Syria has begun moving its chemical weapons stockpile out of storage, U.S. warns 

(Friday, July 13th, 2012)

“Syria has undeclared arsenals of sarin nerve agent, mustard gas, cyanide”

====================

Do you really think the Messiah would compare the kingdom of God to a mustard seed? The Destroyer certainly would, though! 

===================

The mustard seed is not greater than all herbs!

THE HERBS OF THE Ginkgo Biloba IS

GREATER THAN THE MUSTARD HERB!

By the way the birds of the air/fowls of the air lodging in the branches of a mustard tree is a deceptive aspiration.

The birds/fowls of the air are evil spirits!

Remember the parable about faith called the Parable of the Sower where the birds eat the seed (God’s Word) that falls on stoney ground.  The birds are not good and they eat the WORD of God!

FALLEN ANGELS

and PEOPLE THAT SERVE THE DECEPTION

AND SERVE THE EVIL SPIRITS

ARE THE BIRDS AND FOWLS OF THE AIR!

The parable of the Mustard Seed is an invention from a false Messiah

of the false gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke!

HE IS THE DESTROYER!

DEATH

AGAIN,

The gospel of John does not include the parable of the Mustard Seed!

Proverbs 14:12
Thereis a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

It isn’t the size of your faith that matters. You can’t measure love…how can you measure faith? It is faith itself!

The gospel of Luke says that the seed is the Word of God….not the size of faith!

Please Read:

Luke 8:5-15

The Parable of the Mustard Seed and the Parable called The Sower and the Seed seem to be conflicting!

Many people that don’t believe in God, but have faith in themselves, have achieved great heights (good and the bad) on earth,

but nevertheless it isn’t just faith that matters,

in the end it matters in whom we believe!

Please read: I AM THAT I AM LINKED BELOW!

Please compare the synoptic gospels to each other.  If you do compare them you will notice they seem to ying and yang each other in quite a few instances.

Please take note: Whether or not the author of the Gospel of Luke intended to highlight the contradictions of the synoptic gospels, often the Gospel of Luke seems to be the catalyst, at least for me, to notice the differences. Almost as if, in the agreement of events, the Gospel of Luke points to the deception in the synoptic gospels either in his addendum to the Gospels of Matthew and Mark or his diminution of the events in the Gospel of John!

The Gospel of Luke obviously was written after the Gospels of Matthew and Mark!

Then compare the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) with the Gospel of John and see the difference in the events, the personality, and the purpose of the Son of God.

You should notice that the antithesis between the Synoptic Gospels

and the Gospel of John is astounding!

The Truth about the Father and the Son does matter!

TOBE CONTINUED!

On a positive note, here is a site called Mustard Seeds which uses this name for their fantastic business to help children with Autism or PDD!

What is the smallest seed in the world?

The Parable of Faith – Part two

Pope Benedict XVI and the Mustard Tree

Parable of the Mustard Seed Part 4

Indulgences and the Parable of Usury

The Fig Tree – Blessed are the Barren 

=============================

TO READ ABOUT THE TRUE MESSIAH PLEASE READ:

I AM THAT I AM (THE SIGN) – Revised

and

I Am the True Vine

Why Callest Thou Me Good?

Billy Graham and The Synoptic Dilemma: The Beast

The Grace of Anathema Maranatha

————————————————————————————–

Other Blogs of Mine:  Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,   The Keep

How is it That Ye Do Not Understand?

MARK 8:13-21

13And he left them, and entering into the ship again departed to the other side.14Now the disciples had forgotten to take bread, neither had they in the ship with them more than one loaf.

15And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod.16And they reasoned among themselves, saying,

It is because we have no bread.

17And when Jesus knew it, he saith unto them, Why reason ye, because ye have no bread? perceive ye not yet, neither understand? have ye your heart yet hardened?18Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not?

and do ye not remember?19When I brake the five loaves among five thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up? They say unto him, Twelve.

20And when the seven among four thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up? And they said, Seven.

21And he said unto them,
How is it that ye do not understand?

======================

  E   I  E  I  O

======================

Someone please tell me what this means!

Is this a trick question?

I hate to sound mean but I think this rendition of Jesus sounds maniacal!

I’ll tell you the truth, I don’t and never have understood what the above means!

I have never perceived, understood, nor seen, neither remembered anyone that does get what the above means!

I don’t think it means anything!  Do you?

(For the longest time I thought this was a mathematical poser.)

The point is he doesn’t want you to understand. It is a mock of Jesus, his disciples, the miracle of feeding of the 5000 etc and

mocking the gospel of John!

————————————-

Lets take these verses a few at a time and figure out what the Synoptic Jesus is trying to swerve:

1)Did they have bread or not?
Obviously, they did have bread because verse 14 states that they had a loaf of bread! So someone is contradicting himself  just in the above verses! They must not have realized that they had bread, because they ask within themselves is it because we have no bread, when they had a loaf of bread.

2) Does the Synoptic Jesus know that they had a loaf of bread?

 Either the Synoptic Jesus doesn’t know that they had a loaf of bread, or he is lying and using his power of suggestion to make them think that they don’t have bread when in actuality they had a loaf of bread as verse 14 states. (If they had a loaf of bread on the ship….why didn’t the Synoptic Jesus know it? If the Synoptic Jesus knew that there was a loaf of bread on the ship why didn’t he just tell them that they had a loaf of bread on the ship?)

3) Is the Synoptic Jesus berating the disciples?

Definitely! The Synoptic Jesus is very good at creating chaos and confusion. He loves to make them look stupid and make himself look oh so smart when in reality he is crazy, but he is so crazy he doesn’t know that he is crazy. (Reminds me of OBAMA.) 

For if he were in his right mind he would say.

Hey guys, there is a loaf of bread on the ship as verse 14 states.

4)What does the leaven of the Pharisees and the leaven of Herod have to do with whether or not they had taken bread?

Nothing.  Just propaganda, I’m sure!  In these verses Jesus is saying to beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Herod and they say, Is it because we have no bread? when they did have bread.

It makes no sense! It is inane.

=============================================

The feeding of the four thousand is not in the gospel of John

and it is not in the Gospel of Luke.

—————————–

Diminishing Jesus written about in the Gospel of John

—————————–

John 6:51
I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

He is the bread that came down from Heaven. So either the Synoptic disciples did not believe that he was the living bread and did not believe the Gospel of John or the Synoptic Jesus forgot to tell them that he was the living bread or he did not know himself that he was the living bread,

or the Synoptic Gospels  are full of HOT AIR

otherwise they would make sense!

This is proof that the Synoptic Jesus is trying to confuse!

Since Jesus is the bread of life and he taught his disciples this concept

in the Gospel of John

why wouldn’t Jesus in the Gospel of Mark just remind them?

Because Jesus of the Gospel of Mark is not the same person

as Jesus of the Gospel of John.

============

Paul wrote 1Corinthians or so the scholars say:

1 Corinthians 2:9

But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.

Isaiah 64:4
For since the beginning of the world men have not heard, nor perceived by the ear, neither hath the eye seen, O God, beside thee, what he hath prepared for him that waiteth for him.

Compare to the verses in the Gospel of Mark:

17And when Jesus knew it, he saith unto them, Why reason ye, because ye have no bread? perceive ye not yet, neither understand? have ye your heart yet hardened?18Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not?

and do ye not remember?19When I brake the five loaves among five thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up? They say unto him, Twelve.

Did Paul write the Gospel of Mark and Isaiah or did he just add to them?

Maybe. Certainly “his own hand” is in them or someone at the very least that is imitating him.

Josephus Flavius admitted to stealing the Holy Books from the Temple

and took them to Rome of all places

maybe he did it.

==================================

How is it that ye do not understand?

The point is he doesn’t want them to understand!

But as usual he betrays himself: 

Paul was identified with being the Greek-speaking Egyptian that led 4000 murderers in the wilderness in the book of Acts.

Acts 21:38

Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar,

and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?

The point I’m making is that

 Paul is the Synoptic Jesus!

This is proof that the Synoptic Jesus is trying to confuse!

============================================

Megan Kelly of Fox News just said that two Senators now believe that the Sequester is responsible for the bomb blast at the Boston Marathon in Massachusetts which is absolutely ridiculous as is this post demonstrates.

Same kind of ridiculous and insane delusion.

It is not a coincidence that the Newtowners were at this event near where the explosions occurred. I would look into why they were put there and by whom, etc. There were bomb sniffing dogs around and they did not smell the bombs at the beginning of the race  in those areas so that ought to be a big clue.

I’m suspicious of drone usage and involvement.

If you watch drone attacks on line it could easily be altered to mimic a rough bomb

and it makes sense that it is.

Why?

Because the Obama administration said they would not use drone attacks on Americans on American soil.

This is more deadly distraction for Obama and his legion which is his M.O.

Now they have their sites on a bag in front of the fence line at the Marathon yet very few people were affected on that side of the fence line ie the runners. Obviously it was not that bag. On Sean Hannity of Fox News I watched some films as closely as I could (they are pretty quick films) and there was a hole made by something in the middle of the spectators area that was affected which is consistent with a drone strike but people overseas don’t lose their limbs when a drone strikes them, right? If it was in the trash can that was on the outside of the fence line it also would have affected the runners……doesn’t add up

and as far as Napolitan’s suggestion that there is no broader plot

….can you believe anything she says?

Isn’t she the lady lying about ammunition.

DHS excuses for buying so much ammo don’t add up

J. D. Heyes
Natural News
March 27, 2013

Just move along, folks. There’s nothing to see here.

That’s the attitude of the Department of Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano when it comes to scrutiny of her agency’s massive purchase requests for billions – that’s right, billions – of rounds of ammunition, along with 7,000 “personal defense weapons” (they would be called assault weapons if owned by private citizens), and 2,700 mine-resistant, ambush-protected (MRAP) armored vehicles of the type used to protect troops in Iraq and Afghanistan from improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

Which is what this explosive at the Marathon is being described as

is an IED.

Possibly this is about the Sequester in a perverted kind of way!’

Course the press won’t even question anyone about the difference of the appearance of the two men at Benghazi the one that they claim is Ambassador Chris Stevens and is not.

So I guess they would believe that a bag in front of the fence line that affected the people behind the fence line and not the ones in front of the fence line would be the incendiary bomb, because they have their thinking caps on.

Also a friend just mentioned to me that in the comparisons of the pictures of the bag in front of the fence line before and after the explosion one picture has a man hole cover and the other picture does not yet they are supposed to be of the same scene.

So to put it another way

they are lying.

SO if anyone ridicules the public for suspicion of conspiracy they are liars because obviously conspiracies have been occurring for a long time. Why in the world did the clergy not inform us of these contradictions in the bible? Why do they say that the gospels harmonize?

You can learn quite a bit from Walter Veith if interested in learning about the deception most of the world is mired in. I found his you tubes to be of great value and I hope if you want to start getting a real grasp of knowledge you might start there. There are many other sites with his works besides the following but this set of you tubes ought to help quite a bit.

He is prolific, entertaining, honest, and interesting:

Walter Veith: Total Onslaught Series

He is a former Catholic, a scientist, and a teacher:

Who is Walter Veith?

============================

Tell No Man

Salute No Man

Why Callest Thou Me Good?

 The Fig Tree – Blessed are the Barren

Folly of the Synoptic Gospels

America Land of the Nuns and Dishtowels

Other Blogs of Mine:

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon

Seven Mountains of Revelation

Revelation 17:9

9And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.

=====================

Here is another riddle in Revelation and I want to attempt to solve this problemo.

First of all, a woman is a church.

OBVIOUSLY, Rev. 17 is describing a false church.

The verse also says that the heads are seven mountains:

It is obvious—> the hills of Rome.

Seven hills of Rome

List of cities claimed to be built on seven hills

Thats a lot of cities!

To take this a step further

I think it is what this church stands upon spiritually

that are the seven mountains!

Seven Sacraments of the Roman Catholic  Church

Seven Deadly Sins which the above sacraments help to alleviate.

Sounds like the RCC ITself!

It’s a business, you see!

Talk about HYPOCRISY!

I’m sure I will be very unpopular for what is the obvious meaning of the above verse, but that’s life! I love the catholic friends I have known in my life, and always will, but it is what it is. and it is not my fault. What else could the above verse mean? The history of that church system proves itself. What else do you need?

Roman Catholicism is slavery!

They give a false remedy to sin

and lie to it’s own people

and they profit from it.

That is EVIL!

Indulgences, Tourism to every shrine made for every false sighting or revelation from Mary, Icons, Relics, Idols, books, and EUCHARIST WAFERS, and last, but not least,

the The Shroud of Turin!

More than likely involved in illegal banking practices! The Press! UNIONS! Education! Government!

(A self -fulfilling blob)

I think that is why it is referred to as THE BEAST!

The Mysterious Death of Pope John Paul I [A Treatise]

Isn’t that why one Pope got bumped off? He had the audacity to want to clean up the Vatican’s banking problems. He was known as the smiling Pope! He lasted a whole 30 days! He is the 5th Pope (#263) since the signing of the The Lateran Concordant!

Please read:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

The post linked above is about the prophecy in Revelation:

Revelation 17:11

And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

=====================================

Revelation 18:4
Then I heard another voice from heaven say: “Come out of her, my people, so that you will not share in her sins, so that you will not receive any of her plagues;

——————————————————

Other Blogs of Mine:

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon

In The Garden of Gethsemane

Part one: The Prayers in the Garden

Matthew 26:36-46

³⁶Then cometh Jesus with them unto a place called Gethsemane, and saith unto the disciples, Sit ye here, while I go and pray yonder.³⁷And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy.³⁸Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me.

Mark 14:32-34

³²And they came to a place which was named Gethsemane: and he saith to his disciples, Sit ye here, while I shall pray.³³And he taketh with him Peter and James and John, and began to be sore amazed, and to be very heavy;³⁴And saith unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful unto death: tarry ye here, and watch.

Both Matthew and Mark say essentially the same thing!

Luke 22:35-40

³⁵And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing? And they said, Nothing.³⁶Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

The reason for the contradiction is he has to lay the guilt of the arrest of Jesus Christ on Jesus Christ himself : for sedition

Jesus Christ did not tell his disciples to buy a sword!

And Luke was not a disciple of Jesus Christ and was not present in the garden to know what Jesus said and has come up with this story out of thin air!

³⁷For I say unto you, that this that is written must yet be accomplished in me, And he was reckoned (weighed) among the transgressors:

for the things concerning me have an end.

³⁸And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords.

And he said unto them,

It is enough.

This is a parady of the last words Jesus said before he died when He said:

It is finished.

By the way, the things concerning Jesus of Nazareth do not have an end!

It is only wishful thinking outloud from Luke the follower of Saul/Paul and their “way”  which looks more and more like they are against the truth and they are the ones that weigh us.

The apostles of the false Christ from the Land of Synopsia

use their swords to slice and dice men, 

Jesus of Nazareth and his chosen apostles!

They are antithetical in their three gospels

and other books in the New Testament about

Jesus Christ in the gospel of John!

³⁹And he came out, and went, as he was wont, to the mount of Olives; and his disciples also followed him.⁴⁰And when he was at the place, he said unto them,

Pray that ye enter not into temptation.

Just out of nowhere Jesus says: Pray that ye enter not into temptation.

Again, making Jesus sound really weird!

================

Prayer Number One

================

Matthew 26:39-41

³⁹And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt.⁴⁰And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them asleep, and saith unto Peter, What, could ye not watch with me one hour?⁴¹Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.

Mark 14:35-38

³⁵And he went forward a little, and fell on the ground, and prayed that, if it were possible, the hour might pass from him.³⁶And he said, Abba, Father, all things are possible unto thee; take away this cup from me: nevertheless not what I will, but what thou wilt.³⁷And he cometh, and findeth them sleeping, and saith unto Peter, Simon, sleepest thou? couldest not thou watch one hour?³⁸Watch ye and pray, lest ye enter into temptation. The spirit truly is ready, but the flesh is weak.

Luke 22:41-46

⁴¹And he was withdrawn from them about a stone’s cast, and kneeled down, and prayed,⁴²Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done.⁴³And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, strengthening him.⁴⁴And being in an agony he prayed more earnestly: and his sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground.⁴⁵And when he rose up from prayer, and was come to his disciples, he found them sleeping for sorrow,⁴⁶And said unto them, Why sleep ye? rise and pray, lest ye enter into temptation.

It is hard to enter into temptation when asleep and besides they were not asleep as the gospel of John tells.

Why in the world would they be sleeping in a garden in Gethsamane with their two swords that they armed themselves with before entering the garden anyway

(as Luke says earlier).

This is so ridiculous and fakey!

Luke says an angel appeared unto him from heaven to strengthen Jesus, but the other two synoptic gospels (Matthew and Mark) do NOT mention an angel. 

As I said a while ago, Luke was not there, so the angel comes from his own imagination!

==================

Prayer Number Two

==================

Matthew 26:42-43

⁴²He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done.⁴³And he came and found them asleep again: for their eyes were heavy.

Mark 14:39-40

³⁹And again he went away, and prayed, and spake the same words.⁴⁰And when he returned, he found them asleep again, (for their eyes were heavy,) neither wist they what to answer him.

Both Matthew and Mark say that Jesus went back a second time to pray for the cup to pass away from him! But in the gospel of John when Jesus was in Jerusalem for the Jewish Feast and he says:

John 12:27

²⁷Now is my soul troubled; and what shall I say? Father, save me from this hour: but for this cause came I unto this hour.

Jesus was not trying to escape the reason he came!

He is telling us in John 12:27 that others will say that he asks to be saved from this hour are not witnesses! All three synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) are agreed in this representation and have obviously misplaced this quote to another event and placed it in the garden and it has something to do with the Covenant with Many made in their rendition of the “Last Supper.” John does not include the Covenant with Many made in the Last Supper about drinking the fruit of the vine until the Kingdom of God has come.

Must be that the mysterious “Q” source told them to say it.

The Synoptic “Q Source”

I don’t believe the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) of what happened in the garden, because Jesus said that was why he came to this hour was to glorify the name of God. Which he did at the feast in Jerusalem:

John 12:28

²⁸Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again.

==================

Prayer Number Three

==================

Matthew 26:44-46

44And he left them, and went away again, and prayed the third time, saying the same words 45Then cometh he to his disciples, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest: behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners. 46Rise, let us be going: behold, he is at hand that doth betray me.

Mark 14:41-42

⁴¹And he cometh the third time, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest: it is enough, the hour is come; behold, the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners.⁴²Rise up, let us go; lo, he that betrayeth me is at hand.

Both Matthew and Mark say that Jesus tells his disciples to sleep on and then tells them to rise.  They should have asked him “what do you want us to do? Sleep or rise?”

They make Jesus sound skitszoid!

Luke has no more to say about when Jesus prayed in the garden. Matthew says Jesus prayed a second time and a third time for the cup to pass from him. Mark only says he prayed a second time and a third time all the while the disciples were asleep. Does that include Mark? If he was asleep, how would he know? Luke doesn’t mention a second and a third prayer time. And to top it off……they were not there!

All verses are pretty similar but in Matthew Jesus fell on his face, and in Mark Jesus fell on the ground and in Luke Jesus kneels down to pray. Luke, who adds an angel, agony, and great drops of  sweat. Of course, they are all asleep so how would he know of the angel and drops of blood-like sweat and the agony. If Jesus was doing this would not that wake up the disciples, but they were asleep. I imagine if there were an angel visibly there they would be wide awake, but they were asleep.

Does not make sense! 

All three of the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke say that Jesus is praying for the cup to be taken from him, but in the gospel of John this does not happen at all, in fact, Jesus had already prayed (chapter 17 Gospel of John) at the site of the Last Supper. We know Luke was not there, Mark was not there, and Matthew was not there since they missed out on the dialogue at the Last Supper and the prayer.

Jesus was not asking for the cup to be taken from him in the prayer at the Last Supper. John mentions no prayer at the garden but, of course, John and Peter and whoever was in the garden were supposed to be sleeping. Jesus knew what was going to happen. He is the spirit of prophecy as he says in Revelation.

Why do these other three gospels add this blarney when they were not there at the garden or the supper?

I like Shakespeare, but this is ridiculous.

================================

Part Two: The Kiss and the Arrest

=============================

Matthew 26:47-48

⁴⁷And while he yet spake, lo, Judas, one of the twelve, came,

and with him a great multitude with swords and staves,

from the chief priests and elders of the people

.⁴⁸Now he that betrayed him gave them a sign, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he: hold him fast.⁴⁹And forthwith he came to Jesus, and said, Hail, master; and kissed him.

Sounds like Judas was Roman!

Mark 14:43-44

⁴³And immediately, while he yet spake, cometh Judas, one of the twelve, and with him a great multitude with swords and staves, from the chief priests and the scribes and the elders.⁴⁴And he that betrayed him had given them a token, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he; take him, and lead him away safely.⁴⁵And as soon as he was come, he goeth straightway to him, and saith, Master, master; and kissed him.

How would Mark know what Judas said? Mark says that Judas says to lead him away safely and Matthew says: hold him fast after Judas kisses Jesus!

Matthew says Judas says Hail Master and Mark says Judas says Master, master.

Luke 22:47-48

⁴⁷And while he yet spake, behold a multitude, and he that was called Judas, one of the twelve, went before them, and drew near unto Jesus to kiss him.⁴⁸But Jesus said unto him, Judas, betrayest thou the Son of man with a kiss?

That is what Matthew, Mark and Luke seem to be saying is that Judas betrays Jesus with a kiss! Jesus already knew Judas was going to betray him. He said it a bunch at dinner and in the gospel of Matthew 3 times before that. It wasn’t as if Jesus did not know that Judas was going to betray him! This kiss business is so contrived! Jesus knew who would betray him way before the betrayer knew. He also knew if he would kiss him or not and Jesus never prophecies a kiss from the betrayer.  HMMMMMM!

Why not?

I guess the authors of Matthew, Mark and Luke forgot to do that!

THE “Q” SOURCE FORGOT TO TELL MATTHEW, MARK AND LUKE.

Please read my post that I have linked:

An Holy Kiss

They betray themselves with their sign: an holy kiss!

Wasn’t it the Synoptic gospels

that said no sign would be given?

Well let’s check:

Matthew 16:3
And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowering. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?

Matthew 16:4
A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.

Mark 8:12
And he sighed deeply in his spirit, and saith, Why doth this generation seek after a sign? verily I say unto you, There shall no sign be given unto this generation.

Luke 2:12
And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger.

Luke 2:34
And Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against;

Luke 11:29
And when the people were gathered thick together, he began to say, This is an evil generation: they seek a sign; and there shall no sign be given it, but the sign of Jonas the prophet.

Luke 11:30
For as Jonas was a sign unto the Ninevites, so shall also the Son of man be to this generation.

So was the sign of the kiss from Judas in the Garden

the same sign as the sign of the prophet Jonas?

Was the sign of the prophet Jonas the sign of

the baby Jesus in swaddling clothes in a manger?

The Synoptic Gospels are a mess!

=========================

Part Three:  One of Them That Smote the Ear

=======================

Matthew 26:50-51

⁵⁰And Jesus said unto him, Friend, wherefore art thou come? Then came they, and laid hands on Jesus and took him.⁵¹And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest’s, and smote off his ear.

Mark 14:46-47

⁴⁶And they laid their hands on him, and took him.⁴⁷And one of them that stood by drew a sword, and smote a servant of the high priest, and cut off his ear.

Luke 22:49-51

⁴⁹When they which were about him saw what would follow, they said unto him, Lord, shall we smite with the sword?⁵⁰And one of them smote the servant of the high priest, and cut off his right ear.⁵¹And Jesus answered and said, Suffer ye thus far. And he touched his ear, and healed him.

Luke set this up earlier in his gospel when he said that Jesus told his disciples to buy a sword, so I’m surprised he doesn’t say who it is that smote the ear! But he does say that they asked whether they shall smite with the sword.

This is so unreal!

All three synoptic gospels say it was one of them that smote the ear, so I guess they don’t know which one of them it is!

Doesn’t sound like they are in the know!

Only the gospel of Luke says that Jesus healed the ear.

Luke wasn’t there!

He doesn’t know who smote the ear, but he knows Jesus healed the ear yet no one else notices Jesus healing the ear.

Perhaps Luke or Paul is Malchus?

In depictions of Paul there is always one ear missing or a covering of one ear. ( At least that is what I have noticed IN MY STUDIES AND EXPLORATION.)

Sounds an awful lot like Jackie Kennedy’s amnesia of leaping to the trunk of the car, but knowing why she did. To get brain parts when in actuality it looks an awful lot like a hard tube rolling, Maybe caps from a weapon? Not to mention failing to tell about the puppet she received over the fence line at the airport 1/2 hour before the assassination of JFK, but musing as to why someone would give her red roses as she arrived in Dallas. What is so odd about receiving red roses? Jackie Kennedy had lots of selective memories!   Back to the Gospel of Matthew:

Matthew 26:52-54

⁵²Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.⁵³Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?⁵⁴But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be?

Legion is a roman military term!

Only the three synoptic gospels speak about legion and legions, but mostly in reference to demons! Here is a post about Legions and demons:

Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised

Part Four:  Disciples Forsook Him

Matthew 26:55-56

⁵⁵In that same hour said Jesus to the multitudes, Are ye come out as against a thief with swords and staves for to take me? I sat daily with you teaching in the temple, and ye laid no hold on me.⁵⁶But all this was done, that the scriptures of the prophets might be fulfilled.Then all the disciples forsook him, and fled.

Of course thats what they were doing, and Jesus knew it! Why did Jesus ask when he already knew that they came out as against a thief with swords and staves to take him?

Again, the synoptic gospels have made nonsense of the truth and betray themselves!

Mark 14:48-52

48And Jesus answered and said unto them, Are ye come out, as against a thief, with swords and with staves to take me?49I was daily with you in the temple teaching, and ye took me not: but the scriptures must be fulfilled.50And they all forsook him, and fled.

⁵¹And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:⁵²And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.

This is a very strange addition to the story! I really don’t understand the meaning of it,

but I am sure the intent to deceive is written all over it!

Kind of makes me think of the Shroud of Turin!

Luke 22:52-53

⁵²Then Jesus said unto the chief priests, and captains of the temple, and the elders, which were come to him, Be ye come out, as against a thief, with swords and staves?⁵³When I was daily with you in the temple, ye stretched forth no hands against me: but this is your hour, and the power of darkness.

Part Five:  Peter Follows

Matthew 26:57-58

⁵⁷And they that had laid hold on Jesus led him away to Caiaphas the high priest, where the scribes and the elders were assembled.⁵⁸But Peter followed him afar off unto the high priest’s palace, and went in, and sat with the servants, to see the end.

Mark 14:53-54

⁵³And they led Jesus away to the high priest: and with him were assembled all the chief priests and the elders and the scribes.⁵⁴And Peter followed him afar off, even into the palace of the high priest: and he sat with the servants, and warmed himself at the fire.

Luke 22:54

⁵⁴Then took they him, and led him, and brought him into the high priest’s house. And Peter followed afar off.

Looks like not all of the disciples fled or forsook Jesus as Matthew and Mark suggest in the section above! Matthew says Peter followed to see the end which is kind of suggesting that Peter was looking forward to this end. Luke seems to suggest that because of the “buying a sword tale” that the true Jesus Christ was the wolf that scatters the sheep only to cover up who the real wolf is!

This post tells who are the wolves in sheep’s clothing:

Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised

==============================

Part Six:  According to the Gospel of John

John 18:1-12

1When Jesus had spoken these words, he went forth with his disciples over the brook Cedron, where was a garden, into the which he entered, and his disciples.2And Judas also, which betrayed him, knew the place: for Jesus ofttimes resorted thither with his disciples.3Judas then, having received a band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons.4Jesus therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye?5They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them.6As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground.7Then asked he them again, Whom seek ye? And they said, Jesus of Nazareth.8Jesus answered, I have told you that I am he: if therefore ye seek me, let these go their way:9That the saying might be fulfilled, which he spake, Of them which thou gavest me have I lost none.10Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest’s servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant’s name was Malchus.11Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath:

the cup

which my Father hath given me,

shall I not drink it?

12Then the band and the captain and officers of the Jews took Jesus, and bound him,

Peter was the ONE OF THEM that smote the ear!

The man that had his ear whacked was Malchus!

WHAT BIG EARS YOU HAVE!

NSA collecting phone records of millions of Verizon customers daily

Jesus went forth to the garden to meet the band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, and also Judas.

He did not try to escape! He deliberately met the multitude!

He asked that his disciples be allowed to go their way!

They did not forsake him!

He did what He had purposed to do!

The Crucifixion

John 19:29-30

²⁹Now there was set a vessel full of vinegar:

and they filled a spunge with vinegar, and put it upon hyssop, and put it to his mouth.

³⁰When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished:

and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.

———————————————————-

The Covenant in Blood

I wonder why the three Synoptic Gospel have a a covenant for the many at the Last Supper,

but not in the Gospel of John.

Seems to me that the Gospel of John would include this covenant made with the many?

Matthew 26:26-28

²⁶And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body.²⁷And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;²⁸For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

Mark 14:22-25

²²And as they did eat, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is my body.²³And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it.²⁴And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.²⁵Verily I say unto you, I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, until that day that I drink it new in the kingdom of God.

Luke 22:20

²⁰Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.

It is written as “covenant” instead of “testament” in the NIV and many other versions of the bible.

Definition of TESTAMENT

1

a archaic : a covenant between God and the human raceb capitalized : either of two main divisions of the Bible

2

a : a tangible proof or tributeb : an expression of conviction : creed

3

a : an act by which a person determines the disposition of his or her property after deathb : will

— tes·ta·men·ta·ry adjective

=========================================================

Daniel 9:27
And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

So what is Paul saying below?

I have a hard time with Paul and understanding where he is coming from because he seems most of the time to digress/swerve often!

Galatians 3:15-17

¹⁵Brethren, I speak after the manner of men;

Though it be but a man’s covenant,

yet if it be confirmed,

no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.

¹⁶Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.

17

And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

Daniel 9:27 (New International Version)

²⁷ He will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven.’ ^[a] In the middle of the ‘seven’ ^[b] he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on a wing of the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him.

Confirmation of the Covenant: Who is “He”?

Sour Wine

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon

ABOMINATION THAT MAKETH DESOLATE

Today I read an article:

What Is the “Abomination of Desolation”?

The article submitted by The Restored Church of God (RCG Organization) above did not surprise me because I have heard the same description about the abomination of desolation for many years in hundreds (if not thousands) of articles on the internet and all of them seem to be basically alike.

What gets me is why did not the rendition of Jesus in the

Gospel of Matthew get more specific about the future: like saying that people will be flying in airplanes and driving cars? Wouldn’t Jesus have thought that would help us to know that these are the end times? Wouldn’t he want us to know this? How about space travel? And internet communication? What about Haarp and weather manipulation? Mind control?  WWI and WWII where millions of people are slaughtered in ovens and gas chambers? How about the unknown continent of America?

IT is as if he does not know! Just gives vague prophecies of little value!

How convenient!

Matthew 24:41

⁴¹Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

He talks about two women grinding at the mill, granted women still do that in places like Africa. Seems odd he would leave out so much detail and is so vague about the signs except for the signs that happened in the tumultuous years of the destruction of Jerusalem and Rome. IN fact he says:

Matthew 24:19

¹⁹And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!

Well, just so happens Josephus mentions in his writings about some of the same things written about in the Gospel of Matthew.

….

It seems as if the vision of Matthew is a bit short sighted!

As if he could only see what was to be in the future by looking back!

The Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke and Acts and many of the other epistles all seem to weave a nice basket that Josephus backs with his prophecies that as far as I can tell he saw in the future behind him as well!

SEQUENCE OF EVENTS IS IMPORTANT IN SORTING OUT THE TRUTH!

PLEASE READ:

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

The Gospel of Matthew rendition of Jesus appears to be a false prophet he warned of when he said:

Matthew 24:3

³And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?

Matthew 24:4

⁴And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you

nomen

noun \ˈnō-mən\plural no·mi·na

: the second of the three usual names of an ancient Roman male — compare cognomen, praenomen

Kind of a play on words!

Interesting site: Nomen

Matthew 24:35

³⁵Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.

Seems to me many of his words did pass away by his nomen!

Matthew 24:22

²²And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened.

Who is Matthew’s Jesus speaking about when he says the elect?

And the flesh is the word and very little of it survived!

Matthew 23:26-39

³⁶Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.

Yea because it had already happened by the time Matthew (author of Matthew) wrote this particular verse!

³⁷O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

With a little help from their friends!

³⁸Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

How thoughtful and kind. This person acting in the name of Jesus is pretending he cares as he is rubbing their nose in the dirt.

³⁹For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

This person is not the Son of God that is in the Gospel of John!

Because in the Gospel of John they greet Jesus with those same words after he had raised Lazerus from the dead in Bethany as he entered Jerusalem on the colt of an ass for the Jewish feast when the Chief Priests freaked out about how the people were following him and preceeded to entrap the real Jesus. (The one that came to glorify the name of His Father and not just himself!!!! ) The Messiah did not come to crucify Israel either. Pope Benedict was welcomed by those same words by Perez in Israel at the airport when he visited and also toured the Dome of the Rock. (although the film was edited and over-dubbed since then. I heard it and that is what alarmed me. Why was it altered if it wasn’t indicative of deception.)

John 12:12-13 King James Version

¹²On the next day much people that were come to the feast, when they heard that Jesus was coming to Jerusalem,

¹³Took branches of palm trees, and went forth to meet him, and cried, Hosanna: Blessed is the King of Israel that cometh in the name of the Lord.

John 12:12-13 New International Version

¹²The next day the great crowd that had come for the Feast heard that Jesus was on his way to Jerusalem. ¹³They took palm branches and went out to meet him, shouting,
“Hosanna!^[c]“
“Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!”^[d] 
“Blessed is the King of Israel!” ¹⁴Jesus found a young donkey and sat upon it, as it is written,

Funny, I recall that what is written in the NIV is what was said in KJV, but isn’t.

³⁸Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

Sounds like he relishes this desolation and I don’t buy that the Messiah would say that!

Important to observe that Jerusalem was not desolate at that time….

not yet.

Odd discrepancy if you ask me!

I guess the author of the gospel of Matthew had NOT counted on the the survival of the written account given about the true Son of God in the Gospel of John!

Timing is very important!

When Pope Benedict went to Jerusalem in May of 2008 He was greeted by Shimon Perez at the airport and I saw the video clip where Shimon Perez said “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.”

Obama: Only Thing Keeping GOP Together Is Its Love Of Helping Rich People

 Look Who’s Coming For Dinner in Israel

You don’t have to allow him in! He certainly won’t be serving. He is relishing his job.

———————————————————

IT disappeared quickly!!!!

I think that Pope Benedict is the Synoptic version of Jesus in the bible ie a false ‘made up’ rendition of Jesus…..more like Josephus Flavius!

The problem with everyone trying to decipher the meaning of what is written about Jesus is that there is a difference between the Son of Man and the Son of God. One of them has a kingdom now on earth and then the true Son of God’s kingdom is not of this world and He is the true Messiah!

A lot of people were named Jesus back in those days.

A lot of people were named Simon

and Joseph and Matthew, etc.

A lot of people called all kinds of things God!

The Gospel of John and the Synoptic Gospels are talking about two different people.

The Gospel of John seems to be an eyewitness account from the inside. The Synoptic Gospels seem to be a distant, fragmented, corrupted, confused account and very antithetical to the Gospel of John (I believe on purpose) to deceive the readers about who is the true Messiah. There is a huge difference in the personality, character and message portrayed of the Messiah in the Gospel of John and the Synoptic Gospels and they cannot be the same person. Jesus seems to be apolitical in the gospel of John and very political in the synoptic renditions.

The false synoptic versions of the account of the Son of God is the Great Deception!

You cannot combine the Gospel of John with the Synoptic Gospels and say they match, because they don’t.

They are so opposite and they collide!

Everyone needs to remember that there was a war in Heaven and a third of the angels fell! They want to deceive men about God and His Son!

Why? Because they hate God and His Son and they hate all men and women!

Not just the Jews, not just the Christians, and not just Arabs, etc!

Matthew 10:22
And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved.

Mark 13:13
And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake: but he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.

Luke 21:17
And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake.

I put in the search on the online bible “hated of all men”and the Synoptic Gospels are the only ones that have this same saying. (Matthew 10:22, Mark 13:13, Luke 21:17)

I suspect that the Synoptic Jesus was hoping that this would be true and more than likely wants to pick and choose his favorites to endure while turning each faction he invented against each other to confuse us so that we don’t know who the real enemy is. It is a trick of the devil.

I don’t consider these duplicate verses very much of a prophecy

(Mark 13:13 & Matthew 10:22).

Whoever survives will survive. I guess he needed to point out the obvious! Maybe because the Synoptic Jesus needs and loves martyrs! Notice that there aren’t very many martyrs in the Vatican. Those are the guys that get to endure for the Synoptic Messiah.

Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised

The Synoptic Jesus is a very mixed up Messiah!

Maybe “all men” has another meaning!

WHEN ALL MEANS FAIL by Rev. David Wilkerson

Please read the following article which I believe exposes the enemy:

Rev. Wilkerson, Evangelicalism and the Covenant With Many

Aulus

Could this rendition of Jesus be the Abomination of Desolation. He sure seems to gloat about their demise!

Daniel 11:45 (King James Version)

⁴⁵And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him.

Love how words that never pass away seem to be doing just that.  Compare the same verse in New International Version:

Daniel 11:45 (New International Version)

⁴⁵ He will pitch his royal tents between the seas at ^[a] the beautiful holy mountain. Yet he will come to his end, and no one will help him.

Pope Benedict delivered a tabernacle:

Pope Benedict XVI Blesses Magdala Center Cornerstone

“Duc in altum – Put out into the deep”

Im no prophet, but sure seems coincidental ….

Yet it very well could mean absolutely nothing!

I think the Abomination of Desolation happened already

and we are still enduring it!

Matthew 24

After reading Matthew 24

I get the feeling

MATTHEW got up on the wrong side of the bed.

Bed bugs: stronger, tougher, and harder to kill than ever

Joint Statement on Bed Bug Control in the United States from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

===========

Abomination of Desolation Pt 2

Here is an article somewhat related by Sola Dei Gloria with different conclusions: Flavius Josephus and the Apocalypse of John

Blogs about Flavius Josephus

in other words

the False Messiah:

Josephus and His Footprints

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

The Covenant with Many

The Synoptic “Q Source”

Pope Benedict XVI and His Power of Suggestion (aka Joseph Ratzinger)

Pope Delivers Tabernacles- Daniel 11:45

COULD THESE BE THE TABERNACLES SPOKEN OF IN THE BOOK OF DANIEL?

Daniel 11:45

And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him.

In May of 2009, Pope Benedict delivered a tabernacle to Notre Dame in Jerusalem. Please watch that link!  Quite interesting!!!!!!  The tabernacle he delivered was a little box? The Pope also blessed the cornerstone of the Magdala Center. Could that be considered a tabernacle, along with Notre Dame, and the little box (shrine, I guess) that he delivered to the Center of Notre Dame?

The verse in Daniel doesn’t mention just one tabernacle, but tabernacles…..plural!

ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc

Definition of Tabernacle

1. often Tabernacle The portable sanctuary in which the Jews carried the Ark of the Covenant through the desert.

2. often Tabernacle A case or box on a church altar containing the consecrated host and wine of the Eucharist.

3. A place of worship.

4. A niche for a statue or relic.

5. Nautical A boxlike support in which the heel of a mast is stepped.

JAMES AND JOHN ZEBEDEE

Boanerges (sons of thunder). A name given to James and John, the sons of Zebedee, because they wanted to call down “fire from heaven” to consume the Samaritans for not “receiving” the Lord Jesus.

The Gospel of John does not say that James and John were given the name Boanerges!

Why? I think they were named Boanerges by the deceiver/deceivers that wrote the Synoptic Gospels (the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke)!

Please read the link below:

The Grace of Anathema Maranatha

IN the book of Acts, Saul and Barnabus are on a “ministry” that coincides with the death of James, the imprisonment of Peter when Peter goes to another place, the death of Herod when he is eaten by worms and they take John surnamed Mark with them after their “ministry” is completed. What in the world was their “ministry”?

Then Saul metamorphosizes into Paul!

This post is about the tearing down of the character of James and John Zebedee. There was a reason for the synoptic gospels to include these personal attacks on these two brothers. I believe the reason for the attacks on John and James is because the Gospel of John tells about the true Jesus Christ and the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) are trying to deceive us and sell us a false rendition of Jesus Christ and his disciples!

In the gospel of Mark, Jesus is explaining to his disciples what was to befall Him very shortly and James and John come to him:

Mark 10:33-34

³³Saying, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be delivered unto the chief priests, and unto the scribes; and they shall condemn him to death, and shall deliver him to the Gentiles:³⁴And they shall mock him, and shall scourge him, and shall spit upon him, and shall kill him: and the third day he shall rise again.

Mark 10:35

³⁵And James and John, the sons of Zebedee, come unto him, saying, Master, we would that thou shouldest do for us whatsoever we shall desire.

Let’s get real! Does this sound normal?

This is absurd that James and John would respond this way to what Jesus was telling them at that time, according to the gospel of Mark.

Isn’t it odd that Matthew’s gospel doesn’t mention that James and John say: Master we would that thou shouldest do for us whatsoever we shall desire?

But maybe even to the writer of the gospel of Matthew realized how fakey this sounds!

————————————————-

Matthew 20:20-21

²⁰Then came to him the mother of Zebedees children with her sons, worshipping him, and desiring a certain thing of him.²¹And he said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that these my two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on the left, in thy kingdom.

And another anomaly is that in the gospel of Matthew it is the mother of James and John that requests that her two sons sit at the right and left, yet in the gospel of Mark it is  James and John that ask to sit on his left and right!

Mark 10:36-39

³⁶And he said unto them, What would ye that I should do for you?³⁷They said unto him, Grant unto us that we may sit, one on thy right hand, and the other on thy left hand, in thy glory.³⁸But Jesus said unto them, Ye know not what ye ask: can ye drink of the cup that I drink of? and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?³⁹And they said unto him, We can. And Jesus said unto them, Ye shall indeed drink of the cup that I drink of; and with the baptism that I am baptized withal shall ye be baptized:

Why did Jesus ask them if they could drink of the cup that he drinks

and why did Jesus ask if they can be baptized with the baptism

that he was baptized with

if indeed they would be?

Does that make sense?

This is redundant!

Remember : Jesus Christ was baptized by John the Baptist!

Never did anyone see Jesus Christ baptized with FIRE!

——————————————

Mark 10:40-41

⁴⁰But to sit on my right hand and on my left hand is not mine to give; but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared.⁴¹And when the ten heard it, they began to be much displeased with James and John.

Do you really think James and John Zebedee would ask to sit on the right or left side?

And would any sane person ask such a thing to the Messiah?

How did the other ten disciples hear of it? Weren’t the ten disciples also there listening to Jesus at the time?

These were real people and real people don’t act this way in real life!

Not that we don’t think stupid things sometimes, but to say what they said publicly?

I don’t believe that James and John said this to Jesus Christ and in front of the other disciples.

It sounds like a weekly soap opera theme and I think that is what the synoptic gospels want you to think, especially about James and John Zebedee! Why? Because they were the true apostles of Jesus Christ!

It is another way to discredit the truth in the gospel of John that they could not find and destroy!

=================================================

Luke 9:49-50

⁴⁹And John answered and said, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name; and we forbad him, because he followeth not with us.⁵⁰And Jesus said unto him, Forbid him not: for he that is not against us is for us.

Does this sound normal?

What does that mean he that is not against us is for us?

Jesus was not running for a popularity contest, nor for political office.

Just because someone isn’t against you does not mean they are for you!

Just because someone isn’t for you does not mean they are against you!

This is stupidity!

============================================

Luke 9:52-53

⁵²And sent messengers before his face: and they went, and entered into a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him.⁵³And they did not receive him, because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem.

Jesus sent messengers before his face….

……his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem

neither of the above make any sense!

IF Jesus sent messengers before him, how would the Samaritans know that his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem?

If Jesus’s face was as though he would go to Jerusalem, why would it matter if they did not receive him in Samaria?

This is NONSENSE!

=============================================

Luke 9:54-56

⁵⁴And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did?⁵⁵But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.⁵⁶For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them. And they went to another village.

Please Read Woman at the Well!

It is about Jesus going to Samaria and it is written in the gospel of JOHN!

All three synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) do not include this encounter with the woman at the well in Samaria!

WHY?

Something eerie about the absence of this in the other three gospels, because it has to do with the 6th hour which is the same hour that Jesus Christ dies!

THE SAME JESUS CHRIST THAT DIED AT THE 6TH HOUR ON THE CROSS IS THE SAME JESUS CHRIST THAT WENT TO SAMARIA AND MET THE WOMAN AT THE WELL!

For some reason

THE THREE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS EXCLUDE THIS EVENT!

Didn’t they know that Jesus Christ went to Samaria?

Why didn’t they know that?

They PROVE that they DID NOT KNOW HIM by their lack of knowledge that Jesus did go to Samaria and this is what he said to the woman at the well about the 6th hour:

John 5:24-25

²⁴Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
25Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live.

===============================================

Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did? Jesus says :Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of, and then Jesus says :For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them.

IN the book of Acts fire comes down from heaven in the form of cloven tongues.

Revelation also speaks of  fire coming down from heaven in the sight of men and is speaking about the false prophet and the antichrist!

INTERESTING!

——————————-

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

Other Blogs of Mine:

Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,    My Merlon