The Drawbridge

BIblical Controversies and Discord

The Court of the Gentiles and Human Rights


As far as I know, Jesus never said anything about gaity, effeminism, lesbians, or homosexuals. In my opinion they should have the same human rights as others have. I do not think this is a slippery slope. It is common sense.

They should have the right to marry.

Now the bible says we should not eat shellfish…because of the health risks, but it is not one of the Ten Commandments.

Do we say that people who eat shellfish cannot marry?

 We have progressed in this rights struggle for people of different races, creeds and the female gender; we allow them to marry, why stop now?

How does marriage hurt a feminine man or a manly woman?

How does marriage hurt a homosexual or a lesbian?

How would that human right hurt the people in our country?

I think it would make them and us safer.

Did God say he was against homosexuals getting married? Not that I recall but He does not approve of the sexual act because it is unnatural and obviously a health risk.

Because God loves humans he tells them about the risks ahead of time to help protect them no matter who they are, homosexual or heterosexual. African or Roman. Jewish or Palestinian. American or Russian. ETC.

Obviously, each and all of us are imperfect by His design.

I haven’t seen, neither met, nor known anyone that was perfect.

He created humans with flaws or we would be perfect and since angels fell they must have been imperfect too!

That face sure looks familiar to me!

Cardinal John Patrick Foley

Cardinal John Patrick Foley

Jackie o?

Compare the picture above with this picture of Jackie

you have to admit they do look similar.

“During his tenure, the Archbishop once sparked outrage in the homosexual community by describing the AIDS pandemic as a “natural sanction for certain types of activities.”[12

Makes you wonder who is responsible?

He also defended the Church’s exclusively male priesthood, once saying, “Jesus clearly did not ordain women to the priesthood, nor did he authorize the Church to do so.”

How would he know?

When angels think they are God. 

Is Cardinal John Patrick Foley a relative to Jackie O?

“I Come as a Pilgrim”

“The Pope held out a special hand of reconciliation in advance to Catholic homosexuals, who had been outraged at comments made by Archbishop John Foley, the American who heads Vatican communications. Foley had described the scourge of AIDS as a “natural sanction for certain types of activities.” Aboard Spoleto, John Paul said homosexuals “are in the heart of the church,” along with “all people who suffer.” In his first-ever remarks on AIDS, the Pope said, “The church is doing all that is possible to heal and especially to prevent the moral background” of the disease.”

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,147603,00.html#ixzz1v2Q22l8k

^These guys are nuts IMO! They love suffering….keeps them afloat.

Not only homosexuals received the “natural sanction” spoken of by Cardinal John Patrick Foley but so did other people like hemopheliacs. I dated a man who died of aids along with his brother, both were hemopheliacs. Both were happily married and productive men. Before he died he did reveal to me that his investigation of the aids contamination in the blood supply had to do with

the Red Cross, and in particular Elizabeth Dole.

Weird picture of the Doles and the Connallys

I guess  “natural sanction for certain types of activities.”

 is not very exact kind of like the Mustard Seed Parable.

 Please read about natural sanctions in this link:

THE PARABLE OF FAITH – PART ONE

The Parable of Faith – Part two

Pope Benedict XVI and the Mustard Tree

Parable of the Mustard Seed Part 4

————————————-

D.C. gay rights groups evacuated after bomb threats

What is a marriage called when a gay person marries a straight person?

Half gay marriage? Half straight marriage?

How about if the other person isn’t aware of the other persons sexuality? What if the person isn’t even aware of their own sexuality?

Then what? Does that mean they are forever married until death even though it is a bad arrangement?

I don’t think it is fair to draw a line on this human right. I wonder how many unnecessary tragedies have occurred because of this type of hypocrisy especially when it comes to arranged marriages over the history of this world. How many murders have occurred to coverup ones sexuality because of what “the church” deemed legitimate?

Anne Boleyn and others come to my mind!

=======================

 I would rather see a homosexual have one partner and learn about marriage than live wildly and not learn about marriage. Marriage tends to stabilize a person which is good for many reasons. Depriving a person of a stabile loving environment is cruel and certainly doesn’t help.

Marriage is a private relationship between adults so they should be able to marry as long as the other person wants the same, just as I believe a person has the right to a divorce if things don’t work out, without ramifications.

I should have the right to raise my child my way without hindrance from others such as my government and my government school system. I should be able to homeschool if I so choose with out interference from my government. It is not my governments business how I raise my child.

 Sodom and Gommorah

I believe the reason the angels blinded the crowd wasn’t because of their sexual orientation. It was because they were demanding attention from the angels and forcing themselves upon the angels, Lot, and his family. They had no right to do that and Lot should not have offered his daughter to them. They were forcing themselves upon Lot, his family, and the angels. That is why I believe they were blinded.

God did not destroy Rome or Greece and I think they also had homosexuals living in their countries. But our bibles tell us that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed.

Did Jesus destroy homosexuals when he came?

I don’t recall that he did, but he healed people with various imperfections,

but not everybody.

Why was Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed?

The bible says that it was because of the sin of the people had basically gotten so bad that God could not ignore it anymore. It wasn’t just the homosexuals.

It was everyone in those cities.

I do not know what Gomorrah means but this is what it says is the definition:

Go·mor·rah 2
n.
A wicked or depraved place

Sodom means:

Sodomy – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sodomy refers to anal sex or other non-penile/vaginal copulation-like acts, especially between male persons or between a person and an animal.

So we have wickedness, depravity, anal sex and beastiality, and I don’t know what the other non-penile/vaginal copulation means ….maybe oral sex, heavy petting and other things.

So basically the two names of the two cities doesn’t exclude a particular gender. The definition of the names of those two cities does however seem to point to sexual sin and wickedness. 

Men, women, children, and animals were destroyed.

Obviously sin was rampant amongst all the people and tolerated by Lot and his family.

Abraham made a deal with the destroying angels hoping to spare the two cities, if the destroying angels could find a certain amount of righteous people would God spare the cities from destruction. I forget the amount that they agreed upon but it was not just a few but it seems they could not even find that amount because the bible says those cities were not spared.

From that I glean that it is a good idea

to allow righteous people to be righteous,

because it is those people and their righteousness that keep the world safe.

 In the Gospel of John after Jesus had arisen he said

John 14:1

Let not your heart be troubled:

ye believe in God, 

believe also in me.

————————————————

We should help people to believe in humane, thoughtfully kindly ways within the laws of the countries and not persecute believers or non believers, or disembowel them and kill them, lie to them, or torture them, or trick them because they are imperfect.

Christians are imperfect.

Nobody said that a believer was perfect.

Christians should not expect perfection in non believers either.

Non believers should not expect perfection in believers.

Angels are imperfect too…..

Putting someone on the rack doesn’t improve them. I don’t expect the Roman Catholic establishment to be perfect either. They have made huge mistakes but should also have to live by the laws of the land and own up to their mistakes. They have accomplished some good things too and we cannot discount their service in some capacities. Most Roman Catholics are wonderful people and imperfect.

The Roman Catholic Church established a Court of the Gentiles

about the same time as they felt they were being persecuted

because of their abuse of children

and not because of their beliefs.

That is the lie.

It is not a coincidence.

Now the RCC and the Pope and their “protection”

won’t allow anyone to see their secret files,

because they perceive themselves to be HOLY  and above the laws of the land

but want us to suffer their subtly maniacal inquisitions

with the powers that they have established for over 2000 years

through deception.

That is the EPITOME of TREACHERY!

I believe if they own up to their mistakes they as a church could be healed and survive because they are human,

Obviously that power has corrupted them.

If they go down we all go down. That’s how these cowards do business.

Vatican Investigating Girl Scouts

for Links to Safe-Sex Education Groups

Ignorance is their ace in the hole, you might say. That is why there was such a thing as the Dark Ages when the lay people were not allowed to read the bible, in essence, they want to discern for us and deceive us. It is their power. Everything they do is toward that purpose. Education on the other hand gives power back to the individual and out of their hands.

Abusers of mankind!

==============

Case in Point:

Vatican Investigating Girl Scouts

for Links to Safe-Sex Education Groups

Ignorance is their ace in the hole, you might say. That is why there was such a thing as the Dark Ages when the lay people were not allowed to read the bible, in essence, they want to discern for us and deceive us. It is their power. Everything they do is toward that purpose. Education on the other hand gives power back to the individual and out of their hands.

Wikipedia head joins Vatican meeting, talks about abortion controversy 

Wikipedia and peace

———————–

There were 2 other cities in the plain besides Sodom and Gomorrah which were destroyed. It is quite possible since no one knows where or for sure where these 4 places are located that Sodom and Gomorrah is a prophecy. Don’t discount that possibility.

==============

What is sin?

Obviously wickedness, depravity, bad behavior, and bad morals.  The bible says that homosexuality and beastiality are an abomination. Obviously, disobeying the Ten Commandments is considered to be sin.  The rapid decline in the morals of this country by the average citizen seems to coincide with the dismissal of the rule of law.

Whose law?

God’s law.

We have so many new laws in this country, much more than we had 50  years ago. Obviously, it isn’t the addition of these new laws, but the dismissal and disregarding of God’s law in our country that is affecting our country.

Lawlessness and disobedience 

Most of our kids don’t remember or were not alive when debates about the Ten Commandments were occurring in this country, but I remember it was my generation that rebelled against the monuments of God’s law. As I recall, it was the atheists that were the initiators of this mission, because they don’t believe in God. Free love and the hippie movement were also accepted by some of the population and are now standardized in our relationships in various ways. Abortion also was debated and now we have legal abortion for the rights of the mother and against the rights of the baby. The drug trade and drug usage prospered, homosexuals started to come out of the closet.

 I believed in a government separation of church and state.

I went to an Episcopal church for a couple of years in my early teens.

The Church I attended was hit by lightning and burned up. It coincided with a Gay/effeminate Rector taking over the position at about the same time that the church had invested in a new organ. I noticed the new rector because he swished down the aisle and I thought he was weird, but at the time I did not know about homosexuality in any form. Clueless!  When my family attended this church on many Sundays both my brother and I would get nauseated and have to leave early. It was a real symptom. Either something was wrong with me and my brother, or the church. Well, my brother and I did not get struck by lightning or burn up. So obviously something was wrong with the church. Neither did the rector. The fact is I can’t remember if I didn’t have that same symptom before the new rector. Maybe it meant that God does not approve of a homosexual leading the church. I cannot say for sure. Maybe God did not approve of the church itself. I highly doubt the organ was the problem, but it also burned in the church fire. Maybe God didn’t like the model of the organ.

We ought to regard and erect the monuments of God’s Law

to remind the humans and angels about

the Ten Commandments

that God designed

so that our children and other generations to follow

might have the chance to marry.

I have read a lot of the bible but I have not read the whole bible. I have compared the gospels for a number of reasons and I have chosen whom I believe. The Gospel of John. I am not positive in my conclusions to the 100 percentile, but He makes sense to me. I cannot say that the things told in the other 3 gospels did not occur, but does that make it true and I guess by that I mean the content and the conclusions made by the three synoptic gospel writers and all of their quotes attributed to Jesus.

The Gospel of John gives details that are not present in the other three gospels. He names names of the people in his gospel as if he knew them and was a witness. He makes sense. Jesus doesn’t come off as a fruit cake or a tyrant in this gospel. The other three gospels make Jesus sound like a lunatic and I don’t believe them for that cause. I think he was preceded and shadowed by lunatics and copycats.

Think about the coverup of the assassination of JFK. It is similar to what happened to Jesus except that JFK did not say he was the Messiah. He did have a message though and he paid dearly for it.

I do know that when I started to compare the gospels and write about it, it seemed to stir up a lot of controversy. That was not my intent. Maybe it is just coincidence, but I don’t think it is. I think it is a real threat to the establishment of religion, but that was not my intent either,

but it is scary to see how deceptive the clergy have been.

I think it should be a human right to worship whom you believe.

I do not believe I have the right to kill, maim, or force others to believe what I believe. But I do have the right to express my beliefs. It is a human right, just like African Americans have the right to work in public businesses, worship, eat, sleep, drink, marry, drink from a public water fountain, buy a house in any neighborhood, get loans, own a business,  and go to a public school or public college without hindrance because of their race.

I do not go to their bedrooms because it is private.

It is none of my business what they do there. 

It is between them and God

and whether they believe or not is between them and God.

1 Corinthians 6:9
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate

nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

Who is this referring to? Obviously not mankind

The bible says that the effeminate do not inherit the kingdom of God …..

who determines that measure of manliness that does inherit the kingdom of God?

Mitt Romney? George Bush? Billy Graham? Joel Olsteen? The BGEA? Ted Nugent?

The Secret Service? The Jesuits? Putin? Hillary Clinton? The Swiss Guard?

I suspect that the effeminate are the cowards

that aid and abet that power

that abuses mankind.

That is why Revelation says:

Revelation 18:4
And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

By remaining you empower the enemy of mankind and that is cowardly,

which is effeminate.

It is not how manly or feminine you are,

but whether you are an abuser without remorse of your fellow human

like a Nazi.

Here is a site you should listen to and hear. Has quite a few you tubes worthy of contemplating about the Roman Catholic Church and other subjects:

 Stephen Fry dismantles the Roman Catholic Church

“……Do you know who would be the last person ever to be accepted as the Prince of the church? The Galilean carpenter. That Jew. They would kick him out before he tried to cross the threshhold. He would be so ill at ease in the church…..”

————————————-

============

“The Roman Catholic Church faces permanent disruption and banishment in at least five countries if it does not comply with ten “non-negotiable measures” by September 15, 2012, according to a global coalition of

survivors of church rape and torture.”

Catholic Church Faces Disruption and Banishment

as Irish Cardinal Set to Resign

by Kevin Annett

This isn’t small potatos. This system is abusive worldwide!
Could be a hoax but nevertheless I can’t say that it is hoax or not.
===================

Are Human Rights

the same or different

than Moral Rights?

I don’t know.

God gave us the choice to believe Him or not to believe. 

God has the right to judge us however he sees fit to do so as a country and individually.  He created us.

His standard is written about in the bible and it is up to each of us individually to decide and make the choices that please him or displease him.

It is a high standard if you include the other books of the Old Testament as well as the other books of the New Testament.

The Ten Commandments are pretty basic though.

Our country was born by invading this continent with lots of different peoples that escaped from other countries of all different religions and races.

Our government is supposed to represent the people that are here.

That happens to include homosexuals because they are human, as far as I know.

Human rights. What does that mean?

It means if you are human you should be able to enjoy the same rights that other humans have legally.

I believe that includes marriage,

but not sodomy.

Privacy is a human right. Sex is a privacy right.

I’m not sure about that,

but it makes sense to me.

I don’t believe it was intended by God for people to be homosexual, but obviously it was a possibility. I don’t think He approves of homosexuality or any other sin. Did God intend for marriage to be between a man and a man? No, I don’t think so since He doesn’t approve of sodomy, but it was a possibility. The bible says that God will deal with sodomites. It is not my business what happens in their bedroom. It is between them and God. My sins are not their sins, and visa-versa. Unless of course done in the public eye.

What is public?

Well, if our government and religious institutions are disobeying our privacy rights that might include what we do in the privacy of our own homes via computers, the internet, tv, telephone

and anything wired electronically, etc.

Are babies not human?

Do they have the right to live?

They can’t speak till they learn to speak and they in fact are dependent on their human mothers womb until they are designed in the womb

created by God

so shouldn’t they be protected by humans and their human rights

since they are human too and so that they may enjoy the right to marry?

How about children?

They have a right not to be sexually abused by their teachers and the clergy so that they might enjoy the right to marry and not be screwed up in their future relationships and marriage. The clergy should be forthright and offer assistance and openness of their accounts and records

instead of hiding and stalling. 

Do the right thing.

It is a human right,

unless you are not human.

========================

If homosexuality is a learned trait then I leave that to Our Father and Jesus to heal the person of this trait when He decides is the right time for that particular individual. Same goes for a Hindu or a Buddhist, etc. Our Father reaches a person however and whenever that He does. I don’t think forcing the religion of Christianity upon another person by using bully tactics like Haarp or other facilities to cause mayhem and earthquakes (which I believe is occurring now) is the right way. If God Himself intervenes that’s His business!!!!! But I know that lately our government and other governments are using these places to scare and intimidate people.

I can’t say positively that HAARP is responsible for the tsunami/earthquake in Japan last year, but it seems highly likely and should be investigated.

But if it was a judgement from God then what did it mean?

Here are some interesting coincidences that were occurring at that particular time as far as I know in Japan involving the Pope, The Neocatechumenal Way, Roman Catholic leaders and the Japanese people. I’m sure this is just the tip of the iceberg but nevertheless ought to be scrutinized. Please read:

Japan Quakes after Confirmation of the Neocatechumenal Way

Maybe the power that is used at places like HAARP have been around longer than we know.The reason I say that is because of what happened at Yodfat. Please read:

Josephus and His Footprints

Using bully tactics like keeping files on every person in the country to blackmail them, coercing them, is DIS-GRACEFUL.  Our government should not be doing this to anyone and it seems that they are, from what I have witnessed and written about in my posts.

It is that kind of business that in essence is a Disgraceful Force that might incite Our Father to intervene such as occurred at Sodom and Gomorah.

Things are pretty rotten in America and the world

and have been declining for a long time.

Why?

I believe we have misinterpreted our bibles.

I also believe we have misinterpreted the signs,

partially because of the powers and those that wield them

who want us to misinterpret these signs.

I do not have any power over any one so I am not responsible for what is happening in our country and abroad, nor do I want to have that power. But I am speaking out and at this time still have a right to voice my opinion and display what I have uncovered over the internet and what I have learned as a believer in God and Jesus written about in the Gospel of John.

I came to those conclusions by reading the bible and comparing the gospels and comparing them to the Old Testament.

and disregarding what is obviously fraudulent and maniacal.

The Fruits of the Vatican

Mitt Romney’s 2006 Rally Against Gay Marriage

Pope Benedict XVI and His Power of Suggestion

Obviously, my beliefs do affect how I react to human rights, people in general, religion and government.

If these facilities are using their power to incite, coerce, create signs such as earthquakes, tsunamis, the right to earn money or inhibiting buying and selling, behavior modification via electronic devices or anything wired to force people to accept a religion or belief or behave in a bad way then I would say they are INHUMANE. I would say they who are doing this obviously don’t agree with humans having human rights and are waging terrorism against the public. If that is true then a homosexual married couple might be at risk from those that are against this human right and humans in general.

Case in point:

Cracks in the Washington Post story on Romney’s ‘pranks’ emerge

A question emerges in reading the Washington Post piece on Mitt Romney today: How can Romney’s old pal Stu White tell the Washington Post that he has “long been bothered by the Lauber incident” — and then later admit to ABC News that he was “not present for the prank” and “was not aware of it until this year when he was contacted by the Washington Post”?

Romney Friend Stu White Says Campaign Wants Him to Counter Prank Accusations

“One former classmate and old friend of Romney’s – who refused to be identified by name – said there are “a lot of guys” who went to Cranbrook who have “really negative memories” of Romney’s behavior in the dorms, behavior this classmate describes as “like Lord of the Flies.”

The classmate believes Romney is lying when he claims to not remember it.

“It makes these fellows [who have owned up to it] very remorseful.  For [Romney] not to remember it? It doesn’t ring true.  How could the fellow with the scissors forget it?” the former classmate said.

In a radio interview Thursday morning,

Romney offered an apology for the pranks,

but said that “homosexuality” was never on his mind”

==============

Which reminds me of what God said to Abraham when Abraham took his son Isaac to Mt. Moriah to sacrifice him.

After Abraham had built an altar and had bound his son and was about to kill him in the act of sacrifice,

God intervened and told Abraham not to kill his son and said 

That sacrificing Abraham’s son Isaac was never on his mind.

Then Abraham found a ram with its horns caught in the bushes

which God had provided.

Then Abraham sacrificed the ram/lamb (depending on which bible version you read) instead.

I’m sorry and need to apologize

for the above statement:

I made a mistake because I went back to read about Abraham and Isaac and what I had written that God had said (that sacrificing Isaac was never on his mind) is not true. I don’t know how that happened honestly, but God blessed Abraham for his fear of God and his willingness to offer Isaac his only son. I really thought I had read the above but now I cannot find it.

Please read:

Genesis 22

And they came to the place which God had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood.

10 And Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.

11 And the angel of the Lord called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he said, Here am I.

12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him:

for now I know that thou fearest God,

seeing thou hast not withheld thy son,

thine only son from me.

13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son.

14 And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of the Lord it shall be seen.

15 And the angel of the Lord called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time,

16 And said, By myself have I sworn, saith the Lord, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son:

17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;

18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice.

But what about Ishmael? Wasn’t he also Abraham’s son? Hmmm. I guess from this God did not consider that Ishmael was Abraham’s son.

Maybe because God knew something not revealed? 


Still I know that we do make mistakes in God’s name and in the name of Jesus as I have demonstrated so personally. Sorry!

Please read:

Binding of Isaac

“While it is often imagined that Isaac was a small child, some sources claim he was an adult (noting that Jews are considered adults at age 13). The Talmudic sages teach that Isaac was thirty-seven, likely based on the next biblical story, which is of Sarah’s death at 127 (she was ninety when Isaac was born). Bishop Ussher’s chronology would place Isaac at about 20 years of age.”

Genesis 22:14 states that it occurred at “the mount of the LORD”: in 2 Chronicles 3:1Psalm 24:3Isaiah 2:3 & 30:29; and Zechariah 8:3, the Bible seems to identify the location of this event as the hill on which Solomon was said to later build the Temple, now known as the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.[c

Obviously, people jumped the gun

and made some horrible mistakes

in the name of God and in the name of Jesus

and do the same now!

———————

John 8:57-59

57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?

58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you,

Before Abraham was, I am.

59 Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.

For the longest time I have tried to figure out what Jesus was trying to communicate when he said in the Gospel of John:

” Verily, verily, I say unto you,

Before Abraham was, I am.”

Is this what he meant? The reason I say that is because the Temple Mount was built on this site where the event spoken about in Genesis 2:2 occurred with Abraham and his son Isaac!

I even thought maybe the exodus of the hebrews led by Moses from Egypt might have occurred before the event spoken about on the Mount where Abraham and Isaac made their sacrifice, but now it is quite possible that Jesus in the Gospel of John was talking about the event with Abraham and Isaac on that same location.

=====================

Communication between humans is tough sometimes. I noticed through experience that men have a tough time communicating with each other where as women have an easier time communicating. Men are imperfect that way. Women on the other hand are more emotional and tend to be imperfect that way.

Even angels were imperfect.

We humans and angels were made with flaws for a purpose. It is our nature to be imperfect and until God perfects all of us we have to cope with those imperfections in ourselves, each other and the others,

because who knows if God will decide to turn the tables and when.

 In any case, we should try to persuade our peers, clergy, friends and neighbors, families, and our government to do what is right.

Just because we are fighting terrorism does not mean we should do the same and become terrorists ourselves. Believe me we will win the war on terrorism if we fight the war

the right way with integrity and mercy!

How we go about doing it is just as important as accomplishing it. Murdering each other, wire tapping each other, raping and pillaging, invading each other’s bedrooms,  intentional disinformation, blackmailing each other, vexing people, impersonating another person, stealing and robbing, starving people, leaving an individual helpless and unable to protect themselves by disarming them, prohibiting each other in inhumane ways is the wrong way to attain human rights and it is the wrong way to change a person’s belief, spirit, and heart.

Lawlessness vs Lawlessness = Lawlessness

Lawlessness + Lawlessness = Lawlessness

which is in essence

war.

Are we at war with God or OG?

Opinion: On gay marriage, Latinos agree with Obama

OBAMA’S GAY MARRIAGE HEAD FAKE

By Roger Stone

“Once Gay Americans are through celebrating President Barack Obama’s “personal” support of Gay marriage equality, they will learn that Obama’s “evolution” changes nothing. Obama’s new position is a bullshit cop-out.

This comes on the heels of an cynical Obama campaign pirouette where Team Obama trotted out first Secretary of State Hillary Clinton then Vice President “Crazy” Joe Biden to say they support gay marriage and imply that the President would too–after the election.

Now, incredibly, Obama says Gay marriage is a state issue. That’s what they used to say about abortion and before that, slavery. Now Obama tells us that gay couples should be able to marry but he doesn’t believe they have a right to do so. Obama would leave the question to the states–in other words -the status quo. This is like saying that public schools ought to be integrated but if the people of Mississippi disagree, well he says, “let the states decide” …

===================================

By the way, what is the 2nd Commandment

of the Ten Commandments?

What is wrong with saying

“do unto others as you would have them do unto you?” 

There are always going to be extremes on any issue. I don’t think we should make determinations of any issues on that basis,

otherwise I would suggest outlawing marriage for heterosexuals.

==================================

Biden apologizes to Obama for marriage controversy

uh huh.

The Trickery and Treachery of Mitt Romeny

WATCH TAMRON HALL GO NUTS

“What I am asking about is how the campaign has handled this situation, how he handled the Colorado reporter, how he handled same-sex marriage where

he said he agrees with gay parents be able to adopt,

but he does not agree with same-sex marriage? “

That’s a misnomer.

Homosexuals are good enough to raise kids

but not good enough to be married!

Does Mitt Romney not like orphans, kids, and homosexuals?

Why?

————————————

May be Mitty Romney shavout.

Mitt Romney’s 2006 Rally Against Gay Marriage

This man is sinister, sick, demented,

and speaks in dark sentences!

Romney’s lame response on bullying allegations

Adam Lambert Discusses Gay Rights Anthem “Outlaws Of Love”

What Romney can accomplish at Liberty University

Sometimes looks are deceiving and sometimes they aren’t.

He reminds me of George Ganswein

the Pope Benedict’s Secretary

the man who dresses the Pope.

Romney apologizes for high school ‘teasing’

=================

It is okay if you’re gay … Stop Bullying Now!

The times we are living in are treacherous and the leaders we have in our government and religious institutions are as confused as we are because of the treachery and need our help and prayers. We should try to obey the laws of the country we live in as best we can and hopefully all of us can get through the deceit and treachery eventually.

May 11, 2012 Posted by | 1963, Abraham, Assassination of JFK, Assassination of President Kennedy, BGEA, bible, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversies, Bible Deception, BIBLE PROPHECY, BILLY GRAHAM, Christian Deception, Deception, Endtime Deception, Equal rights, Gospel of John, Great Deception, Human rights, It is okay if you're gay ... Stop Bullying Now!, JESUIT, Joseph Ratzinger, Joseph Ratzinger and The Covenant with Many, Politics and Religion, POPE BENEDICT XVI, President Bill Clinton, President Obama, Roman Catholicism, Rome, Senator Hillary Clinton, Sin, Stephen Fry, Synoptic Deception, Synoptic Gospels, THE ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION, The Court of the Gentiles, The False Church, The Gospels, The Kennedy's, The President, The Press, The Synoptic Gospels | 1963, The White House, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many



PART 1

———————————————————————————————–

JFK and Mel Gibson

The Covenant with Many

————————————————————————————————————–

The Covenant with Many

(revised)

 

February 11, 2010 By Kevin Flower Israeli archaeologists say they’ve found a 1,500-year-old road, 4.5 meters under the current level of streets in Jerusalem’s Old City.

 

The reason I am writing this post is because of the prophecy in Daniel that a lot of people write about on blogs and websites.

I don’t understand why the prophecy teachers and scholars that try to have an understanding of Daniel’s prophecies…get stuck on the same mantra.

I am not trying to be different, but I think there have been some colossal mistakes made by scholars, bible teachers and the whole spectrum of experts of the bible.

I don’t see how you can read the Gospel of John and collapse it into the Synoptic gospels and say they blend at all or compliment each other.


In Reality

The Gospel of John and the Synoptic Gospels

collide !

In the book of Daniel it talks about Messiah the Prince and a prince.

Why does everyone think the covenant with many is for the future.

How does one come to that conclusion from these verses?

Daniel 9:25-27

25Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

It is quite possible that the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince has already occurred,

but has been covered up by the

Chief Priests and the Legion – (please read)

Ancient wall found in Jerusalem

Western Wall, Jerusalem

The Western Wall was built by King Herod in 20 BC during his expansion of the Temple enclosure, and is part of a retaining wall that enclosed the western part of Temple Mount. According to the Roman-Jewish historian Josephus, construction of the walls took 11 years, during which time it rained in Jerusalem only at night so as not to interfere with the workers’ progress.

Ancient road found in Jerusalem’s heart

February 11, 2010|By Kevin Flower

“Archaeologists working under the direction of the Israeli Antiquities Authority have uncovered a 1500-year-old road running through the center of Jerusalem’s Old City.

Excavation director Dr. Ofer Sion said the discovery lends further credence to the accuracy of what is known as the Madaba Map – a Byzantine period mosaic map of the Holy Land that depicts an entrance into Jerusalem that leads to a single central street.

Archaeologists working in Jerusalem have made various finds to suggest the Madaba map was geographically correct, but the road depicted in the mosaic had not been found.”

Obviously, there have been two walls from two different temple eras

and a road!


Micah predicted the downfall of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple, which were fulfilled by the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in about 586 BC and again by the Romans in 70 AD. The Temple has not been rebuilt since that destruction. Jerusalem was destroyed a second time by the Romans in about 135 AD.

The only reason I added the above link and the information about the destruction of Jerusalem

and the temple and the destruction again of Jerusalemin in 135 AD

is because it might apply to Daniel’s prophecies.


Perhaps we are wrong about when Jesus really died? Many people seem to think Jesus was 30 or 33 when he started his ministry but in the Gospel of John they refer to him as not yet being 5o years old.

I would say we have a problem within the bible of who and which Jesus is the Messiah!

John 8:56-59

56Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.

57Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?

58Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

59Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.

(Interesting that they threw stones at him.)

Cephus” means stone.

The Synoptic Gospels have built their “image of Jesus” metaphorically by using stones!

By the way, I believe Cephus refers to Josephus Flavius!

Was there ever a decree to build the temple to the Messiah the Prince?

Perchance the destruction of Jerusalem in 135 AD is a clue?

Maybe the decree to build the temple to the Messiah the Prince occurred before 135 AD!

Seems odd that after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD that anyone would need to destroy it again 65 years later.

Building a city takes time, and funds, and manpower,

so why was there a need to destroy it again so soon after it had already been destroyed?


Seems to me that most and maybe all scholars of the bible are making presumptions, because they lump the gospels into one big ball but I think, to be fair,

we should separate the Synoptic Gospels from the Gospel of John

and calculate both sides to see if maybe we can come up with some other answers.

Maybe that is what is meant by the 153 fish which relates to the inferred 153:265 ratio!

Pope Benedict XVI and 153 Great Fish

Pope Benedict XVI is the

265th Pope,

was born Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger


Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, and the Pope

George Gänswein, Pope Benedict XVI, and Mel Gibson

revised

In the two article above that I just recently posted which are very similar I included in both a link to an article I found on the internet about names!

Praising Or Pleading

(POP)

seems to be his (The Pope) MO these days and in this article he pleads for parents to give their children traditional names before baptism so I gather names have meaning to him!

So since they are so important I thought maybe his name might be important also.

The Pope’s Last Name

IN the article

I relate the possibility that the Pope is related to another Pope whose last name was RATTE which would fulfill another prophecy in Revelation 17:11 about him being the eighth and one of the seven:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

But I did not deal with his middle name so:

The Pope’s Middle Name

Aloisius a german name means great warrior but comes from the name

Cleophas meaning and name origin

Cleophas \c-leo-phas\ as a boy’s name is of Greek origin, and the meaning of Cleophas is “visionof glory“.

Biblical name: husband of one of the Marys who stood at the foot of the Cross.

Cleophas has 4 variant forms: CleoCleofasCleofaso and Cleophus.


Alphaeus

which is basically the switch from the Synoptic version and Simon from Cyrene who bears the cross and takes over after Jesus is crucified. In essence to REPLACE the true disciples/apostles with his own sons etc because they were the Chief Priests and they wanted to stay that way and replace Jesus with their own perception of Him. It is the great deception! The Synoptic version of the bible (Matthew Mark and Luke) plus many additional books in the bible to form the amalgamation we now call Christianity.

Basically, Rome absconded the truth and twisted it into their baby.

That is why I believe that Mel Gibson has been targeted for his rendition of the Gospels in THE PASSION,

THE BABY or to be more specific THE DEVIL’s BABY

Here are a few posts about that baby!:

Affliction and the Time of Testing

Mel Gibson and the Book of Acts 2

Mel Gibson, Japan Quakes, and the Kamikazes

Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, and the Pope

George Gänswein, Pope Benedict XVI, and Mel Gibson

revised

You might say I went overboard, which is true, but I am trying to learn and to get your attention and the articles are ongoing because of the events which are at present rapidly unfolding.

======================

Back to the Prophecy of Daniel

============================================================

Daniel 9:26

26And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

INTERESTING: NICODEMAS MEANS “THE PEOPLE” AND

IT WAS NICODEMAS AND JOSEPH OF ARIMATHEA

THAT BURIED JESUS.


THE POPE’S FIRST NAME


IT’S A GOOD POSSIBILITY THAT JOSEPH OF ARIMATHEA

IS THE “prince of the people“.

Another interesting coincidence: Demas is a fellowlabourer of Paul:

Philemon 1:24

24Marcus, Aristarchus, Demas, Lucas, my fellowlabourers.

You don’t suppose that Demas is Nicodemas?

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

Daniel 9:27

27And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Sounds to me like in order to cover-up the abomination he had to make it desolate?

Who is “he” in verse 27?

Is “he” the Messiah the Prince?

OR

Is “he” the prince?


It makes a big difference who “he” is in verse 27!

The thing that concerns me is that we have been waiting for some treaty or covenant that will be confirmed and seems to me we ought to know first and foremost:

what is the covenant that is made with the many?

Then try to figure out

who confirms that covenant with the many!


The Covenant with the Many


Many treaties have been made with many people so what kind of treaty will be made with the many and confirmed with the many that this particular prophecy in Daniel is referring to? Certainly it has to do with the prince and the temple and/or worship and/or sin.

Most treaties we read about in the news most people are unaware of so why would Daniel of the bible be speaking of some political treaty that only the few politicians and leaders involved realize. This is a prophecy about the Messiah the Prince and the people of the prince and he (I assume is the prince of the people)

But it isn’t a treaty that Daniel talks about….it’s a covenant!

To be more specific it is the “covenant with many”!


What is the covenant with many?

I looked up “covenant” in the bible search on line and found a lot of covenants.

The covenant that caught my eye is the one that the Synoptic Jesus makes with the Synoptic disciples at the Synoptic Last Supper

and the verses about this covenant uses the word many.

I think that is a BIG CLUE about this covenant!


MATTHEW 26:26-29

26And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body.27And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;28For this is my blood of the new testamentwhich is shed for many for the remission of sins.29But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.

MARK 14:22-25

22And as they did eat, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is my body.23And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it.24And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testamentwhich is shed for many.25Verily I say unto you, I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, until that day that I drink it new in the kingdom of God.

LUKE 22:15-20

15And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer:16For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God.17And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves:18For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come.19And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.20Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.

 

THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

DOES NOT MENTION THIS

NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant with many!


I THINK THAT IS VERY SIGNIFICANT THAT THE

New Testament/Covenant

IS ABSENT IN

THE GOSPEL OF JOHN!


The three Synoptic gospels don’t mention the washing of the feet,

nor the dialogue that Jesus has with his disciples explaining what is going to happen

and many other things that is worth the time to study.


WHAT IS GOING ON?

Why are the Synoptic Gospels account of the Last Supper so different than the Gospel of John?


Were there two different “LAST SUPPERS”?


For a  break and for fun in an ironic way,

Please watch:

The Last, But One Supper

(It is a Monty Python skit with John Cleese acting like the Pope)


THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW SAYS THAT BLOOD OF THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant WHICH IS SHED FOR THE MANY is

FOR THE “REMISSION OF SINS“.

THE OTHER TWO SYNOPTICS GOSPELS (MARK AND LUKE) EXCLUDE THE “REMISSION OF SINS” TO THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant.

THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW AND THE GOSPEL OF MARK SAY THAT THE BLOOD OF THE NEW TESTAMENT/covenant IS SHED FOR THE MANY.

BUT THE GOSPEL OF LUKE SAYS IT IS FOR YOU. (HE IS TALKING TO HIS DISCIPLES)

EVEN THOUGH THESE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS ARE IN AGREEMENT THAT THERE IS A

NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant.

THEY ARE DISAGREEING AS TO WHO THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant IS FOR…..

THEMSELVES (YOU) OR THE MANY.

(I HATE TO BE A JERK!)

BUT THE ACCOUNTS GIVEN OF THE “LAST SUPPER” BY THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT (NT as opposed to the OT)

DIFFER A GREAT DEAL AS TO THIS “NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant” AND ARE WORLDS APART FROM THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

SINCE this “New Testament”

DOESN’T EVEN OCCUR IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN.

THE PRAYER AND THE DIALOGUE OF JESUS WITH HIS DISCIPLES

HAPPENS ONLY IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN AND THERE IS QUITE A BIT OF INFORMATION GIVEN!

========

Another point by Paul Carlson in his article  below, I get the impression that Paul Carlson thinks that all of the contradictions that are contained in the NT makes everything written about Jesus a lie and that is not my point!

I don’t believe that!

I think Jesus the Messiah did come and so did false messiahs and their many supporters

to quell the truth against Him and His true apostles

for money, power and control.

It’s like saying, for example, that the  September 11th terrorist attack on the Twin Terrors weren’t destroyed because 3 or 4 witnesses/terrorists don’t tell the same story, hence it’s all a lie and the Twin Towers are still there. That is ridiculous! But that is the point in having contradictions so that some people will come to that conclusion! Obviously, the Twin Towers were destroyed and something very big happened, because they are no longer there.

Deception is in the bible purposefully

to deceive

and to reveal!

In other words, it works both ways!

An oxymoron (plural oxymorons or oxymora) (from Greek ὀξύμωρον, “sharp dull”) is a figure of speechthat combines contradictory terms. Oxymorons appear in a variety of contexts, including inadvertent errors such as extremely average and literary oxymorons crafted to reveal a paradox.

Truth is a funny thing, because it is quite possible these contradictions were said

and did actually happen

…..but by who?

Why don’t the experts and scholars of the bible raise the possibility of what seems to be written in black and white in the bible? I get the impression they are hiding from what seems to be obvious …….

but why?

When Jesus came it made such a stir that Jerusalem was destroyed and their temple, Rome was destroyed and Jerusalem was destroyed again 65 years later. Jesus was big news and his coming had major ramifications! And I believe his enemies made sure of the destruction. propaganda and deception to cover up the truth! History was rewritten to hide the truth and many people were slaughtered!

People that lived under the rule of the Romans were slaughtered when they wrote anything that would make the Romans look bad. And I am convinced those times are coming again soon. So when you read Josephus and other writers, keep in mind that they could lose their lives for what they wrote and so maybe there are hidden meanings to their stories. Contradictions may abound in the bible and in the history given by the major history authors (Josephus included, even though his accounts seem to be false IMO) to point us to the truth while avoiding the threat of death for us to be able to discern via archeology and other avenues and the unfolding, at the right time! Possibly the power that caused so much destruction was something other than just the Romans, because they also suffered and suffer now, because they lack the truth and are deceived…..they just don’t realize it!

Daniel 7:25

And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High,

and think to change times and laws:

and they shall be given into his hand

until

time and times and the dividing of time.

I think that is what is meant by the words “time and times and the dividing of times” is what has been written about that time and the deception about those times.


I think we are in the times prophesied by Daniel and specifically

the “Dividing of time”.


Please read the following fantastic article I found on the internet which is linked next:

The Reliance of Luke-Acts on the Writings of Flavius Josephus

…..”So, Steve Mason, associate Professor of Humanities at York University, Ontario asks:

“If Luke did not know of Josephus’ work, how did this language suggest itself to him?”[5]….


Daniel is talking about he, the prince that was to come,

the prince that Jesus warns us about in the gospel of John.

So when you link to this site below by Paul Carlson and/or read my articles that talk about contradictions in the bible

keep in mind that just because there are contradictions

doesn’t mean it did not occur!

===========

New Testament Contradictions (1995)

Paul Carlson

A. WHEN – BEFORE OR DURING PASSOVER?

“…….In Matthew, Mark and Luke the last supper takes place on the first day of the Passover (Matthew 26:17, Mark 14:12, Luke 22:7).

In John’s gospel it takes place a day earlier and Jesus is crucified on the first day of the Passover (John 19:14).…….”

============


The Blood Covenant at the Last Supper

in the Synoptic Gospels seems to be a bit odd

since Jesus had not died yet!


I know I must seem like I’m just quibbling about small details,

(although they are not small to me)

but

since it is a contract

it seems to me it should be very clear and concise!


All I can tell is that this NEW TESTAMENT/covenant

is for “many”

or for


“you” which was “them” (the disciples sitting at the table).


Why the controversy?

Can’t they even agree on what the “New Testament” /covenant is,

and who it is between,

and what it is for?


The reason this is so IMPORTANT to me is that I have found many problems in the Synoptic Gospels

and have an inclination

to distrust their word of the Word.

New Testament

the collection of the books of the Bible that were produced by the early Christian church, comprising the Gospels, Acts of the Apostles, the Epistles, and the Revelation of St. John the Divine.
the covenant between god and humans in which the dispensation of grace is revealed through Jesus Christ
==============================================

Could the

“Covenant with many”

spoken about by Daniel be the

“Covenant with many”

made at the Last Supper

in the Synoptic Gospels?


Makes sense to me!


If so, then who confirms this covenant?


======================================

Whoever confirms this covenant could be the “he” in verse Daniel 9:27

In my last article on another blog, I wrote called Abomination of Desolation: Part one

(which is also linked here and at the bottom of this post)

the Synoptic Jesus in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke

talks about desolation:

Matthew 23:38

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

Luke 13:35

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate:

and verily I say unto you,

Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say,

Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.


=============================

They themselves

(The Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke)

testify to the

“Desolation” and a “Covenant with Many”

===========================

Remember:

the Covenant is not in tbe Gospel of John

nor is desolation mentioned.


========================
Daniel 9:26
26And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
—————–
Daniel 9:27
27And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
————-
Whoever that prince is that “he” is referring to is the one that causes the sacrifice and the oblation to cease., etc
after the Messiah is cut off.

I believe it is the the same prince that Jesus of the Gospel of John warns us about:
Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.
—————-
Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh,

and hath nothing in me.

——————

From the sounds of His warnings the prince of this world would be coming very soon,
not waiting 2000 years later!
I assume that is why Jesus says NOW twice.
“Now” could have a double meaning?
*********
The first time you hear about the prince of this world (in the Gospel of John)
is at the Jewish Feast in Jerusalem
after Jesus had raised Lazarus from the dead in Bethany when the Greeks arrive to that Jewish Feast to see Jesus.
I think that was a sign about this prince of this world.


===============================
I believe that the Covenant at the Last Supper was made with the prince of this world,
and he broke the covenant and desolation occurred.

I DO NOT BELIEVE GOD THE FATHER OR HIS TRUE SON ARE LIARS!
I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT JESUS OF NAZARETH WRITTEN ABOUT IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN
WOULD MAKE A COVENANT AND THEN BREAK IT
AND THEN CAUSE DESOLATION
SO THEREFORE WHOEVER DOES THIS IS THE LIAR
AND IS NOT THE TRUE MESSIAH!!!!!

The reason I believe this is because this Covenant at the Last Supper
is not in the Gospel of John
and John does not mention it later in his gospel.

The only gospels to mention desolation are two of the Synoptic Gospels

in the past tense:


Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
—————–

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate:
and verily I say unto you,
Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say,Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.
———————————

Here are some interesting comparisons of Paul and Josephus.
PLEASE READ:

Flavious Josephus And the Apostle Paul Were the Same Person?, page 1

and there are many more examples which I have included in other articles about
Josephus Flavius and Joseph of Arimathea.
PLEASE READ:
Maybe if we looked at things a bit differently, events like Masada and Yodfat and the discrepancies of the archeological evidence vs. Josephus Flavius’s historical account
might make more sense…….
Perhaps since no evidence of Jewish bones have been found at the site of Masada
could there have been a resurrection of the living?
I don’t know of course, but it is worth considering!

Josephus Flavius’s historical account and the archeological evidence do NOT match,
so I wonder what really did happen at Masada and Yodfat
and why would Josephus make up stories of mass suicide of JEWS!
that seems to have not happened at all?
If a mass suicide did not occur, why would Josephus lie about it???
Is he trying to promote suicide as a heroic sacrificial act for Jews or is he trying to infer their inferiority?
What would be the point?
He did seem to turn on his own country and people from what I have read about him and by him,
if, in fact, he was Jewish?
But then wasn’t HITLER Jewish? And we do not want to forget that lesson!
Or was he leaving us clues???
Why would he lie about it?
If there had been a victory by the Romans
why not write about it?

From his writings. he seemed to be kind of sick in the head or had some kind of deep insanity. His accounts of what happened show lots of inside information, even what people were actually thinking
and he seemed to be in charge !!!
His paranoia may be a result of knowing the thoughts of the people and their plots against him.
If you read his works they are quite descriptive of maniacal sadistic manipulative type behavior
and he seemed to enjoy the destruction and the deceptions of the people!


It must be that he is trying to hide who he is!


WHY?


Could Josephus Flavius be the “prince” ?


Could he have rewritten history and written the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke)
to cover up the truth
about Jesus of Nazareth
and replace himself
as the Messiah?
IE
THE DEVIL
Could he have taken the records in the Temple in Jerusalem as he says he did,
rewritten parts of the OT to bolster his Synoptic Gospels,
composed other books from The Book of ACTS and the rest?
Could he have changed the Genealogy records or destroyed them as others say they no longer exist to cover up
WHO HE REALLY IS?


Could he have been the one to make a covenant with many?


Could Josephus be Cephus?


Makes sense to me!

THE STONE

????????????????????????????????

Could Josephus Flavius Son of Matthew be Joseph of ARIMathea

(ARI means lion. and eagle)

Ari is also a very GREEK name.
ARISTOTLE

Jacqueline Kennedy married Aristotle Onassis which in itself seems very odd when you think about it!
Especially since recently ART of New Wineskins with *his propaganda site* IMO
implied that the head wound of the beast spoken about in Revelation
was President Kennedy’s assassination and that President Barrack Obama’s head vein?/scar? had something to do with this prophecy!
The Devil and his legions are in a hurry for lots and lots of reasons!

Since finishing this post today,
I have watched some you-tubes of the moments of President Kennedy’s assassination, because of what I have been learning and writing and it looks pretty scary. I have seen them a hundred times before and always gave Jacky the benefit of doubt because she is a female, very pretty, soft spoken and his wife,
but Jacqueline’s behavior before and after, are disconcerting to say the least!

Here is what I see NOW:
She is fiddling with him as he is shot the first time, then Connelly looks back and she looks at Connelly and he is shot, she looks back at her husband and gets closer and under him and he is shot again and the blood spray goes up, then
it looks as if she has something in her right hand after the second shot.
Possibly, lost that object when she pushed her husband over and fled to the trunk of the car to get whatever was back there,and it looks like a tube of lipstick because of the way it stays on the trunk of the car. She pursues it on the trunk of the car and gets it and gets back and hunches down with everyone else.
*April 2nd 2011 Just watched this video again a few times and it looks like she is the only one that seems to be busy …..very active….and in control…….everyone else seems to be reacting.
Everyone else seems to be in slow motion and she is in very fast motion.
Whoever her focus is on seems to be before that person is shot! IMO
Which is very disturbing!


Here is the video:

And the Secret Service act peculiar in the front seat, the driver and the passenger and the guy that left his post at the back corner  by President Kennedy.

But WHO knows with digital mastering and all of the coverups!

The same applies to Mel Gibson and the tapes of his rantings. My husband is a sound engineer and voices can also be spliced and diced and altered …….digitally mastered. It isn’t as if he doesn’t have plenty of emotional voice samples in all of the movies he has been involved with.
WHO knows!
I just would not place much faith in visual or sound technology.
I hope it isn’t a technique or practice employed to defame, destroy and rob individuals who have money, influence or sway,
but aren’t in alignment with the
One World Government, One World Religion, and One World Finance
fostered by Pope Benedict XVI and his legions.


THAT WOULD BE A NIGHTMARE
but maybe it is a warning and a sign of things to come!

Another time and on another post I watched a you-tube which also showed

peculiar behavior of the Secret Service


and that was behind Donald Rumsfeld when he misspoke

about the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

This is the post:

“A very interesting you -tube I watched recently of Donald Rumsfeld slip of the tongue, and I have linked it. Pay close attention to what he says about the the shooting down of the plane and the Pentagon and the reaction of the people in the background. Makes me think the Secret Service are a bit more powerful than I ever imagined. The Treasury Department runs the Secret Service. That is interesting since we are in debt up to our EARS. President Bush SR used to head the CIA. Hmmmmmmmmm. I wonder if Rumsfeld didn’t do that on purpose for our benefit? You never know! I hope so.”

The article below shows the relationship of banking

with the Synoptic Gospels, Paul, Josephus and BAAL!

1 Timothy 6:10
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

Please Read:

The Synoptic “Q Source”

*************************


What we do know is that

President John Kennedy

was killed because of his posture and his actions

exposing

SECRET SOCIETIES.


Time is our ally.


Please read about the head wound below:

Many people keep looking for a place called Arimathea, and so far there is none.

Could Josephus Flavius/Joseph of ARI-Mathea have been the Fear of the Jews?

Could Saul/Paul be Josephus Flavius?

1 Corinthians 3:22

22Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas,

or the world,

or life, or death,

or things present, or things to come;

all are your’s;

=====================

John 14:30

Hereafter I will not talk much with you:

for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

[and compare to what Paul says]

1 Corinthians 16:24
My love be with you all in Christ Jesus. Amen.

=============

Below Saul/Paul contradicts himself:
and then following Paul tricks people:

2 Corinthians 11:31
The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is blessed for evermore, knoweth that I lie not.
2 Corinthians 12:16
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty,

I caught you

with guile.

Guile

=====================[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[=================
If you read his history of the Jews and Josephus’s biography it’s almost like he is writing about the underworld,
or the world of the dead.
The spiritual world.
======================

A lot of the names and events seem to parallel Acts and I don’t think it’s accidental!
He seems to relish the people being deceived!
THE DEVIL ENJOYS DECEPTION!
Could Josephus Flavius have been as a
Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde
with

MANY OTHER NAMES

I don’t think we should ignore his writings, but rather compare his style and details to the events in the bible!

================================
Other sites of interest in regard to old and recent covenants:
===============================


=================================

My last *four posts that I believe relate to the subject of the covenant follow:

*Abomination of Desolation: Part one

*The Abomination of Desolation Part 2

*In The Garden of Gethsemane

*Sour Wine

Josephus and His Footprints

CONFIRMATION OF THE COVENANT

The Fruits of the Vatican

———–=======================———–

Here is a recent Covenant with Many that might be of interest:

Magen David Adom Covenant

– The value of saving lives as seen by the three religions, will be presented to the Pope

=======================================

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)


I Am the True Vine


If you have read any of my articles I have a basic theme throughout most of my posts on my blogs and it is that the Synoptic (Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke), Acts and many other epistles are false! I believe they represent a false Messiah and a False Prophet! I believe I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt quite often that they contradict each other and are antithetical to the gospel of John. They promote a political agenda to control the people and quell the truth about Jesus and his message.I think the synoptic gospels were written by thieves of the true Word of God and his true apostles.

I believe these guys killed the true apostles, stole what they could from them, altered their messages, rewrote history to cover up their crime, in collusion with the the powers that be at the time to create their own version of Jesus and God.

The contradictions are pretty apparent if you compare the gospels to each other and read the bible critically. For many years, I didn’t study, but just read what other people thought and still kept running into a cement wall. I don’t think I have all the answers, yet nor do I think I will attain that ever in my lifetime. I write in my blogs as I am learning and hope it will help others that have also questioned the same things I question that is written about God and Jesus.

I don’t think it is healthy to accept what we have been fed for years as “the truth” I think it is healthier to question, study and discuss. I don’t think the ecclesiastic entity appreciates our freedom to question it’s authority on their interpretation of what is written in the bible but who said they have the right to quell our search for the truth? To them it is Apostacy,,,the falling away…. I say it is Apostacy from them, and falling away from them. They think they have the answers…..

I dont think they have the answers, so thats why I write my blogs. Enuf said on that!


 

April 5, 2011 Posted by | bible, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversies, BIBLE PROPHECY, Book of Daniel, Bread of Life, Daniel, Deception, Endtime Deception, JOSEPHUS, POPE BENEDICT XVI, prophecy of Daniel, Roman Catholicism, Synoptic Gospels, THE ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION, The Antichrist, The False Church, THE FALSE MESSIAH, The Gospels | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment