The Drawbridge

BIblical Controversies and Discord

Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many – Part 2

You will miss the point of this post if you neglect Part 1 which is linked in the following title:)

In part one of this trilogy

The Covenant with Many

I stumbled upon a coincidence of Joseph of Arimathea/Josephus Flavius

marriage to the church

and the marriage of Jackie Kennedy to Aristotle Onassis (the Greek Shipping Tycoon)

and this is how this particular post came about!

President Kennedy Assassination and Mel Gibson

Part two

After my conclusions about the Kennedy assassination I was intrigued and curious why Jackie Kennedy would be so bold as to kill her husband in broad daylight in front of cameras and people etc. I went through quite a few emotions and ideas kept popping in my head about his supposed affairs except vaguely and over time, reading about them with Marilyn Monroe. I always still had a deep respect for our President and his stance publicly for truth and openness and I have always hated that he was assassinated. I also hate the secrecy associated with the findings about the assassination! His private life might not have been perfect, but he seemed like a Perfect President. And probably there is more to the story than what meets the eye!

I always thought highly of Mrs. Kennedy and her kids. After looking at many pictures of her she is even more beautiful than I remember. But compared to the woman on the screen in the Zapruder film I just wasn’t satisfied with my conclusions even though I think that woman did assassinate President Kennedy.

To start, I would like to divulge again that I am a portrait artist and I notice features a little more closely than the average person. So I decided to compare pictures of her to see if possibly, by chance, that the woman in the Zapruder film might be someone else. I found quite a few pictures and compared them to each other to see if and when she might have been replaced with a double. I know that sounds preposterous, but there is no doubt in my mind after seeing the Zapruder film over and over, and studying it closely, that she looks and acted very guilty. Yet Jacky Kennedy doesn’t seem to be the type of woman to be so calculating and cold. The person on the screen in the film acts like a professional hit woman. So after writing the article The Covenant with Many and the deception involved and how the assassination of President Kennedy seems to cor-relate in very strange ways, especially Jackie’s marriage later to Aristotle Onassis, I had to look into it deeper than I ever have.


I kept running into the dilemma of mirror-image confusion. If you take an object and stick it in your right hand and go to the mirror the object will be in you left hand. In many of the pictures of her she parted her hair on the left and sometimes on the right.

For instance:

(I put the web addresses for you to put in your title bar to go to the picture to see it larger because my blog will not show it large enough to see a clearly)


This is the first lady at Taj Mahal on one of her many trips. In the picture above her purse is on her left arm and the part in her hair is on the left and her leg is poised forward on the left when facing her (or her right) and on the picture above that it is the exact opposite. I spent a long time pondering and studying these pictures because she is wearing the same dress and obviously it is the same day, right?… appears that way anyway.

Then I realized the mirror-image dilemma.



But we do now!

Most people rarely change their part from the left to the right, or visa versa. But with mirror-image I could not get past the confusion, until I put her with another person …..her husband.

Men never change their parts, especially back in those days. So I studied a bunch of pictures of them together and in every shot I could find of the two of them together, their parts were always on the same side. His would be on his right when facing him and hers was on the right when facing her when they were side by side. So if you looked at them they were two right parts, like they matched.

Both have their parts on the right above.


Again, again  and again!

Both have their parts on the right again!

Both have their parts on the same side again like parallel as the other two above!

And again. Hard to see but their parts are on the right.

Again both President Kennedy and Mrs. Kennedy have their parts on the right when you are facing them.

Jackie’s Pink Suit– more examples two Jackies

“It was at President Kennedy’s request that she wear the outfit in Dallas.

He said she looked “ravishing in it.” 

(Susan Mary Alsop, 1963)”


The Covenant with Many – Part one


Part 3

Now Before the Assassination in Dallas

April 7, 2011 Posted by | BIBLE PROPHECY, Deception, Jackie Kennedy, Jackie Onassis, JFK, John Kennedy, JOSEPHUS, Josephus Flavius, Mel Gibson, POPE BENEDICT XVI, President Kennedy, The 34th President, The 44th President, The Kennedy's | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

153 Hail Mary’s and 153 Hilda

John 21

1After these things Jesus shewed [proved] himself again to the disciples at the sea of Tiberias;

and on this wise [in this way] shewed [proved] he himself.


Odd that this is said twice within the same sentence

which makes me think it is a warning and at the very least a

Double Entendre

“A double entendre (French pronunciation: [dublɑ̃tɑ̃dʁə]) or adianoeta[1] is a figure of speech in which a spoken phrase is devised to be understood in either of two ways. Often the first (more obvious) meaning is straightforward, while the second meaning is less so: often risqué, inappropriate, or ironic.
The Oxford English Dictionary defines a double entendre as especially being used to “convey an indelicate meaning”. It is often used to express potentially offensive opinions without the risks of explicitly doing so.”

or maybe a Riddle

I am he


another… this way?

Please read the articles about the Neocatechumenal way

of Roman Catholicism

in Israel and in Japan:

Cardinal O’Malley : Neocatechumenal Way’s Domus Galilaeae Center in Israel

Japan Quakes after Confirmation of the Neocatechumenal Way

If you read the article it shows that the Pope was wrong or misstepped

and made a big huge error in his power that backfired which proved he is wrong!

Either which way he was wrong, which is ironic!

Will he try again on the Sea of Galilee….we shall see, but I would hope he has learned his limitations!

2There were together Simon Peter, and Thomas called Didymus, and Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, and the sons of Zebedee, and two other of his disciples.

3Simon Peter saith unto them, I go a [alpha.aleph.truth] fishing. They say unto him, We also go with thee. [They follow Peter] They went forth, and entered into a ship immediately; and that night they caught nothing.

4But when the morning was now come, Jesus stood on the shore:

but the disciples knew not that it was Jesus.

5Then Jesus saith unto them, Children, have ye any meat [belief?our meat is to believe] [His meat is to do the will of God]?

They answered him, No.

6And he said unto them, Cast the net on the right side of the ship [starboard side], and ye shall find. They cast therefore, and now they were not able to draw it for the multitude of fishes.

Here is a link with the whole article about ship terminology:
Know Your Ship Terminology
…..”The port side is the left side of the ship, when you are facing forward
(i.e., toward the pointy front end of the ship).
Here’s a simple rule for remembering this: Left has four letters, and port has four letters.
The right side of the ship is the starboard side”……
…….”The pointy end of the ship I discussed earlier is in fact called the bow, and the back end of the ship is called the stern”……..
……If you want to reach the bow, you head in a forward direction. But if you want to reach the stern you don’t head backwards; you head aft. Why? Just to confuse us, of course……..


7Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter,

It is the Lord.

Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt

[In architecture or structural engineering, a girt is a horizontal structural member in a framed wall. Girts provide lateral support to the wall panel.]

his fisher’s coat unto him, (for he was naked,

[did not believe in Jesus of the Gospel of John and was in sin])

and did cast [sow] himself into the sea.

Sowing of himself as the Lord ie the Pope and the Synoptic Jesus

(into the See)?

[I think this is a reference to the Book of Acts about and Paul’s ship wreck when he cast the wheat into the sea and that it was not about Jesus, but Peter himself. Not to mention He did not yet believe in Jesus, ie naked. Everything about Peter and Paul in the Book of Acts is weird.

8And the other disciples came in a little ship; (for they were not far from land, but as it were two hundred cubits,) dragging

1. Pull (someone or something) along forcefully, roughly, or with difficulty.
2. Take (someone) to or from a place or event, despite their reluctance:

the net [fish net/the internet] with fishes.

9As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.

10Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish [meat /believe/ truth]which ye have now caught.

Caught in the act? caught, trapped, lured, entrapped?


11Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great fishes, an hundred and fifty and three:

and for all there were so many, yet was not the net broken.


Split the two sentences with a Period instead of a colon and you get Another meaning.

12Jesus saith unto them, Come and dine. And none of the disciples durst [dared] ask him,

Who art thou?

knowing that it was the Lord.

13Jesus then cometh,

In my opinion, Jesus does not come till we know

the which

Jesus he is.

The Synoptic Jesus of the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke

and inspired by the “Q” source


Jesus of Nazareth

written about in the Gospel of John.

and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish likewise.

14This is now the third time that Jesus shewed [proved] himself to his disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.

15So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these?

The fish? Tall tales?Hail Mary’s of the beaded prayers? Lucky passes? The other disciples?Women?

He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee.

He saith unto him,

Feed my lambs.

Does he mean with food or with the truth ie His bread, or both!

16He saith to him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee.

He saith unto him,

Feed my sheep.

17He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee.

Jesus saith unto him,

Feed my sheep.

Peter was grieved because he had denied Jesus three times which could mean in reference to

times, time and a half a time

and not feeding his lambs and sheep possibly for

times. time of the above measurement of time

18Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdest thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not.

Please read::

The Image of the Beast


Jesus of the Gospel of John says :

John 5:42-44

42But I know you, that ye have not the love of God in you.43I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.44How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only?

I wrote about Ye


Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised

John 14:30
Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.


19This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him,

Follow me.

20Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee?

21Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this man do?

22Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee?

follow thou me.

23Then went this saying abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should not die: yet Jesus said not unto him, He shall not die; but, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee?

24This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his testimony is true.

25And there are also many other things which Jesus did,

the which ,

if they should be written every one,

I suppose that even the world itself could not contain

the books that should be written. Amen.


153 Fish and 153 HAIL MARY’s

Did Jesus ask Peter if he loved 153 fish more than Him?

Makes sense since Peters co-fishers, some of the disciples hauled them in.

Or was Jesus referring to the 153 Hail Mary’s of the rosary?

How about lucky passes called Hail Mary’s in football?

Here is a song by Oksana :

Oksana – ,,Say My Name”

There is an asteroid named 153Hilda.

153 Hilda


Hilda was observed to occultstar on December 31, 2002, from Japan. It has a very low-amplitude light curve indicating a spherical body or a non-varying albedo.[citation needed]


…..”In astronomical parlance, apparition is the term that refers to the appearance of periodic comets. Periodic comets are classified as those comets whose orbital period does not reach 200 years, or those who have been seen in more than one perihelion passage. They are also called short-period comets. The term periodic comet is also used to mean any comet that is marked by a periodic orbit, regardless of it being greater or less than two centuries.”….

…..”Popular comets in human history are often signalled by apparitions, and are often named after the persons who were lucky enough to have seen them. Halley’s Comet, Finlay’s Comet, and Neujmin Comet are just some of the examples. However, there are also periodic comets whose name is from the person who actually calculated their orbit, and examples are 2P/Encke and 27P/Crommelin.”…..

…..”It is not always easy to tell the next apparition of a periodic comet, and this is because the orbit of such comets is also not easy to measure exactly. Possible space perturbations coming from various planets might mess up the celestial path. Few comets were actually lost because of their orbits getting affected by non-gravitational factors such as gas release and some other materials that form and define

the coma and tail of a comet.”…..

Medjugorje Annual Apparitions: 1992 – Medjugorje Messages

Apparitions at Fatima (1992)

……”Praised by Pope John Paul II and Sr. Lucía herself — both of whom appear in postscript footage from a premiere of the film greeting the three young actors who play the visionaries in the film — Apparitions at Fatima is free of the sentiment and stereotyping of the Hollywood version (which Sr. Lucía reportedly disliked) — not to mention the softening and homogenization of the story’s spirituality for mainstream audiences.”……

…..”Apparitions at Fatima deals with the more challenging aspects of the Fatima story, including the vision of hell that so terrified little Jacinta (Cécile Maupeu), and the harsh penances the children took on themselves in reparation of the sins of the world, including refraining from drinking water on hot days and wearing ropes around their waists tied so tightly that Mary herself had to tell the children that, while God was pleased with their willingness to suffer, they should not wear the ropes to bed.”…..

How Insane!

Most of these “Mary visits” are rushing the apparition believers to say the rosary and pray, pray, pray for whatever it is she warns them of, as if she knows what is ahead. Perhaps she does know. Perhaps she knows because it is the plan of the Roman Catholic Entity to which she belongs to accomplish. Long term type plans. Then use Propaganda Scare Tactics on children…………….no less.

The innocent.

Here is a post by Ultraguy on his site linked:

New Wineskins

Eternal Perspective

Posted by: ultraguy | March 8, 2011

“In his latest post, Andrew Strom has put succinctly what I’ve thought for a long time:

God looks at things from an “eternal” point of view. To Him the greatest disaster is for man to die in an unsaved state – totally unprepared for Judgment and eternity. God is even willing for there to be great shaking and turmoil in the earth, if it causes men to seek Him and find eternal salvation. There is none of this in “man’s” media. It is just a total “human” tragedy and they have no interest in eternity at all.

One could just as well speak of “great shaking and turmoil” in peoples’ individual lives, whatever form that may take, and however it may come about, e.g., illness, job loss, death of a loved one, etc.

“On the other hand, if this physical life and its various shakings and turmoils are all that the great cosmic ‘game’ of life is about, then ours is a sorry lot indeed.  Satan would like to convince you that the physical is paramount. God’s ‘game’ is different. The things of this earth — our earthly treasure and interactions ‘down here’ are all intended, in one fashion or another, as a way to ‘get’ (save) peoples eternal selves from something much worse.”

Eternal perspective and eternal salvation. Buy now while it’s still on sale (free).”

………………….end of his post=======================end of his post………………….


Some of his article may be true but IMO

this part is a con job:

“Buy now while it’s still on sale (free).”

Why, is it gonna cost me later on? Does the price go up after this moment or that?  Because there are calamities in the world…….to become a believer (if one is not one) they have to do it NOW or it will be more expensive later.

Calamities are a fact of living life on earth!

Sounds like a one day sale at Nordstroms!

Armageddon Entrepreneurs: Who’s Profiting From Fear?

Pope Benedict XVI and His Power of Suggestion

It does seem like there is a game going on, but I don’t think it is a good game.

Moor like hunting a horse while holding it’s rein.


The fact is

God is not in a hurry,

but the Devil is in a hurry!


But, Mousie, thou art no thy lane [you aren’t alone]
In proving foresight may be vain:
The best laid schemes o’ mice an’ men
Gang aft a-gley, [often go awry]
An’ lea’e us nought but grief an’ pain,
For promised joy.

John Steinbeck’s 1937 novel – Of Mice and Men.

“Chodesh Tammuz,” The Month of Tammuz


To be honest I have no idea if the above and what is following applies but with everything going on in the world today I thought I should add it to this post!

Isaiah 66:16-18

16For by fire and by his sword will the LORD plead with all flesh:

and the slain of the LORD shall be many.

17They that sanctify themselves,



1. Set apart as or declare holy; consecrate.
2. Make legitimate or binding by religious sanction


and purify themselves in the gardens behind one tree in the midst,

eating swine’s flesh,

and the abomination, and the mouse,

shall be consumed together, saith the LORD.

18For I know their works and their thoughts:

it shall come,

that I will gather all nations and tongues;

and they shall come, and see my glory.

[It does seem coincidental!]

By the way, I don’t think the “abomination” is our President or the US since this verse is speaking to the world!

I think it is the Vatican, the Pope, Roman Catholicism, the Universal Religion, and the NeoCatechumenal Way!

They were just “sanctioned” by the Vatican and the Pope before the earthquake and the tsunami in Japan.

IN fact the Pope said that the Lord sanctioned their new religion by an ecclesiastical vote.

I think Isaiah 66:16-18 is referring to both!

To Mimic Asteroid Collisions, Scientists Smash Boulders Together

Courtyard of the Gentiles

At the airport in Dallas 1/2 hour before his assassination both Jackie and John Kennedy greet an old woman in a wheel chair and the press mentions how this woman waited for 69 years to meet a President. As if she wanted this experience as a baby etc. It was a ridiculous remark. But I think it is in reference to a woman who waited in the temple for so many years to meet Jesus as a baby in the bible.

Then the other picture is a ship with the opposite numbers of 153. Both taken on their cruise at Hyannisport.  A bit weird.

Those pictures were snapped from a French synopsis of Jackie Kennedy on following you tubes:

What Jackie knew – Part 1

What Jackie knew – Part 2

 What Jackie knew – Part 3

What Jackie knew – Part 4

What Jackie knew – Part 5

What Jackie knew – Part 6

Please read about the Neocatechumenal way of Roman Catholicism:

Japan Quakes after Confirmation of the Neocatechumenal Way

Pope Prays

Affliction and the Time of Testing

Mel Gibson and the Book of Acts 2

The Grace of Anathema Maranatha

Since writing this post which was at the beginning I think of the Obama Administration or near there I have changed my viewpoint about Obama, I do think he is evil. I think Islam is evil and should be dealt with harshly as harshly as they deal with the world. I made my suggestions in other posts which is get rid of Medina Mecca and the Dome of the Rock first and then the Vatican. Hit them where it hurts them because they don’t care about human beings or the truth. Their ideology and their means to promote their ideology. PERIOD. And become independent finally of Islam and their oil. I didn’t know what I know now about Obama and his lies and the lies I hear in the press etc. So I have evolved and hope to evolve more in relation to the truth but it is insanely difficult to find the truth and shed the lies we are barraged with in the world and some even in the bible. Of course it depends on what truth means to you. The definition of truth. While something may have occurred may make it true because it occurred to some degree but the reason for it occurring may not be true or the details involved. Some take the bible literally and believe in the bible as true word of God. But men wrote the bible. I think some were inspired by God and by other sources. I know the bible has been tampered with as well as the holy books because when the temple was destroyed Josephus took the holy books and became the propaganda man in Rome. That means he cooked the books. The bible relates about evil kings and evil things while they did and do exist they were not true. They were evil and I don’t believe in them except that they existed and still do. So anyway I try to expose what I think is false and what is true from my comparisons and others have done the same and still do. I try also to expose what I think is false or true in the news as others also still do. It is tough. The more you expose the more shit happens. It’s pretty ugly and the world is a mess. My apologies for anything I may have caused in my pursuit for the truth, exposing lies or trying to anyway, and writing about it.

more articles at: Merangue’s Blog

March 19, 2011 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment