The Drawbridge

BIblical Controversies and Discord

Ted Nugent and CBS Playing Hardball


My first challenge is for Chris Matthews, The Bush Family, Jesse Ventura, Hollywood, Mel Gibson, CIA, the Mob, the Pope (Pope Benedict and his brother George Ratzinger, and their devotee Ganswein), the Vatican and their assassins, the Cardinals from Tarcisio Pietro Evasio Cardinal Bertone on down, the Jesuits, the Secret Service, President Obama, the Clintons, the Nixons, the Grahams and the BGEA, NBC. ABC, CBS News, MSNBC and all their affiliates and owners of them,  the Kissingers and the Hearsts, the Rockerfellers, the State Department, anyone and everyone who has written a book about JFK and their publishers (such as Kenneth O’Donnell and David Powers) , the Warren Commission, Rick Warren, the Saddlebacks and The Chief Priests and the Legion, the Evangelicals, The RCC, the Q Source, the Presidential Museums and the School Book Depository Museum, The Department of Parks and Recreation, the Labor Department, Congress, The Senate, the US Military, Wikipedia (Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales and their workers),

and all those women who had affairs with JFK

I challenge anyone to find a picture of

President John F. Kennedy

having extramarital sex!

There is a new book being touted by the Press, in particular Chris Matthews of Hardball, about an affair that supposedly occurred for 18 months of JFK’s administration until his death with an intern at the White House. Jacqueline related his fondness for baths with rubber ducks. Now this ex-intern  Mimi Alford says she took baths with JFK and his rubber ducks.  How original! She also went to the same girls school as Jackie. What a coincidence.

Chris Matthews Explains JFK’s Affairs: He Was Able To ‘Understand People’s

Feelings And Not Be Moved’

“Matthews called JFK’s actions “indefensible” and gave us some insight into what Kennedy was like as a person:

“Part of it that’s indefensible is his tone of detachment, his ability to understand the feelings of those around him, and in fact track them and manipulate them, whether it’s Curtis LeMay or it’s his wife. I mean, his amazing ability to understand people’s feelings and not be moved by them at all. I think the word that’s been used recently is “heedless.” Cold detachment.

And the other part of it is the compartmentalization of his life where he could have what seems to be — if you’ve listened to all these tapes that have come out — a full marriage. Discussions about emotions and life, the normal things that most married couples think of as marriage, that sharing of emotions and life. And, yet, having these other compartments with these other women at the same time. He was able to keep them sealed off from one another in a way that was almost inhuman.”

Sounds like Bill Clinton! But Chris Matthews wants you to buy his book instead of Mimi’s! 

“Matthews writes that he found an overlooked passage on White House tapes in which Kennedy confesses to his role in the death of South Vietnam President Ngo Dinh Diem in a coup that took place in November 1963 — less than three weeks before Kennedy’s own death.”

LBJ and Eugene McCarthy on the

Assassination of Dgo Dinh Diem

“President Johnson: But, they started with me on Diem, you remember?

Eugene McCarthy: Yeah.

President Johnson: That he was corrupt and he ought to be killed. So we killed him. We all got together and got a goddamm bunch of thugs and we went in and assassinated him. Now, we’ve really had no political stability since then.

McCarthy: Yeah.”

WHO ARE THEY?


JFK’s Memoir Dictation on the Assassination of Diem

“President Kennedy: Opposed to the coup was General Taylor, the Attorney General, Secretary McNamara to a somewhat lesser degree, John McCone, partly because of an old hostility to Lodge which causes him to lack confidence in Lodge’sjudgement, partly as a result of a new hostility because Lodge shifted his station chief; in favor of the coup was State, led by Averell Harriman, George Ball, Roger Hilsman supported by Mike Forrestal at the White House.”

I guess by State he means The State Department

Lodge is said by JFK. Inserted in writing, but not said by JFK Henry Cabot Lodge JR.

He just says LODGE I think. So Lodge could be something like state. Inserted was CIA before station chief. Lodge was ambassador to South Vietnam so I guess he was able to decide who was station chief of CIA? Odd that an ambassador has that power. I do think this recording is important. To know what JFK meant by Lawge/Lodge/Large would be helpful. I won’t assume it is what the transcriber inserted putting the meaning and maybe the blame on the wrong person. So the Department of State runs the CIA or just has representatives in the CIA. So what is a station chief?

Is he talking about the Press? The CIA? It is hard to know!

In any case it seems that this tape

needs a great deal of

interpretation!!!!!

Henry Cabot Lodge Jr :Later career

He was re-appointed ambassador to South Vietnam by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965, and served thereafter as Ambassador at Large (1967–1968) and Ambassador to West Germany (1968–1969). In 1969, he was appointed by President Richard Nixon to serve as head of the American delegation at the Paris peace negotiations, and he served occasionally as envoy to the Holy See from 1970 to 1977.[15]

“An ambassador-at-large is a diplomat of the highest rank or a minister who is accredited to represent his country internationally. “

“According to international protocol, ambassadors and ambassadors-at-large are officially styled and addressed as His/Her Excellency, or Mr. Ambassador. The title may be abbreviated in official correspondence as H.E.[1]

Then there is Sir Andrew McLeod Brooks Large  son of Major General Stanley Eyre Large. Sir Andrew McLeod Brooks Large was Deputy Governor of the Bank of England, and a member of its Monetary Policy Committee from September 2002 to January 2006.”

Chester Bowles Selected as a foreign policy adviser in 1960 to Senator John F. Kennedy, Bowles went on to act as chairman of the platform committee for the Democratic National Convention that year. President Kennedy appointed Bowles to the post of Under Secretary of State in 1961.

In early December 1961 he was replaced by George Ball as Undersecretary, a consequence of his perceived failure to adequately fulfill his duties as an administrator in the Department of State, and his earlier leaking of his opposition to the Bay of Pigs Invasion. His removal was made part of a broader bureaucratic reshuffle, which became known as the‘Thanksgiving Day Massacre.’ In December 1961 he was named the President’s Special Representative and Adviser on African, Asian, and Latin American Affairs, and Ambassador at Large.

“Ball was one of the architects of Cable 243,

and a supporter of the 1963 overthrow of South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem.

“He often used the aphorism (perhaps originally coined by Ian Fleming in

 Diamonds are Forever

“Nothing propinks like propinquity,”

later dubbed the Ball Rule of Power.[6] 

It means that the more direct access you have to the president, the greater your power, no matter what your title actually is.

Ball was an avowed socioeconomic elitist and an advocate of free trade, multinational corporations and the latters’ theoretical ability to neutralize what he considered to be “obsolete” nation states. Prior to and following his ambassadorship, Ball was employed by Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb. He was a senior managing director at Lehman Brothers until his retirement in 1982.[7] Ball was among the first North American members of the Bilderberg Group, attending every meeting except for one before his death.[8]

GeorgeWildmanBall7th U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.

GeorgeWildmanBall

7th U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.

From Bowles to Ball…this is mighty interesting!

(in a “upside-down”/ “went to another place” biblical kind-of-way)

“Lodge” could be also referring to

The Skull and Bones Society

and whoever is in charge of that society.

I don’t have any idea about that group of people! But since Averell Harriman was a member (It’s in Wikipedia) it might be related. I don’t know about the rest of the men mentioned. Maybe that is false info.

 “The society’s alumni organization, which owns the society’s real property and oversees the organization, is the Russell Trust Association

From 1978 onward, business of the Russell Trust Association was handled by its single trustee, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. partner John B. Madden. Madden started with Brown Brothers Harriman in 1946, under senior partner Prescott Bush.

I believe this is the man in the you tubes of JFK at the airport in Dallas Texas a half hour before the assassination who is keenly observing the events there such as when Jackie Kennedy receives her puppet, when Jackie Kennedy jabs Roy Kellerman etc.

You can find that you tube on my posts about the

Covenant with Many

Rev. Wilkerson, Evangelicalism and

the Covenant With Many

 in particular

from this you tube:

PRESIDENT KENNEDY’S ARRIVAL AT LOVE FIELD IN DALLAS ON 11/22/63

Testing Sargent Shriver:

Vietnam and Assassinations

Shriver says it was the CIA.

Chris Matthews On John F. Kennedy: New Book Pulls Back Curtain On

‘Ask Not’ Speech, Nixon Debates And More

Chris Matthews seems to have swallowed the myths of JFK’s detractors.

Of course, he is a part of the PRESS and it is his job,

his religion

and his paycheck on the line!

Chris Matthews ’67 Returns to Alma Mater

He offers a whole new meaning to the

HOLY CROSS.

Mission Statement

We, the Jesuit Community at the College of the Holy Cross, shaped by the Gospel, the Ignatian Exercises, and our encounters with the people of God, and missioned here by the Society of Jesus, embrace our responsibility to Holy Cross as living representatives of the College’s traditions and identity.

Chris Matthews ’67 

“How did Holy Cross prepare Matthews for his career? In his words, “We argued about what we really believed about life, about God, about truth, about right and wrong, and how or if we could ever get to the bottom of it all. I still pursue those arguments, just on a larger stage.”

Matthews_0682
“Matthews poses with one of his professors during his time at Holy Cross, James F. Powers, professor emeritus of history. Both in his memoir Now, Let Me Tell You What I Really Think, and in his televised visit to campus commemorating the 40th anniversary of the Kennedy assassination, Matthews made specific mentions of Powers. It was in Professor Powers’ Western Civilization class on Nov. 22, 1963 that Matthews and others first heard the news flash about the president’s shooting, and like most of his generation, he vividly recalls the details of that moment, down to Professor Powers’ response.”

Gee I wonder if James Powers knows David Powers

the one that co-wrote

Johnny, We Hardly Knew Ye: Memories of John Fitzgerald Kennedy

with Kenneth O’Donnell and Joe McCarthy

???

Is that Joseph McCarthy? Hmmmmmm

So now I am supposed to believe that JFK took baths with an intern with rubber duckies and that JFK compartmentalized his affairs and whatever else Chris Matthews (who now is also a Psychologist) says about JFK.

Why doesn’t Chris Matthews tell us why Jackie changed her voice into Marilyn Monroe

or maybe Marilyn Monroe exchanged bodies with Jackie Kennedy spoken about in the you tube:

Rivals: Jackie Kennedy Vs Marilyn Monroe (part 2) 1/2

Curiouser and curiouser there are tapes of Jackie Kennedy talking about having flour up to her elbows…Reminds me of Hillary Clinton!

Did Hillary go to the same girl’s school as Jackie and Mimi? I think it is called Miss Porter’s School.

I wonder if it is not also a Jesuit prep school?

Chris Matthews book is called Jack Kennedy: Elusive Hero.

“As Matthews writes, “I found a fighting prince never free of pain, never far from trouble, never accepting the world he found, never wanting to be his father’s son. He was a far greater hero than he ever wished us to know.””

So now JFK did not want to be his father’s son?

DID JFK tell him this?

Or did he hear it from conversations that Jackie Kennedy/ONASSIS  left behind?

Chris Matthews of Hard BALL make up and all

 ”Grinning like a Cheshire Cat”

is selling tickets for his book signing in Dallas, Texas

at their Sixth Floor Museum in May of this year.

Doesn’t MSNBC pay Chris Matthews enough?

Or is this “JFK propaganda tour” part of his job for the press.

“Government of the peopleby the people, for the people

now is

“Government of the press, by the press, for the press” and the clergy

that run them.

==============================

My second challenge is to those mentioned above

and anyone for that matter

to show me a video of President John F. Kennedy

making his infamous Press/Secret Society Speech

to the Press at a Press/Correspondents dinner!

JFK Blows The Whistle on Secret Societies!

 I do have a video/you-tube of JFK exchanging something that seemed important and meaningful by the way he passed it to someone

at Love Field Airport in Dallas a half hour before he was killed on these posts.

My bet is that it was that speech!

Makes sense to me!

 At the bottom of this post are snapshots of that exchange from my post

CBS News and JFK Part 3

 =============================

Barack Obama at Correspondents Dinner tonight talked about the Free Press.

Ha Ha.

 If you check out these posts with their you tubes below you will see what he means in an IRONIC Way,

of course,

THEY OWN HIM!

Soon enough he ‘ll be saying Massa,

 but only after he fulfills their agenda.

What has been occurring in the Press and President Obama’s characterization of their freedom reminds me of the movie

Tropic Thunder with Robert Downey Jr .

“I know who I am! I’m a dude, playing a dude, disguised as another dude.” 

Talked about eating dogs…pit bulls in particular and comparing the taste to Hockey moms.  I wonder what he meant?

Kind of odd.  

The press laughed so they must know.

By the way, anyone know what BG:L is?

(“First they came…)

JacQueline Kennedy and then Came Lot

CBS News and JFK

CBS News and JFK Part 2

CBS News and JFK Part 3

CBS News and JFK (The first few hours)

JFK Assassination, CBS News and the Second Vatican Council

exchange picture 6

exchange picture 7 -Jackie starts to make a signal with her hand while JFK gives the man in glasses the black flat objectexchange picture 8 Jackie makes signal on her collar as man in background and Lady Bird (I think) are watching

Exchange 8 picture and hand signal on collar by Jackie Kennedy


Many more articles below about the differences

between the gospels which I believe is the

sum of the equation

AND 

why President Kennedy was murdered!

Here is the CBS Press in their latest explosive maniacal rhetoric

drunken on their own petard:

Ted Nugent explodes at notion he’s not a moderate

They omit 10 minutes of an interview with Ted Nugent and instead show him losing his temper to prove how cool and idiotic they are as if they succeeded somehow. There is something definitely wrong with the food and drink that the press are serving to the US and to themselves. Jeff Glor from CBS This Morning is ridiculous. Then to top it off Romney’s spokesmen response says that there is no excuse for the lack of civility or words to that effect.

Did the press intentionally bait Ted Nugent in the ten minutes not aired? I don’t know,

but I do know that tension is building and the Press seem to be enjoying it way too much

in a mir-iad of ways. And they have the Secret Service to back them up.

They are inane.

Please read:

CBS’s Jeff Glor stunned by Ted Nugent’s outburst

Jeff Glor did not look stunned to me! He looked unabashedly and unashamedly content!

I think Ted Nugent loves kids, loves freedom, and was honestly upset and blew up. The press and the Secret Service obviously goaded him!

A lot of that going on these days! It stinks!

They may in fact be responsible for his kidney stone. Kidney stones are very painful. Sometimes the body covers the pain, but the body still reacts to the invasion. I think the Press, Jeff Glor and the Secret Service should apologize to Ted Nugent and pay him for their mindless invasive phobic zealotry by using sleazy bully tactics IMO and the damages that they may have caused him physically, emotionally intending to belittle him by airing his outburst. He did apologize, but they did not!

His outburst was inconsequential

till he ended up in a hospital!

Ted Nugent Speaks out Against Obama and Gun Control

I agree with Ted Nugent about gun control. I do not trust my government to protect me. When they want to take away my right to bear arms I know that they are against me. It was not a lone civilian that killed JFK, please read

Rev. David Wilkerson, Billy Graham and Evangelicalism to see why.

 I would not even declaw a cat at the expense of my furniture, unless of course if I loved my furniture more than my cats which I don’t. I do love my cats. As long as there are criminals and predators I want the right to protect myself, my kids, my loved ones, my home, and my property. If they want to disarm the people of the United States then I suggest they start at the top and work their way down beginning with the President and his family, the Secret Service, the Press, the Mob, the CIA, Russia, The Jesuits, The RCC and their protectors, the Armed Forces, the Police, Judges, Senators, Armed Guards, etc.

You get my drift;)

New Swiss Guards Swear To Give Up Lives To Protect Pope

Whose lives are they talking about?

I thought the Swiss were always neutral.

We are done for.

Who the heck designed their uniforms?

What I want to know is can they dance?

Dances of the soldiers

 Matthews vs. Gun Owner: “You’re Carrying A G-D D-mn Gun!”

Barrack Obama on Gun Control

But at his first Press dinner Barack Obama said that only Michelle had the right to bare/bear her arms. She does have pretty arms, but I  think he meant more than that. I think he was indirectly referring to the assassination of President Kennedy and the Press and their involvement in that event. Still I wish he would shoot straight so that the American people would know what he meant. It is disconcerting, to say the least,  and very close to doublespeak. I don’t trust that kind of communication! I would rather listen to Ted Nugent who does shoot straight because I do know what he means! As with the pitt bull comment mentioned above by President Obama at his last press dinner went over my head and seemed to be perverse. Not a good sign. Even Michelle Obama seemed to be confused. That is why I think the Press own him.

These are hard times and it is predicted in our bibles that

even our loved ones will be influenced by evil.

Brokaw: White House Correspondents’ dinner hurting the press

“If there’s ever an event that separates the press from the people they’re supposed to be serving, symbolically, it is that one.” he said…..

“That’s another separation between what we’re supposed to be doing and what the people expect us to be doing….”

 What does the press think the people expect and what does the press think they are supposed to do? 


==============================

Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland

Alice first encounters the Cheshire Cat at the Duchess‘s house in her kitchen, and then later outside on the branches of a tree, where it appears and disappears at will, engaging Alice in amusing but sometimes vexing conversation. The cat sometimes raises philosophical points that annoy or baffle Alice. It does, however, appear to cheer her up when it turns up suddenly at the Queen of Hearts‘ croquet field, and when sentenced to death baffles everyone by having made its head appear without its body, sparking a massive argument between the executioner and the King and Queen of Hearts about whether
something that does not have a body can indeed be beheaded.

Rev. David Wilkerson, Billy Graham and Evangelicalism

ElectroMagnetic and Population Control

Posted on May 8, 2012 

Gay Marriage Is a Human Right

The most trusted man in America 

By Richard Galant, CNN

updated 1:27 PM EDT, Tue June 5, 2012
======================================

My Blogs:

Which compare the Synoptic gospels to the Gospel of John and the Assassination of JFK and other subjects.

Merangue’s Blog

THE TURRET

Blue Skies

Eye of a Needle

The Keep

May 6, 2012 Posted by | Assassination of President Kennedy, BGEA, BILLY GRAHAM, Chris Matthews, CIA, DIEM, Dr. Graham, Endtime Deception, Evangelicalism and the Covenant With Many, Franklin Graham, George Gänswein, Hardball, Jackie Kennedy, Jackie Onassis, Jeff Glor, jesse ventura on ted nugent, JESUIT, JFK, John F. Kennedy, John Kennedy, Joseph Ratzinger, Jr, Laura Ingram, LBJ, Martin Luther King, Mel Gibson, MSNBC, Politics and Religion, POPE BENEDICT XVI, President Bill Clinton, President John F. Kennedy, President Kennedy, President Obama, QUEEN ELIZABETH, Roman Catholicism, Sarah Palin, Secret Service, Secret Societies, Senator Hillary Clinton, Ted Nugent, Texas Historical Commission, The Assassination of JFK, The Assassination of President Kennedy, The First Lady, The Kennedy's, The Pentagon, The President, The Press, The White House, Treasury Department, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nellie Connally: Did Nellie Shoot John Connally?


Nov. 10, 1997 c-span

“Former Congressman Jake Pickle introduces this one hour discussion from the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library, Austin Texas”

snapshot from c-span video

“Well, welcome to the um Nellie Connally homecoming.

This is her home town and uh thank goodness she has bloomed where she was pottied and we’re proud of it.

Now, I’m always a bit nervous when I introduce my dear UT classmate, Nellie Connally, because she’s got the last word, but whose friendship I have enjoyed for over 60 years.

Nellie Brill Connally of Austin has great charm and personality. We elected her our UT Sweetheart and, of course, elected Big John as President of the student body at the same time. That was when we were young and twenty and campus elections were bi-partison, honest, and very important.

Intermingled with her charm and happy laughter is a streak of impishness and even devil(?), if you misbehaved. She does not take herself too seriously and thinks you shouldn’t either, therefore we have all learned to be on our guard. Maybe that’s why Nellie and I have gotten along so well. We understand and we’re sort of kindred spirits in that regard.

Now, I’ve always been proud to have been John’s Law Fraternity Brother, his business partner at KVET and his best man at their wedding. I’ve always told Big John that I’m still the best man, but he didn’t always agree with me on that. (laughter)

During the early years of World War 2, Nellie sold radio spots for station KTVC

(The radio station that was bought/managed by Lady Bird Johnson in 1943)

in the brown building. She knew many of the bidness stores on Congress Avenue and she knew all the merchants on E 6th Street. She would go into the stores unbelievably ?great?, shuck the owners under the chin, give him a little hug, and leave the the business with a contract for spots for 6 months. She was so good she could sell Saul Ginsberg a ticket to the PLO (?Bank?/?Bake?) and she, and she can sell Texas (?Pryor?) haircut.

Well, what a lifetime of great achievement and honor John and Nellie have enjoyed. John was founder of Radio Station KVET, administrative assistant and personal advisor to the …?…Center to Lyndon Johnson, Secretary to the US Navy, Governor of Texas, Secretary of the US Treasury, and served on the board of dozens of corporations.

Now, some say that Nellie lived in the shadow of Big John. Well, there’s nothin wrong with that Nellie, we all have lived under the shadow of Big John. And to be very blunt about it, when we say we’ve all lived under the shadow, that includes LBJ, ?biz? Barnes, Larry Temple, George Christian, Price Daniels, Joe Kilgore, Mac Myers, Julian Reed, Howard Rhodes, John Mobley, and me, especially.

Of those of us whose know this couple best think that John lived in the shadow of Nellie’s charm.

Nellie has always been

our First Lader

[Oppressor-Lucifer snake that befuddles, baffles, confuses, etc]

and leader to all

of these glory years.

Nellie also knows what it is to have position, power and resources

and lose the resources,

but she and John took it on the chin with class, and dignity, and poise and we all love you for that Nellie and we have been proud to see you come back and go forward in

[?haver?]  (babble/nonsense?) time 

and we’re proud of you.

(applause)

Nellie is the unstoppable Grand Dame of Texas public life. She still carries on. Listen, she was a driving force and inspiration that recently created The Nellie Connally Breast Cancer Center at MD Anderson in Houston where millions of dollars have been raised to fight and help eradicate cancer. She has been given the Woman of Distinction Award for the Conis Colitis Foundation in Houston, as well as, the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation Award.

(albeit with OPM for her name and namesakes)

Tonight, she may

(Or she might not….lawyer jargon)


relive with us that heart-breaking day in Dallas, November 22nd, 63 which changed the course of world history and Nellie was there at the very center of that gut-wrenching tragedy. However, to many of her old friends here tonight, she’s is still Nellie Brill Connally of Austin,

our First Lader

[Oppressor-Lucifer snake that befuddles, baffles, confuses, etc],

the mother of John the third, Sharon, our great sculpturer, and Mark, our financier and banker, but she is still our UT Sweetheart who hadn’t changed a bit in 60 years.”

(Then Nellie Connally takes the podium)

Nellie Connally!

 “I don’t know whether to thank Jake or not.

Pretty neat fella!”

“….Today, I’m gonna to read to you some notes I wrote some 30 some odd years ago. Just after we brought John home from Parkland Hospital in Dallas.

I wrote them for my children and my grand children, and others to come, in case they wanted to know how I felt during that day. They lay dormant for 30 years, I forgot all about them. I put them in a file drawer, closed the drawer, and for 30 years never thought of them. One day, I was going through the files, opened the files and I saw these papers. Strange looking papers. I pulled them out and they were these notes. If I had not known that I had written them, I would have said, “I didn’t.” If someone had asked me, “could you write?” I would have said, “No.”….”

Strange to say the least!

In another interview

 when questioned she says the following:

Former Texas First Lady Nellie Connally 

by Texas Monthly Talks

Q:  The time passes and you discover these notes again. What made you think…you said 33 years afterward….

Nellie: Can you believe?

Q:  What made you think at that time I ought to haul these out and I ought to begin to tell the story

Nellie:  Well, I just wanted to read them, so I took them out to read

 and I thought they were pretty accurate pretty good. You know many more things could be added but uh it would destroy the historic notes so I have because I’ve learned a lot of things the different things that uh I could would like to put in there maybe but I’m not ever gonna change em..”

—————————————————————————————–

Well, the truth probably is that those “historians” she talks about a few minutes, seconds…. later (lader?) told her they were important, so she looked for them in those files

one day

so why in the world did she go through this ridiculous explanation about accidentally finding them in her files?

If she had not known she had written them ….yet she didn’t

OR DID SHE?

she didn’t even remember them….yet she found them when she needed them for those historians that told her they were important

and she doesn’t even know if she could write…..yet she did

OR COULD SHE?

Does that make any sense?

Neither does what she says about

how she accidentally found those

strange looking papers.

She probably wanted to see what it is she wrote

(if she wrote them),

because people were curious about her role in the assassination…..

(now that the evidence is slowly being manipulated and trickled out to the public) and she knows her part in the assassination and wanted to manipulate the public.

She says she didn’t write it for the world,

but just for her kids and their kids her grandchildren etc

then why write a book?

Why get on TV and do interviews?

Those historians……IM CURIOUS

What are their names?

Are these the same guys who have hidden history from us for 40 years

 that now want us to know history 

or do they just want to

manipulate history and us?

“Subsequent to Governor Connally’s administration, she served as a member of the

Texas Historical Commission.”

aka 

THC

sounds like a drug

So I guess she is one of those “historians”?

I call that sneaky!

In another interview she said:

“I cannot believe that the notes that I wrote have suddenly become so important.”

“I sat there and wrote what happened in that car. Not for you, not for the world,

 not for history,

not because I thought I was a writer.”

=================

Here are books on internet that Nellie

authored or co-authored:

books by Nellie Connally

Then in that same interview she was asked :

Q: When people read the book now what do you want them to take a way from it?

and she answered;

A: Well I want them to take a way this little bit of history,

which is not happy history, but it is history and I did have my notes checked by the history department at the U. of Texas to see if it really history and they told me if I would change nothing add nothing subtract nothing, not worry about sentence structure, commas, spelling that it was  history. IF I started adding, taking out or doing any of that then it was just a story so  they are exactly as I wrote them that day at the Mansion for my babies.”

(not for history’s sake but for her children and their children etc would know how she felt about being in that car)

In an obituary for Nellie Connally linked below it lists what she did to sell the book:

Nellie Connally, former Texas First lady ( 1919-2006)

 She conducted a national tour to publicize her book that featured parties in Texas, New York and Washington, along with a host of media appearances, including The TODAY Show, Larry King Live, CBS Evening News and NBC Evening News.

My dad wrote about his life for his kids and he did not publish a book, tour the countryside appearing on talk shows and television news programs. 

He typed it and gave it to his kids!


WHAT A STRANGE LOOKING PICTURE

of the “sad pink suit” and Nellie

40 or more years after the assassination!

The woman sitting behind that sad suit looks mighty proud!

WHO TOOK THIS PICTURE?

Just for her kids and their kids, huh?

===================================

Did Nellie write those notes?

===============================================

They seem scripted to me!

Later, in her story of the aftermath of the assassination of President Kennedy her son came to her little cell and insisted that she write a note to Jackie Kennedy for him to deliver in Washington DC. 

Could someone have needed a sample of her handwriting to write those notes for her that she says she didn’t write,

for instance

Jackie Kennedy?

Here is a video of Nellie whose voice sounds like Jean Hill that I found recently!

In the recording, she pronounces the word “Telegram” in a funny way for a Southern Woman. Jean Hill was from Oklahoma and I believe that Nellie Connally is Texan. but the lady on the video recording talks with an English Accent especially when she says telegram. It is hard to distinguish her facial anatomy because the video is so light and faded, but I can hear the difference. It is obvious that the person acting as Nellie on the you tube is an actress

(not a very good one)

and she is mocking us. 

Here is the you tube of Jean Hill to compare to the you tube of Nellie!

What they saw Jean Hill

_______

NELLIE CONNALLY’S STATEMENT TO THE PRESS ON NOVEMBER 24, 1963

(2:48-2:50/5:02 is where she says “telegram’)

As I recall,

Billy Graham also

says the word “Telegram”

like the English!

 In 1959, he led his first crusade, which was in London.

Please watch this video of Billy Graham and his english accent:

Billy Graham on the Beatles (1964)

especially the end of the recording

Revelation 13:2
And the beast which I saw was like unto aleopard (camouflaged/hiding/sneaky), and his feet were as the feet of a bear (heavy footprint/mauls), and his mouth as the mouth of a lion (teeth): and the dragon gave him his power (“Q”ing), and his seat, and great authority. (Author of destruction)

===========

I think the beast is

the Synoptic Jesus authored by Q !!!


books by Nellie Connally

Here is another voice sample of Nellie in 1963 to compare:

LBJ and Mrs. Nellie Connally

She sounds different then the Press Statement on November 24th!

IN CONTROL,

CALM, COOL, COLLECTED, NOT WORRIED

AND THAT WAS JUST A FEW HOURS

 FROM THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY

AND THE NEAR DEATH OF HER HUSBAND!

Do you suppose they got the sample of her handwriting

wrote her memories for her

and then replaced her with an actress

or brainwashed her,

or is this some form of DEMON POSSESSION?

Yes, I know it sounds odd, but so is every aspect of this time in history, the investigation, the players involved and their behavior, the witnesses, the coverup, the trickling of information and the flood of disinformation, the power shift, the results evidenced in the world today

AND AS JAKE PICKLE SAID 

“because she’s got the last word!”

CAN YOU BELIEVE?


In essence,

Nellie Connally was and is the epitome of those

Secret Societies that President Kennedy tried to warn us about,

and she was his enemy all along!

Please don’t be fooled by the accolades she receives and received in her public appearances and interviews

and don’t be fooled by her charm!

Her words are chicanery!

840 Small lead particles found on rug underneath left jump seat of Presidential limousine.

SCIENCE IN CRIME DETECTION-2

WHO HANDLED THE GUN

The question I feel obligated to ask:

Did Nellie Connally shoot John Connally?

The Last Two Days, November 1963: 21-22

================

Please Read:

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

Then Please Read:

The Covenant with Many

JFK Assassination, CBS News and the Second Vatican Council

CBS News and JFK (The first few hours)

CBS News and JFK

CBS News and JFK Part 2

CBS News and JFK Part 3

CBS News and JFK Part 4

CBS News and JFK Part 5

June 28, 2011 Posted by | 1963, Assassination of JFK, BILLY GRAHAM, Billy Graham on the Beatles (1964), CIA, Congressman Jake Pickle, Dallas, Deception, Dr. Graham, Endtime Deception, Jake Pickle, JFK, John Connally, John Kennedy, KTVC, Lader, Lady Byrd Johnson, LBJ, Mrs. Lady Bird Johnson, Nellie Connally, Nellie Connally homecoming, President Kennedy, QUEEN ELIZABETH, Secret Service, Secret Societies, Synoptic Gospels, Texas Historical Commission, The 34th President, THE ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION, The Antichrist, The Beast, The Beatles, The False Church, THE FALSE MESSIAH, The Kennedy's, The President, The Press, Treasury Department, What they saw Jean Hill | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many – Part 3


JFK Blows The Whistle on Secret Societies!

You will miss the point of this post if you neglect Part 1

which is linked in the following title:)

The Covenant with Many


Part 3

Now before the assassination in Dallas

Now her part is on the left and his part is still on the right when facing them!

Both their parts are in the center.

LastMeal

Their parts are opposite each other as they sit next to each other.

Hers on the left and his on the right.

His part is on the right and hers on the left as you face them!

Now their parts are on the inside. Hers on the left and his on the right.

This woman is not Jackie Kennedy!

Not only did her part change ……..but so did her shins. Jackie Kennedy had sort of boney shins and the imposter has thick shins in comparison. Shins don’t change over the years except with extreme weight gain. Eventually, I will update this post with examples. The woman at the funeral of JFK was not the real Jackie Kennedy….unless Jackie replaced her legs with someone else’s legs.

Newly Discovered Footage of JFK’s Final Moments

also shows the parts of both President Kennedy and woman in the car with him

in this you tube linked in purple above!

Here is the Zapruder film for you to see the cold blooded assassination of our President

by what I believe is a double of the first lady.

=================================

Somewhere, somehow, something happened to her

and she was replaced!

Perhaps on her trip to India?

Here is the you tube link in red below to study:

Hi quality footage of JFK Assassination

The Undamaged Zapruder Film

335 of the last sequence of the slow motion concentrated on President Kennedy, Jackie Kennedy has something in her hand behind his back, because it is perpendicular to the horizon. It is either heat and smoke, or has been touched up to hide what she is holding.

The link below (Part One of this trilogy) has a few you tubes of the assassination and one in particular that examines the Secret Service and their innocence  and seems pretty accurate, except for the fact that the woman representing Jacqueline Kennedy does wave in the direction of the Secret Service guard, and he backs off and shrugs 3 times, even though he was supposed to be on the heel of the car protecting the President.

Below this title and link is a snippet of the post!

Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, Joseph Ratzinger

and

The Covenant with Many

“Here is what I see NOW:

She is fiddling with him as he is shot the first time, then Connelly looks back and she looks at Connelly and he is shot, she looks back at her husband and gets closer and under him and he is shot again and the blood spray goes up, then

it looks as if she has something in her right hand after the second shot

(perhaps a silencer and it looks like Captain Hook’s arm without the hook?).

And it seems to be emitting gas straight up! And if I am correct it probably came with her red roses!

Who was the florist?

Supposedly, Jackie thought it was odd that she received red roses in Dallas in one of her infamous interviews spinning the Camelot myth.

Possibly, lost that object when she pushed her husband over and fled to the trunk of the car to get whatever was back there,and it looks like a tube of lipstick because of the way it stays on the trunk of the car. She pursues it on the trunk of the car and gets it and gets back and hunches down with everyone else.

*April 2nd 2011 Just watched this video again a few times and it looks like she is the only one that seems to be busy …..very active….and in control…….everyone else seems to be reacting.

Everyone else seems to be in slow motion and she is in very fast motion.

Whoever her focus is on seems to be before that person is shot! IMO

Which is very disturbing!”

Jackie triggers a killing mechanism?

Basically, what I am trying to say in above snippet of the post is that she is running circles around everyone and most people in a state of shock do not react so quickly unless they are the perpetrator!

===============
Supposedly Jackie would not change her clothes before the swearing in of Lyndon Johnson and said 

“I want them to see what they have done.”

That is called deflecting and pointing the finger elsewhere.

Murderers don’t usually need to be reminded, so who is she speaking of?

And as far as having her husbands brains in her hands, or in her lap …….how could that possibly be true if she was on the trunk of the car picking up things (perhaps caps?)

unless she picked it up his brain parts

after she hunkered down

with the rest of the people that seemed to react normally!

besides the fact that she was not Jackie Kennedy, IMO.

Here is film shot from the opposite direction as the Zapruder film and seems to match exactly, which substantiates the Zapruder films accuracy IMO!

Orville Nix, version 1 (AVI, 3.41 MB)
Orville Nix, version 2 (AVI, 2.25 MB)

=================

April 6th re-vision

Funny thing is that I started to notice a lot of articles creeping into the Internet about Jackie being part Jewish, as if that has anything to do with this at all, and I realized that the propaganda machine was active, very busy to deceive, cover up and deflect.

Case in point:


Another you tube suddenly appeared with News coverage about the Kennedys visit in San Antonio before the assassination. Supposedly this old man had kept a movie of the Kennedy’s for almost 50 years in a drawer ‘all neat and perfect’ in his attic desk and just decided to donate it.

In my opinion, its a fake.

President Kennedy looks like he is out to lunch, as if he is not really there, or in another place. His actions and expressions do NOT fit the scene. And, of course, the man that donated the film mentions that President Kennedy is confused and gives his own excuse for why the President is acting confused!

WHICH IS VERY TELLING …..AS IF HE KNOWS!

Jackie wore her hair parted on the other side that night also. I think that was the point of this you tube…..covering their tracks….so to speak. If you watch the you tube it looks suspicious and is very confusing, a film full of mayhem that could easily be manipulated and, in fact, if you study the film it has a lot of discrepancies. Why anyone would go to such trouble – all of a sudden – and it magically appearing 50 years later is suspicious in its entirety. President Kennedy looks like he’s drugged. It just does not fit!!! So I am including this you tube in this article.

Jackie is wearing gloves when she enters

and then when she gives her speech she’s not wearing her gloves

which is Very Very out of character for her.

I think someones made a big error in this film.

They forgot the gloves!

That’s what happens when you are in a hurry.

Not only that, but they forgot to invite the Connally’s.

That Day in Dallas/ Nellie Connally

By Robert R. Rees,
CyberProfile Contributing Editor

However, the Connally’s were on every other activity STRANGE and, in fact,

It is VERY VERY FISHY

— the sudden appearance of this film, that is!!!!!

Why would the Connally’s be excluded?

The whole event I have described, the odd behavior of the people involved, the exclusion of the Connally’s, leads me to believe that this was the critical point,

a watershed event

in regards to

the assassination of President Kennedy!

All I can say is, in time, all things will

be revealed and, I hope, whoever is involved

knowingly

in propaganda to deceive 

will change their course and do the right thing while they still have a chance

before it is too late!

Film surfaces of JFK night before assassination

Zoom in and Check out 1:54/4:22 expression of Jackie in this film. Very odd and I would call it demonic, as if she had had a fit,

or a glitch!

DOES THIS LOOK LIKE JACKIE KENNEDY?

Check out the woman near the end of the film who seems to be trying to say something  with her hand at 3:43/4:22. Perhaps she is an unwilling participant in a very ugly scam!

Then from frame 2:07/4:22 Jackie Kennedy looks at least 10/20 years older sitting with her bare hands in her pockets.

This film is full of holes!

Now compare this to the poise of the real Jackie speaking spanish!

Jacqueline Kennedy speaking spanish

and her part matches her husband’s part!

I wonder if the film that suddenly surfaced didn’t steal bits and pieces from this film and many others,

but just made a few errors in the new “timely” film just now donated

because this old man all of sudden decided to part with

his sacred treasure!

There is a big difference between the women in each of these films besides the obvious glitch!

So why would this old man come up with this film 48 or so years later and decide to donate it – at this time – when he had it in his drawer the whole time?

Why would some of the news stations and press combine it with another film and put sound behind it, even though it was a silent film?

Some of the broadcasts that were aired ought to be investigated for fraud.

IT is as if the Press is hiding something that they are complicit in!

Why embellish the film?

Could it be they want you to swallow it,

hook, line and sinker?

They have the tools to deceive and they are deceiving you!

Why?

Life Magazine supposedly had the Zapruder film and parts were destroyed

Why?

Who do they work for?

Who does the man at the Museum of The Texas School Book Depository work for that received this film and helped to affirm it’s worth. Does he have no levels or standards of  integrity for a film to be accepted as historical evidence? I guess anything goes.

Even I could layer a film as bad as that one!

It is sooooo obvious that this film is layered!

Even Diane Sawyer (who acts drunk on herself, IMO) of ABC News aired it and they did their own layering for you to accept it!

If they try to spoon feed us this film and add, of course, the other one of the same night …

does that make it true?

Because their are two films of the same scam

does that make it true?

How about 3 or 4?

Who do they serve?

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

For if they know or have an inkling that they are deceiving,

they should quit,

but they don’t because they have to support their life style!

===============================

Basically, what happened that day:

The power of the Presidency was stolen by the Treasury Department!

The Treasury Department heads the Secret Service

which is supposed to protect the President

and his wife !!!

So we lost a branch of our government that day,

our elected President, and his wife!

That’s why there was cover-up!

==============================

JFK & Marilyn Monroe Photo: ONLY Picture Together Unveiled (VIDEO)

Only Photo of JFK & Marilyn Monroe Together Unveiled, On Sale

Trove of John F. Kennedy photos from White House are sold at auction

IF you look real close this is a picture that has been manipulated also.

I have read so much pure junk and innuendo about JFK and his brother Bobby

and a recent released photo of JFK and Bobby with Marilyn Monroe that

was “saved”

from a dryer

Up for auction, only photo of JFK and Marilyn Monroe

together moments after she sang sultry ‘Happy Birthday’


IT is a strange photo with President Kennedy looking away.

He was embarrassed:

Because it is not him

he was wearing a grecian hair band?

 he could not figure out which side

to part his hair

on that occasion!

It is not even Robert Kennedy or Marilyn Monroe!

Marilyn Monroe had a soft rounder nose and plumper lips and two shoulders

not just one and a half!

Compare her nose to the nose on the woman in the other picture. There is a big difference! IN this picture her nose is not as boney or as long as the one above and her lips are plump comparatively. Even the woman’s body is different. Marilyn Monroe was always clumsily over-weight in a very attractive way and the woman above is slender and even the breasts are different and smaller! 

THIS IS RIDICULOUS….

THE PICTURE OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY, BOBBY KENNEDY AND MARILYN MONROE

ABOVE IS A FAKE

AND LOOKS TO BE A LEFTOVER

FROM MANIPULATING PHOTOS

TO MAKE A GOOD COVERUP

(that is why it was found in a dryer of all places )

AND TARNISH THEIR REPUTATIONS

AND FALSELY PROVE A RELATIONSHIP

WITH MM FOR THAT COVERUP.

I WONDER WHY?

It is called DIS – INFORMATION!

============

Hersh’s Dark Camelot

The three people that these actors above represented were cut down early in life and I think I know why:

To fulfill prophecy in order to deceive!

It has something to do with the head wound prophecy in Revelation: 

Revelation 13:3 

  3And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death;

and his deadly wound was healed:

and all the world wondered after the beast.

THE PROPHECY WAS ALREADY FULFILLED BY ROME

SO IN ORDER TO DEFLECT THEY HAD TO FULFILL IT IN OUR COUNTRY 

Please read:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

By the way, in his letters when JFK used the code letters

MM

I don’t think it is in reference to Marilyn Monroe,

but rather

Mary Magdalene.

I found a few places that use MM for their identification!

They are MANY!

But for $$$$$$$$ and the public’s consumption they have made a

Mountain out of a Mole!


I found a few places that ALSO use MM for their identification!


Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America (M.M.)

[MM] Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America (Maryknoll Fathers)

M a r y k n o l l    O f f i c e   f o r    G l o b a l    C o n c e r n s

MMi

WORLD MEDICAL MISSION

Agency Mission:

“World Medical Mission is a ministry of Samaritan’s Purse,
an international Christian relief and evangelism organization specializing in meeting the needs of victims of war, poverty, natural disasters and disease”

 Samaritan’s Purse

More like the big fish ate the little fish. Basically, the son of Billy Graham took over a ministry. Whether foul play was involved…who knows.

The founder died from Leukemia soon after the friendship with Franklin Graham!

John 12:6

 6This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.

Letter From Billy Graham to John F. Kennedy

Billy Graham, August 10, 1960.  The Honorable Jack Kennedy, The United States Senate, Capital Building, Washington, DC.  Dear Senator:  I trust that you will treat this letter in the strictest confidence.  There is a rumor in the Democratic Party that I intend to raise the religious issue publicly during the presidential campaign.  This is not true.  In fact, I would like to commend you for facing it squarely and courageously.  There was another matter concerning malicious gossip that I had overheard about you.  I took it immediately to two of your closest friends and they clarified it.  I promis you it has not gone beyond me.  It is most unfortunate that political leaders are subject to these types of ugly rumors and gossip.  I shall probably vote for Vice President Nixon for several reasons, including a long-standing personal friendship.  I am sure you can understand my position.  However, if you should be elected President, I will do all in my power to help unify the American people behind you.  In the event of your election you will have my wholehearted loyalty and support.  With every good wish, I am cordially yours.

IF this letter was truly written by Billy Graham, which I cannot verify,

it is sickening!

Paragraph two is very telling! He says he took it to two of JFK’s friends but that it did not go past him ……kind of a misnomer. You don’t go to two friends to clarify, if you want to keep a secret. DUH

So what was the intent of the letter?

If you read  between the lines I would call that a veiled threat, otherwise why bring it up. What friends? Was it Mr. Graham’s job to clarify rumors of JFK or was he just alerting the Senator that he had some goods on him? 

KIND OF CAGEY!

Kind of gross!

—————————-

I think President John F. Kennedy, Senator Bobby Kennedy, Marilyn Monroe

and many, many others were unfortunate victims of a

mafia filled church, drunk on power and deception,

that tried to make our country heel!

The mafia is obviously their creation!

They do the dirty work for the church and the church absolves them and themselves. 

THEY INFILTRATE EVERY ALLEY AND DARK CORNER OF EVERY INSTITUTION TO DO THEIR MISSION!

They are the scum of the earth!

========================

Rome’s secret weapon for recatholicising the EU

“This brings us to Benedict and Rome today.  Readers will be well aware of the Vatican’s efforts after World War II to dominate Europe through the Treaty of Rome.  This strategy was spearheaded by the “St Benedict for first European” campaign conceived during World War II.  Pius XII may have been silent about the holocaust but he certainly made waves when one of Benedict’s early monasteries, Monte Cassino, was bombed by the allies.  Churchill, unworried, correctly observed, “the enemy fortifications were hardly separate from the building itself”. But Pius castigated it as an “atrocity bombing”.  He and his two successors, John XXIII and Paul VI, 

all vowed to use Benedict’s European credentials to bring the continent to heel.”

We are the allies that bombed Monte Cassino!

Please read:

 The Synoptic “Q Source”

Special reference to Billy Graham and his part in this affair in the article linked!

John 16:2
They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh,

that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.

JOHN KENNEDY, HIS BROTHER BOBBY AND MARILYN MONROE

WERE MURDERED FOR

MM

===============================

Now, we have lost our government in total to the

World Government headed by Rome!

Obviously, it was the Vatican and the Pope and their legions

and

THEY ARE MANY

who arranged the death of President Kennedy and probably Jacqueline!

But thank goodness it won’t last!

Courtyard of the Gentiles

Revelation 11:1-2

1And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.

2But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not;

for it is given unto the Gentiles:

and the holy city shall they tread under foot

forty and two months.

That’s about 3 1/2 years we have to put up with this nonsense!

Time is ticking!

They are the legions that want to make you believe them, nothing, or anything and everything,

but the truth!

That is their end/purpose!

=================

Now, we have lost our government in total to the

World Government headed by Rome!

Obviously, it was the Vatican, the Pope, and their legions

who arranged the death of President Kennedy and probably Jacqueline!

Thank goodness it won’t last!

Courtyard of the Gentiles

Revelation 11:1-2 

And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.

2But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not;

for it is given unto the Gentiles:

and the holy city shall they tread under foot

forty and two months.

That’s about 3 1/2 years we have to put up with this nonsense!

Time is ticking!

They are the legions that want to make you believe them, nothing, or anything and everything,

but the truth!

That is their end/purpose!

============================

The President and First Lady after the First Anniversary Inaugural Salute Dinner, 1962

Photo Credit: Cecil Stoughton, White House/John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston

zoom in on the hands, bottom of dress, the man’s face behind Jackie.

I guess the photographer needed to add people and shadows….

to make it look real?


How about that eyebrow and the side burns on the man behind Jackie….

maybe Cal Thomas was attending?


In regards to Cal Thomas, he was just recently accused of Plagiarizing by a ridiculous Texas editor

 (I call it relating)

Columnist Cal Thomas accused of plagiarizing the New York Times 

 Accused Of PlagiarismCal Thomas Admits He Should Have Credited 

==========================

 Lyndon Johnson Swearing-in Nov 22, 1963

The Most Revealing Wink
Of The 20th Centur
y

 A WINK FROM THE MAN ON THE LEFT AT JOHNSON!

A SMILE ON JOHNSON’S WIFE!

NOT SURE ABOUT ABOUT THE EXPRESSION ON JACKIE!

THEN GRIEF SEEMED TO OVERCOME THE CROWD IN THE PLANE AS JOHNSON IS SWORN IN AS PRESIDENT!

WHO IS THAT MAN IS WITH THE DARK EYEBROWS

IN THE LEFT CORNER AT THE BOTTOM?

THIS REMINDS ME OF A YOU-TUBE OF PRESIDENT CLINTON AFTER RON BROWN AND MANY OTHERS WERE KILLED IN A PLANE CRASH! ONE MINUTE HE WAS HAPPY AND WHEN HE KNEW THAT THE CAMERA WAS ON HIM HE CRIED!

Bill Clinton fakes crying

==========================

I checked out this you-tube filming from the car behind the limo of President Kennedy and I took some close-up shots of the hands of Jackie’s double, because of Mary Moore’s testimony of seeing a white puppy dog between the President and his wife at the time of the assassination which she was ridiculed for that observation. Since reviewing, I thought it might be possible that she was seeing Jackie Kennedy’s gloved hands as their limo passed by her. So I keyed in on those hands and they seem rather large in comparison to her husband President Kennedy. White gloves can appear larger in video. White always looks larger and affects photography in funny ways, but nevertheless her/his hands seem extremely large especially the one closest to the President.

I am including a comparison of her/his hand waving and the President from this film following:

See the QuickTime Movie taken by Dave Powers

Zoom the view of these pictures to see better!

Her hand is opening and his hand is pointing forward on the right. Compare the relationship to their heads!

Her hand looks really huge like a man but even larger.

Her hand is closed again and it looks like a rose with thorns on the arm. Kind of an odd shape if you zoom in.

(and it looks like a silencer)

Jackie saluting behind and to the right possibly to a Secret Service guard (the one that is supposed to shield the President?)

Her hand size is about the same size as her head..maybe larger!

His hand is a little forward, but seems dramatically smaller in comparison to his head and normal.

Her hand looks abnormally GIGANTiC???

STRANGE!

I can see why Mary Moore thought she saw

fluffy white puppy between them.

The look of love is in your eyes

THE FACE OF EVIL IN DALLAS 1963


====================================================

Truth may be stranger that fiction

in an automated kind-of-way!

====================================================

Some of these guys supposedly boasted that they got the SOB (JFK) and the little bastard (Bobby Kennedy)!

At Bobby Kennedy’s assassination a woman with a polka dot dress was seen, but disappeared.

Maybe he is that woman!

David Sánchez Morales

“During that operation he acquired a reputation as the CIA’s top assassin in Latin America.”

After the communist revolution of 1959, Cuba restricted religious practice, this led to persecution of many Catholics at universities and jobs………
…..From 1959 to 1961 eighty percent of the professional Catholic priests and Protestant ministers left Cuba for the United States. Relationships between the new government and congregations were tense, the new Cuban government was very limiting and suspicious of church operations, blaming them for collaboration with the CIA during the Bay of Pigs invasion and stockpiling arms provided for a “counter-revolution“.

I believe that Jackie was not really Jackie, but a hit woman – how far fetched could it be that maybe she was a he and a hit man that was very effeminate with very large hands, like in the picture above.

The one hiding his face
that has his arm around his companion on the right!

Jackie arrival at Love Field

Either she is packing a gun in her crotch or she is a HE!

It might be a good idea to have her pink suit examined for

traces of semen!

If she were actually a he it would explain what she did with the wedding ring at the hospital probably because she no longer had her gloves and the ring didn’t fit!

It would also explain the odd phone call from President LBJ to Jackie and would explain her odd replies.

LBJ and Jacqueline Kennedy

Kind of like

George Gänswein and the Pope

In my latest article

Courtyard of the Gentiles

ROMAN CATHOLICISM STINKS! 

Please read the articles below:
 

The Covenant with Many

———————–

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

I Am the True Vine

The Fortress

The Kennedys

Television review: ‘The Kennedys’



April 7, 2011 Posted by | BILLY GRAHAM, Deception, Endtime Deception, Jackie Kennedy, Jackie Onassis, JFK, John Kennedy, JOSEPHUS, Josephus Flavius, Mel Gibson, POPE BENEDICT XVI, President Kennedy, Samaritan's Purse, The 34th President, The 44th President, The False Church, The Kennedy's, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many – Part 2


You will miss the point of this post if you neglect Part 1 which is linked in the following title:)

In part one of this trilogy

The Covenant with Many

I stumbled upon a coincidence of Joseph of Arimathea/Josephus Flavius

marriage to the church

and the marriage of Jackie Kennedy to Aristotle Onassis (the Greek Shipping Tycoon)

and this is how this particular post came about!


President Kennedy Assassination and Mel Gibson

Part two

After my conclusions about the Kennedy assassination I was intrigued and curious why Jackie Kennedy would be so bold as to kill her husband in broad daylight in front of cameras and people etc. I went through quite a few emotions and ideas kept popping in my head about his supposed affairs except vaguely and over time, reading about them with Marilyn Monroe. I always still had a deep respect for our President and his stance publicly for truth and openness and I have always hated that he was assassinated. I also hate the secrecy associated with the findings about the assassination! His private life might not have been perfect, but he seemed like a Perfect President. And probably there is more to the story than what meets the eye!

I always thought highly of Mrs. Kennedy and her kids. After looking at many pictures of her she is even more beautiful than I remember. But compared to the woman on the screen in the Zapruder film I just wasn’t satisfied with my conclusions even though I think that woman did assassinate President Kennedy.

To start, I would like to divulge again that I am a portrait artist and I notice features a little more closely than the average person. So I decided to compare pictures of her to see if possibly, by chance, that the woman in the Zapruder film might be someone else. I found quite a few pictures and compared them to each other to see if and when she might have been replaced with a double. I know that sounds preposterous, but there is no doubt in my mind after seeing the Zapruder film over and over, and studying it closely, that she looks and acted very guilty. Yet Jacky Kennedy doesn’t seem to be the type of woman to be so calculating and cold. The person on the screen in the film acts like a professional hit woman. So after writing the article The Covenant with Many and the deception involved and how the assassination of President Kennedy seems to cor-relate in very strange ways, especially Jackie’s marriage later to Aristotle Onassis, I had to look into it deeper than I ever have.

=========================

I kept running into the dilemma of mirror-image confusion. If you take an object and stick it in your right hand and go to the mirror the object will be in you left hand. In many of the pictures of her she parted her hair on the left and sometimes on the right.

For instance:

(I put the web addresses for you to put in your title bar to go to the picture to see it larger because my blog will not show it large enough to see a clearly)

http://cache2.allpostersimages.com/p/LRG/34/3482/N386F00Z/posters/rickerby-art-first-lady-jackie-kennedy-standing-by-reflecting-pool-in-front-of-taj-mahal-during-visit-to-india.jpg

1962

http://popartmachine.com/item/pop_art/LOC+1138083/%5BJACQUELINE-KENNEDY-IN-FRONT-OF-THE-TAJ-MAHAL%5D-LOT-9700-%5BITEM%5D…

http://www.allposters.com/-sp/First-Lady-Jackie-Kennedy-Standing-by-Reflecting-Pool-in-Front-of-Taj-Mahal-During-Visit-to-India-Posters_i4740851_.htm

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&q=pictures+of+jacquelin+kennedy+in+
Taj+Mahal&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=7222b5efa7d4217b

This is the first lady at Taj Mahal on one of her many trips. In the picture above her purse is on her left arm and the part in her hair is on the left and her leg is poised forward on the left when facing her (or her right) and on the picture above that it is the exact opposite. I spent a long time pondering and studying these pictures because she is wearing the same dress and obviously it is the same day, right?…..it appears that way anyway.

Then I realized the mirror-image dilemma.

DID WE HAVE THAT PROCESS VIA PHOTOSHOP BACK IN THOSE DAYS…..

I HAVE NO IDEA?

But we do now!

Most people rarely change their part from the left to the right, or visa versa. But with mirror-image I could not get past the confusion, until I put her with another person …..her husband.

Men never change their parts, especially back in those days. So I studied a bunch of pictures of them together and in every shot I could find of the two of them together, their parts were always on the same side. His would be on his right when facing him and hers was on the right when facing her when they were side by side. So if you looked at them they were two right parts, like they matched.

Both have their parts on the right above.

Again.

Again, again  and again!

Both have their parts on the right again!

Both have their parts on the same side again like parallel as the other two above!

And again. Hard to see but their parts are on the right.

Again both President Kennedy and Mrs. Kennedy have their parts on the right when you are facing them.

Jackie’s Pink Suit– more examples two Jackies

“It was at President Kennedy’s request that she wear the outfit in Dallas.

He said she looked “ravishing in it.” 

(Susan Mary Alsop, 1963)”

===========================

The Covenant with Many – Part one

============================

Part 3

Now Before the Assassination in Dallas

April 7, 2011 Posted by | BIBLE PROPHECY, Deception, Jackie Kennedy, Jackie Onassis, JFK, John Kennedy, JOSEPHUS, Josephus Flavius, Mel Gibson, POPE BENEDICT XVI, President Kennedy, The 34th President, The 44th President, The Kennedy's | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many



PART 1

———————————————————————————————–

JFK and Mel Gibson

The Covenant with Many

————————————————————————————————————–

The Covenant with Many

(revised)

 

February 11, 2010 By Kevin Flower Israeli archaeologists say they’ve found a 1,500-year-old road, 4.5 meters under the current level of streets in Jerusalem’s Old City.

 

The reason I am writing this post is because of the prophecy in Daniel that a lot of people write about on blogs and websites.

I don’t understand why the prophecy teachers and scholars that try to have an understanding of Daniel’s prophecies…get stuck on the same mantra.

I am not trying to be different, but I think there have been some colossal mistakes made by scholars, bible teachers and the whole spectrum of experts of the bible.

I don’t see how you can read the Gospel of John and collapse it into the Synoptic gospels and say they blend at all or compliment each other.


In Reality

The Gospel of John and the Synoptic Gospels

collide !

In the book of Daniel it talks about Messiah the Prince and a prince.

Why does everyone think the covenant with many is for the future.

How does one come to that conclusion from these verses?

Daniel 9:25-27

25Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

It is quite possible that the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince has already occurred,

but has been covered up by the

Chief Priests and the Legion – (please read)

Ancient wall found in Jerusalem

Western Wall, Jerusalem

The Western Wall was built by King Herod in 20 BC during his expansion of the Temple enclosure, and is part of a retaining wall that enclosed the western part of Temple Mount. According to the Roman-Jewish historian Josephus, construction of the walls took 11 years, during which time it rained in Jerusalem only at night so as not to interfere with the workers’ progress.

Ancient road found in Jerusalem’s heart

February 11, 2010|By Kevin Flower

“Archaeologists working under the direction of the Israeli Antiquities Authority have uncovered a 1500-year-old road running through the center of Jerusalem’s Old City.

Excavation director Dr. Ofer Sion said the discovery lends further credence to the accuracy of what is known as the Madaba Map – a Byzantine period mosaic map of the Holy Land that depicts an entrance into Jerusalem that leads to a single central street.

Archaeologists working in Jerusalem have made various finds to suggest the Madaba map was geographically correct, but the road depicted in the mosaic had not been found.”

Obviously, there have been two walls from two different temple eras

and a road!


Micah predicted the downfall of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple, which were fulfilled by the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in about 586 BC and again by the Romans in 70 AD. The Temple has not been rebuilt since that destruction. Jerusalem was destroyed a second time by the Romans in about 135 AD.

The only reason I added the above link and the information about the destruction of Jerusalem

and the temple and the destruction again of Jerusalemin in 135 AD

is because it might apply to Daniel’s prophecies.


Perhaps we are wrong about when Jesus really died? Many people seem to think Jesus was 30 or 33 when he started his ministry but in the Gospel of John they refer to him as not yet being 5o years old.

I would say we have a problem within the bible of who and which Jesus is the Messiah!

John 8:56-59

56Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.

57Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?

58Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

59Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.

(Interesting that they threw stones at him.)

Cephus” means stone.

The Synoptic Gospels have built their “image of Jesus” metaphorically by using stones!

By the way, I believe Cephus refers to Josephus Flavius!

Was there ever a decree to build the temple to the Messiah the Prince?

Perchance the destruction of Jerusalem in 135 AD is a clue?

Maybe the decree to build the temple to the Messiah the Prince occurred before 135 AD!

Seems odd that after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD that anyone would need to destroy it again 65 years later.

Building a city takes time, and funds, and manpower,

so why was there a need to destroy it again so soon after it had already been destroyed?


Seems to me that most and maybe all scholars of the bible are making presumptions, because they lump the gospels into one big ball but I think, to be fair,

we should separate the Synoptic Gospels from the Gospel of John

and calculate both sides to see if maybe we can come up with some other answers.

Maybe that is what is meant by the 153 fish which relates to the inferred 153:265 ratio!

Pope Benedict XVI and 153 Great Fish

Pope Benedict XVI is the

265th Pope,

was born Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger


Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, and the Pope

George Gänswein, Pope Benedict XVI, and Mel Gibson

revised

In the two article above that I just recently posted which are very similar I included in both a link to an article I found on the internet about names!

Praising Or Pleading

(POP)

seems to be his (The Pope) MO these days and in this article he pleads for parents to give their children traditional names before baptism so I gather names have meaning to him!

So since they are so important I thought maybe his name might be important also.

The Pope’s Last Name

IN the article

I relate the possibility that the Pope is related to another Pope whose last name was RATTE which would fulfill another prophecy in Revelation 17:11 about him being the eighth and one of the seven:

The Seventh and the Eighth Pope of Revelation- Benedict XVI

But I did not deal with his middle name so:

The Pope’s Middle Name

Aloisius a german name means great warrior but comes from the name

Cleophas meaning and name origin

Cleophas \c-leo-phas\ as a boy’s name is of Greek origin, and the meaning of Cleophas is “visionof glory“.

Biblical name: husband of one of the Marys who stood at the foot of the Cross.

Cleophas has 4 variant forms: CleoCleofasCleofaso and Cleophus.


Alphaeus

which is basically the switch from the Synoptic version and Simon from Cyrene who bears the cross and takes over after Jesus is crucified. In essence to REPLACE the true disciples/apostles with his own sons etc because they were the Chief Priests and they wanted to stay that way and replace Jesus with their own perception of Him. It is the great deception! The Synoptic version of the bible (Matthew Mark and Luke) plus many additional books in the bible to form the amalgamation we now call Christianity.

Basically, Rome absconded the truth and twisted it into their baby.

That is why I believe that Mel Gibson has been targeted for his rendition of the Gospels in THE PASSION,

THE BABY or to be more specific THE DEVIL’s BABY

Here are a few posts about that baby!:

Affliction and the Time of Testing

Mel Gibson and the Book of Acts 2

Mel Gibson, Japan Quakes, and the Kamikazes

Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, and the Pope

George Gänswein, Pope Benedict XVI, and Mel Gibson

revised

You might say I went overboard, which is true, but I am trying to learn and to get your attention and the articles are ongoing because of the events which are at present rapidly unfolding.

======================

Back to the Prophecy of Daniel

============================================================

Daniel 9:26

26And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

INTERESTING: NICODEMAS MEANS “THE PEOPLE” AND

IT WAS NICODEMAS AND JOSEPH OF ARIMATHEA

THAT BURIED JESUS.


THE POPE’S FIRST NAME


IT’S A GOOD POSSIBILITY THAT JOSEPH OF ARIMATHEA

IS THE “prince of the people“.

Another interesting coincidence: Demas is a fellowlabourer of Paul:

Philemon 1:24

24Marcus, Aristarchus, Demas, Lucas, my fellowlabourers.

You don’t suppose that Demas is Nicodemas?

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

Daniel 9:27

27And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Sounds to me like in order to cover-up the abomination he had to make it desolate?

Who is “he” in verse 27?

Is “he” the Messiah the Prince?

OR

Is “he” the prince?


It makes a big difference who “he” is in verse 27!

The thing that concerns me is that we have been waiting for some treaty or covenant that will be confirmed and seems to me we ought to know first and foremost:

what is the covenant that is made with the many?

Then try to figure out

who confirms that covenant with the many!


The Covenant with the Many


Many treaties have been made with many people so what kind of treaty will be made with the many and confirmed with the many that this particular prophecy in Daniel is referring to? Certainly it has to do with the prince and the temple and/or worship and/or sin.

Most treaties we read about in the news most people are unaware of so why would Daniel of the bible be speaking of some political treaty that only the few politicians and leaders involved realize. This is a prophecy about the Messiah the Prince and the people of the prince and he (I assume is the prince of the people)

But it isn’t a treaty that Daniel talks about….it’s a covenant!

To be more specific it is the “covenant with many”!


What is the covenant with many?

I looked up “covenant” in the bible search on line and found a lot of covenants.

The covenant that caught my eye is the one that the Synoptic Jesus makes with the Synoptic disciples at the Synoptic Last Supper

and the verses about this covenant uses the word many.

I think that is a BIG CLUE about this covenant!


MATTHEW 26:26-29

26And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body.27And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;28For this is my blood of the new testamentwhich is shed for many for the remission of sins.29But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.

MARK 14:22-25

22And as they did eat, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is my body.23And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it.24And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testamentwhich is shed for many.25Verily I say unto you, I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, until that day that I drink it new in the kingdom of God.

LUKE 22:15-20

15And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer:16For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God.17And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves:18For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come.19And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.20Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.

 

THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

DOES NOT MENTION THIS

NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant with many!


I THINK THAT IS VERY SIGNIFICANT THAT THE

New Testament/Covenant

IS ABSENT IN

THE GOSPEL OF JOHN!


The three Synoptic gospels don’t mention the washing of the feet,

nor the dialogue that Jesus has with his disciples explaining what is going to happen

and many other things that is worth the time to study.


WHAT IS GOING ON?

Why are the Synoptic Gospels account of the Last Supper so different than the Gospel of John?


Were there two different “LAST SUPPERS”?


For a  break and for fun in an ironic way,

Please watch:

The Last, But One Supper

(It is a Monty Python skit with John Cleese acting like the Pope)


THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW SAYS THAT BLOOD OF THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant WHICH IS SHED FOR THE MANY is

FOR THE “REMISSION OF SINS“.

THE OTHER TWO SYNOPTICS GOSPELS (MARK AND LUKE) EXCLUDE THE “REMISSION OF SINS” TO THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant.

THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW AND THE GOSPEL OF MARK SAY THAT THE BLOOD OF THE NEW TESTAMENT/covenant IS SHED FOR THE MANY.

BUT THE GOSPEL OF LUKE SAYS IT IS FOR YOU. (HE IS TALKING TO HIS DISCIPLES)

EVEN THOUGH THESE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS ARE IN AGREEMENT THAT THERE IS A

NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant.

THEY ARE DISAGREEING AS TO WHO THE NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant IS FOR…..

THEMSELVES (YOU) OR THE MANY.

(I HATE TO BE A JERK!)

BUT THE ACCOUNTS GIVEN OF THE “LAST SUPPER” BY THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT (NT as opposed to the OT)

DIFFER A GREAT DEAL AS TO THIS “NEW TESTAMENT/Covenant” AND ARE WORLDS APART FROM THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

SINCE this “New Testament”

DOESN’T EVEN OCCUR IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN.

THE PRAYER AND THE DIALOGUE OF JESUS WITH HIS DISCIPLES

HAPPENS ONLY IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN AND THERE IS QUITE A BIT OF INFORMATION GIVEN!

========

Another point by Paul Carlson in his article  below, I get the impression that Paul Carlson thinks that all of the contradictions that are contained in the NT makes everything written about Jesus a lie and that is not my point!

I don’t believe that!

I think Jesus the Messiah did come and so did false messiahs and their many supporters

to quell the truth against Him and His true apostles

for money, power and control.

It’s like saying, for example, that the  September 11th terrorist attack on the Twin Terrors weren’t destroyed because 3 or 4 witnesses/terrorists don’t tell the same story, hence it’s all a lie and the Twin Towers are still there. That is ridiculous! But that is the point in having contradictions so that some people will come to that conclusion! Obviously, the Twin Towers were destroyed and something very big happened, because they are no longer there.

Deception is in the bible purposefully

to deceive

and to reveal!

In other words, it works both ways!

An oxymoron (plural oxymorons or oxymora) (from Greek ὀξύμωρον, “sharp dull”) is a figure of speechthat combines contradictory terms. Oxymorons appear in a variety of contexts, including inadvertent errors such as extremely average and literary oxymorons crafted to reveal a paradox.

Truth is a funny thing, because it is quite possible these contradictions were said

and did actually happen

…..but by who?

Why don’t the experts and scholars of the bible raise the possibility of what seems to be written in black and white in the bible? I get the impression they are hiding from what seems to be obvious …….

but why?

When Jesus came it made such a stir that Jerusalem was destroyed and their temple, Rome was destroyed and Jerusalem was destroyed again 65 years later. Jesus was big news and his coming had major ramifications! And I believe his enemies made sure of the destruction. propaganda and deception to cover up the truth! History was rewritten to hide the truth and many people were slaughtered!

People that lived under the rule of the Romans were slaughtered when they wrote anything that would make the Romans look bad. And I am convinced those times are coming again soon. So when you read Josephus and other writers, keep in mind that they could lose their lives for what they wrote and so maybe there are hidden meanings to their stories. Contradictions may abound in the bible and in the history given by the major history authors (Josephus included, even though his accounts seem to be false IMO) to point us to the truth while avoiding the threat of death for us to be able to discern via archeology and other avenues and the unfolding, at the right time! Possibly the power that caused so much destruction was something other than just the Romans, because they also suffered and suffer now, because they lack the truth and are deceived…..they just don’t realize it!

Daniel 7:25

And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High,

and think to change times and laws:

and they shall be given into his hand

until

time and times and the dividing of time.

I think that is what is meant by the words “time and times and the dividing of times” is what has been written about that time and the deception about those times.


I think we are in the times prophesied by Daniel and specifically

the “Dividing of time”.


Please read the following fantastic article I found on the internet which is linked next:

The Reliance of Luke-Acts on the Writings of Flavius Josephus

…..”So, Steve Mason, associate Professor of Humanities at York University, Ontario asks:

“If Luke did not know of Josephus’ work, how did this language suggest itself to him?”[5]….


Daniel is talking about he, the prince that was to come,

the prince that Jesus warns us about in the gospel of John.

So when you link to this site below by Paul Carlson and/or read my articles that talk about contradictions in the bible

keep in mind that just because there are contradictions

doesn’t mean it did not occur!

===========

New Testament Contradictions (1995)

Paul Carlson

A. WHEN – BEFORE OR DURING PASSOVER?

“…….In Matthew, Mark and Luke the last supper takes place on the first day of the Passover (Matthew 26:17, Mark 14:12, Luke 22:7).

In John’s gospel it takes place a day earlier and Jesus is crucified on the first day of the Passover (John 19:14).…….”

============


The Blood Covenant at the Last Supper

in the Synoptic Gospels seems to be a bit odd

since Jesus had not died yet!


I know I must seem like I’m just quibbling about small details,

(although they are not small to me)

but

since it is a contract

it seems to me it should be very clear and concise!


All I can tell is that this NEW TESTAMENT/covenant

is for “many”

or for


“you” which was “them” (the disciples sitting at the table).


Why the controversy?

Can’t they even agree on what the “New Testament” /covenant is,

and who it is between,

and what it is for?


The reason this is so IMPORTANT to me is that I have found many problems in the Synoptic Gospels

and have an inclination

to distrust their word of the Word.

New Testament

the collection of the books of the Bible that were produced by the early Christian church, comprising the Gospels, Acts of the Apostles, the Epistles, and the Revelation of St. John the Divine.
the covenant between god and humans in which the dispensation of grace is revealed through Jesus Christ
==============================================

Could the

“Covenant with many”

spoken about by Daniel be the

“Covenant with many”

made at the Last Supper

in the Synoptic Gospels?


Makes sense to me!


If so, then who confirms this covenant?


======================================

Whoever confirms this covenant could be the “he” in verse Daniel 9:27

In my last article on another blog, I wrote called Abomination of Desolation: Part one

(which is also linked here and at the bottom of this post)

the Synoptic Jesus in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke

talks about desolation:

Matthew 23:38

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

Luke 13:35

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate:

and verily I say unto you,

Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say,

Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.


=============================

They themselves

(The Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke)

testify to the

“Desolation” and a “Covenant with Many”

===========================

Remember:

the Covenant is not in tbe Gospel of John

nor is desolation mentioned.


========================
Daniel 9:26
26And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
—————–
Daniel 9:27
27And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
————-
Whoever that prince is that “he” is referring to is the one that causes the sacrifice and the oblation to cease., etc
after the Messiah is cut off.

I believe it is the the same prince that Jesus of the Gospel of John warns us about:
Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.
—————-
Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh,

and hath nothing in me.

——————

From the sounds of His warnings the prince of this world would be coming very soon,
not waiting 2000 years later!
I assume that is why Jesus says NOW twice.
“Now” could have a double meaning?
*********
The first time you hear about the prince of this world (in the Gospel of John)
is at the Jewish Feast in Jerusalem
after Jesus had raised Lazarus from the dead in Bethany when the Greeks arrive to that Jewish Feast to see Jesus.
I think that was a sign about this prince of this world.


===============================
I believe that the Covenant at the Last Supper was made with the prince of this world,
and he broke the covenant and desolation occurred.

I DO NOT BELIEVE GOD THE FATHER OR HIS TRUE SON ARE LIARS!
I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT JESUS OF NAZARETH WRITTEN ABOUT IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN
WOULD MAKE A COVENANT AND THEN BREAK IT
AND THEN CAUSE DESOLATION
SO THEREFORE WHOEVER DOES THIS IS THE LIAR
AND IS NOT THE TRUE MESSIAH!!!!!

The reason I believe this is because this Covenant at the Last Supper
is not in the Gospel of John
and John does not mention it later in his gospel.

The only gospels to mention desolation are two of the Synoptic Gospels

in the past tense:


Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
—————–

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate:
and verily I say unto you,
Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say,Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.
———————————

Here are some interesting comparisons of Paul and Josephus.
PLEASE READ:

Flavious Josephus And the Apostle Paul Were the Same Person?, page 1

and there are many more examples which I have included in other articles about
Josephus Flavius and Joseph of Arimathea.
PLEASE READ:
Maybe if we looked at things a bit differently, events like Masada and Yodfat and the discrepancies of the archeological evidence vs. Josephus Flavius’s historical account
might make more sense…….
Perhaps since no evidence of Jewish bones have been found at the site of Masada
could there have been a resurrection of the living?
I don’t know of course, but it is worth considering!

Josephus Flavius’s historical account and the archeological evidence do NOT match,
so I wonder what really did happen at Masada and Yodfat
and why would Josephus make up stories of mass suicide of JEWS!
that seems to have not happened at all?
If a mass suicide did not occur, why would Josephus lie about it???
Is he trying to promote suicide as a heroic sacrificial act for Jews or is he trying to infer their inferiority?
What would be the point?
He did seem to turn on his own country and people from what I have read about him and by him,
if, in fact, he was Jewish?
But then wasn’t HITLER Jewish? And we do not want to forget that lesson!
Or was he leaving us clues???
Why would he lie about it?
If there had been a victory by the Romans
why not write about it?

From his writings. he seemed to be kind of sick in the head or had some kind of deep insanity. His accounts of what happened show lots of inside information, even what people were actually thinking
and he seemed to be in charge !!!
His paranoia may be a result of knowing the thoughts of the people and their plots against him.
If you read his works they are quite descriptive of maniacal sadistic manipulative type behavior
and he seemed to enjoy the destruction and the deceptions of the people!


It must be that he is trying to hide who he is!


WHY?


Could Josephus Flavius be the “prince” ?


Could he have rewritten history and written the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke)
to cover up the truth
about Jesus of Nazareth
and replace himself
as the Messiah?
IE
THE DEVIL
Could he have taken the records in the Temple in Jerusalem as he says he did,
rewritten parts of the OT to bolster his Synoptic Gospels,
composed other books from The Book of ACTS and the rest?
Could he have changed the Genealogy records or destroyed them as others say they no longer exist to cover up
WHO HE REALLY IS?


Could he have been the one to make a covenant with many?


Could Josephus be Cephus?


Makes sense to me!

THE STONE

????????????????????????????????

Could Josephus Flavius Son of Matthew be Joseph of ARIMathea

(ARI means lion. and eagle)

Ari is also a very GREEK name.
ARISTOTLE

Jacqueline Kennedy married Aristotle Onassis which in itself seems very odd when you think about it!
Especially since recently ART of New Wineskins with *his propaganda site* IMO
implied that the head wound of the beast spoken about in Revelation
was President Kennedy’s assassination and that President Barrack Obama’s head vein?/scar? had something to do with this prophecy!
The Devil and his legions are in a hurry for lots and lots of reasons!

Since finishing this post today,
I have watched some you-tubes of the moments of President Kennedy’s assassination, because of what I have been learning and writing and it looks pretty scary. I have seen them a hundred times before and always gave Jacky the benefit of doubt because she is a female, very pretty, soft spoken and his wife,
but Jacqueline’s behavior before and after, are disconcerting to say the least!

Here is what I see NOW:
She is fiddling with him as he is shot the first time, then Connelly looks back and she looks at Connelly and he is shot, she looks back at her husband and gets closer and under him and he is shot again and the blood spray goes up, then
it looks as if she has something in her right hand after the second shot.
Possibly, lost that object when she pushed her husband over and fled to the trunk of the car to get whatever was back there,and it looks like a tube of lipstick because of the way it stays on the trunk of the car. She pursues it on the trunk of the car and gets it and gets back and hunches down with everyone else.
*April 2nd 2011 Just watched this video again a few times and it looks like she is the only one that seems to be busy …..very active….and in control…….everyone else seems to be reacting.
Everyone else seems to be in slow motion and she is in very fast motion.
Whoever her focus is on seems to be before that person is shot! IMO
Which is very disturbing!


Here is the video:

And the Secret Service act peculiar in the front seat, the driver and the passenger and the guy that left his post at the back corner  by President Kennedy.

But WHO knows with digital mastering and all of the coverups!

The same applies to Mel Gibson and the tapes of his rantings. My husband is a sound engineer and voices can also be spliced and diced and altered …….digitally mastered. It isn’t as if he doesn’t have plenty of emotional voice samples in all of the movies he has been involved with.
WHO knows!
I just would not place much faith in visual or sound technology.
I hope it isn’t a technique or practice employed to defame, destroy and rob individuals who have money, influence or sway,
but aren’t in alignment with the
One World Government, One World Religion, and One World Finance
fostered by Pope Benedict XVI and his legions.


THAT WOULD BE A NIGHTMARE
but maybe it is a warning and a sign of things to come!

Another time and on another post I watched a you-tube which also showed

peculiar behavior of the Secret Service


and that was behind Donald Rumsfeld when he misspoke

about the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

This is the post:

“A very interesting you -tube I watched recently of Donald Rumsfeld slip of the tongue, and I have linked it. Pay close attention to what he says about the the shooting down of the plane and the Pentagon and the reaction of the people in the background. Makes me think the Secret Service are a bit more powerful than I ever imagined. The Treasury Department runs the Secret Service. That is interesting since we are in debt up to our EARS. President Bush SR used to head the CIA. Hmmmmmmmmm. I wonder if Rumsfeld didn’t do that on purpose for our benefit? You never know! I hope so.”

The article below shows the relationship of banking

with the Synoptic Gospels, Paul, Josephus and BAAL!

1 Timothy 6:10
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

Please Read:

The Synoptic “Q Source”

*************************


What we do know is that

President John Kennedy

was killed because of his posture and his actions

exposing

SECRET SOCIETIES.


Time is our ally.


Please read about the head wound below:

Many people keep looking for a place called Arimathea, and so far there is none.

Could Josephus Flavius/Joseph of ARI-Mathea have been the Fear of the Jews?

Could Saul/Paul be Josephus Flavius?

1 Corinthians 3:22

22Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas,

or the world,

or life, or death,

or things present, or things to come;

all are your’s;

=====================

John 14:30

Hereafter I will not talk much with you:

for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

[and compare to what Paul says]

1 Corinthians 16:24
My love be with you all in Christ Jesus. Amen.

=============

Below Saul/Paul contradicts himself:
and then following Paul tricks people:

2 Corinthians 11:31
The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is blessed for evermore, knoweth that I lie not.
2 Corinthians 12:16
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty,

I caught you

with guile.

Guile

=====================[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[=================
If you read his history of the Jews and Josephus’s biography it’s almost like he is writing about the underworld,
or the world of the dead.
The spiritual world.
======================

A lot of the names and events seem to parallel Acts and I don’t think it’s accidental!
He seems to relish the people being deceived!
THE DEVIL ENJOYS DECEPTION!
Could Josephus Flavius have been as a
Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde
with

MANY OTHER NAMES

I don’t think we should ignore his writings, but rather compare his style and details to the events in the bible!

================================
Other sites of interest in regard to old and recent covenants:
===============================


=================================

My last *four posts that I believe relate to the subject of the covenant follow:

*Abomination of Desolation: Part one

*The Abomination of Desolation Part 2

*In The Garden of Gethsemane

*Sour Wine

Josephus and His Footprints

CONFIRMATION OF THE COVENANT

The Fruits of the Vatican

———–=======================———–

Here is a recent Covenant with Many that might be of interest:

Magen David Adom Covenant

– The value of saving lives as seen by the three religions, will be presented to the Pope

=======================================

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)


I Am the True Vine


If you have read any of my articles I have a basic theme throughout most of my posts on my blogs and it is that the Synoptic (Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke), Acts and many other epistles are false! I believe they represent a false Messiah and a False Prophet! I believe I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt quite often that they contradict each other and are antithetical to the gospel of John. They promote a political agenda to control the people and quell the truth about Jesus and his message.I think the synoptic gospels were written by thieves of the true Word of God and his true apostles.

I believe these guys killed the true apostles, stole what they could from them, altered their messages, rewrote history to cover up their crime, in collusion with the the powers that be at the time to create their own version of Jesus and God.

The contradictions are pretty apparent if you compare the gospels to each other and read the bible critically. For many years, I didn’t study, but just read what other people thought and still kept running into a cement wall. I don’t think I have all the answers, yet nor do I think I will attain that ever in my lifetime. I write in my blogs as I am learning and hope it will help others that have also questioned the same things I question that is written about God and Jesus.

I don’t think it is healthy to accept what we have been fed for years as “the truth” I think it is healthier to question, study and discuss. I don’t think the ecclesiastic entity appreciates our freedom to question it’s authority on their interpretation of what is written in the bible but who said they have the right to quell our search for the truth? To them it is Apostacy,,,the falling away…. I say it is Apostacy from them, and falling away from them. They think they have the answers…..

I dont think they have the answers, so thats why I write my blogs. Enuf said on that!


 

April 5, 2011 Posted by | bible, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversies, BIBLE PROPHECY, Book of Daniel, Bread of Life, Daniel, Deception, Endtime Deception, JOSEPHUS, POPE BENEDICT XVI, prophecy of Daniel, Roman Catholicism, Synoptic Gospels, THE ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION, The Antichrist, The False Church, THE FALSE MESSIAH, The Gospels | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment