The Court of the Gentiles and Human Rights
As far as I know, Jesus never said anything about gaity, effeminism, lesbians, or homosexuals. In my opinion they should have the same human rights as others have. I do not think this is a slippery slope. It is common sense.
They should have the right to marry.
Now the bible says we should not eat shellfish…because of the health risks, but it is not one of the Ten Commandments.
Do we say that people who eat shellfish cannot marry?
We have progressed in this rights struggle for people of different races, creeds and the female gender; we allow them to marry, why stop now?
How does marriage hurt a feminine man or a manly woman?
How does marriage hurt a homosexual or a lesbian?
How would that human right hurt the people in our country?
I think it would make them and us safer.
Did God say he was against homosexuals getting married? Not that I recall but He does not approve of the sexual act because it is unnatural and obviously a health risk.
Because God loves humans he tells them about the risks ahead of time to help protect them no matter who they are, homosexual or heterosexual. African or Roman. Jewish or Palestinian. American or Russian. ETC.
Obviously, each and all of us are imperfect by His design.
I haven’t seen, neither met, nor known anyone that was perfect.
He created humans with flaws or we would be perfect and since angels fell they must have been imperfect too!
That face sure looks familiar to me!
Cardinal John Patrick Foley
Jackie o?
Compare the picture above with this picture of Jackie
you have to admit they do look similar.
“During his tenure, the Archbishop once sparked outrage in the homosexual community by describing the AIDS pandemic as a “natural sanction for certain types of activities.”[12
Makes you wonder who is responsible?
He also defended the Church’s exclusively male priesthood, once saying, “Jesus clearly did not ordain women to the priesthood, nor did he authorize the Church to do so.”
How would he know?
When angels think they are God.
Is Cardinal John Patrick Foley a relative to Jackie O?
“I Come as a Pilgrim”
“The Pope held out a special hand of reconciliation in advance to Catholic homosexuals, who had been outraged at comments made by Archbishop John Foley, the American who heads Vatican communications. Foley had described the scourge of AIDS as a “natural sanction for certain types of activities.” Aboard Spoleto, John Paul said homosexuals “are in the heart of the church,” along with “all people who suffer.” In his first-ever remarks on AIDS, the Pope said, “The church is doing all that is possible to heal and especially to prevent the moral background” of the disease.”
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,147603,00.html#ixzz1v2Q22l8k
^These guys are nuts IMO! They love suffering….keeps them afloat.
Not only homosexuals received the “natural sanction” spoken of by Cardinal John Patrick Foley but so did other people like hemopheliacs. I dated a man who died of aids along with his brother, both were hemopheliacs. Both were happily married and productive men. Before he died he did reveal to me that his investigation of the aids contamination in the blood supply had to do with
the Red Cross, and in particular Elizabeth Dole.
Weird picture of the Doles and the Connallys
I guess “natural sanction for certain types of activities.”
is not very exact kind of like the Mustard Seed Parable.
Please read about natural sanctions in this link:
THE PARABLE OF FAITH – PART ONE
The Parable of Faith – Part two
Pope Benedict XVI and the Mustard Tree
Parable of the Mustard Seed Part 4
————————————-
D.C. gay rights groups evacuated after bomb threats
What is a marriage called when a gay person marries a straight person?
Half gay marriage? Half straight marriage?
How about if the other person isn’t aware of the other persons sexuality? What if the person isn’t even aware of their own sexuality?
Then what? Does that mean they are forever married until death even though it is a bad arrangement?
I don’t think it is fair to draw a line on this human right. I wonder how many unnecessary tragedies have occurred because of this type of hypocrisy especially when it comes to arranged marriages over the history of this world. How many murders have occurred to coverup ones sexuality because of what “the church” deemed legitimate?
Anne Boleyn and others come to my mind!
=======================
I would rather see a homosexual have one partner and learn about marriage than live wildly and not learn about marriage. Marriage tends to stabilize a person which is good for many reasons. Depriving a person of a stabile loving environment is cruel and certainly doesn’t help.
Marriage is a private relationship between adults so they should be able to marry as long as the other person wants the same, just as I believe a person has the right to a divorce if things don’t work out, without ramifications.
I should have the right to raise my child my way without hindrance from others such as my government and my government school system. I should be able to homeschool if I so choose with out interference from my government. It is not my governments business how I raise my child.
Sodom and Gommorah
I believe the reason the angels blinded the crowd wasn’t because of their sexual orientation. It was because they were demanding attention from the angels and forcing themselves upon the angels, Lot, and his family. They had no right to do that and Lot should not have offered his daughter to them. They were forcing themselves upon Lot, his family, and the angels. That is why I believe they were blinded.
God did not destroy Rome or Greece and I think they also had homosexuals living in their countries. But our bibles tell us that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed.
Did Jesus destroy homosexuals when he came?
I don’t recall that he did, but he healed people with various imperfections,
but not everybody.
Why was Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed?
The bible says that it was because of the sin of the people had basically gotten so bad that God could not ignore it anymore. It wasn’t just the homosexuals.
It was everyone in those cities.
I do not know what Gomorrah means but this is what it says is the definition:
| Go·mor·rah 2 |
Sodom means:
Sodomy – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sodomy refers to anal sex or other non-penile/vaginal copulation-like acts, especially between male persons or between a person and an animal.
So we have wickedness, depravity, anal sex and beastiality, and I don’t know what the other non-penile/vaginal copulation means ….maybe oral sex, heavy petting and other things.
So basically the two names of the two cities doesn’t exclude a particular gender. The definition of the names of those two cities does however seem to point to sexual sin and wickedness.
Men, women, children, and animals were destroyed.
Obviously sin was rampant amongst all the people and tolerated by Lot and his family.
Abraham made a deal with the destroying angels hoping to spare the two cities, if the destroying angels could find a certain amount of righteous people would God spare the cities from destruction. I forget the amount that they agreed upon but it was not just a few but it seems they could not even find that amount because the bible says those cities were not spared.
From that I glean that it is a good idea
to allow righteous people to be righteous,
because it is those people and their righteousness that keep the world safe.
In the Gospel of John after Jesus had arisen he said
John 14:1
Let not your heart be troubled:
ye believe in God,
believe also in me.
————————————————
We should help people to believe in humane, thoughtfully kindly ways within the laws of the countries and not persecute believers or non believers, or disembowel them and kill them, lie to them, or torture them, or trick them because they are imperfect.
Christians are imperfect.
Nobody said that a believer was perfect.
Christians should not expect perfection in non believers either.
Non believers should not expect perfection in believers.
Angels are imperfect too…..
Putting someone on the rack doesn’t improve them. I don’t expect the Roman Catholic establishment to be perfect either. They have made huge mistakes but should also have to live by the laws of the land and own up to their mistakes. They have accomplished some good things too and we cannot discount their service in some capacities. Most Roman Catholics are wonderful people and imperfect.
The Roman Catholic Church established a Court of the Gentiles
about the same time as they felt they were being persecuted
because of their abuse of children
and not because of their beliefs.
That is the lie.
It is not a coincidence.
Now the RCC and the Pope and their “protection”
won’t allow anyone to see their secret files,
because they perceive themselves to be HOLY and above the laws of the land
but want us to suffer their subtly maniacal inquisitions
with the powers that they have established for over 2000 years
through deception.
That is the EPITOME of TREACHERY!
I believe if they own up to their mistakes they as a church could be healed and survive because they are human,
Obviously that power has corrupted them.
If they go down we all go down. That’s how these cowards do business.
Vatican Investigating Girl Scouts
for Links to Safe-Sex Education Groups
Ignorance is their ace in the hole, you might say. That is why there was such a thing as the Dark Ages when the lay people were not allowed to read the bible, in essence, they want to discern for us and deceive us. It is their power. Everything they do is toward that purpose. Education on the other hand gives power back to the individual and out of their hands.
Abusers of mankind!
==============
Case in Point:
Vatican Investigating Girl Scouts
for Links to Safe-Sex Education Groups
Ignorance is their ace in the hole, you might say. That is why there was such a thing as the Dark Ages when the lay people were not allowed to read the bible, in essence, they want to discern for us and deceive us. It is their power. Everything they do is toward that purpose. Education on the other hand gives power back to the individual and out of their hands.
Wikipedia head joins Vatican meeting, talks about abortion controversy
Wikipedia and peace
———————–
There were 2 other cities in the plain besides Sodom and Gomorrah which were destroyed. It is quite possible since no one knows where or for sure where these 4 places are located that Sodom and Gomorrah is a prophecy. Don’t discount that possibility.
==============
What is sin?
Obviously wickedness, depravity, bad behavior, and bad morals. The bible says that homosexuality and beastiality are an abomination. Obviously, disobeying the Ten Commandments is considered to be sin. The rapid decline in the morals of this country by the average citizen seems to coincide with the dismissal of the rule of law.
Whose law?
God’s law.
We have so many new laws in this country, much more than we had 50 years ago. Obviously, it isn’t the addition of these new laws, but the dismissal and disregarding of God’s law in our country that is affecting our country.
Lawlessness and disobedience
Most of our kids don’t remember or were not alive when debates about the Ten Commandments were occurring in this country, but I remember it was my generation that rebelled against the monuments of God’s law. As I recall, it was the atheists that were the initiators of this mission, because they don’t believe in God. Free love and the hippie movement were also accepted by some of the population and are now standardized in our relationships in various ways. Abortion also was debated and now we have legal abortion for the rights of the mother and against the rights of the baby. The drug trade and drug usage prospered, homosexuals started to come out of the closet.
I believed in a government separation of church and state.
I went to an Episcopal church for a couple of years in my early teens.
The Church I attended was hit by lightning and burned up. It coincided with a Gay/effeminate Rector taking over the position at about the same time that the church had invested in a new organ. I noticed the new rector because he swished down the aisle and I thought he was weird, but at the time I did not know about homosexuality in any form. Clueless! When my family attended this church on many Sundays both my brother and I would get nauseated and have to leave early. It was a real symptom. Either something was wrong with me and my brother, or the church. Well, my brother and I did not get struck by lightning or burn up. So obviously something was wrong with the church. Neither did the rector. The fact is I can’t remember if I didn’t have that same symptom before the new rector. Maybe it meant that God does not approve of a homosexual leading the church. I cannot say for sure. Maybe God did not approve of the church itself. I highly doubt the organ was the problem, but it also burned in the church fire. Maybe God didn’t like the model of the organ.
We ought to regard and erect the monuments of God’s Law
to remind the humans and angels about
the Ten Commandments
that God designed
so that our children and other generations to follow
might have the chance to marry.
I have read a lot of the bible but I have not read the whole bible. I have compared the gospels for a number of reasons and I have chosen whom I believe. The Gospel of John. I am not positive in my conclusions to the 100 percentile, but He makes sense to me. I cannot say that the things told in the other 3 gospels did not occur, but does that make it true and I guess by that I mean the content and the conclusions made by the three synoptic gospel writers and all of their quotes attributed to Jesus.
The Gospel of John gives details that are not present in the other three gospels. He names names of the people in his gospel as if he knew them and was a witness. He makes sense. Jesus doesn’t come off as a fruit cake or a tyrant in this gospel. The other three gospels make Jesus sound like a lunatic and I don’t believe them for that cause. I think he was preceded and shadowed by lunatics and copycats.
Think about the coverup of the assassination of JFK. It is similar to what happened to Jesus except that JFK did not say he was the Messiah. He did have a message though and he paid dearly for it.
I do know that when I started to compare the gospels and write about it, it seemed to stir up a lot of controversy. That was not my intent. Maybe it is just coincidence, but I don’t think it is. I think it is a real threat to the establishment of religion, but that was not my intent either,
but it is scary to see how deceptive the clergy have been.
I think it should be a human right to worship whom you believe.
I do not believe I have the right to kill, maim, or force others to believe what I believe. But I do have the right to express my beliefs. It is a human right, just like African Americans have the right to work in public businesses, worship, eat, sleep, drink, marry, drink from a public water fountain, buy a house in any neighborhood, get loans, own a business, and go to a public school or public college without hindrance because of their race.
I do not go to their bedrooms because it is private.
It is none of my business what they do there.
It is between them and God
and whether they believe or not is between them and God.
1 Corinthians 6:9
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate,
nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
Who is this referring to? Obviously not mankind
The bible says that the effeminate do not inherit the kingdom of God …..
who determines that measure of manliness that does inherit the kingdom of God?
Mitt Romney? George Bush? Billy Graham? Joel Olsteen? The BGEA? Ted Nugent?
The Secret Service? The Jesuits? Putin? Hillary Clinton? The Swiss Guard?
I suspect that the effeminate are the cowards
that aid and abet that power
that abuses mankind.
That is why Revelation says:
Revelation 18:4
And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
By remaining you empower the enemy of mankind and that is cowardly,
which is effeminate.
It is not how manly or feminine you are,
but whether you are an abuser without remorse of your fellow human
like a Nazi.
Here is a site you should listen to and hear. Has quite a few you tubes worthy of contemplating about the Roman Catholic Church and other subjects:
Stephen Fry dismantles the Roman Catholic Church
“……Do you know who would be the last person ever to be accepted as the Prince of the church? The Galilean carpenter. That Jew. They would kick him out before he tried to cross the threshhold. He would be so ill at ease in the church…..”
————————————-
============
“The Roman Catholic Church faces permanent disruption and banishment in at least five countries if it does not comply with ten “non-negotiable measures” by September 15, 2012, according to a global coalition of
survivors of church rape and torture.”
Catholic Church Faces Disruption and Banishment
as Irish Cardinal Set to Resign
by Kevin Annett
Are Human Rights
the same or different
than Moral Rights?
I don’t know.
God gave us the choice to believe Him or not to believe.
God has the right to judge us however he sees fit to do so as a country and individually. He created us.
His standard is written about in the bible and it is up to each of us individually to decide and make the choices that please him or displease him.
It is a high standard if you include the other books of the Old Testament as well as the other books of the New Testament.
The Ten Commandments are pretty basic though.
Our country was born by invading this continent with lots of different peoples that escaped from other countries of all different religions and races.
Our government is supposed to represent the people that are here.
That happens to include homosexuals because they are human, as far as I know.
Human rights. What does that mean?
It means if you are human you should be able to enjoy the same rights that other humans have legally.
I believe that includes marriage,
but not sodomy.
Privacy is a human right. Sex is a privacy right.
I’m not sure about that,
but it makes sense to me.
I don’t believe it was intended by God for people to be homosexual, but obviously it was a possibility. I don’t think He approves of homosexuality or any other sin. Did God intend for marriage to be between a man and a man? No, I don’t think so since He doesn’t approve of sodomy, but it was a possibility. The bible says that God will deal with sodomites. It is not my business what happens in their bedroom. It is between them and God. My sins are not their sins, and visa-versa. Unless of course done in the public eye.
What is public?
Well, if our government and religious institutions are disobeying our privacy rights that might include what we do in the privacy of our own homes via computers, the internet, tv, telephone
and anything wired electronically, etc.
Are babies not human?
Do they have the right to live?
They can’t speak till they learn to speak and they in fact are dependent on their human mothers womb until they are designed in the womb
created by God
so shouldn’t they be protected by humans and their human rights
since they are human too and so that they may enjoy the right to marry?
How about children?
They have a right not to be sexually abused by their teachers and the clergy so that they might enjoy the right to marry and not be screwed up in their future relationships and marriage. The clergy should be forthright and offer assistance and openness of their accounts and records
instead of hiding and stalling.
Do the right thing.
It is a human right,
unless you are not human.
========================
If homosexuality is a learned trait then I leave that to Our Father and Jesus to heal the person of this trait when He decides is the right time for that particular individual. Same goes for a Hindu or a Buddhist, etc. Our Father reaches a person however and whenever that He does. I don’t think forcing the religion of Christianity upon another person by using bully tactics like Haarp or other facilities to cause mayhem and earthquakes (which I believe is occurring now) is the right way. If God Himself intervenes that’s His business!!!!! But I know that lately our government and other governments are using these places to scare and intimidate people.
I can’t say positively that HAARP is responsible for the tsunami/earthquake in Japan last year, but it seems highly likely and should be investigated.
But if it was a judgement from God then what did it mean?
Here are some interesting coincidences that were occurring at that particular time as far as I know in Japan involving the Pope, The Neocatechumenal Way, Roman Catholic leaders and the Japanese people. I’m sure this is just the tip of the iceberg but nevertheless ought to be scrutinized. Please read:
Japan Quakes after Confirmation of the Neocatechumenal Way
Maybe the power that is used at places like HAARP have been around longer than we know.The reason I say that is because of what happened at Yodfat. Please read:
Josephus and His Footprints
Using bully tactics like keeping files on every person in the country to blackmail them, coercing them, is DIS-GRACEFUL. Our government should not be doing this to anyone and it seems that they are, from what I have witnessed and written about in my posts.
It is that kind of business that in essence is a Disgraceful Force that might incite Our Father to intervene such as occurred at Sodom and Gomorah.
Things are pretty rotten in America and the world
and have been declining for a long time.
Why?
I believe we have misinterpreted our bibles.
I also believe we have misinterpreted the signs,
partially because of the powers and those that wield them
who want us to misinterpret these signs.
I do not have any power over any one so I am not responsible for what is happening in our country and abroad, nor do I want to have that power. But I am speaking out and at this time still have a right to voice my opinion and display what I have uncovered over the internet and what I have learned as a believer in God and Jesus written about in the Gospel of John.
I came to those conclusions by reading the bible and comparing the gospels and comparing them to the Old Testament.
and disregarding what is obviously fraudulent and maniacal.
The Fruits of the Vatican
Mitt Romney’s 2006 Rally Against Gay Marriage
Pope Benedict XVI and His Power of Suggestion
Obviously, my beliefs do affect how I react to human rights, people in general, religion and government.
If these facilities are using their power to incite, coerce, create signs such as earthquakes, tsunamis, the right to earn money or inhibiting buying and selling, behavior modification via electronic devices or anything wired to force people to accept a religion or belief or behave in a bad way then I would say they are INHUMANE. I would say they who are doing this obviously don’t agree with humans having human rights and are waging terrorism against the public. If that is true then a homosexual married couple might be at risk from those that are against this human right and humans in general.
Case in point:
Cracks in the Washington Post story on Romney’s ‘pranks’ emerge
A question emerges in reading the Washington Post piece on Mitt Romney today: How can Romney’s old pal Stu White tell the Washington Post that he has “long been bothered by the Lauber incident” — and then later admit to ABC News that he was “not present for the prank” and “was not aware of it until this year when he was contacted by the Washington Post”?
Romney Friend Stu White Says Campaign Wants Him to Counter Prank Accusations
“One former classmate and old friend of Romney’s – who refused to be identified by name – said there are “a lot of guys” who went to Cranbrook who have “really negative memories” of Romney’s behavior in the dorms, behavior this classmate describes as “like Lord of the Flies.”
The classmate believes Romney is lying when he claims to not remember it.
“It makes these fellows [who have owned up to it] very remorseful. For [Romney] not to remember it? It doesn’t ring true. How could the fellow with the scissors forget it?” the former classmate said.
In a radio interview Thursday morning,
Romney offered an apology for the pranks,
but said that “homosexuality” was never on his mind”
==============
Which reminds me of what God said to Abraham when Abraham took his son Isaac to Mt. Moriah to sacrifice him.
After Abraham had built an altar and had bound his son and was about to kill him in the act of sacrifice,
God intervened and told Abraham not to kill his son and said
That sacrificing Abraham’s son Isaac was never on his mind.
Then Abraham found a ram with its horns caught in the bushes
which God had provided.
Then Abraham sacrificed the ram/lamb (depending on which bible version you read) instead.
I’m sorry and need to apologize
for the above statement:
I made a mistake because I went back to read about Abraham and Isaac and what I had written that God had said (that sacrificing Isaac was never on his mind) is not true. I don’t know how that happened honestly, but God blessed Abraham for his fear of God and his willingness to offer Isaac his only son. I really thought I had read the above but now I cannot find it.
Please read:
Genesis 22
9 And they came to the place which God had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood.
10 And Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.
11 And the angel of the Lord called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he said, Here am I.
12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him:
for now I know that thou fearest God,
seeing thou hast not withheld thy son,
thine only son from me.
13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son.
14 And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of the Lord it shall be seen.
15 And the angel of the Lord called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time,
16 And said, By myself have I sworn, saith the Lord, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son:
17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;
18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice.
But what about Ishmael? Wasn’t he also Abraham’s son? Hmmm. I guess from this God did not consider that Ishmael was Abraham’s son.
Maybe because God knew something not revealed?
Still I know that we do make mistakes in God’s name and in the name of Jesus as I have demonstrated so personally. Sorry!
Please read:
Binding of Isaac
“While it is often imagined that Isaac was a small child, some sources claim he was an adult (noting that Jews are considered adults at age 13). The Talmudic sages teach that Isaac was thirty-seven, likely based on the next biblical story, which is of Sarah’s death at 127 (she was ninety when Isaac was born). Bishop Ussher’s chronology would place Isaac at about 20 years of age.”
Genesis 22:14 states that it occurred at “the mount of the LORD”: in 2 Chronicles 3:1; Psalm 24:3; Isaiah 2:3 & 30:29; and Zechariah 8:3, the Bible seems to identify the location of this event as the hill on which Solomon was said to later build the Temple, now known as the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.[c
Obviously, people jumped the gun
and made some horrible mistakes
in the name of God and in the name of Jesus
and do the same now!
———————
John 8:57-59
57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?
58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you,
Before Abraham was, I am.
59 Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.
For the longest time I have tried to figure out what Jesus was trying to communicate when he said in the Gospel of John:
” Verily, verily, I say unto you,
Before Abraham was, I am.”
Is this what he meant? The reason I say that is because the Temple Mount was built on this site where the event spoken about in Genesis 2:2 occurred with Abraham and his son Isaac!
I even thought maybe the exodus of the hebrews led by Moses from Egypt might have occurred before the event spoken about on the Mount where Abraham and Isaac made their sacrifice, but now it is quite possible that Jesus in the Gospel of John was talking about the event with Abraham and Isaac on that same location.
=====================
Communication between humans is tough sometimes. I noticed through experience that men have a tough time communicating with each other where as women have an easier time communicating. Men are imperfect that way. Women on the other hand are more emotional and tend to be imperfect that way.
Even angels were imperfect.
We humans and angels were made with flaws for a purpose. It is our nature to be imperfect and until God perfects all of us we have to cope with those imperfections in ourselves, each other and the others,
because who knows if God will decide to turn the tables and when.
In any case, we should try to persuade our peers, clergy, friends and neighbors, families, and our government to do what is right.
Just because we are fighting terrorism does not mean we should do the same and become terrorists ourselves. Believe me we will win the war on terrorism if we fight the war
the right way with integrity and mercy!
How we go about doing it is just as important as accomplishing it. Murdering each other, wire tapping each other, raping and pillaging, invading each other’s bedrooms, intentional disinformation, blackmailing each other, vexing people, impersonating another person, stealing and robbing, starving people, leaving an individual helpless and unable to protect themselves by disarming them, prohibiting each other in inhumane ways is the wrong way to attain human rights and it is the wrong way to change a person’s belief, spirit, and heart.
Lawlessness vs Lawlessness = Lawlessness
Lawlessness + Lawlessness = Lawlessness
which is in essence
war.
Are we at war with God or OG?
Opinion: On gay marriage, Latinos agree with Obama
OBAMA’S GAY MARRIAGE HEAD FAKE
By Roger Stone
“Once Gay Americans are through celebrating President Barack Obama’s “personal” support of Gay marriage equality, they will learn that Obama’s “evolution” changes nothing. Obama’s new position is a bullshit cop-out.
This comes on the heels of an cynical Obama campaign pirouette where Team Obama trotted out first Secretary of State Hillary Clinton then Vice President “Crazy” Joe Biden to say they support gay marriage and imply that the President would too–after the election.
Now, incredibly, Obama says Gay marriage is a state issue. That’s what they used to say about abortion and before that, slavery. Now Obama tells us that gay couples should be able to marry but he doesn’t believe they have a right to do so. Obama would leave the question to the states–in other words -the status quo. This is like saying that public schools ought to be integrated but if the people of Mississippi disagree, well he says, “let the states decide” …
===================================
By the way, what is the 2nd Commandment
of the Ten Commandments?
What is wrong with saying
“do unto others as you would have them do unto you?”
There are always going to be extremes on any issue. I don’t think we should make determinations of any issues on that basis,
otherwise I would suggest outlawing marriage for heterosexuals.
==================================
Biden apologizes to Obama for marriage controversy
uh huh.
The Trickery and Treachery of Mitt Romeny
WATCH TAMRON HALL GO NUTS
“What I am asking about is how the campaign has handled this situation, how he handled the Colorado reporter, how he handled same-sex marriage where
he said he agrees with gay parents be able to adopt,
but he does not agree with same-sex marriage? “
That’s a misnomer.
Homosexuals are good enough to raise kids
but not good enough to be married!
Does Mitt Romney not like orphans, kids, and homosexuals?
Why?
————————————
May be Mitty Romney shavout.
Mitt Romney’s 2006 Rally Against Gay Marriage
This man is sinister, sick, demented,
and speaks in dark sentences!
Romney’s lame response on bullying allegations
Adam Lambert Discusses Gay Rights Anthem “Outlaws Of Love”
What Romney can accomplish at Liberty University
Sometimes looks are deceiving and sometimes they aren’t.
He reminds me of George Ganswein
the Pope Benedict’s Secretary
the man who dresses the Pope.
Romney apologizes for high school ‘teasing’
=================
It is okay if you’re gay … Stop Bullying Now!
The times we are living in are treacherous and the leaders we have in our government and religious institutions are as confused as we are because of the treachery and need our help and prayers. We should try to obey the laws of the country we live in as best we can and hopefully all of us can get through the deceit and treachery eventually.
Ted Nugent and CBS Playing Hardball
My first challenge is for Chris Matthews, The Bush Family, Jesse Ventura, Hollywood, Mel Gibson, CIA, the Mob, the Pope (Pope Benedict and his brother George Ratzinger, and their devotee Ganswein), the Vatican and their assassins, the Cardinals from Tarcisio Pietro Evasio Cardinal Bertone on down, the Jesuits, the Secret Service, President Obama, the Clintons, the Nixons, the Grahams and the BGEA, NBC. ABC, CBS News, MSNBC and all their affiliates and owners of them, the Kissingers and the Hearsts, the Rockerfellers, the State Department, anyone and everyone who has written a book about JFK and their publishers (such as Kenneth O’Donnell and David Powers) , the Warren Commission, Rick Warren, the Saddlebacks and The Chief Priests and the Legion, the Evangelicals, The RCC, the Q Source, the Presidential Museums and the School Book Depository Museum, The Department of Parks and Recreation, the Labor Department, Congress, The Senate, the US Military, Wikipedia (Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales and their workers),
and all those women who had affairs with JFK
I challenge anyone to find a picture of
President John F. Kennedy
having extramarital sex!
There is a new book being touted by the Press, in particular Chris Matthews of Hardball, about an affair that supposedly occurred for 18 months of JFK’s administration until his death with an intern at the White House. Jacqueline related his fondness for baths with rubber ducks. Now this ex-intern Mimi Alford says she took baths with JFK and his rubber ducks. How original! She also went to the same girls school as Jackie. What a coincidence.
Chris Matthews Explains JFK’s Affairs: He Was Able To ‘Understand People’s
Feelings And Not Be Moved’
“Part of it that’s indefensible is his tone of detachment, his ability to understand the feelings of those around him, and in fact track them and manipulate them, whether it’s Curtis LeMay or it’s his wife. I mean, his amazing ability to understand people’s feelings and not be moved by them at all. I think the word that’s been used recently is “heedless.” Cold detachment.
And the other part of it is the compartmentalization of his life where he could have what seems to be — if you’ve listened to all these tapes that have come out — a full marriage. Discussions about emotions and life, the normal things that most married couples think of as marriage, that sharing of emotions and life. And, yet, having these other compartments with these other women at the same time. He was able to keep them sealed off from one another in a way that was almost inhuman.”
Sounds like Bill Clinton! But Chris Matthews wants you to buy his book instead of Mimi’s!
“Matthews writes that he found an overlooked passage on White House tapes in which Kennedy confesses to his role in the death of South Vietnam President Ngo Dinh Diem in a coup that took place in November 1963 — less than three weeks before Kennedy’s own death.”
LBJ and Eugene McCarthy on the
Assassination of Dgo Dinh Diem
“President Johnson: But, they started with me on Diem, you remember?
Eugene McCarthy: Yeah.
President Johnson: That he was corrupt and he ought to be killed. So we killed him. We all got together and got a goddamm bunch of thugs and we went in and assassinated him. Now, we’ve really had no political stability since then.
McCarthy: Yeah.”
WHO ARE THEY?
JFK’s Memoir Dictation on the Assassination of Diem
“President Kennedy: Opposed to the coup was General Taylor, the Attorney General, Secretary McNamara to a somewhat lesser degree, John McCone, partly because of an old hostility to Lodge which causes him to lack confidence in Lodge’sjudgement, partly as a result of a new hostility because Lodge shifted his station chief; in favor of the coup was State, led by Averell Harriman, George Ball, Roger Hilsman supported by Mike Forrestal at the White House.”
I guess by State he means The State Department
Lodge is said by JFK. Inserted in writing, but not said by JFK Henry Cabot Lodge JR.
He just says LODGE I think. So Lodge could be something like state. Inserted was CIA before station chief. Lodge was ambassador to South Vietnam so I guess he was able to decide who was station chief of CIA? Odd that an ambassador has that power. I do think this recording is important. To know what JFK meant by Lawge/Lodge/Large would be helpful. I won’t assume it is what the transcriber inserted putting the meaning and maybe the blame on the wrong person. So the Department of State runs the CIA or just has representatives in the CIA. So what is a station chief?
Is he talking about the Press? The CIA? It is hard to know!
In any case it seems that this tape
needs a great deal of
interpretation!!!!!
Henry Cabot Lodge Jr :Later career
He was re-appointed ambassador to South Vietnam by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965, and served thereafter as Ambassador at Large (1967–1968) and Ambassador to West Germany (1968–1969). In 1969, he was appointed by President Richard Nixon to serve as head of the American delegation at the Paris peace negotiations, and he served occasionally as envoy to the Holy See from 1970 to 1977.[15]
“According to international protocol, ambassadors and ambassadors-at-large are officially styled and addressed as His/Her Excellency, or Mr. Ambassador. The title may be abbreviated in official correspondence as H.E.[1]“
“Then there is Sir Andrew McLeod Brooks Large son of Major General Stanley Eyre Large. Sir Andrew McLeod Brooks Large was Deputy Governor of the Bank of England, and a member of its Monetary Policy Committee from September 2002 to January 2006.”
Chester Bowles Selected as a foreign policy adviser in 1960 to Senator John F. Kennedy, Bowles went on to act as chairman of the platform committee for the Democratic National Convention that year. President Kennedy appointed Bowles to the post of Under Secretary of State in 1961.
In early December 1961 he was replaced by George Ball as Undersecretary, a consequence of his perceived failure to adequately fulfill his duties as an administrator in the Department of State, and his earlier leaking of his opposition to the Bay of Pigs Invasion. His removal was made part of a broader bureaucratic reshuffle, which became known as the‘Thanksgiving Day Massacre.’ In December 1961 he was named the President’s Special Representative and Adviser on African, Asian, and Latin American Affairs, and Ambassador at Large.
“Ball was one of the architects of Cable 243,
and a supporter of the 1963 overthrow of South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem.
“He often used the aphorism (perhaps originally coined by Ian Fleming in
“Nothing propinks like propinquity,”
later dubbed the Ball Rule of Power.[6]
It means that the more direct access you have to the president, the greater your power, no matter what your title actually is.
Ball was an avowed socioeconomic elitist and an advocate of free trade, multinational corporations and the latters’ theoretical ability to neutralize what he considered to be “obsolete” nation states. Prior to and following his ambassadorship, Ball was employed by Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb. He was a senior managing director at Lehman Brothers until his retirement in 1982.[7] Ball was among the first North American members of the Bilderberg Group, attending every meeting except for one before his death.[8]“
GeorgeWildmanBall
7th U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.
From Bowles to Ball…this is mighty interesting!
(in a “upside-down”/ “went to another place” biblical kind-of-way)
“Lodge” could be also referring to
The Skull and Bones Society
and whoever is in charge of that society.
I don’t have any idea about that group of people! But since Averell Harriman was a member (It’s in Wikipedia) it might be related. I don’t know about the rest of the men mentioned. Maybe that is false info.
“The society’s alumni organization, which owns the society’s real property and oversees the organization, is the Russell Trust Association“
From 1978 onward, business of the Russell Trust Association was handled by its single trustee, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. partner John B. Madden. Madden started with Brown Brothers Harriman in 1946, under senior partner Prescott Bush.
I believe this is the man in the you tubes of JFK at the airport in Dallas Texas a half hour before the assassination who is keenly observing the events there such as when Jackie Kennedy receives her puppet, when Jackie Kennedy jabs Roy Kellerman etc.
You can find that you tube on my posts about the
Covenant with Many
Rev. Wilkerson, Evangelicalism and
the Covenant With Many
from this you tube:
PRESIDENT KENNEDY’S ARRIVAL AT LOVE FIELD IN DALLAS ON 11/22/63
Testing Sargent Shriver:
Vietnam and Assassinations
Shriver says it was the CIA.
Chris Matthews On John F. Kennedy: New Book Pulls Back Curtain On
‘Ask Not’ Speech, Nixon Debates And More
Chris Matthews seems to have swallowed the myths of JFK’s detractors.
Of course, he is a part of the PRESS and it is his job,
his religion
and his paycheck on the line!
Chris Matthews ’67 Returns to Alma Mater
He offers a whole new meaning to the
HOLY CROSS.
Mission StatementWe, the Jesuit Community at the College of the Holy Cross, shaped by the Gospel, the Ignatian Exercises, and our encounters with the people of God, and missioned here by the Society of Jesus, embrace our responsibility to Holy Cross as living representatives of the College’s traditions and identity. |
Chris Matthews ’67
“How did Holy Cross prepare Matthews for his career? In his words, “We argued about what we really believed about life, about God, about truth, about right and wrong, and how or if we could ever get to the bottom of it all. I still pursue those arguments, just on a larger stage.”
“Matthews poses with one of his professors during his time at Holy Cross, James F. Powers, professor emeritus of history. Both in his memoir Now, Let Me Tell You What I Really Think, and in his televised visit to campus commemorating the 40th anniversary of the Kennedy assassination, Matthews made specific mentions of Powers. It was in Professor Powers’ Western Civilization class on Nov. 22, 1963 that Matthews and others first heard the news flash about the president’s shooting, and like most of his generation, he vividly recalls the details of that moment, down to Professor Powers’ response.”
Gee I wonder if James Powers knows David Powers
the one that co-wrote
Johnny, We Hardly Knew Ye: Memories of John Fitzgerald Kennedy
with Kenneth O’Donnell and Joe McCarthy
???
So now I am supposed to believe that JFK took baths with an intern with rubber duckies and that JFK compartmentalized his affairs and whatever else Chris Matthews (who now is also a Psychologist) says about JFK.
Why doesn’t Chris Matthews tell us why Jackie changed her voice into Marilyn Monroe
or maybe Marilyn Monroe exchanged bodies with Jackie Kennedy spoken about in the you tube:
Rivals: Jackie Kennedy Vs Marilyn Monroe (part 2) 1/2
Curiouser and curiouser there are tapes of Jackie Kennedy talking about having flour up to her elbows…Reminds me of Hillary Clinton!
Did Hillary go to the same girl’s school as Jackie and Mimi? I think it is called Miss Porter’s School.
I wonder if it is not also a Jesuit prep school?
Chris Matthews book is called Jack Kennedy: Elusive Hero.
“As Matthews writes, “I found a fighting prince never free of pain, never far from trouble, never accepting the world he found, never wanting to be his father’s son. He was a far greater hero than he ever wished us to know.””
So now JFK did not want to be his father’s son?
DID JFK tell him this?
Or did he hear it from conversations that Jackie Kennedy/ONASSIS left behind?
Chris Matthews of Hard BALL make up and all
”Grinning like a Cheshire Cat”
is selling tickets for his book signing in Dallas, Texas
at their Sixth Floor Museum in May of this year.
Doesn’t MSNBC pay Chris Matthews enough?
Or is this “JFK propaganda tour” part of his job for the press.
“Government of the people, by the people, for the people”
now is
“Government of the press, by the press, for the press” and the clergy
that run them.
==============================
My second challenge is to those mentioned above
and anyone for that matter
to show me a video of President John F. Kennedy
making his infamous Press/Secret Society Speech
to the Press at a Press/Correspondents dinner!
JFK Blows The Whistle on Secret Societies!
I do have a video/you-tube of JFK exchanging something that seemed important and meaningful by the way he passed it to someone
at Love Field Airport in Dallas a half hour before he was killed on these posts.
My bet is that it was that speech!
Makes sense to me!
At the bottom of this post are snapshots of that exchange from my post
CBS News and JFK Part 3
Barack Obama at Correspondents Dinner tonight talked about the Free Press.
Ha Ha.
If you check out these posts with their you tubes below you will see what he means in an IRONIC Way,
of course,
THEY OWN HIM!
Soon enough he ‘ll be saying Massa,
but only after he fulfills their agenda.
What has been occurring in the Press and President Obama’s characterization of their freedom reminds me of the movie
Tropic Thunder with Robert Downey Jr .
“I know who I am! I’m a dude, playing a dude, disguised as another dude.”
Talked about eating dogs…pit bulls in particular and comparing the taste to Hockey moms. I wonder what he meant?
Kind of odd.
The press laughed so they must know.
By the way, anyone know what BG:L is?
(“First they came…)
JacQueline Kennedy and then Came Lot
CBS News and JFK
CBS News and JFK Part 2
CBS News and JFK Part 3
CBS News and JFK (The first few hours)
JFK Assassination, CBS News and the Second Vatican Council
exchange picture 6
exchange picture 7 -Jackie starts to make a signal with her hand while JFK gives the man in glasses the black flat objectexchange picture 8 Jackie makes signal on her collar as man in background and Lady Bird (I think) are watching
Exchange 8 picture and hand signal on collar by Jackie Kennedy
Many more articles below about the differences
between the gospels which I believe is the
sum of the equation
AND
why President Kennedy was murdered!
Here is the CBS Press in their latest explosive maniacal rhetoric
drunken on their own petard:
Ted Nugent explodes at notion he’s not a moderate
They omit 10 minutes of an interview with Ted Nugent and instead show him losing his temper to prove how cool and idiotic they are as if they succeeded somehow. There is something definitely wrong with the food and drink that the press are serving to the US and to themselves. Jeff Glor from CBS This Morning is ridiculous. Then to top it off Romney’s spokesmen response says that there is no excuse for the lack of civility or words to that effect.
Did the press intentionally bait Ted Nugent in the ten minutes not aired? I don’t know,
but I do know that tension is building and the Press seem to be enjoying it way too much
in a mir-iad of ways. And they have the Secret Service to back them up.
They are inane.
Please read:
CBS’s Jeff Glor stunned by Ted Nugent’s outburst
Jeff Glor did not look stunned to me! He looked unabashedly and unashamedly content!
I think Ted Nugent loves kids, loves freedom, and was honestly upset and blew up. The press and the Secret Service obviously goaded him!
A lot of that going on these days! It stinks!
They may in fact be responsible for his kidney stone. Kidney stones are very painful. Sometimes the body covers the pain, but the body still reacts to the invasion. I think the Press, Jeff Glor and the Secret Service should apologize to Ted Nugent and pay him for their mindless invasive phobic zealotry by using sleazy bully tactics IMO and the damages that they may have caused him physically, emotionally intending to belittle him by airing his outburst. He did apologize, but they did not!
His outburst was inconsequential
till he ended up in a hospital!
Ted Nugent Speaks out Against Obama and Gun Control
I agree with Ted Nugent about gun control. I do not trust my government to protect me. When they want to take away my right to bear arms I know that they are against me. It was not a lone civilian that killed JFK, please read
Rev. David Wilkerson, Billy Graham and Evangelicalism to see why.
I would not even declaw a cat at the expense of my furniture, unless of course if I loved my furniture more than my cats which I don’t. I do love my cats. As long as there are criminals and predators I want the right to protect myself, my kids, my loved ones, my home, and my property. If they want to disarm the people of the United States then I suggest they start at the top and work their way down beginning with the President and his family, the Secret Service, the Press, the Mob, the CIA, Russia, The Jesuits, The RCC and their protectors, the Armed Forces, the Police, Judges, Senators, Armed Guards, etc.
You get my drift;)
New Swiss Guards Swear To Give Up Lives To Protect Pope
Whose lives are they talking about?
I thought the Swiss were always neutral.
We are done for.
Who the heck designed their uniforms?
What I want to know is can they dance?
Dances of the soldiers
Matthews vs. Gun Owner: “You’re Carrying A G-D D-mn Gun!”
But at his first Press dinner Barack Obama said that only Michelle had the right to bare/bear her arms. She does have pretty arms, but I think he meant more than that. I think he was indirectly referring to the assassination of President Kennedy and the Press and their involvement in that event. Still I wish he would shoot straight so that the American people would know what he meant. It is disconcerting, to say the least, and very close to doublespeak. I don’t trust that kind of communication! I would rather listen to Ted Nugent who does shoot straight because I do know what he means! As with the pitt bull comment mentioned above by President Obama at his last press dinner went over my head and seemed to be perverse. Not a good sign. Even Michelle Obama seemed to be confused. That is why I think the Press own him.
These are hard times and it is predicted in our bibles that
even our loved ones will be influenced by evil.
Brokaw: White House Correspondents’ dinner hurting the press
“If there’s ever an event that separates the press from the people they’re supposed to be serving, symbolically, it is that one.” he said…..
“That’s another separation between what we’re supposed to be doing and what the people expect us to be doing….”
What does the press think the people expect and what does the press think they are supposed to do?
==============================
Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
Alice first encounters the Cheshire Cat at the Duchess‘s house in her kitchen, and then later outside on the branches of a tree, where it appears and disappears at will, engaging Alice in amusing but sometimes vexing conversation. The cat sometimes raises philosophical points that annoy or baffle Alice. It does, however, appear to cheer her up when it turns up suddenly at the Queen of Hearts‘ croquet field, and when sentenced to death baffles everyone by having made its head appear without its body, sparking a massive argument between the executioner and the King and Queen of Hearts about whether
something that does not have a body can indeed be beheaded.
Rev. David Wilkerson, Billy Graham and Evangelicalism
ElectroMagnetic and Population Control
Gay Marriage Is a Human Right
The most trusted man in America
By Richard Galant, CNN
My Blogs:
Which compare the Synoptic gospels to the Gospel of John and the Assassination of JFK and other subjects.
Merangue’s Blog
THE TURRET
Blue Skies
Eye of a Needle
The Keep
Nellie Connally: Did Nellie Shoot John Connally?
Nov. 10, 1997 c-span
“Former Congressman Jake Pickle introduces this one hour discussion from the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library, Austin Texas”
“Well, welcome to the um Nellie Connally homecoming.
This is her home town and uh thank goodness she has bloomed where she was pottied and we’re proud of it.
Now, I’m always a bit nervous when I introduce my dear UT classmate, Nellie Connally, because she’s got the last word, but whose friendship I have enjoyed for over 60 years.
Nellie Brill Connally of Austin has great charm and personality. We elected her our UT Sweetheart and, of course, elected Big John as President of the student body at the same time. That was when we were young and twenty and campus elections were bi-partison, honest, and very important.
Intermingled with her charm and happy laughter is a streak of impishness and even devil(?), if you misbehaved. She does not take herself too seriously and thinks you shouldn’t either, therefore we have all learned to be on our guard. Maybe that’s why Nellie and I have gotten along so well. We understand and we’re sort of kindred spirits in that regard.
Now, I’ve always been proud to have been John’s Law Fraternity Brother, his business partner at KVET and his best man at their wedding. I’ve always told Big John that I’m still the best man, but he didn’t always agree with me on that. (laughter)
During the early years of World War 2, Nellie sold radio spots for station KTVC
(The radio station that was bought/managed by Lady Bird Johnson in 1943)
in the brown building. She knew many of the bidness stores on Congress Avenue and she knew all the merchants on E 6th Street. She would go into the stores unbelievably ?great?, shuck the owners under the chin, give him a little hug, and leave the the business with a contract for spots for 6 months. She was so good she could sell Saul Ginsberg a ticket to the PLO (?Bank?/?Bake?) and she, and she can sell Texas (?Pryor?) haircut.
Well, what a lifetime of great achievement and honor John and Nellie have enjoyed. John was founder of Radio Station KVET, administrative assistant and personal advisor to the …?…Center to Lyndon Johnson, Secretary to the US Navy, Governor of Texas, Secretary of the US Treasury, and served on the board of dozens of corporations.
Now, some say that Nellie lived in the shadow of Big John. Well, there’s nothin wrong with that Nellie, we all have lived under the shadow of Big John. And to be very blunt about it, when we say we’ve all lived under the shadow, that includes LBJ, ?biz? Barnes, Larry Temple, George Christian, Price Daniels, Joe Kilgore, Mac Myers, Julian Reed, Howard Rhodes, John Mobley, and me, especially.
Of those of us whose know this couple best think that John lived in the shadow of Nellie’s charm.
Nellie has always been
our First Lader
[Oppressor-Lucifer snake that befuddles, baffles, confuses, etc]
and leader to all
of these glory years.
Nellie also knows what it is to have position, power and resources
and lose the resources,
but she and John took it on the chin with class, and dignity, and poise and we all love you for that Nellie and we have been proud to see you come back and go forward in
[?haver?] (babble/nonsense?) time
and we’re proud of you.
(applause)
Nellie is the unstoppable Grand Dame of Texas public life. She still carries on. Listen, she was a driving force and inspiration that recently created The Nellie Connally Breast Cancer Center at MD Anderson in Houston where millions of dollars have been raised to fight and help eradicate cancer. She has been given the Woman of Distinction Award for the Conis Colitis Foundation in Houston, as well as, the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation Award.
(albeit with OPM for her name and namesakes)
Tonight, she may
(Or she might not….lawyer jargon)
relive with us that heart-breaking day in Dallas, November 22nd, 63 which changed the course of world history and Nellie was there at the very center of that gut-wrenching tragedy. However, to many of her old friends here tonight, she’s is still Nellie Brill Connally of Austin,
our First Lader
[Oppressor-Lucifer snake that befuddles, baffles, confuses, etc],
the mother of John the third, Sharon, our great sculpturer, and Mark, our financier and banker, but she is still our UT Sweetheart who hadn’t changed a bit in 60 years.”
(Then Nellie Connally takes the podium)
Nellie Connally!
“I don’t know whether to thank Jake or not.
Pretty neat fella!”
“….Today, I’m gonna to read to you some notes I wrote some 30 some odd years ago. Just after we brought John home from Parkland Hospital in Dallas.
I wrote them for my children and my grand children, and others to come, in case they wanted to know how I felt during that day. They lay dormant for 30 years, I forgot all about them. I put them in a file drawer, closed the drawer, and for 30 years never thought of them. One day, I was going through the files, opened the files and I saw these papers. Strange looking papers. I pulled them out and they were these notes. If I had not known that I had written them, I would have said, “I didn’t.” If someone had asked me, “could you write?” I would have said, “No.”….”
Strange to say the least!
In another interview
when questioned she says the following:
Former Texas First Lady Nellie Connally
Q: The time passes and you discover these notes again. What made you think…you said 33 years afterward….
Nellie: Can you believe?
Q: What made you think at that time I ought to haul these out and I ought to begin to tell the story
Nellie: Well, I just wanted to read them, so I took them out to read
and I thought they were pretty accurate pretty good. You know many more things could be added but uh it would destroy the historic notes so I have because I’ve learned a lot of things the different things that uh I could would like to put in there maybe but I’m not ever gonna change em..”
—————————————————————————————–
Well, the truth probably is that those “historians” she talks about a few minutes, seconds…. later (lader?) told her they were important, so she looked for them in those files
one day
so why in the world did she go through this ridiculous explanation about accidentally finding them in her files?
If she had not known she had written them ….yet she didn’t
OR DID SHE?
she didn’t even remember them….yet she found them when she needed them for those historians that told her they were important
and she doesn’t even know if she could write…..yet she did
OR COULD SHE?
Does that make any sense?
Neither does what she says about
how she accidentally found those
strange looking papers.
She probably wanted to see what it is she wrote
(if she wrote them),
because people were curious about her role in the assassination…..
(now that the evidence is slowly being manipulated and trickled out to the public) and she knows her part in the assassination and wanted to manipulate the public.
She says she didn’t write it for the world,
but just for her kids and their kids her grandchildren etc
then why write a book?
Why get on TV and do interviews?
Those historians……IM CURIOUS
What are their names?
Are these the same guys who have hidden history from us for 40 years
that now want us to know history
or do they just want to
manipulate history and us?
“Subsequent to Governor Connally’s administration, she served as a member of the
Texas Historical Commission.”
aka
THC
sounds like a drug
So I guess she is one of those “historians”?
I call that sneaky!
In another interview she said:
“I cannot believe that the notes that I wrote have suddenly become so important.”
“I sat there and wrote what happened in that car. Not for you, not for the world,
not for history,
not because I thought I was a writer.”
=================
Here are books on internet that Nellie
authored or co-authored:
Then in that same interview she was asked :
Q: When people read the book now what do you want them to take a way from it?
and she answered;
A: Well I want them to take a way this little bit of history,
which is not happy history, but it is history and I did have my notes checked by the history department at the U. of Texas to see if it really history and they told me if I would change nothing add nothing subtract nothing, not worry about sentence structure, commas, spelling that it was history. IF I started adding, taking out or doing any of that then it was just a story so they are exactly as I wrote them that day at the Mansion for my babies.”
(not for history’s sake but for her children and their children etc would know how she felt about being in that car)
In an obituary for Nellie Connally linked below it lists what she did to sell the book:
Nellie Connally, former Texas First lady ( 1919-2006)
“ She conducted a national tour to publicize her book that featured parties in Texas, New York and Washington, along with a host of media appearances, including The TODAY Show, Larry King Live, CBS Evening News and NBC Evening News.“
My dad wrote about his life for his kids and he did not publish a book, tour the countryside appearing on talk shows and television news programs.
He typed it and gave it to his kids!
WHAT A STRANGE LOOKING PICTURE
of the “sad pink suit” and Nellie
40 or more years after the assassination!
The woman sitting behind that sad suit looks mighty proud!
WHO TOOK THIS PICTURE?
Just for her kids and their kids, huh?
===================================
Did Nellie write those notes?
===============================================
They seem scripted to me!
Later, in her story of the aftermath of the assassination of President Kennedy her son came to her little cell and insisted that she write a note to Jackie Kennedy for him to deliver in Washington DC.
Could someone have needed a sample of her handwriting to write those notes for her that she says she didn’t write,
for instance
Jackie Kennedy?
Here is a video of Nellie whose voice sounds like Jean Hill that I found recently!
In the recording, she pronounces the word “Telegram” in a funny way for a Southern Woman. Jean Hill was from Oklahoma and I believe that Nellie Connally is Texan. but the lady on the video recording talks with an English Accent especially when she says telegram. It is hard to distinguish her facial anatomy because the video is so light and faded, but I can hear the difference. It is obvious that the person acting as Nellie on the you tube is an actress
(not a very good one)
and she is mocking us.
Here is the you tube of Jean Hill to compare to the you tube of Nellie!
What they saw Jean Hill
_______
NELLIE CONNALLY’S STATEMENT TO THE PRESS ON NOVEMBER 24, 1963
(2:48-2:50/5:02 is where she says “telegram’)
As I recall,
Billy Graham also
says the word “Telegram”
like the English!
In 1959, he led his first crusade, which was in London.
Please watch this video of Billy Graham and his english accent:
Billy Graham on the Beatles (1964)
especially the end of the recording
Revelation 13:2
And the beast which I saw was like unto aleopard (camouflaged/hiding/sneaky), and his feet were as the feet of a bear (heavy footprint/mauls), and his mouth as the mouth of a lion (teeth): and the dragon gave him his power (“Q”ing), and his seat, and great authority. (Author of destruction)
===========
I think the beast is
the Synoptic Jesus authored by Q !!!
Here is another voice sample of Nellie in 1963 to compare:
LBJ and Mrs. Nellie Connally
She sounds different then the Press Statement on November 24th!
IN CONTROL,
CALM, COOL, COLLECTED, NOT WORRIED
AND THAT WAS JUST A FEW HOURS
FROM THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY
AND THE NEAR DEATH OF HER HUSBAND!
Do you suppose they got the sample of her handwriting
wrote her memories for her
and then replaced her with an actress
or brainwashed her,
or is this some form of DEMON POSSESSION?
Yes, I know it sounds odd, but so is every aspect of this time in history, the investigation, the players involved and their behavior, the witnesses, the coverup, the trickling of information and the flood of disinformation, the power shift, the results evidenced in the world today
AND AS JAKE PICKLE SAID
“because she’s got the last word!”
CAN YOU BELIEVE?
In essence,
Nellie Connally was and is the epitome of those
Secret Societies that President Kennedy tried to warn us about,
and she was his enemy all along!
Please don’t be fooled by the accolades she receives and received in her public appearances and interviews
and don’t be fooled by her charm!
Her words are chicanery!
| 840 | Small lead particles found on rug underneath left jump seat of Presidential limousine. |
The question I feel obligated to ask:
Did Nellie Connally shoot John Connally?
The Last Two Days, November 1963: 21-22
================
Please Read:
I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised
I AM THAT I AM (Part two)
Then Please Read:
The Covenant with Many
JFK Assassination, CBS News and the Second Vatican Council
CBS News and JFK (The first few hours)
CBS News and JFK
CBS News and JFK Part 2
CBS News and JFK Part 3
CBS News and JFK Part 4
CBS News and JFK Part 5
THE PARABLE OF FAITH – PART ONE
PART ONE
The other night I was watching Face Off with my daughter who loves the artistry of makeup. The show is very creative and a lot of fun to watch. The theme of the show that night was about Fears: The contestants had to create a monster from a particular fear or phobia. While inspecting the monsters that were created Tom Sevini, an American actor, stuntman, director, award-winning special effects and makeup artist and one of the judges on the shoe that night mentioned a person he knew from a famous horror movie who had scars on his neck for many years that were the result of mustard gas. He said the wounds had never healed, but remained open sores.
I challenge whoever reads this series about the mustard seed parable
to truthfully consider the possibility that this parable
is fraudulent, deceptive, and misleading!
===================
FAITH AS A GRAIN OF MUSTARD SEED
Matthew 13:31-32
31Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field:
32Which indeed is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof.
Matthew 17:14-21
14And when they were come to the multitude, there came to him a certain man, kneeling down to him, and saying,15Lord, have mercy on my son: for he is lunatick, and sore vexed: for ofttimes he falleth into the fire, and oft into the water.16And I brought him to thy disciples, and they could not cure him.17Then Jesus answered and said, O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you? how long shall I suffer you? bring him hither to me.18And Jesus rebuked the devil; and he departed out of him: and the child was cured from that very hour.19Then came the disciples to Jesus apart, and said, Why could not we cast him out?20And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.
21Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.
The disciples did not have the faith as a grain of mustard seed
to help banish the devil from the child,
yet it is only faith of a grain of mustard seed that can move mountains!
Jesus in the gospel of Matthew says that the kind of devil the disciples were attempting to banish from the child would not depart without prayer and fasting.
So their faith was not enough,
EVEN if they had faith as a grain of mustard seed!
HUGE CONTRADICTION!
The gospel of John does not include the parable of the Mustard Seed!
Why?
Because the parable is a lie!
I wonder why Jesus (in the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke) did not demonstrate this faith by MOVING/REMOVING a real mountain?
I MAINTAIN THAT THE JESUS SPEAKING IN THE GOSPELS OF MATTHEW, MARK, AND LUKE COULD NOT MOVE/REMOVE A MOUNTAIN!
What kind of mountain are they referring to?
Could this parable be referring to
Isaiah 14:12-14
12How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God:
I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
It is a great possibility that this is the mountain that the synoptic gospels are referring to in the Parable of the Mustard Seed!
Mark 4:30-32
30And he said, Whereunto shall we liken the kingdom of God? or with what comparison shall we compare it?31It is like a grain of mustard seed, which, when it is sown in the earth, is less than all the seeds that be in the earth:32But when it is sown, it groweth up, and becometh greater than all herbs, and shooteth out great branches; so that the fowls of the air may lodge under the shadow of it.
Here is an article/blog that discusses the truth about the mustard seed!
PLEASE READ!
In the Bible versus the Quran: the Mustard seed is the smallest of all the seeds on earth
The mustard seed is NOT the smallest seed on earth!
That is an out and out lie!
The World’s Smallest & Largest Seed
The authors of the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke
were either ignorant of the truth about the smallest of seeds on earth,
or they lied!
If they lied about this FACT,
what else have they lied about??????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IN answer to the man’s question as to whether the Quran is an offshoot of the bible, I would respond with a definite YES, at least THE QURAN is an offshoot of the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke!
The Jesus in the three synoptic gospels is not the true Son of God
as I have written about numerous times in most of my articles on my blogs!
Syria has begun moving its chemical weapons stockpile out of storage, U.S. warns
(Friday, July 13th, 2012)
“Syria has undeclared arsenals of sarin nerve agent, mustard gas, cyanide”
====================
Do you really think the Messiah would compare the kingdom of God to a mustard seed? The Destroyer certainly would, though!
===================
The mustard seed is not greater than all herbs!
THE HERBS OF THE Ginkgo Biloba IS
GREATER THAN THE MUSTARD HERB!
By the way the birds of the air/fowls of the air lodging in the branches of a mustard tree is a deceptive aspiration.
The birds/fowls of the air are evil spirits!
Remember the parable about faith called the Parable of the Sower where the birds eat the seed (God’s Word) that falls on stoney ground. The birds are not good and they eat the WORD of God!
FALLEN ANGELS
and PEOPLE THAT SERVE THE DECEPTION
AND SERVE THE EVIL SPIRITS
ARE THE BIRDS AND FOWLS OF THE AIR!
The parable of the Mustard Seed is an invention from a false Messiah
of the false gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke!
HE IS THE DESTROYER!
DEATH
AGAIN,
The gospel of John does not include the parable of the Mustard Seed!
Proverbs 14:12
Thereis a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.
It isn’t the size of your faith that matters. You can’t measure love…how can you measure faith? It is faith itself!
The gospel of Luke says that the seed is the Word of God….not the size of faith!
Please Read:
Luke 8:5-15
The Parable of the Mustard Seed and the Parable called The Sower and the Seed seem to be conflicting!
Many people that don’t believe in God, but have faith in themselves, have achieved great heights (good and the bad) on earth,
but nevertheless it isn’t just faith that matters,
in the end it matters in whom we believe!
Please read: I AM THAT I AM LINKED BELOW!
Please compare the synoptic gospels to each other. If you do compare them you will notice they seem to ying and yang each other in quite a few instances.
Please take note: Whether or not the author of the Gospel of Luke intended to highlight the contradictions of the synoptic gospels, often the Gospel of Luke seems to be the catalyst, at least for me, to notice the differences. Almost as if, in the agreement of events, the Gospel of Luke points to the deception in the synoptic gospels either in his addendum to the Gospels of Matthew and Mark or his diminution of the events in the Gospel of John!
The Gospel of Luke obviously was written after the Gospels of Matthew and Mark!
Then compare the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) with the Gospel of John and see the difference in the events, the personality, and the purpose of the Son of God.
You should notice that the antithesis between the Synoptic Gospels
and the Gospel of John is astounding!
The Truth about the Father and the Son does matter!
TOBE CONTINUED!
On a positive note, here is a site called Mustard Seeds which uses this name for their fantastic business to help children with Autism or PDD!
What is the smallest seed in the world?
The Parable of Faith – Part two
Pope Benedict XVI and the Mustard Tree
Parable of the Mustard Seed Part 4
Indulgences and the Parable of Usury
The Fig Tree – Blessed are the Barren
=============================
TO READ ABOUT THE TRUE MESSIAH PLEASE READ:
I AM THAT I AM (THE SIGN) – Revised
and
I Am the True Vine
Why Callest Thou Me Good?
Billy Graham and The Synoptic Dilemma: The Beast
The Grace of Anathema Maranatha
————————————————————————————–
Other Blogs of Mine: Merangue’s Blog, Blue Skies, Eye of a Needle, The Keep
Prophecy of Esaias
Revising at this time:
Parables, Isaiah, and Ashes
Matthew 13:10-17
10And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?11He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
Then why bother talking to them in parables!
Does that make any sense? Why gather people about you and talk so they don’t understand?
Isn’t that what speaking in tongues is for?
12For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.13Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.
14And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias,
which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand;
and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:
Well, that is the important thing ….to fulfill prophecy at every cost!
Even at the expense of truth!
Why would Jesus waste His time teaching people He did not want to learn from His teaching. I just can’t imagine the Son of God wasting His time in such a fashion.
Didn’t He have better things to do than that?
15For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
So the Synoptic Jesus of the Gospel of Matthew came to gather crowds about him, because he did not want to heal the people.
Synoptic Ignorance ….yea, that will keep them busy and under his spell.
He came so they would not see with their eyes?
He came so that they would not hear with their ears?
He came so that they should not understand with their heart?
He came so that they should not be converted?
He came so that He should not heal them?
Somehow, that just doesn’t seem even logical,
much less sane.
I really don’t think Jesus Christ came to trick people,
yet Matthew’s rendition of Jesus
admits to tricking the people.
Isn’t that deception!
Obviously, this was not the Messiah!
===================
16But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.
17For verily I say unto you,
That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see,
and have not seen them;
and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.
(now he his pandering)
Then the Synoptic Jesus of the Gospel of Matthew
tells the the parables of the
Sower and the Seed
and the
Wheat and the Tares:
Matthew 13:34-36
36Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house:
and his disciples came unto him, saying,
Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field.
Then the Synoptic Jesus explains the parable of the Wheat and the Tares to the disciples
because they did not seem to be blessed?
I thought they (the disciples) were blessed, because their eyes saw and their ears heard, but apparently they needed help to see and to hear, so they came to Jesus in private,
and then he explains the parable of the Wheat and Tares to them.
So was this Jesus pandering to his disciples even though their ears didn’t really hear, and their eyes didn’t really see, and their hearts didn’t really understand?
I thought he said:
16But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.
Was Matthew’s Jesus lying to his disciples?
Was the Synoptic Jesus using reverse psychology to get his disciples to admit to not understanding him and come to ask him what the parables meant?
Something is not right here!
This Synoptic Jesus contradicts himself by saying that
they had eyes to see and ears to hear unlike everyone else,
because obviously they didn’t!
Wouldn’t the real Jesus know whether they understood what he was saying
so that he would not contradict himself,
or was this Synoptic Jesus being sarcastic about his disciple’s blessedness
ie. presumed knowledge?
Somebody is trying to make Jesus look sinister
and/or his disciples look dumb.
Either way it’s a very odd!
All I can surmise from this is it doesn’t sound like Jesus Christ the Son of God…the one that gave his life for his friends. I am not saying he did not share wisdom, but why did he pretend that they knew the meaning when he knew they did not know the meaning? Why did he teach people so that they would not understand,
so he wouldn’t have to heal them?
Isn’t that insane? Isn’t that deceitful? Isn’t that evil?
I don’t think the true Jesus Christ was deceitful.
Isaiah 53:9
And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death;
because he had done no violence,
neither was any deceit in his mouth.
Deceit is deception!
OR is Isaiah insane along with Matthew
who supposedly wrote the Synoptic Gospel of Matthew, OR is it possible that someone added to the book of Isaiah?
(In any case the fact that his disciples had to get help to understand his parables when he said that they understood because they were blessed at the very least was sarcasm. Jesus in the Gospel of John was not sarcastic. I have noticed that many people have resorted to sarcasm in the years of the Obama administration even those that seemed to be on his side referring to him in terms of the Messiah by the press, Time Magazine, and even a few comedians. So far it seems that everything Obama says people have to weigh because it seems nothing he says is true. Of course usually we find out later in time because most of what he says are promises he doesn’t intend to keep, etc. It seems that Jesus of the Gospel of Matthew also had that same personality trait. Maybe the Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew was a sneaky politician. There are many examples if you read my posts that are on the subject of the gospels and especially the ones that compare the gospels.)
The Gospel of Matthew basically is saying that Jesus was deceiving and yet Isaiah says there was no deceit in his mouth.
SO which is it?
Do you believe the Gospel of Matthew on this point about Jesus,
or do you believe Isaiah?
Then whose mouth was deceiving in the Gospel of Matthew?
The DECEIVER
Please read:
Salute No Man
In my opinion, this rendition of Jesus Christ in the gospel of Matthew seems like a pompous show-off and a deceiver. I really truly believe that Jesus Christ was not a show-off. I believe Jesus Christ was sincere to the utmost and kind, and the gospel writer Matthew either misunderstood Jesus to the nth degree, or made this one up! The Synoptic version of Jesus is pretty mixed up
and I think it was done purposefully to mix us up!
I don’t believe for a minute that Jesus Christ came to ridicule men,
even the ones that did not see, and did not hear,
or have hearts to understand!
If I did believe that Jesus came so I and others would not understand or perceive, and if I believed that He came so he would not heal me and you,
then why bother learning about Him!
I wouldn’t waste my time on a false Messiah!
These Synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke)
are uncannily similar in places and seems that their goal was to diminish and overpower the gospel of John. Its apparent to me that Luke wrote his gospel after seeing John’s gospel, because Luke’s gospel is eerily antithetical to the gospel of John in many, many places, and the same goes for the gospels of Matthew and Mark!
Is it possible that there are some parts of the Synoptic Gospels that are true?
There is definitely big disagreement as to His character
His purpose,
if and when you compare it to the Gospel of John,
Which you ought to do,
because it is very telling and has been a blessing to me!
There are so many problems when you compare the Synoptic Gospels with the Gospel of John. It is also possible that Luke, by being so antithetical with the Gospel of John,
is actuality highlighting the deception in the gospels of Matthew and Mark?
Could be that the writer of the gospel of Luke was trying to point to the deception without being obvious. Then again the writer of the gospel of Luke may be so depraved that he/she relished the insertion of aberrant remarks against Jesus Christ.
One thing to keep in mind is that the people that hated Jesus were in power and people were killed for telling and writing the truth about Jesus. It is possible that the writers of the gospels had to write in ways so that we might have to search for the truth in the gospels! We are very lucky in these times to be able to write what we want to write and read what we want to read without the threat of death, but under Roman rule people were slaughtered for no reason and sometimes simply for entertainment.
Which could be why Jesus Christ says:
I speak not of you all: I know whom I have chosen: but that the scripture may be fulfilled, He that eateth bread with me hath lifted up
his heel against me.
Jesus was also cryptic in his words! He could have just said who it was that had lifted his heel against him, but instead he left clues in his words for us. Obviously, there were reasons for this because he knew the words would be destroyed!
If you read some of my earlier posts you will see the lack of harmony between the Synoptic gospels and the Gospel of John and I think the dissimilarities are so striking that they ought to be heavily scrutinized!
Two of the gospels writers of Mark (John Mark) and Luke were not apostles! They were followers/cohorts of Paul/Saul of Tarsus. I don’t think Matthew was an apostle either because he missed some really important events that John writes about in his gospel or he purposefully omitted them to satisfy someone else’s objectives.
I am very suspicious that Paul wrote the gospel of Matthew!
Now wouldn’t that be a coup to have Paul (and his partners) authoring 3 out of 4 of the gospels, Acts and Romans etc, etc, etc?
I am very suspicious that Saul/Paul of Tarsus is either Simon of Cyrene or one of Simon’s Sons.
Tarsus (skeleton)
the bones of the ankle and heel, collectively
Gee, that’s a big clue!
Luke in his gospel added this quote from Jesus Christ at the Last Supper event :
And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat:
As I said in another post, how does he know?
Luke wasn’t at the Last Supper and the above statement is not in any of the other gospels!
—————–
Isaiah 44:13-20
13The carpenter stretcheth out his rule; he marketh it out with a line; he fitteth it with planes, and he marketh it out with the compass, and maketh it after the figure of a man, according to the beauty of a man;
that it may remain in the house.
What house?
The house spoken of in the Book of Acts?
14He heweth him down cedars, and taketh the cypress and the oak, which he strengtheneth for himself among the trees of the forest: he planteth an ash, and the rain doth nourish it.15Then shall it be for a man to burn: for he will take thereof, and warm himself;yea, he kindleth it, and baketh bread; yea, he maketh a god, and worshippeth it; he maketh it a graven image, and falleth down thereto.16He burneth part thereof in the fire; with part thereof he eateth flesh; he roasteth roast, and is satisfied: yea, he warmeth himself, and saith, Aha, I am warm, I have seen the fire:17And the residue thereof he maketh a god, even his graven image: he falleth down unto it, and worshippeth it, and prayeth unto it, and saith, Deliver me; for thou art my god.
18They have not known nor understood:
for he hath shut their eyes, that they cannot see;
and their hearts, that they cannot understand.
WHO
HAS SHUT THEIR EYES
THAT THEY CANNOT SEE;
AND THEIR HEARTS, THAT THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND?
Paul of Tarsus?
Tarsus is part of Turkey.
What is the religion of Turkey?…..98 % Islam.
The Synoptic Gospels are the origin of ISLAM!
19And none considereth in his heart, neither is there knowledge nor understanding to say, I have burned part of it in the fire; yea, also I have baked bread upon the coals thereof;
I have roasted flesh,
and eaten it:
and shall I make the residue thereof an abomination?
shall I fall down to the stock of a tree?20He feedeth on ashes: a deceived heart hath turned him aside, that he cannot deliver his soul, nor say, Is there not a lie in my right hand?
Is this talking about the DECEIVER?
I believe that the
“Q Source”
that is credited to a great degree to be the inspiration of the Synoptic Gospels is the Deceiver!
I think that “The brethren of Jesus” are the
four carpenters James, Joses, Simon and Judas written about in Zechariah:
The Carpenters of Zechariah-The Four Horns
18Then lifted I up mine eyes, and saw, and behold four horns.19And I said unto the angel that talked with me, What be these? And he answered me, These are the horns which have scattered Judah, Israel, and Jerusalem.20And the LORD shewed me four carpenters.21Then said I, What come these to do? And he spake, saying, These are the horns which have scattered Judah, so that no man did lift up his head: but these are come to fray them, to cast out the horns of the Gentiles,
which lifted up their horn over the land of Judah to scatter it.
Who is no man?
Please read these two comparisons of the gospels:
Salute No Man
Tell No Man
Matthew 13:55
Is not this the carpenter‘s son? is not his mother called Mary?
and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?
Mark 6:3
Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.
IN the Gospel of John
Jesus never calls his mother by the name of Mary!
He calls her Woman!
WHY?
John 19:25-26
25Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother’s sister,
Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene.
26When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son!
Mary was the sister of the mother of Jesus!
=============================
I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *
-
Archives
- July 2016 (3)
- March 2015 (1)
- December 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (1)
- December 2011 (1)
- July 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
-
Categories
- 10 lies told about the newtown massacre
- 1963
- 1997 c-span
- Abraham
- Adam Lanza
- AF-1
- Alex Jones
- Assassination of JFK
- Assassination of President Kennedy
- ATHEISTs
- Aurora
- Austin
- Barack Obama
- Benghazi
- BGEA
- bible
- Bible Contradictions
- Bible Controversies
- Bible Deception
- BIBLE PROPHECY
- Bill Clinton
- Bill O'Reilly
- BILLY GRAHAM
- Billy Graham on the Beatles (1964)
- Boehner
- Book of Daniel
- books by Nellie Connally
- Bread of Life
- CAP FIELD
- CBS NEWS
- CBS News and JFK
- CBS News and JFK (The first few hours)
- Chris Matthews
- Christian Deception
- CIA
- Congressman Jake Pickle
- Consecration of the Bread
- COPD
- Covenant
- Dallas
- Daniel
- Deception
- Democrats Push For Gun Control
- did Nellie shoot John Connally
- DIEM
- Dr. Graham
- Ellen DeGereres
- Endtime Deception
- Equal rights
- Eric Holder
- Evangelical
- Evangelicalism and the Covenant With Many
- Face Off
- FAITH AS A GRAIN OF MUSTARD SEED
- Fears
- Feeding of the 4000
- Feeding of the 5000
- First Lady
- First Lady of Texas
- Fiscal Cliff
- Former Texas First Lady Nellie Connally
- Fox News
- Franklin Graham
- George Gänswein
- Geraldo Rivera
- Gospel of John
- Gospel of Luke
- Gospel of Mark
- Gospel of Matthew
- Great Deception
- Hardball
- Harry Reid
- Hearts Are Broken
- Human rights
- In The Garden of Gethsemane
- Indulgences
- IT
- It is okay if you're gay … Stop Bullying Now!
- Jack Ready
- Jackie Kennedy
- Jackie Kennedy: Martin Luther King Jr. "phony"
- Jackie Onassis
- Jake Pickle
- Jamie Lee Foxx
- JAPAN
- Jeff Glor
- jesse ventura on ted nugent
- JESUIT
- JFK
- JFK and the Secret Service
- Jim Carey
- John Connally
- John F. Kennedy
- John Kennedy
- Joseph Ratzinger
- Joseph Ratzinger and The Covenant with Many
- JOSEPHUS
- Josephus Flavius
- Jr
- KTVC
- Lader
- Lady Byrd Johnson
- Laura Ingram
- LBJ
- Liincoln
- Madonna
- Martin Luther King
- Mary Mother of Christ
- Matthew McConaughey
- Mel Gibson
- Michelle
- Michelle Obama
- Mrs. Lady Bird Johnson
- MSNBC
- Mustard Seeds
- Nancy Pelosi
- Nellie Connally
- Nellie Connally homecoming
- NELLIE CONNALLY'S STATEMENT TO THE PRESS ON NOVEMBER 24
- Neocatechumenal Way
- Neocats
- Newtown
- Newtown Massacre
- NEWTOWN SCHOOL MASSACRE
- NRA
- NTA
- Opus Dei
- Parables
- parables of the bible
- Parkland Hospital
- Phobias
- Politics and Religion
- POPE BENEDICT XVI
- Pope Stresses
- President Bashar al-Assad
- President Bill Clinton
- President John F. Kennedy
- President Kennedy
- President Obama
- prophecy of Daniel
- PUTIN
- Q Source
- Qing
- QUEEN ELIZABETH
- Rahm Emanuel
- Rev. Wilkerson
- Roman Catholic Church
- Roman Catholicism
- Rome
- RUSSIA
- Samaritan's Purse
- Sarah Palin
- SARS
- Sasha and Malia
- Secret Service
- Secret Societies
- Senator Hillary Clinton
- Simon of Cyrene
- Sin
- Sleaves Cost Money
- Stephen Fry
- Susan Rice
- Synoptic Deception
- Synoptic Gospels
- Syria
- Ted Nugent
- Texas Historical Commission
- Texas Monthly Talks
- The 34th President
- The 44th President
- THE ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION
- The Antichrist
- The Assassination of JFK
- The Assassination of President Kennedy
- The Beast
- The Beatles
- The Book of Acts
- The Court of the Gentiles
- The Covenant with Many
- The Eucharist
- The False Church
- THE FALSE MESSIAH
- The First Lady
- The Gospels
- The Kennedy's
- The Monstrace
- The Pentagon
- The President
- The Press
- The Shroud of Turin
- The Synoptic Gospels | 1963
- The Truth
- The Way
- The White House
- Treasury Department
- TURKEY
- UN
- Uncategorized
- Vatican News
- Viet Cong
- Viet Nam
- What they saw Jean Hill
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
The Drawbridge 
